| Literature DB >> 35976657 |
Otavio de Azevedo Magalhães1, Rafael Jorge Alves de Alcantara1, José Alvaro Pereira Gomes1, Jarbas Caiado de Castro Neto2, Paulo Schor1.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the surgical technique, clinical performance, and biocompatibility of a novel keratoprosthesis (KPro) named KPro of Brazil (KoBra) in an alkali-burned rabbit model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35976657 PMCID: PMC9400124 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.8.14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.048
Figure 1.(A) Keratoprosthesis of Brazil (KoBra) design and dimensions. Mushroom-shaped front stem (optical component; left) made of PMMA; 7.5-mm diameter titanium back plate (right) with three holes and slit for locking of back plate to the optical component. (B) Alkali burn in rabbit ocular surface after epithelial debridement.
Figure 2.Postoperative Keratoprosthesis of Brazil (KoBra) implantation at three distinct time points. (A) Immediate KoBra implantation. (B, C) Well-placed KoBra after 6 months of follow-up. (D) Well-placed KoBra in a heavily vascularized cornea after 12 months of follow-up with mild RPM formation.
Animal Details and Outcomes of KoBra Implantation
| Rabbit No. | Gender | Follow-Up (Months) | RPM | Elevated IOP | Postoperative Interventions | Postoperative Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 12 | + | − | − | − |
| 2 | Male | 9 | − | + | − | Corneal melting and glaucoma - extrusion |
| 3 | Male | 12 | + | + | − | − |
| 4 | Female | 12 | + | − | Full conjunctival flap | − |
| 5 | Male | 12 | − | − | − | − |
| 6 | Female | 12 | + | − | − | − |
| 7 | Female | 12 | − | + | − | − |
| 8 | Female | 4 | − | − | − | Presumed infectious keratitis extrusion |
| 9 | Male | 12 | − | − | − | − |
| 10 | Male | 12 | + | − | Lateral tarsorrhaphy | − |
| 11 | Female | 12 | − | − | − | − |
| 12 | Male | 12 | + | + | − | − |
| 13 | Male | 12 | − | − | Full conjunctival flap | − |
| 14 | Female | 12 | + | − | − | − |
Figure 3.In vivo AS-OCT of the KoBra after 12 months of follow-up. (A) The front plate (FP) and optical cylinder (OC) are clearly visible over the corneal graft (CG). The titanium back plate (BP appears dark in OCT under CG). (B) RPM is clearly visible posterior to the optical cylinder (arrow).
Figure 4.SEM images of the 3D-printed implant. (A) Rough surface characteristic of the additive layer manufactured material. (B) Collagen fibrils arranged in parallel in the collagen matrix, as well as fibril bundle. (C) Higher magnification of selection in inset. (D) Diffuse infiltration of collagen fibril deposition within the back plate's microporosities.