Ursula G Kyle1, Laurence Genton, Claude Pichard. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 6621 Fannin St, WT6-006, Houston, TX 77030, USA. ukyle@bcm.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study determined the association between phase angle (PhA), by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and nutritional risk by Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day non-survival in patients at hospital admission compared to healthy controls. METHODS: PhA was determined by BIA in patients (n = 983, 52.7 ± 21.5 yrs, M 520) and compared to healthy age-, sex- and height-matched controls. Low PhA was set at <5.0° (men) and <4.6° (women) as previously determined (Kyle, in press). RESULTS: PhA was lower in patients (men 6.0 ± 1.4°, women 5.0 ± 1.3°) than controls (men 7.1 ± 1.2°, women 6.0 ± 1.2°, un-paired t-test p < 0.001). Patients were more likely to have low PhA than controls: NRS-2002: no risk (relative risk (RR) 1.7, 95th confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.3), moderate risk (RR 4.5, CI 3.4-5.8) and severe risk (RR 7.5, CI 5.9-9.4); similar results were obtained by SGA; LOS ≥21 days (RR 6.9, CI 5.1-9.1) and LOS 5-20 days (RR 5.2, CI 3.9-6.9) and non-survivors (RR 3.1, CI 2.1-3.4) compared to survivors. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between low PhA and nutritional risk, LOS and non-survival. PhA is helpful to identify patients who are at nutritional risk at hospital admission in order to limit the number of in-depth nutritional assessments.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study determined the association between phase angle (PhA), by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and nutritional risk by Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day non-survival in patients at hospital admission compared to healthy controls. METHODS: PhA was determined by BIA in patients (n = 983, 52.7 ± 21.5 yrs, M 520) and compared to healthy age-, sex- and height-matched controls. Low PhA was set at <5.0° (men) and <4.6° (women) as previously determined (Kyle, in press). RESULTS: PhA was lower in patients (men 6.0 ± 1.4°, women 5.0 ± 1.3°) than controls (men 7.1 ± 1.2°, women 6.0 ± 1.2°, un-paired t-test p < 0.001). Patients were more likely to have low PhA than controls: NRS-2002: no risk (relative risk (RR) 1.7, 95th confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.3), moderate risk (RR 4.5, CI 3.4-5.8) and severe risk (RR 7.5, CI 5.9-9.4); similar results were obtained by SGA; LOS ≥21 days (RR 6.9, CI 5.1-9.1) and LOS 5-20 days (RR 5.2, CI 3.9-6.9) and non-survivors (RR 3.1, CI 2.1-3.4) compared to survivors. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between low PhA and nutritional risk, LOS and non-survival. PhA is helpful to identify patients who are at nutritional risk at hospital admission in order to limit the number of in-depth nutritional assessments.
Authors: Emanuele Rinninella; Marco Cintoni; Antonino De Lorenzo; Giovanni Addolorato; Gabriele Vassallo; Rossana Moroni; Giacinto Abele Donato Miggiano; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maria Cristina Mele Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Asja E Friedrich; Antje Damms-Machado; Tobias Meile; Nicole Scheuing; Katrin Stingel; Maryam Basrai; Markus A Küper; Klaus M Kramer; Alfred Königsrainer; Stephan C Bischoff Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Shengnan Zhou; Zhangping Yu; Xiaodong Shi; Huaiyu Zhao; Menghua Dai; Wei Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: M Bellini; D Gambaccini; L Bazzichi; G Bassotti; M G Mumolo; B Fani; F Costa; A Ricchiuti; N De Bortoli; M Mosca; S Marchi; A Rossi Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Georgi Vassilev; Till Hasenberg; Johannes Krammer; Peter Kienle; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Mirko Otto Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Karisa C Schreck; Fang-Chi Hsu; Adam Berrington; Bobbie Henry-Barron; Diane Vizthum; Lindsay Blair; Eric H Kossoff; Linda Easter; Christopher T Whitlow; Peter B Barker; Mackenzie C Cervenka; Jaishri O Blakeley; Roy E Strowd Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 11.800