| Literature DB >> 35976575 |
Bradley J Schwehr1, David Hartnell1,2, Massimiliano Massi3, Mark J Hackett4,5.
Abstract
Fluorescence microscopy is a key tool in the biological sciences, which finds use as a routine laboratory technique (e.g., epifluorescence microscope) or more advanced confocal, two-photon, and super-resolution applications. Through continued developments in microscopy, and other analytical methods, the importance of lipids as constituents of subcellular organelles, signalling or regulating molecules continues to emerge. The increasing recognition of the importance of lipids to fundamental cell biology (in health and disease) has prompted the development of protocols and techniques to image the distribution of lipids in cells and tissues. A diverse suite of spectroscopic and microscopy tools are continuously being developed and explored to add to the "toolbox" to study lipid biology. A relatively recent breakthrough in this field has been the development and subsequent application of metal-based luminescent complexes for imaging lipids in biological systems. These metal-based compounds appear to offer advantages with respect to their tunability of the photophysical properties, in addition to capabilities centred around selectively targeting specific lipid structures or classes of lipids. The presence of the metal centre also opens the path to alternative imaging modalities that might not be applicable to traditional organic fluorophores. This review examines the current progress and developments in metal-based luminescent complexes to study lipids, in addition to exploring potential new avenues and challenges for the field to take.Entities:
Keywords: Cell imaging; Fluorescence; Lipid droplets; Metal complexes; Microscopy; Phospholipids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35976575 PMCID: PMC9385838 DOI: 10.1007/s41061-022-00400-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Top Curr Chem (Cham) ISSN: 2364-8961
Fig. 1Chemical structures of traditional histochemical dye examples, commercially available BODIPY dyes, and Nile Red
Summary of photophysical properties, imaging/staining conditions and biological properties of the complexes
| Probe | Metal | Photophysical properties in solution | Imaging and staining conditions | Biological properties | Xlog | References | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λabs (nm) | λem (nm) | Φaer | Τaer | Solvent | Biological staining | Target | λex for imaging (nm) | Staining concentration | Staining media | Uptake mechanism | Cytotoxicity | log | ||||
| 1 | Re | 266 | 569 | 0.103 | 2373 (86%) ns, 575 (14%) ns | 1% DMSO/water | Live cells, fixed cells, fixed tissue | Lipid droplets | 830 (TPE) | 10 μM | PBS | – | No signs of cytotoxicity (MTS) | – | 1.601 | [ |
| 2 | Ir | 470 | 616 | 0.078 | – | MeCN | Living cells, living organism | Lipid droplets | 580–670 | 10 μM | Serum-free media | Energy-dependent pathway | > 40 μM (IC50, 48 h, A549, HeLa, HepG2 and LO2 cells) | 2.15 | 5.249 | [ |
| 3 | Ir | 470 | 618 | 0.056 | – | MeCN | Living cells, living organism | Lipid droplets | 580–670 | 10 μM | Serum-free media | – | > 40 μM (IC50, 48 h, A549, HeLa, HepG2 and LO2 cells) | 2.19 | 5.799 | [ |
| 4 | Ir | 275 | 612, 664 | 0.09 | 0.83 μs | DCM | Live cells | Lipid droplets | 405 | 10 μM | Pluronic F127/water (1/100) | Energy-dependent, mixed caveolae- and clathrin-mediated endocytosis | 52.9 ± 3.7 μM (dark) 1.1 ± 0.1 μM (light) (IC50, 24 h, HeLa cells) | 1.08 ± 0.05 | – | [ |
| 5 | Cu | 309 | 510 | 0.005 | 250 (76%) ps, 2.79 (24%) ns | MeCN | Live cells | Lipid droplets | 488 | 25 μM | – | – | – | – | 5.915 | [ |
| 6 | Zn | 390 | 630 | 0.44 | 0.49 (80%), 1.55 (20%) ns | DMSO | Live cells, fixed tissue | Lipid droplets | 543, 790 (TPE) | 2 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/250) | Energy-dependent, clathrin-mediated endocytosis | 8 μM (CCK-8, 90% cell viability) | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 8.336 | [ |
| 7 | Au | 256 | 580 | 0.045 ± 0.005 | 0.45 ± 0.02 μs | Hexane | Fixed cells, fixed tissue | Lipid droplets | 405, 710 (TPE) | 1 mg/mL | Isopropanol/water (1/1) | – | – | – | – | [ |
| 8 | Ru | – | 655 | 0.0044 | 117 | Liposome | – | Phospholipids | 440 | – | Acetonitrile | – | – | – | 5.398 | [ |
