Literature DB >> 35975941

The effect of trimethylamine N-oxide on the metabolism of visceral white adipose tissue in spontaneously hypertensive rat.

Guo-Dong He1,2, Xiao-Cong Liu2, Xing-Hua Hou3, Ying-Qing Feng1,2.   

Abstract

Strong links have been reported among trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), visceral white adipose tissue (vWAT), and cardiometabolic diseases. However, the effects of TMAO on vWAT in hypertension remained incompletely explored. The impact of a chronic 22-week-long treatment with 1 g/L TMAO on vWAT, and its transcriptional and metabolic changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) were evaluated by serum cytokine measurements, histological analysis, fatty acid determinations, and co-expression network analyses. TMAO increased the serum interleukin-6 levels and insulin secretion in SHRs. The adipocyte size was diminished in the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group. In addition, one kind of monounsaturated fatty acids (cis-15-tetracosenoate) and four kinds of polyunsaturated fatty acids (cis-11,14,17-eicosatrienoic acid, docosatetraenoate, docosapentaenoate n-3, and docosapentaenoate n-6) were elevated by TMAO treatment. Three co-expression modules significantly related to TMAO treatment were identified and pathway enrichment analyses indicated that phagosome, lysosome, fatty acid metabolism, valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation and metabolic pathways were the most significantly altered biological pathways. This study shed new light on the metabolic roles of TMAO on the vWAT of SHRs. TMAO regulated the metabolic status of vWAT, including reduced lipogenesis and an improved specific fatty acid composition. The mechanisms underlying these effects likely involve phagosome and lysosome pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trimethylamine N-oxide; fatty acids; hypertension; lysosome; phagosome; visceral white adipose tissue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35975941      PMCID: PMC9387326          DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2022.2104783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adipocyte        ISSN: 2162-3945            Impact factor:   3.553


Introduction

The gut microbiota represented a key intermediary between diet and host physiology, contributing to cardiometabolic diseases and associated hypertension [1,2]. However, specific cellular and molecular mechanisms by which gut microbial metabolites promote cardiometabolic diseases remain incompletely explored. Recently, multiple epidemiological and animal studies have indicated that elevated trimethylamine N-oxide concentrations are closely linked to the development of cardiometabolic diseases, such as insulin resistance and atherosclerosis [3-6]. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), an organic gut microbiota-derived metabolite mainly originating from dietary choline and L-carnitine, plays a prominent role in mechanistic links to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic heart disease [7]. In addition to promoting atherosclerosis, TMAO has been correlated with prolonging and exacerbating the hypertensive status induced by angiotensin II in rats [8,9]. However, several experimental and clinical studies have described the circulatory system’s negative impact on TMAO [10,11]. Furthermore, TMAO supplementation slows aortic lesion formation in a mouse model [12] and exerts a beneficial effect on heart failure [13] by reducing the diastolic dysfunction in the pressure-overloaded hearts of hypertensive rats [14]. White adipose tissue (WAT), a heterogeneous organ composed of mature adipocytes, adipocyte progenitor cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and diverse types of immune cells, functions in energy storage and as an endocrine organ [15]. Bioactive molecules, such as free fatty acids, leptin, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, can be released into circulation by WAT. These molecules may contribute to cardiometabolic disorder [16,17]. The TMAO-producing enzyme Fmo3 acts as a negative regulator of programmed WAT [18]. In addition, accumulated evidence indicates that TMAO behaves similarly to hormones in adipose tissue [18,19]. Owing to the strong links between TMAO, WAT, and cardiometabolic diseases, we hypothesized that TMAO compromises WAT’s ability to maintain metabolic homoeostasis in cardiometabolic diseases. This study evaluated the impact of a chronic 22-week-long treatment with TMAO on visceral WAT (vWAT), and its transcriptional and metabolic changes, in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs).

Materials and methods

Animal treatments

Male SHRs and normal Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were provided by Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. The rats were housed at Forervegen’s Experimental Animal Center (Guangzhou, China) and were kept in groups of three animals in polypropylene cages under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at 22–23°C and humidity of 45%–55%. They were provided a standard laboratory diet and water ad libitum. Seven- to eight-week-old SHRs (n = 12) were randomly assigned to a water group, either drinking tap water or water containing 1 g/L TMAO (product number: T1362, Tokyo Chemical Industry, Japan). The dose of 1 g/L of TMAO was selected to increase the plasma TMAO by 9–18-fold to mimic physiological high-dose TMAO concentrations based on previous study results [14]. After 22 weeks of treatment with water or TMAO, rats were maintained in metabolism cages for 2 days to evaluate their 24-h food balance. Blood glucose levels of rats were measured after fasting over-night. Fasting serum was collected by cardiac puncture, and vWAT was sampled from each abdominal cavity. All animal care and experimental protocols were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital.

Evaluation of TMAO concentration

The blood plasma concentration of TMAO was determined using liquid chromatography coupled with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry as previously described [8]. The ion transitions were m/z 76.1 > 58.0 for TMAO and m/z 85.1 > 66.0 for TMAO-D9. The calibration curve range was 1–5,000 ng/mL for TMAO.

Measurements of circulating cytokines

Luminex tests were used to determine serum cytokines (Luminex MAGPIX, Luminex Corp.) using appropriate kits (Millipore) in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. We measured and analysed six cytokines, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), insulin, and leptin. Assays were analysed on Luminex 200 (Luminex Corp.).

Haematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Masson staining of vWAT

The paraffin sections of vWAT were subjected to HE and Masson staining using HE staining (abs9217, Absin) and Masson Trichrome Staining (abs9348, Absin) kits following the manufacturer’s specifications. The images were analysed using ImageJ software (ImageJ v.1.8.0).

Determination of the adipose tissue medium- and long-chain fatty acids (MLCFAs)

For fatty acids extraction, 60 mg of vWAT was transferred to a centrifuging tube. After adding 1 mL chloroform/methanol solution, each sample was ultrasonicated for 30 min, centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 min, followed by supernatant removal. Then, 2 mL 1% sulphuric acid/methanol solution was added for 0.5-h methyl esterification in a water bath at 80°C. For extraction, 1 mL of n-hexane was added, and for washing, 5 mL of water was added. A total of 500 μL extract supernatant was mixed with 25 μL of internal standard (methyl nonadecanoate) before injection. For standard preparation, the mixed standard solution of 40 components of methyl esterified fatty acids (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a reference standard to identify the fatty acids as previously described [20]. Ten mixed standard concentration gradients of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/L were prepared, in which the concentration of each component accounted for 2% and 4% of the total concentration of two gradients, with 30 and 10 components accounting for 2% and 4%, respectively. An Agilent DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 µm) was used to separate the methyl esterified fatty acids. The temperature was initially set to 50°C for 3 min and then escalated at a rate of 10°C/min to 220°C for 20 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas, and the carrier gas velocity was set at 1.0 mL/min. The analysis was performed using an Agilent 7890A/5975C gas chromatography-mass spectrometer. Agilent ChemStation software was used to determine the retention times and areas of chromatographic peaks. Each sample’s MLCFA content was determined by graphing the curve.

RNA preparation, sequencing, and analysis

RNA of vWAT was isolated using the TRIzol reagent/chloroform isolation method. The full-length complementary DNAs and RNA-seq libraries were prepared using SMART technology (Clontech) [21]. RNA sequencing was carried out using an illuminated Nova-Seq 6000 System with the assistance of Guangzhou Epibiotek Co., Ltd. The GENCODE database was utilized to annotate mRNAs [22]. RNA reads were counted using feature Counts [23]. To normalize gene expression counts for the sequence, the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) approach was used. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate variables within the three groups. Data were transformed into log2 scale and plotted using the plotPCA function in R v.3.5.2.

Differential expression analysis

Expression levels were estimated on the basis of the high-throughput sequences by differential expression analysis. The raw counts from the sequence datasets were used as in input in the ‘DESeq2’ R package (DESeq2 1.16.1) [24] to obtain differentially expressed genes based on log2 fold change ≥ |1.0| at a statistical significance of adjust p-value < 0.05. The R heatmap and ggplot2 package were applied to construct the heatmap.

Co-expression networks of mRNAs

First, we eliminated genes with expression levels lower than 1 FPKM in at least 90% of the samples. The remaining genes having a standard deviation larger than 0.2 were further maintained for a downstream weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Modules of co-expression networks were determined using the ‘WGCNA’ package in R as previously described [25]. Briefly, a suitable soft threshold power was determined using the scale-free topology requirement. Then, the weighted adjacency matrix was generated. Correlations and adjacencies were converted into a matrix of topological overlap (TOM), after which the equivalent dissimilarity was calculated (1-TOM). Next, genes were clustered hierarchically using 1-TOM as the distance metric. The dynamic tree cut technique with default parameters was used to discover modules. For each module, Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichments were conducted to understand the enriched functions using R package ‘clusterprofile’. The PCA of each gene module evaluated module eigengenes (MEs) as the major components, and within a specific module, the expression patterns of all the genes might be summed into a single characteristic expression profile. Significant associations were defined significantly if the module had a p-value < 0.05 and an eigengene-trait absolute correlation > 0.7.

Statistical analysis

Undetectable cytokine concentrations, where the analyte concentration was less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), were replaced with LLOQ/√2. The means ± standard deviations (SDs) of ongoing parameters were provided. Student’s t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess variations between two groups. To investigate the significant variations between three or more groups, a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or Kruskal-Wallis with multiple comparison testing was used. A two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were conducted using R programming language version 4.0.

