| Literature DB >> 29997803 |
Chen Yang1,2, Faisal Mehmood1, Tsz Lung Lam3,4, Sharon Lai-Fung Chan3,4, Yuan Wu1, Chi-Shun Yeung1, Xiangguo Guan1, Kai Li1,2, Clive Yik-Sham Chung1, Cong-Ying Zhou1,2, Taotao Zou1, Chi-Ming Che1,2.
Abstract
A new class of cyclometalated Ir(iii) complexes supported by various bidentate C-deprotonated (C^N) and cis-chelating bis(N-heterocyclic carbene) (bis-NHC) ligands has been synthesized. These complexes display strong emission in deaerated solutions at room temperature with photoluminescence quantum yields up to 89% and emission lifetimes up to 96 μs. A photo-stable complex containing C-deprotonated fluorenyl-substituted C^N shows no significant decomposition even upon irradiation for over 120 h by blue LEDs (12 W). These, together with the strong absorption in the visible region and rich photo-redox properties, allow the bis-NHC Ir(iii) complexes to act as good photo-catalysts for reductive C-C bond formation from C(sp3/sp2)-Br bonds cleavage using visible-light irradiation (λ > 440 nm). A water-soluble complex with a glucose-functionalized bis-NHC ligand catalysed a visible-light-driven radical cyclization for the synthesis of pyrrolidine in aqueous media. Also, the bis-NHC Ir(iii) complex in combination with a cobalt catalyst can catalyse the visible-light-driven CO2 reduction with excellent turnover numbers (>2400) and selectivity (CO over H2 in gas phase: >95%). Additionally, this series of bis-NHC Ir(iii) complexes are found to localize in and stain endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of various cell lines with high selectivity, and exhibit high cytotoxicity towards cancer cells, revealing their potential uses as bioimaging and/or anti-cancer agents.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 29997803 PMCID: PMC6003676 DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04458h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Chart 1Iridium(iii) complexes in this work. Complexes 1a,73,74 1b,731d28 and 2d31 have been reported in the literature.
Fig. 11H NMR spectra for (a) 4; (b) 6; (c) Ru(bpy)3Cl2, fac-Ir(ppy)3 and [(dFCF3ppy)2Ir(dtbbpy)]PF6 in deuterated MeCN solution for irradiating by blue light (12 W, λmax = 462 nm)46 (all solutions are degased by nitrogen gas for 10 min); (d) crystal structure diagrams showing the photoinduced transformation of coordination for Ir metals in 6 and (butyl group on bis-NHC ligand and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity); (e) UV/Vis absorption (dotted line), excitation (dashed line) and emission (solid line) spectra of solutions of 6 and (concentration of 2.0 × 10–5 M) in degassed DCM at 298 K.
Photophysical data of complexes 1–9
| Complex | Medium | Absorption ( | Emission |
|
|
| CH2Cl2 | 255 (26.8), 267 (24.9), 311 (10.6), 342 (6.1), 380 (3.7), 416 (1.2) | 470 (2.1), 499, 534 | 89 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 254 (36.8), 266 (35.5), 311 (15.5), 342 (9.1), 381 (5.82), 416 (2.16) | 470 (2.1), 500, 534 | 89 |
|
| H2O | 254 (36.8), 266 (35.5), 311 (15.5), 342 (9.1), 381 (5.82), 416 (2.16) | 469 (2.0), 498, 534 | 89 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 252 (13.5), 290 (21.7), 332 (12.6), 369 (6.07), 405 (4.92) | 530, 547, 570 (3.03) | 11.1 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 252 (15.5), 282 (15.1), 313 (20.5), 335 (23.1), 375 (21.9), 389 (20.9), 440 (20.9) | 472, 674 (4.8), 824 | 0.2 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 260 (31.4), 297 (30.0), 316 (33.5), 334 (32.3), 360 (22.4), 378 (16.8), 421 (10.5) | 524, 564 (28.6), 614 | 65 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 267 (52.2), 297 (46.8), 316 (50.9), 335 (49.0), 358 (36.3), 376 (27.3), 421 (16.2) | 525, 566 (28.7), 614 | 75 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 268 (42.1), 299 (42.3), 320 (50.4), 338 (49.2), 364 (32.6), 379 (25.6), 421 (14.6) | 527, 568 (32.7), 616 | 82 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 260 (54.1), 273 (42.5), 310 (32.9), 323 (34.8), 377 (67.2), 398 (97.0), 436 (71.6) | 576 (96.1), 625, 683 | 22.6 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 271 (23.0), 321 (25.0), 377 (9.57), 407 (6.81), 436 (3.38) | 531, 560 (6.4) | 78 |
|
| H2O | 268 (21.4), 321 (22.1), 377 (8.06), 407 (5.49), 436 (2.42) | 536, 560 (5.0) | 66 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 270 (23.0), 323 (32.1), 383 (10.7), 415 (7.88), 447 (4.08) | 530, 558 (3.2) | 68 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 296 (26.8), 333 (18.5), 388 (9.31), 437 (7.76), 467 (4.60) | 582, 623 (6.2) | 36 |
|
| H2O | 293 (25.9), 330 (17.4), 386 (9.63), 432 (6.92), 464 (3.71) | 583, 622 (5.9) | 32 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 260 (80.1), 290 (48.5), 315 (35.4), 376 (34.5), 429 (7.52), 485 (3.47), 494 (2.88) | 618, 659 (5.2) | 3 |
|
| CH2Cl2 | 313 (24.2), 334 (23.8), 384 (12.7), 428 (10.7), 457 (8.20), 485 (3.47) | 617, 667 (7.4) | 13 |
|
| H2O | 315 (18.4), 380 (9.69), 420 (7.6), 454 (4.95), 475 (2.15) | 620 (4.5), 668 | 9 |
Measured in degassed CH2Cl2 and water (2.0 × 10–5 M) at 298 K.
