Literature DB >> 35977507

Multiomics assessment of dietary protein titration reveals altered hepatic glucose utilization.

Michael R MacArthur1, Sarah J Mitchell2, Katia S Chadaideh3, J Humberto Treviño-Villarreal4, Jonathan Jung4, Krystle C Kalafut4, Justin S Reynolds4, Charlotte G Mann2, Kaspar M Trocha4, Ming Tao5, Tay-Zar Aye Cho6, Anantawat Koontanatechanon6, Vladimir Yeliseyev7, Lynn Bry7, Alban Longchamp8, C Keith Ozaki5, Caroline A Lewis9, Rachel N Carmody3, James R Mitchell2.   

Abstract

Dietary protein restriction (PR) has rapid effects on metabolism including improved glucose and lipid homeostasis, via multiple mechanisms. Here, we investigate responses of fecal microbiome, hepatic transcriptome, and hepatic metabolome to six diets with protein from 18% to 0% of energy in mice. PR alters fecal microbial composition, but metabolic effects are not transferable via fecal transplantation. Hepatic transcriptome and metabolome are significantly altered in diets with lower than 10% energy from protein. Changes upon PR correlate with calorie restriction but with a larger magnitude and specific changes in amino acid (AA) metabolism. PR increases steady-state aspartate, serine, and glutamate and decreases glucose and gluconeogenic intermediates. 13C6 glucose and glycerol tracing reveal increased fractional enrichment in aspartate, serine, and glutamate. Changes remain intact in hepatic ATF4 knockout mice. Together, this demonstrates an ATF4-independent shift in gluconeogenic substrate utilization toward specific AAs, with compensation from glycerol to promote a protein-sparing response.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATF4; CP: Metabolism; RNA seq; amino acids; calorie restriction; dietary restriction; gluconeogenesis; metabolic health; protein restriction; serine; stable isotope tracing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35977507      PMCID: PMC9490641          DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.995


  70 in total

1.  The GCN2 eIF2alpha kinase regulates fatty-acid homeostasis in the liver during deprivation of an essential amino acid.

Authors:  Feifan Guo; Douglas R Cavener
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 27.287

2.  Very-low-protein diets lead to reduced food intake and weight loss, linked to inhibition of hypothalamic mTOR signaling, in mice.

Authors:  Yingga Wu; Baoguo Li; Li Li; Sharon E Mitchell; Cara L Green; Giuseppe D'Agostino; Guanlin Wang; Lu Wang; Min Li; Jianbo Li; Chaoqun Niu; Zengguang Jin; Anyongqi Wang; Yu Zheng; Alex Douglas; John R Speakman
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota.

Authors:  Rachel N Carmody; Georg K Gerber; Jesus M Luevano; Daniel M Gatti; Lisa Somes; Karen L Svenson; Peter J Turnbaugh
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 21.023

4.  Differential metabolomics reveals ophthalmic acid as an oxidative stress biomarker indicating hepatic glutathione consumption.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Soga; Richard Baran; Makoto Suematsu; Yuki Ueno; Satsuki Ikeda; Tadayuki Sakurakawa; Yuji Kakazu; Takamasa Ishikawa; Martin Robert; Takaaki Nishioka; Masaru Tomita
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Decreased Consumption of Branched-Chain Amino Acids Improves Metabolic Health.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Nicole E Cummings; Sebastian I Arriola Apelo; Joshua C Neuman; Ildiko Kasza; Brian A Schmidt; Edda Cava; Francesco Spelta; Valeria Tosti; Faizan A Syed; Emma L Baar; Nicola Veronese; Sara E Cottrell; Rachel J Fenske; Beatrice Bertozzi; Harpreet K Brar; Terri Pietka; Arnold D Bullock; Robert S Figenshau; Gerald L Andriole; Matthew J Merrins; Caroline M Alexander; Michelle E Kimple; Dudley W Lamming
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Sex and genetic background define the metabolic, physiologic, and molecular response to protein restriction.

Authors:  Cara L Green; Heidi H Pak; Nicole E Richardson; Victoria Flores; Deyang Yu; Jay L Tomasiewicz; Sabrina N Dumas; Katherine Kredell; Jesse W Fan; Charlie Kirsh; Krittisak Chaiyakul; Michaela E Murphy; Reji Babygirija; Gregory A Barrett-Wilt; Joshua Rabinowitz; Irene M Ong; Cholsoon Jang; Judith Simcox; Dudley W Lamming
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 27.287

7.  Dietary protein restriction inhibits tumor growth in human xenograft models.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Remi M Adelaiye; Antonella L Rastelli; Kiersten Marie Miles; Eric Ciamporcero; Valter D Longo; Holly Nguyen; Robert Vessella; Roberto Pili
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-12

8.  An integrative analysis of tissue-specific transcriptomic and metabolomic responses to short-term dietary methionine restriction in mice.

Authors:  Sujoy Ghosh; Laura A Forney; Desiree Wanders; Kirsten P Stone; Thomas W Gettys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Physiologic Responses to Dietary Sulfur Amino Acid Restriction in Mice Are Influenced by Atf4 Status and Biological Sex.

Authors:  William O Jonsson; Nicholas S Margolies; Emily T Mirek; Qian Zhang; Melissa A Linden; Cristal M Hill; Christopher Link; Nazmin Bithi; Brian Zalma; Jordan L Levy; Ashley P Pettit; Joshua W Miller; Christopher Hine; Christopher D Morrison; Thomas W Gettys; Benjamin F Miller; Karyn L Hamilton; Ronald C Wek; Tracy G Anthony
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Low protein diets produce divergent effects on energy balance.

Authors:  Adel Pezeshki; Rizaldy C Zapata; Arashdeep Singh; Nicholas J Yee; Prasanth K Chelikani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.