Results

TMAO regulated the serum levels of cytokines and insulin in SHRs

After 22 weeks of treatment with TMAO, the TMAO plasma level of rats in the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group were significantly higher than in the SHR-water and WYK groups (Table 1). However, there were no significant differences in food intakes and body weights between groups (Table 1). This indicated that TMAO had no influence on food balance.
Table 1.

TMAO regulated the serum levels of IL-6 and insulin in SHRs.

VariablesWKY GroupSHR-Water GroupSHR-TMAO GropP Value(by ANOVA)
Body mass and food intake
Body mass, g349.18 ± 21.15335.41 ± 23.45357.18 ± 17.380.23
24 h food intake, g15.65 ± 3.2413.47 ± 1.4012.51 ± 1.860.09
TMAO
Plasma TMAO, ng/ml102.48 ± 44.14144.72 ± 25.274031.03 ± 1035.35*†< 0.01
Circulating cytokines
IL-6, pg/ml17.29 ± 0.0017.29 ± 2.2941.79 ± 19.60*†< 0.01
IL-1β, pg/ml9.04 ± 8.145.18 ± 6.752.04 ± 0.830.14
TNF-α, pg/ml1.49 ± 0.720.81 ± 0.271.17 ± 0.520.17
MCP-1, pg/ml169.22 ± 70.01122.09 ± 63.35180.91 ± 31.350.15
leptin, pg/ml6436.17 ± 755.632424.40 ± 709.16*1957.83 ± 1110.89*< 0.01
Insulin and FBG
Insulin, pg/ml3060.67 ± 1268.036988.40 ± 2304.11*22729.17 ± 19264.28*†0.01
FBG, mmol/l4.28 ± 0.284.94 ± 0.43*4.68 ± 0.180.02

Values are means ± SD. Data are for Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats (n = 6), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) treated with water (SHR-Water; n = 6), and SHRs treated with 1 g/L trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in drinking water (SHR-TMAO; n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test was used. *P < 0.05 vs. the WKY group; †P < 0.05 vs. the SHR-Water group by a Tukey’s post hoc test. FBG: fasting blood glucose.

TMAO regulated the serum levels of IL-6 and insulin in SHRs. Values are means ± SD. Data are for Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats (n = 6), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) treated with water (SHR-Water; n = 6), and SHRs treated with 1 g/L trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in drinking water (SHR-TMAO; n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test was used. *P < 0.05 vs. the WKY group; †P < 0.05 vs. the SHR-Water group by a Tukey’s post hoc test. FBG: fasting blood glucose. Because circulating TMAO is considered to be associated with increases in inflammatory cytokines [26], we measured five serum inflammatory cytokines, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, MCP-1, and leptin, to ascertain the effects of chronic TMAO treatment on vWAT in SHRs. With the 1 g/L TMAO treatment, only the IL-6 serum level was markedly elevated, whereas other cytokines did not show statistical differences (Table 1). However, inflammatory responses might still not be confirmed because IL-6 had context-dependent pro-and anti-inflammatory properties [27]. In addition, TMAO is positively associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors, such as insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome [28], and the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group showed dramatically elevated serum insulin levels in this study (Table 1). However, TMAO-treated SHRs demonstrated mild decreases in fasting blood glucose levels compared with the SHRs groups, but it was not significant (P > 0.05). Owing to the results of serum cytokine and insulin levels, we focused on the effects of TMAO on the metabolism of vWAT in SHRs because IL-6 and insulin regulate adipose tissue, but they had opposite effects [29,30].

TMAO regulated the vWAT size in SHRs

To evaluate the effects of elevated levels of IL-6 and insulin on vWAT mediated by TMAO, we observed the morphology of vWAT using HE and Masson staining. Adipocyte size was assessed using HE staining to determine whether adipocyte hypertrophy occurred after a long TMAO treatment period (Figure 1aandb).
Figure 1.

Adipose histology and quantification. a, b: Representative images of haematoxylin and eosin stain from visceral white adipose tissue in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) group (a) and the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group (b). c, d: Representative images of Masson stain from visceral white adipose tissue in SHR (c) and SHR 1 g/L TMAO (d) groups. e: Adipocyte area. The results are expressed as means ± SDs. The differences between the two groups were statistically analysed using Student’s t-tests. The data represent statistical significance at ****p < 0.0001. f: Histogram of adipocyte count distribution of specified adipocyte area; 100 adipocytes per mouse were used for quantitative evaluation.

Adipose histology and quantification. a, b: Representative images of haematoxylin and eosin stain from visceral white adipose tissue in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) group (a) and the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group (b). c, d: Representative images of Masson stain from visceral white adipose tissue in SHR (c) and SHR 1 g/L TMAO (d) groups. e: Adipocyte area. The results are expressed as means ± SDs. The differences between the two groups were statistically analysed using Student’s t-tests. The data represent statistical significance at ****p < 0.0001. f: Histogram of adipocyte count distribution of specified adipocyte area; 100 adipocytes per mouse were used for quantitative evaluation. The size of adipocytes was diminished in the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group. Furthermore, Masson staining was used to examine fibrosis in vWAT caused by collagen deposition (Figure 1candd). No evidence of adipose fibrosis was found. Thus, the effects of adipocyte volume diminishment after TMAO treatment might be associated with increased IL-6 secretion.