4, 4 and 4 were measured at the concentration of 5 × 10–6 M.
5b was measured at the concentration of 1 × 10–6 M.
Phosphorescence quantum yields were measured by using [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2 (Φ = 0.062 in MeCN) as standard.
Fig. 2UV-Vis absorption (top) and emission (bottom) spectra of solutions of 1a–3a and 1d–2d in degassed DCM (concentration of 2.0 × 10–5 M) at 298 K.
Fig. 3UV/Vis absorption (black dashed line), excitation (red solid line) and emission (green solid line) spectra of solutions of (a) 4 (5.0 × 10–6 M); (b) 5b (1.0 × 10–6 M) in degassed DCM at 298 K.
Electrochemical data of bis-NHC Ir(iii) complexes
| Complex |
|
|
|
| 0.87 | –2.52 |
|
| 0.64 | –2.24 |
|
| 0.74 | –2.41 |
|
| 0.79 | –2.40 |
|
| 0.74 | –2.44 |
|
| 0.72 | –2.25 |
|
| 0.98 | –2.14 |
|
| 1.04 | –1.94 |
|
| 0.69 | –2.09 |
|
| 0.62 | –1.94 |
|
| 0.62 | –2.16 |
Supporting electrolyte: 0.1 M Bu4NPF6 in MeCN and values are recorded vs. Ag/AgNO3 (0.1 M) in MeCN; Cp2Fe+/0 occurs at the range of 0.05–0.08 (V) vs. Ag/AgNO3.
Values refer to oxidation peak potential (Epa) at 25 °C for irreversible couples at a scan rate of 100 mV s–1.
Values refer to reduction peak potential (Epc) for the irreversible reduction waves.
Fig. 4Cyclic voltammograms of 1b, 2a, 4, 5b and 6 in MeCN with Bu4NPF6 (0.1 M) as supporting electrolyte. Conditions: glass-carbon, working electrode, scan rate: 100 mV s–1.
Fig. 5Time-resolved spectra of 4 (a) tr-abs (insets: decay of tr-abs at λ = 350 nm and 480 nm); (b) tr-em (decay of tr-em at λ = 524 nm) spectra recorded at specified times after laser pulse excitation (355 nm) in degassed MeCN at 298 K.
Fig. 6Transient absorption spectra recorded (a) under specified laser energy; (b) in presence of specified concentrations of acetone; of a degassed aqueous solution of 4 (about 1 × 10–5 M). Kinetic studies of (c) λtr-abs (495 nm) and (d) λtr-abs (720 nm) in the absence/presence of specified concentrations of acetone.
Chart 2General photo-catalytic reactions by cyclometalated complexes. EWG = electron-withdrawing group.
Screening bis-NHC Ir(iii) complexes for photo-catalysis
|
| |||
| Entry | PC | Conversion | Yield |
| 1 |
| 93 | 59 |
| 2 |
| 1 | 0 |
| 3 |
| 90 | 59 |
| 4 |
| 90 | 52 |
| 5 |
| 93 | 59 |
| 6 |
| 80 | 44 |
| 7 |
| 49 | 24 |
| 8 |
| 11 | 7.3 |
| 9 |
| 0.1 | 0 |
Complex 3a was not tested because of the low quantum yield (0.2%, see Table 1).
Procedure: substrate 50 μmol, PC (1 mol%), DIPEA (5 equiv.), HCOOH (2.5 equiv.) in 4 mL MeCN solution was degassed by nitrogen, and irradiated by blue light (12 W, λmax = 462 nm) at ambient temperature for 4 h.
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy by adding internal standard of 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine.
