Literature DB >> 28990994

Long-Term Visual Outcomes, Complications, and Retention of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis.

Carolina Aravena1,2, Fei Yu1, Anthony J Aldave1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcomes of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro).
METHODS: Data were collected regarding preoperative characteristics, surgical procedure(s) performed, and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent KPro implantation from May 1, 2004, to May 1, 2011, and were followed for 5 years after surgery.
RESULTS: Seventy-four KPro procedures were performed in 58 eyes (55 patients), with more than 1 KPro implanted in 10 eyes. The mean follow-up duration was 82.8 ± 20.5 months (range 57-145 months), and the most common indication for keratoprosthesis implantation was corneal transplant failure (50%). Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was ≥20/200 in 5%; between 1 and 8 years after surgery, the percentage of eyes with CDVA ≥20/200 varied between 57% (4 years) and 82% (8 years). Nineteen (25.7%) KPros implanted were removed (retention failure rate 0.047/eye-year), although a KPro was retained at final follow-up in 55 eyes (94.8%). The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane formation in 51.7% of eyes. The incidence of each postoperative complication decreased significantly over the first 10 years after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The KPro provides significant visual improvement in most eyes, with more than 50% regaining and maintaining 20/200 CDVA each year through 8 years after surgery. The incidence of each postoperative complication decreases significantly over the first 10 years after surgery. Although almost one-quarter of implanted keratoprostheses were removed, over 90% of eyes reaching 5 years of follow-up retain a keratoprosthesis at final follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28990994     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

Review 1.  Keratoprosthesis: Current global scenario and a broad Indian perspective.

Authors:  Geetha Iyer; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Shweta Agarwal; Deepti Talele; Ekta Rishi; Pukhraj Rishi; Sripriya Krishnamurthy; Lingam Vijaya; Nirmala Subramanian; Shanmugasundaram Somasundaram
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 2.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  Manachai Nonpassopon; Muanploy Niparugs; Maria Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Titanium Powder 3D-Printing Technology for a Novel Keratoprosthesis in Alkali-Burned Rabbits.

Authors:  Otavio de Azevedo Magalhães; Rafael Jorge Alves de Alcantara; José Alvaro Pereira Gomes; Jarbas Caiado de Castro Neto; Paulo Schor
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  CorNeat KPro: Ocular Implantation Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Gilad Litvin; Ido Klein; Yoav Litvin; Guy Klaiman; Abraham Nyska
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.152

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.