Identification and quantification of MLCFAs

Our results previously showed that the TMAO treatment induces IL-6 secretion and diminishes vWAT. Furthermore, owing to the well-known stimulatory effects of IL-6 on lipolysis, as well as fatty acid oxidation [31], we applied 40 fatty-acid methyl ester standards to a gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer analysis to further ascertain the impact of TMAO on fatty acid metabolism in vWAT. A total of 34 different kinds of fatty acids have been identified and quantified in the vWAT samples (Table 2), of which six fatty acids were undetected in all the samples. As shown in Table S1, the standard curve, linearity, and correlation coefficient (R2) of each component were in the selected concentration range. The linearity and correlation coefficient for each component was > 0.999 (Table S1).
Table 2.

The composition of medium- and long- chain fatty acids found in vWAT from WKY, SHR-Water, and SHR-1 g/L TMAO groups.

  Mean ± SD (ug/mL)
p-value
ComponentMLCFAsWKYSHR-WaterSHR-1 g/L TMAO(by ANOVA)
SFA     
Total SFA/52117.910 ± 10630.58455661.060 ± 3004.82954037.027 ± 2482.367NS
C10:0decanoate32.931 ± 7.0830.315 ± 3.00027.762 ± 3.669NS
C11:0undecanoate1.615 ± 0.2441.218 ± 0.242*1.177 ± 0.187*0.008
C12:0dodecanoate143.254 ± 48.983157.897 ± 23.382131.426 ± 10.765NS
C14:0myristate2403.795 ± 735.6722939.138 ± 400.3672554.393 ± 241.84NS
C15:0pentadecanoate604.943 ± 95.525407.972 ± 69.976*417.751 ± 61.53*<0.001
C16:0palmitate43348.974 ± 8945.04346846.530 ± 2658.38745803.567 ± 2248.655NS
C17:0heptadecanoate627.358 ± 93.689420.187 ± 43.349*420.692 ± 55.311*<0.001
C18:0stearate4340.754 ± 903.284438.812 ± 82.3264238.007 ± 274.481NS
C20:0arachidate272.060 ± 52.552201.562 ± 24.866*187.234 ± 25.007*0.002
C21:0heneicosanoate16.617 ± 3.8710.366 ± 1.993*10.716 ± 1.458*0.001
C22:0behenate257.650 ± 39.618160.821 ± 33.310*203.689 ± 35.711*0.001
C23:0tricosanoate14.549 ± 3.4999.106 ± 2.167*8.168 ± 1.321*0.001
C24:0tetracosanoate53.410 ± 11.09537.135 ± 8.945*32.445 ± 7.151*0.003
MUFA     
Total MUFA/99163.218 ± 21219.853106566.155 ± 6668.756102210.392 ± 5432.69NS
C14:1N5myristoleate82.945 ± 36.141142.266 ± 39.530112.270 ± 39.12NS
C15:1N5cis-10-pentadecenoate24453.243 ± 5319.74426613.658 ± 1535.10526002.833 ± 1300.146NS
C16:1N7palmitoleate6618.981 ± 2973.06510,172.508 ± 1818.9679027.605 ± 1995.191NS
C17:1N7cis-10-heptadecenoate245.269 ± 50.836243.384 ± 31.908240.533 ± 19.507NS
C18:1TN9elaidate59453.262 ± 11706.42361168.845 ± 3659.75558346.452 ± 2955.179NS
C18:1N9oleate7105.363 ± 1558.7917294.707 ± 549.1527423.020 ± 674.394NS
C20:1N9cis-11-Eicosenoic acid609.412 ± 98.469492.531 ± 42.099*500.322 ± 36.212*0.012
C22:1N9erucate90.740 ± 24.71488.875 ± 29.00990.567 ± 24.441NS
C24:1N9cis-15-tetracosenoate504.002 ± 78.387349.381 ± 54.404*466.791 ± 90.456†0.008
PUFA     
Total PUFA/90744.451 ± 12068.82271859.955 ± 6915.35674212.841 ± 5411.2180.003
C18:2N6linoleate82805.971 ± 11050.11065731.671 ± 5846.682*67139.866 ± 5244.781*0.003
C18:3N6γ-linolenate172.574 ± 43.026178.344 ± 41.249211.010 ± 29.839NS
C18:3N3α-linolenate(ALA)4165.654 ± 458.2443153.924 ± 502.287*3335.967 ± 196.782*0.001
C20:2N6cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic acid541.499 ± 85.57446.854 ± 80.936539.826 ± 27.926NS
C20:3N6cis-8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid253.191 ± 58.59208.937 ± 38.409279.975 ± 39.021NS
C20:4N6arachidonate1628.711 ± 275.2661327.785 ± 260.2491590.469 ± 317.444NS
C20:3N3cis-11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic acid35.540 ± 3.45927.875 ± 4.903*35.111 ± 5.219†0.018
C20:5N3cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)39.624 ± 8.37726.102 ± 5.013*24.896 ± 3.753*0.001
C22:4N6docosatetraenoate465.513 ± 114.483315.139 ± 80.688*456.924 ± 120.188†0.047
C22:5N6docosapentaenoate n-654.818 ± 14.40751.037 ± 15.10682.354 ± 25.877*†0.025
C22:5N3docosapentaenoate n-3 (DPA)517.826 ± 104.889318.490 ± 87.286*445.799 ± 103.421†0.011
C22:6N3cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)63.530 ± 20.41673.797 ± 23.16370.643 ± 23.198NS
Undetectable     
C22:2N6cis-13,16-Docosadienoic acid////
C4:0butyrate////
C6:0hexanoate////
C8:0octanoate////
C13:0tridecanoate////
C18:2TTN6linolelaidate////