Visible-light-induced C–C bond formation for aryl halide
|
| ||||
| Entry | PC (substrate) | Amines | Conversion | Yield |
| 1 |
| DIPEA | 97 | 67 |
| 2 |
| DIPEA | 97 | 64 |
| 3 |
| DIPEA | 96 | 64 |
| 4 |
| DIPEA | 98 | 54 |
| 5 |
| DIPEA | 99 | <15 |
| 6 |
| DIPEA | 84 | 51 |
| 7 |
| TEA | 97 | 79 |
| 8 |
| TEA | 91 | 64 |
| 9 |
| TMEDA | 52 | 32 |
| 10 |
| DBU | 96 | 72 |
| 11 |
| DIPEA | 85 | 54 |
| 12 |
| DIPEA | 62 | 28 |
| 13 |
| — | 0 | 0 |
| 14 |
| DIPEA | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | Ru(bpy)3Cl2 ( | DIPEA | 0 | 0 |
| 16 |
| DIPEA | 27 | 16 |
Procedure: substrate 50 μmol, PC (2 mol%), amine (5 equiv.), HCOOH (2.5 equiv.) in 4 mL aqueous solution was degassed by nitrogen, and irradiated by blue light (12 W, λmax = 462 nm) at ambient temperature for 10 h.
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy by adding internal standard of 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine.
Irradiated for 4 h.
Absence of HCOOH.
Presence of air (no degassing).
Absence of amine.
Absence of light.
Visible-light-induced C–C bond formation of alkyl bromide
|
| ||||
| Entry | PC | Amines | Conversion | Yield |
| 1 | Ru(bpy)3Cl2 | DIPEA | 19 | 5 |
| 2 |
| DIPEA | 90 | 72 |
| 3 |
| DIPEA | 99 | 85 |
| 4 |
| DIPEA | 99 | 76 |
| 5 |
| DIPEA | 99 | 90 |
| 6 |
| TEA | 99 | 72 |
| 7 |
| TMEDA | 84 | 55 |
| 8 |
| DBU | 99 | 64 |
| 9 |
| — | 0 | 0 |
| 10 |
| DIPEA | 27 | 15 |
| 11 |
| DIPEA | 0 | 0 |
| 12 |
| DIPEA | 0 | 0 |
| 13 |
| DIPEA | 99 | 59 |
Entry 1–12: R = H (substrate B1); procedure: substrate 50 μmol, PC (2 mol%), amine (5 equiv.) and HCOOH (2.5 equiv.) in 4 mL MeCN solution was degassed by nitrogen, and irradiated by blue light (12 W, λmax = 462 nm) at 25 °C.
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy by adding an internal standard of 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine.
Absence of HCOOH (20 equiv.).
Absence of light.
Presence of TEMPO (radical trapping reagent, 2 equiv.).
Entry 13: R = Me (substrate B2).
Visible-light-induced radical cyclization in aqueous solution
|
| ||||
| Entry | Solvents (H2O/MeOH) | Reductant | Conversion | Yield |
| 1 | 3/1 | Ascorbic acid | 23 | 10 |
| 2 | 3/1 | Ascorbic acid | 20 | 14 |
| 3 | 3/1 | DIPEA | 98 | 49 |
| 4 | 3/1 | DIPEA | 90 | 21 |
| 5 | 3/1 | DIPEA | 79 | 31 |
| 6 | 1/1 | DIPEA | 99 | 64 |
| 7 | 1/3 | DIPEA | 99 | 87 |
| 8 | 0/1 | DIPEA | 99 | 66 |
Procedure: substrate 50 μmol, 6 (2 mol%), reductant (5 equiv.), Bu4NCl (5 equiv.) in 4 mL aqueous solution was degassed by nitrogen, and irradiated by blue light (12 W, λmax = 462 nm) at 25 °C.
Solvent system used is water/methanol in volume ratio (v/v).
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy by adding internal standard of 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine.
Absence of HCOOH.
Absence of Bu4NCl.
Fig. 7TON value and amounts of gases (CO and H2) generation from CO2 in a CO2-saturated MeCN/TEA (4/1, v/v, 4 mL in total) solution as a function of irradiation time: concentration dependence of (a) PC 4 and (b) catalyst [Co(TPA)Cl]Cl; (c) a solution containing 0.005 mM [Co(TPA)Cl]Cl, 0.5 mM 4 was irradiated using blue LEDs (12 W) based on the averaged results from three parallel reaction runs.
Fig. 8Fluorescence microscopy images of HeLa cancer cells incubated with the Ir(iii) NHC complexes: merged (top), ER-tracker™ (middle) and complexes (bottom). Complexes were excited at 340 nm using an emission filter of 510 nm. ER-tracker™ was excited at 546 nm using an emission filter of >580 nm.