| Literature DB >> 35978664 |
Sabrina Alves Fernandes1, Cristiane Valle Tovo2, André Luiz Machado da Silva3, Letícia Pereira Pinto1, Randhall B Carteri4, Angelo A Mattos1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition, lipodystrophy, and dyslipidemia are prevalent characteristics in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with or without previous treatment. Such a clinical condition can lead to the hypothesis of the presence of hepatic steatosis with possible progression to fibrosis and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Notably, a low phase angle (PA), evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), is an independent prognostic marker of clinical progression and survival in HIV-infected patients. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between PA and body composition with steatosis and hepatic fibrosis in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients.Entities:
Keywords: Bioelectrical impedance; Coinfection; Hepatitis C virus; Human immunodeficiency virus; Nutrition; Phase angle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35978664 PMCID: PMC9258259 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i6.1173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Hepatol
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the evaluated patients (n = 43) (mean ± SD)
|
|
|
| Male sex, | 22 (51.2) |
| Age, yr | 46.2 ± 8.5 |
| Body mass index | 25.9 ± 4.9 |
| Phase angle | 7.1 ± 0.8 |
| Lean mass, % | 75.5 ± 9.2 |
| Fatty mass, % | 24.5 ± 9.2 |
|
| |
| 1 | 30 (69.7) |
| 2 | 02 (4.7) |
| 3 | 09 (20.9) |
| Missing data | 02 (4.7) |
|
| |
| F0 | 05 (11.6) |
| F1 | 10 (23.3) |
| F2 | 01 (2.3) |
| F3 | 10 (23.3) |
| F4 | 17 (39.5) |
| CAP | 241.1 ± 55.7 |
CAP: Controlled attenuation parameter; HCV: Hepatitis C virus.
Relationship between hepatic fibrosis and controlled attenuation parameter vs phase angle and lean mass (n = 43)
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Phase angle | 0.075 | 0.634 | 0.016 | 0.918 |
| Lean mass | 0.095 | 0.543 | 0.493 | 0.001 |
Spearman’s rho test.
Pearson test.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
CAP: Controlled attenuation parameter.
Comparison between groups in accordance with fibrosis staging
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Phase angle° | 7.3° ± 1.0 | 7.0° ± 0.7 |
| 0.355 |
| Lean mass (%) | 73.9% ± 9.7 | 76.5 ± 8.9 |
| 0.378 |
| Fatty mass (%) | 26.1% ± 9.7 | 23.5% ± 8.9 |
| 0.381 |
Values are represented as mean ± SD. TE: Transient elastography.
Relationship between phase angle and lean mass, fatty mass and controlled attenuation parameter
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Lean mass (%) | 0.373 | 0.014 | 0.208 | 0.353 | 0.189 | 0.412 |
| Fatty mass (%) | -0.373 | 0.014 | -0.208 | 0.353 | -0.189 | 0.411 |
| CAP | 0.016 | 0.918 | 0.035 | 0.878 | 0.102 | 0.659 |
Spearman’s rho test. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
CAP: Controlled attenuation parameter.