Values are means ± SD. Data are for Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats (n = 6), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) treated with water (SHR-Water; n = 6), and SHRs treated with trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in drinking water (SHR-TMAO; n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test was used. TMA, trimethylamine; NS, no significant differences among groups by ANOVA. *P < 0.05 vs. the WKY group; †P < 0.05 vs. the SHR-Water group by a Tukey’s post hoc test

The composition of medium- and long- chain fatty acids found in vWAT from WKY, SHR-Water, and SHR-1 g/L TMAO groups. Values are means ± SD. Data are for Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats (n = 6), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) treated with water (SHR-Water; n = 6), and SHRs treated with trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in drinking water (SHR-TMAO; n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test was used. TMA, trimethylamine; NS, no significant differences among groups by ANOVA. *P < 0.05 vs. the WKY group; †P < 0.05 vs. the SHR-Water group by a Tukey’s post hoc test There were no noticeable distinctions between the concentrations of total saturated fatty acid (SFA) and total monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) in the three groups, but the total polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) level in the WKY group was higher than in the other groups. When compared with levels in WKY rats, 16 MLCFAs obviously decreased (p < 0.05) in SHRs treated with water, including eight SFAs (undecanoate, pentadecanoate, heptadecanoate, arachidonate, heneicosanoate, behenate, tricostate, and tetracosanoate), two MUFAs (cis-11-eicosenoic acid ester and cis-15-tetracosenoate), and six PUFAs [linoleate, linolenate, cis-11,14,17-ricosatrienoic acid ester, cis-5,8,11,14,17-ricosapentaenoic acid ester, docosatetraenoate, and docosapentaenoic (C22:5N3)]. Among them, one MUFA (cis-15-tetracosenoate) and four PUFAs [cis-11,14,17-ricosatrienoic acid, docosatetraenoate, docosapentaenoate n-3 (C22:5N3), and docosapentaenoate n-6 (C22:5N6)] were elevated by the TMAO treatment. In this study, our results showed that TMAO induced IL-6 secretion and regulated the composition of fatty acids, especially PUFAs, in vWAT.

RNA sequencing and co-expression network analysis of vWAT

To further understand the experimental results, we continued exploring the possible mechanisms using RNA-seq. First, we confirmed the reliability of the RNA-seq data using a Pearson’s correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and the FPKM density distribution of the 18 samples (Figure 2a–). A high repeatability in the sequencing results was achieved in each group. In addition, a hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that the gene expression patterns in vWAT were distinguishable among the three groups (Figure 3a–). The top 25 up- and top 25 down-regulated mRNAs in the SHR group vs. the SHR 1 g/L TMAO group are shown in Table 3.
Figure 2.

A: Pearson’s correlations among samples based on expression levels. B: Principal component analysis of 18 samples based on expression levels. C: Density plot displaying the gene density at different FPKM levels. D: Box plot of the FPKM distribution among the 18 samples. SHRW: white adipose tissue of spontaneously hypertensive rat, SHRWT: white adipose tissue of TMAO treated spontaneously hypertensive rat, WYKW: white adipose tissue of WYK.

Figure 3.

A-C: Hierarchical cluster analysis among the three groups. SHRW: white adipose tissue of spontaneously hypertensive rat, SHRWT: white adipose tissue of TMAO treated spontaneously hypertensive rat, WYKW: white adipose tissue of WYK. D: The correlations between each functional module and phenotype. Colours correspond to correlations. Positive correlations are shown by red, and negative correlations are shown by green. Additionally, correlation coefficients and P values are marked.

Table 3.

