| Literature DB >> 35979007 |
Abstract
Objective: To study the diagnostic value of combined detection of pelvic ultrasound and serum LH, FSH, and E2 levels in children with idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35979007 PMCID: PMC9377888 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7928344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of the physiological indicators of the two groups (x ± s).
| Groups |
| Height (cm) | Leptin (ng/mL) | Bone age (year) | Areola diameter (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 30 | 131.4 ± 5.4 | 3.38 ± 1.12 | 8.5 ± 1.3 | 2.2 ± 0.5 |
| Experimental group | 30 | 145.32 ± 6.9 | 9.74 ± 2.36 | 10.8 ± 1.7 | 3.7 ± 1.4 |
|
| 8.702 | 13.335 | 5.886 | 5.527 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of related parameters of pelvic ultrasound examination between the two groups ().
| Groups |
| Uterine long diameter (cm) | Uterine volume (cm3) | Ovarian area (cm2) | Ovarian volume (cm2) | Maximum diameter of follicle (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 30 | 1.91 ± 0.30 | 1.25 ± 0.65 | 1.63 ± 0.72 | 0.87 ± 0.49 | 2.32 ± 0.21 |
| Experimental group | 30 | 2.53 ± 0.44 | 2.67 ± 1.84 | 2.75 ± 1.24 | 2.76 ± 0.63 | 6.63 ± 2.17 |
|
| 6.377 | 3.986 | 4.278 | 12.970 | 10.828 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of the endometrial thickness between the two groups (x ± s). The coordinate represents the control group and the experimental group; the ordinate represents the endometrial thickness; the endometrial thickness of the control group was (1.69 ± 0.35) mm; the horizontal value of the endometrial thickness in the experimental group was (3.57 ± 1.20) mm; indicates that there was a significant difference in the endometrial thickness between the control group and the experimental group (t = 8.238, p < 0.001).
Figure 2Comparison of serum LH, FSH, and E2 levels between the two groups (x ± s). The abscissa represents the control group and the experimental group, and the ordinate represents the level of serum LH, FSH, and E2. (a) indicates that there was a significant difference in the LH level between the control group and the experimental group (t = 9.223, p < 0.001); (b) indicates that there was a significant difference in FSH levels between the control group and the experimental group (t = 17.653, p < 0.001); (c) means that there was a significant difference in E2 levels of the control group and the experimental group (t = 15.658, p < 0.001).
Figure 3Comparison of single and combined detection of serum LH, FSH, and E2 indicators.
Comparison of the area, standard error a, asymptotic Sig. B, and asymptotic 95% confidence interval of each indicator.
| Area | Standard error A | Asymptotic Sig. B | Asymptotic 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
| LH | 0.833 | 0.056 | 0 | 0.724 | 0.943 |
| FSH | 0.850 | 0.054 | 0 | 0.745 | 0.955 |
| E2 | 0.767 | 0.064 | 0 | 0.642 | 0.891 |
| LH + FSH + E2 | 0.767 | 0.064 | 0.000 | 0.642 | 0.891 |
| Pelvic ultrasound | 0.800 | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.682 | 0.918 |
| Pelvic ultrasound + LH | 0.833 | 0.056 | 0.000 | 0.724 | 0.943 |
| Pelvic ultrasound + FSH | 0.733 | 0.066 | 0.002 | 0.603 | 0.864 |
| Pelvic ultrasound + E2 | 0.767 | 0.064 | 0.000 | 0.642 | 0.891 |
| Combined detection | 0.950 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of each index.
| Positive if greater than or equal to a | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LH | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.767 | 0.100 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| FSH | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.833 | 0.133 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| E2 | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.700 | 0.167 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| LH + FSH + E2 | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.733 | 0.200 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| Pelvic ultrasound | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.767 | 0.167 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| Pelvic ultrasound + LH | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.800 | 0.133 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| Pelvic ultrasound + FSH | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.700 | 0.233 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| Pelvic ultrasound + E2 | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.733 | 0.200 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| |||
| Combined detection | −1.0000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.5000 | 0.933 | 0.033 | |
| 2.0000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |