René J Boosman1, Merel Jebbink2, Wouter B Veldhuis3, Stefanie L Groenland4, Bianca A M H van Veggel5, Pim Moeskops6, Adrianus J de Langen5, Jos H Beijnen7,8, Egbert F Smit5, Alwin D R Huitema7,9,10, Neeltje Steeghs4. 1. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.boosman@nki.nl. 2. Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.jebbink@nki.nl. 3. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. , Quantib, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Pharmacology Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 10. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important drug in the treatment of EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials with osimertinib could not demonstrate an exposure-efficacy relationship, while a relationship between exposure and toxicity has been found. In this study, we report the exposure-response relationships of osimertinib in a real-life setting. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed, including patients receiving 40 - 80 mg osimertinib as ≥ 2 line therapy and from whom pharmacokinetic samples were collected during routine care. Trough plasma concentrations (Cmin,pred) were estimated and used as a measure of osimertinib exposure. A previously defined exploratory pharmacokinetic threshold of 166 µg/L was taken to explore the exposure-efficacy relationship. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients and 513 osimertinib plasma concentration samples were included. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 13.3 (95% confidence interval (CI):10.3 - 19.1) months and 9.3 (95% CI: 7.2 - 11.1) months for patients with Cmin,pred < 166 µg/L and Cmin,pred ≥ 166 µg/L, respectively (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, a Cmin,pred < 166 µg/L resulted in a non-statistically significant hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 0.60 - 2.01; p = 77). Presence of a EGFR driver-mutation other than the exon 19 del or L858R mutations, led to a shorter PFS with a hazard ratio of 2.89 (95% CI: 1.18 - 7.08; p = 0.02). No relationship between exposure and toxicity was observed (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: In our real-life cohort, no exposure-response relationship was observed for osimertinib in the current dosing scheme. The feasibility of a standard lower fixed dosing of osimertinib in clinical practice should be studied prospectively.
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important drug in the treatment of EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials with osimertinib could not demonstrate an exposure-efficacy relationship, while a relationship between exposure and toxicity has been found. In this study, we report the exposure-response relationships of osimertinib in a real-life setting. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed, including patients receiving 40 - 80 mg osimertinib as ≥ 2 line therapy and from whom pharmacokinetic samples were collected during routine care. Trough plasma concentrations (Cmin,pred) were estimated and used as a measure of osimertinib exposure. A previously defined exploratory pharmacokinetic threshold of 166 µg/L was taken to explore the exposure-efficacy relationship. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients and 513 osimertinib plasma concentration samples were included. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 13.3 (95% confidence interval (CI):10.3 - 19.1) months and 9.3 (95% CI: 7.2 - 11.1) months for patients with Cmin,pred < 166 µg/L and Cmin,pred ≥ 166 µg/L, respectively (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, a Cmin,pred < 166 µg/L resulted in a non-statistically significant hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 0.60 - 2.01; p = 77). Presence of a EGFR driver-mutation other than the exon 19 del or L858R mutations, led to a shorter PFS with a hazard ratio of 2.89 (95% CI: 1.18 - 7.08; p = 0.02). No relationship between exposure and toxicity was observed (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: In our real-life cohort, no exposure-response relationship was observed for osimertinib in the current dosing scheme. The feasibility of a standard lower fixed dosing of osimertinib in clinical practice should be studied prospectively.
Authors: C Narjoz; A Cessot; A Thomas-Schoemann; J L Golmard; O Huillard; P Boudou-Rouquette; A Behouche; F Taieb; J P Durand; A Dauphin; R Coriat; M Vidal; M Tod; J Alexandre; M A Loriot; F Goldwasser; B Blanchet Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Keunchil Park; Eng-Huat Tan; Ken O'Byrne; Li Zhang; Michael Boyer; Tony Mok; Vera Hirsh; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Ki Hyeong Lee; Shun Lu; Yuankai Shi; Sang-We Kim; Janessa Laskin; Dong-Wan Kim; Catherine Dubos Arvis; Karl Kölbeck; Scott A Laurie; Chun-Ming Tsai; Mehdi Shahidi; Miyoung Kim; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aaron P Mitchell; Michael R Harrison; Mark S Walker; Daniel J George; Amy P Abernethy; Bradford R Hirsch Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Remy B Verheijen; Huixin Yu; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 6.875