The top 25 up and top 25 down regulated mRNAs in SHR group vs. SHR 1 g/L TMAO group.

gene_namebaseMeanlog2FoldChangepvaluepadj
Gsta37.0423.257.69E-201.13E-15
Pax510.3318.519.91E-147.29E-10
Clec4m15.7618.301.43E-104.72E-07
Marco34.2017.022.12E-050.005451
Nppa22.7216.341.22E-104.72E-07
Sptlc36.896.660.0001330.012946
Prom294.816.531.99E-050.005451
Tnnt2593.896.355.66E-050.008671
Pnoc5.105.930.0002570.016091
LOC1036927855.124.782.18E-050.005451
Actg2126.634.771.65E-070.000221
Cldn715.564.737.79E-050.00963
LOC10369005411.974.223.01E-060.001578
Gstm369.534.150.0001370.01303
LOC100912599144.814.140.0003070.01732
Tmc48.094.050.0007830.025
Esrp112.504.000.0012270.030941
AABR07015881.16.813.980.002270.041812
LOC10091142235.433.733.17E-050.006959
Cd2455.753.610.0001940.015397
Krt205.623.560.0018580.038065
Fam84a9.263.530.0013430.032033
Pls18.983.420.002380.04281
Crabp247.263.423.31E-050.00701
Fam50a32.383.360.0008470.025416
Zfp36641.40−2.222.52E-050.005981
Gan8.35−2.260.001460.033424
AABR07055864.210.81−2.280.0021340.040883
Setbp17.64−2.320.0025030.043924
Tmtc114.81−2.350.0003330.017717
Fat446.36−2.357.59E-050.009611
Amer113.75−2.360.0006060.022419
LOC10369377620.96−2.390.0001890.0153
Fosb84.33−2.420.0029740.047383
Zc3h12c8.59−2.424.74E-050.008495
Marf123.64−2.460.0009360.02746
Slain15.85−2.636.25E-050.00912
AABR07033887.130.59−2.706.12E-050.00912
Cdhr16.51−2.740.0026280.044647
Mcc15.59−2.773.76E-050.007593
LOC1036949087.59−2.880.000730.024333
LOC10091167230.07−2.957.83E-050.00963
LOC1003628144.67−3.220.0027160.04531
Scube34.45−3.290.0024030.042917
Eomes4.43−3.310.0018830.03838
Rnf1125.12−3.670.0023860.04281
Lrrn429.17−3.740.0019250.038857
LOC10091087515.44−4.050.0002080.015523
AABR07054286.14.35−4.260.0004770.020284
AABR07000398.1666.24−7.267.46E-070.000522
The top 25 up and top 25 down regulated mRNAs in SHR group vs. SHR 1 g/L TMAO group. A: Pearson’s correlations among samples based on expression levels. B: Principal component analysis of 18 samples based on expression levels. C: Density plot displaying the gene density at different FPKM levels. D: Box plot of the FPKM distribution among the 18 samples. SHRW: white adipose tissue of spontaneously hypertensive rat, SHRWT: white adipose tissue of TMAO treated spontaneously hypertensive rat, WYKW: white adipose tissue of WYK. A-C: Hierarchical cluster analysis among the three groups. SHRW: white adipose tissue of spontaneously hypertensive rat, SHRWT: white adipose tissue of TMAO treated spontaneously hypertensive rat, WYKW: white adipose tissue of WYK. D: The correlations between each functional module and phenotype. Colours correspond to correlations. Positive correlations are shown by red, and negative correlations are shown by green. Additionally, correlation coefficients and P values are marked. To further identify pathways significantly related to the TMAO treatment on vWAT, a weighted gene co-expression network analysis was used to construct gene co-expression networks. We used an empirically derived soft threshold of 11 to stress the importance of strong correlations in network development, encapsulating a robust model suitable for scale-free topology (R2 > 0.80, Figure S1A). In total, 23 modules of mRNA expression were identified through a hierarchical clustering dendrogram (Figure S1B). Using a nominally significant cut-off (cor > 0.50, p < 0.05), nine module-trait relationships emerged (Figure 3d). The three highest correlations were detected using the module-trait association analysis for the green (cor = 0.71, p = 0.00094), light cyan (cor = −0.86, p = 3.8e−06), and salmon (cor = −0.87, p = 2.3e−06). Additionally, a module-module correlation analysis revealed that the green module was correlated with both light cyan (cor = −0.58, p = 0.012) and salmon (cor = −0.85, p = 7.2e−06) modules (Figure S1C). Finally, the green, light cyan, and salmon gene-expression modules were selected for further investigation.

Pathway enrichment analysis of co-expression modules

Because the green, light cyan, and salmon modules were strongly associated with TMAO therapy, and the gene co-expression modules were comprised of highly correlated genes, we performed a KEGG gene enrichment analysis to further investigate the biological functions of these gene modules. The top 20 KEGG pathway terms were identified from genes in each module (Figure 4a–). Among the altered signalling pathways, the most significantly altered biological pathways included phagosome, lysosome, fatty acid metabolism, valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation, and metabolic pathways. The genes categorized for these pathways are listed in Table 4. Lamp1 and Ctss played roles in both the phagosome and lysosome pathways. In addition, Ehhadh and Aldh3a2 were shown to function in both fatty acid metabolism and valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation pathways.
Figure 4.