| 9 | Ru | – | – | – | – | – | Live cells, fixed cells | Phospholipids | 488 | 2 µM | Buffer containing preformed LUVs or calf thymus D | – | – | – | 6.830 | [ |
| 10 | Ru | – | 655 | 0.0186 | 155 | Liposome | – | Phospholipids | 440 | – | Acetonitrile | – | – | – | 8.262 | [ |
| 11 | Ru | – | 655 | 0.011 | 158 | Liposome | – | Phospholipids | 440 | – | Acetonitrile | – | – | – | 11.126 | [ |
| 12 | Ru | – | 660 | 0.0031 | 86 | Liposome | – | Phospholipids | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6.003 | [ |
| 13 | Ru | – | 660 | 0.0073 | 97 | Liposome | – | Phospholipids | 440 | – | Acetonitrile | – | – | – | 4.571 | [ |
| 14 | Ru | – | 660 | 0.0104 | 105 | Liposome | – | Phospholipids | 440 | – | Acetonitrile | – | – | – | 7.435 | [ |
| 15 | Ru | – | – | – | – | – | – | Phospholipids | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8.422 | [ |
| 16 | Ru | 285 | 655 | 0.027 | 368 ns | Liposome in PBS | – | Phospholipids | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7.258 | [ |
| 17 | Ir | 250 | 600 | 0.084 | 610, 161, 70 ns | Liposome in PBS | – | Phospholipids | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10.654 | [ |
| 18 | Pt | ca. 375 | 528 | 0.30 | 1.95 μs | HEPES buffer | Live cells | Phospholipids | 400, 720 (TPE) | 1 μg/mL | Culture media | – | 10 μg/mL HeLa cells, ca. 90% cell viability, 25 h 10 μg/mL epithelial cells, ca. 70% cell viability 25 h | – | 14.303 | [ |
| 19 | Ru | 258 | 613 | – | 0.68 ± 0.017 μs | 9/1 MeCN/DMSO | Live cells | Phospholipids | 458 | 35 μM | Culture media | – | 35 μM SP2 myeloma cells, ca. 70% cell viability | – | 5.129 | [ |
| 20 | Ru | 258 | 614 | – | 0.78 ± 0.022 μs | 9/1 MeCN/DMSO | Live cells | Phospholipids | 458 | 35 μM | Culture media | – | 35 μM SP2 myeloma cells, ca. 70% cell viability | – | 6.674 | [ |
| 21 | Re | 380 | 550 | – | – | – | Live cells | Phospholipids | 405 | 100 μg/mL | – | – | – | – | 1.343 | [ |
| 22 | Re | 380 | 550 | – | – | – | Live cells | Phospholipids | 405 | 100 μg/mL | – | – | 100 μg/mL MFC-7 cells, ca. 25% cell viability | – | 3.491 | [ |
| 23 | Re | 380 | 550 | – | – | – | Live cells | Phospholipids | 405 | 100 μg/mL | – | – | – | – | 4.923 | [ |
| 24 | Ir | ca. 295 | 587 | 0.18 | 0.68 μs | DCM | Live cells | Phospholipids | 488 | 5 μM | – | Energy-dependent, endocytosis | – | 9.89 | 13.300 | [ |
| 25 | Al | 394 | 643 | 0.42 | 4.3 ns | DMSO | Live cells | Phospholipids | 561 | 1 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/2000) | Membrane potential-dependent passive diffusion | 2 μM HeLa cells, ca. 90% cell viability, 48 h | – | 7.174 | [ |
| 26 | Tb | – | – | – | – | – | Live cells | Phospholipids | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | [ |
| 27 | Ir | 263 | 618 | 0.055 | 131 ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 403 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/500) | Energy dependent pathway | Low (40 μM, 24 h) (MTS) | 2.09 ± 0.06 | 3.904 | [ |
| 28 | Ir | 256 | 542 | 0.042 | 140 ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 403 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/500) | Energy dependent pathway | Low (40 μM, 24 h) (MTS) | 2.01 ± 0.05 | 4.548 | [ |
| 29 | Ir | 268 | 560 | 0.023 | 114 ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 403 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/500) | Energy dependent pathway | Low (40 μM, 24 h) (MTS) | 2.68 ± 0.08 | 5.8444 | [ |
| 30 | Ir | 263 | 580 | 0.021 | 153 ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 403 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/500) | Energy dependent pathway | Low (40 μM, 24 h) (MTS) | 2.23 ± 0.04 | 5.484 | [ |
| 31 | Ir | 260 | 575 | 0.036 | 497 ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 403 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/500) | Energy dependent pathway | Low (40 μM, 24 h) (MTS) | 2.57 ± 0.05 | 5.484 | [ |
| 32 | Ir | 257 | 635 | 0.028 | 218 ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 403 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/500) | Energy dependent pathway | High (40 μM, 24 h) (MTS) | 1.68 ± 0.05 | 3.985 | [ |
| 33 | Ir | – | 520 | 0.062 | 332 (88%) ns, 38 (12%) | 0.1% DMSO/water | Live bacteria | General lipophilic staining | 405 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture media (1/1000) | – | Low | – | 4.907 | [ |
| 34 | Ir | – | 552 | 0.057 | 628 (59%) ns, 189 (41%) ns | 0.1% DMSO/water | Live bacteria | General lipophilic staining | 405 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture media (1/1000) | – | Low | – | 4.548 | [ |
| 35 | Ir | – | 600 | 0.039 | 928 (75%) ns, 305 (25%) ns | 0.1% DMSO/water | Live bacteria | General lipophilic staining | 405 | 20 μM | DMSO/culture media (1/1000) | – | Low | – | 6.128 | [ |
| 36 | Re | 276 | 517 | 0.25 | 5 (57%) ns, 10 (43%) ns | DCM | Live bacteria, fixed bacteria | General lipophilic staining | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4.963 | [ |
| 37 | Pt | 282 | 515 | 0.28 | 11 ns | DCM | Live bacteria, fixed bacteria | General lipophilic staining | 488 | 10 μM | DMSO/nutrient broth (1/1000) | – | – | – | 10.580 | [ |
| 38 | Pd | 256 | 585, 638 | 0.12 | 0.88 ns | Cyclohexane | – | General lipophilic staining | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4.978 | [ |
| 39 | Pd | 258 | 595, 650 | 0.50 | 4.46 ns | Cyclohexane | – | General lipophilic staining | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6.376 | [ |
| 40 | Pd | 253 | 587, 636 | 0.14 | 1.05 ns | Cyclohexane | – | General lipophilic staining | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8.406 | [ |
| 41 | Pd | 760 | 660 | – | – | 5% DMSO/water | Live cells, living organism | General lipophilic staining | 561, 760 (TPE) | 5 μM | DMSO/culture medium (1/200) | – | Low (< 20 mM) (MTT) | – | 8.839 | [ |
| 42 | Cr | 337 | 395, 415 | – | 0.2 (78.5%) ns, 6.0 (21.5%) ns | DCM | Live cells | General lipophilic staining | 405, 810 (TPE) | 50 μM | Ethanol/culture medium (1/50) | – | 100 μM ca. 10% viability 4 h (Alamar Blue) and 15 min (LDH) | – | 8.153 | [ |
| 43 | Mn | 455 | 480 | 0.29 | 4.51 ns | DCM | Live cells, fixed tissue | General lipophilic staining | 405, 760 (TPE) | 5–10 μM | – | – | Low (80 μM, 24 h) (MTT) | – | 12.560 | [ |
aValues calculated using the XlogP v2.0 method
Fig. 2Chemical structures of 1–3
Fig. 3Chemical structure of 4. Bottom panel shows 4 (red) (a) incubated in 3T3-L1 differentiated adipocytes and co-stained with Lipid Blue (green) (b) and merged image (c). Scale bar: 25 μm. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Zhu et al. [104]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society
Fig. 4Chemical structures of 5–6. Analysis of adipocytes with immunofluorescence (green, a) and uptake of compound 5 (red, b), merged images of (a, b) (c, d). Reproduced with permission from Tang et al. [108]
Fig. 5Chemical structure of 7. The decanuclear molecule contains two interlocked, perpendicular 5-membered rings. The ring which is perpendicular to the page has been greyed out for clarity. Bottom panel shows co-localisation of Oil Red O (red) with 7 (green), counterstained with DAPI (blue) n subcutaneous adipose tissues of mouse. Scale bars: 100 μm [109]. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Koshevoy et al. [110]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society
Fig. 6Chemical structures of 8–17
Fig. 7Chemical structure of 18
Fig. 8Chemical structures of 19–20
Fig. 9Chemical structures of 21–24
Fig. 10Chemical structure of 25. Bottom panel showing merged brightfield images of HeLa cells, incubated with (a, e) of pECFP-Golgi (green) (b, f), 25 (red) (c, g) and LysoTracker® Deep Red (blue) (d, h) at 0 min (a–d) and 30 min (e–h) [119]. Scale bar = 10 μm. Figure reproduced from Tang et al. [119]. Under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Fig. 11Chemical structure of 26
Fig. 12Chemical structures of 27–32
Fig. 13Chemical structures of 33–37. Application of compounds 33–35 (yellow) to image lipophilic structures in living bacteria (B. cereus) using confocal fluorescence microscopy [66]. Scale bar = 5 µm. Reproduced with permission from Ranieri et al. [66]
Fig. 14Chemical structures of 38–42
Fig. 15Chemical structure of 43. Mouse brain incubated with 43 (red) and sectioned into 20 μm slices, co-stained with NucRed (green) and imaged using confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 20 μm. Reproduced with permission from Tian et al. [65]