Kyoto encyclopaedia of genes and genomes pathway enrichment of genes in the green (a), light cyan (b), and salmon (c) modules generated by hierarchical clustering of WGCNA. The size and the colour intensity of a circle represented gene number and -log10 (P-value), respectively. Rich Factor was considered the ratio of the number of genes in a certain module to the total number of genes in the pathway.

Table 4.

The gene name and enrichment levels categorized for phagosome, lysosome, fatty acid metabolism, and valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation.

PathwayTermSymbolDescriptionFDREnrichment
Fatty acid metabolismEhhadhenoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase0.03110.08
Fatty acid metabolismCpt2carnitine palmitoyltransferase 20.2900014.56
Fatty acid metabolismAldh3a2aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member A20.0310010.08
Fatty acid metabolismAcsl4acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 40.0310010.08
Fatty acid metabolismAcaa2acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 20.2900014.56
LysosomeSmpd1sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1, acid lysosomal0.000414.94
LysosomeNeu1neuraminidase 10.000414.94
LysosomeMan2b1mannosidase, alpha, class 2B, member 10.000414.94
LysosomeLgmnlegumain0.000414.94
LysosomeLamp1lysosomal-associated membrane protein 10.000414.94
LysosomeHexahexosaminidase A0.000414.94
LysosomeFuca1fucosidase, alpha-L- 1, tissue0.000414.94
LysosomeCtsscathepsin S0.000414.94
LysosomeCtshcathepsin H0.000414.94
LysosomeAp1s2adaptor-related protein complex 1, sigma 2 subunit0.000414.94
LysosomeAgaaspartylglucosaminidase0.000414.94
LysosomeAcp5acid phosphatase 5, tartrate resistant0.000414.94
PhagosomeTubb6tubulin, beta 6 class V0.000204.42
PhagosomeTubb2atubulin, beta 2A class IIa0.000204.42
PhagosomeTuba1btubulin, alpha 1B0.000204.42
PhagosomeTap1transporter 1, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP)0.000204.42
PhagosomeRT1-T24-4RT1 class I, locus T24, gene 40.000204.42
PhagosomeRT1-BbRT1 class II, locus Bb0.000204.42
PhagosomeRT1-BaRT1 class II, locus Ba0.000204.42
PhagosomeRT1-A2RT1 class Ia, locus A20.000204.42
PhagosomeRab7aRAB7A, member RAS oncogene family0.000204.42
PhagosomeNcf4neutrophil cytosolic factor 40.000204.42
PhagosomeLamp1lysosomal-associated membrane protein 10.000204.42
PhagosomeFcgr2bFc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIb, receptor (CD32)0.000204.42
PhagosomeCtsscathepsin S0.000204.42
PhagosomeCd209fCD209f antigen0.000204.42
PhagosomeAtp6v0e1ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal, V0 subunit e10.000204.42
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationMccc2methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase 2 (beta)0.0016015.15
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationHmgcs13-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 1 (soluble)0.0016015.15
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationHibch3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase0.0016015.15
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationEhhadhenoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase0.0016015.15
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationAldh3a2aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member A20.0016015.15
The gene name and enrichment levels categorized for phagosome, lysosome, fatty acid metabolism, and valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation. Kyoto encyclopaedia of genes and genomes pathway enrichment of genes in the green (a), light cyan (b), and salmon (c) modules generated by hierarchical clustering of WGCNA. The size and the colour intensity of a circle represented gene number and -log10 (P-value), respectively. Rich Factor was considered the ratio of the number of genes in a certain module to the total number of genes in the pathway.

Discussion

An interesting finding of our study was the metabolic role of TMAO on the vWAT of SHRs. We found that TMAO could regulate the metabolic status of the vWAT of SHRs, including lipogenesis reduction and improvement of specific fatty acids composition. The mechanism underlying this effect was more likely to involve the regulation of phagosomes and lysosomes in vWAT (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

A summary figure showing the main results by Figdraw (www.figdraw.com).

A summary figure showing the main results by Figdraw (www.figdraw.com). Increased exposure to TMAO is associated with atherosclerosis and major adverse cardiovascular events. The TMAO pathway likely interacts with pathogenic mechanisms, including the development of atherosclerotic plaque iteration in macrophages [3,5,32] and the promotion of platelet hyper-responsiveness [33]. Furthermore, circulating TMAO induces low-grade chronic systemic inflammation [34] and increases levels of inflammatory cytokines by promoting NF-κB activation [35] and activating the NLRP3 inflammasome [26]. Moreover, recent studies have revealed that TMAO was positively associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors, such as insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Consequently, we measured six inflammatory serum cytokines, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, MCP-1, insulin, and leptin, to ascertain the effects of chronic treatment with TMAO on vWAT in SHRs. Notably, although no overt inflammation was observed, elevated circulating levels of IL-6 and insulin might reveal a possible link between TMAO and vWAT. Novel beneficial roles for TMAO in glucose homoeostasis and insulin secretion have been reported, and the improvement of impaired glucose tolerance mediated by increased insulinemia was related to ER-stress improvement, which was confirmed in vitro by treating isolated pancreatic islets with subcutaneous TMAO infusion [36]. Consistently, our results showed that chronic high-dose TMAO treatments triggered insulin secretion, which might activate hepatic lipogenesis [37]. Although the circulating levels of IL-6 were elevated by the TMAO treatment in this study, other inflammation-associated cytokines, IL-1β, TNF-α, and MCP-1, did not show statistical differences. In addition, IL-6 has context-dependent pro- and anti-inflammatory properties [27]. Therefore, the inflammatory responses induced by TMAO might still not be confirmed. However, clear evidence has shown that IL-6 and insulin can regulate adipose tissue, but that they had opposite effects. On the one hand, IL-6 induces adipocyte lipolysis via activating the STAT3 pathway [38], which is associated with anti-inflammatory signalling [39]; however, on the other hand, insulin plays an important role in inhibiting lipolysis [40]. To evaluate the effects of elevated levels of IL-6 and insulin on vWAT mediated by TMAO, we observed the morphology of vWAT through HE and Masson staining. The beneficial effects of a 22-week TMAO treatment resulted in adipocyte volume diminishment through increased IL-6 secretion [36]. Thus, compared with the effect of lipogenesis stimulated by insulin, the effect of IL-6 on lipolysis occupied the dominant role during TMAO treatment in SHRs. Combined with our previous results and the well-known stimulatory effect of IL-6 on lipolysis, as well as fatty acid oxidation [31], TMAO was highly likely to regulate the fatty acid composition in vWAT. Therefore, a gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer analysis was performed to determine the changes in the composition of fatty acids. In this study, we found that TMAO elevated one MUFA (cis-15-tetracosenoate) and four PUFAs [cis-11,14,17-eicosatrienoic acid, docosatetraenoate, docosapentaenoate n-3 (C22:5N3), and docosapentaenoate n-6 (C22:5N6)] in vWAT. Adherence to a balanced diet may help postpone the onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and extend life. These diets were mostly composed of fatty acids [41]. The beneficial effects of MUFA and PUFA for CVD may alleviate systolic and diastolic blood pressure by alleviating oxidative stress and modifying the activities of membrane-associated proteins [42,43]. Cis-15-tetracosenoic acid, also called nervonic acid, was increased in vWAT by the TMAO treatment. It is a long-chain fatty acid with significant biological functions, including increasing brain progression, enhancing memory, and delaying brain ageing [44]. A study examining the relationship between erythrocyte omega-9 monounsaturated fatty acids and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality discovered that cis-15-tetracosenoic acid is an independent predictor of cardiovascular death [45]. For PUFAs, many health benefits have been reported. For example, marine n-3 PUFAs might protect against acute coronary syndrome in men [46], and increased n-6 PUFA consumption is related to a decreased risk of CVD [47]. However, prospective observational studies may support the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with PUFAs, whereas randomized controlled studies frequently yielded neutral conclusions [48]. Because the health effects of PUFAs might be influenced by their metabolic key enzymes [49], further investigations should focus on individual differences in those enzymes’ activity levels. Our results disclosed that TMAO was able to increase two n-3 PUFAs (cis-11,14,17-eicosatrienoic acid and docosapentaenoate n-3) and two n-6 PUFAs (docosatetraenoate and docosapentaenoate n-6). Eicosatrienoic acid, an elongation product of polylactic acid, shows anti-inflammatory properties through nuclear factor kappa B activity downregulation [50-52]. Docosapentaenoic acid has been frequently overlooked in lipid research. Although a previous study demonstrated that docosapentaenoic n-3 and docosapentaenoic n-6 enhances lipoprotein profiles and aortic function in hamsters fed a high cholesterol diet [53], the true functionality of these PUFAs remains obscure until more is known regarding the properties of unique, specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators [54]. To further investigate the potential mechanism of TMAO-mediated vWAT regulation, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing and a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. WGCNA, a powerful tool for identifying key functional modules in big data analysis [25,55], was employed to undertake a systems-level view of transcriptional differences associated with the TMAO treatment in SHRs. The results of the WGCNA indicated that TMAO mainly regulates metabolic pathways in vWAT. Interestingly, the fatty acid metabolism pathway was also identified as a most significantly altered biological pathway, which supported our results that TMAO could regulate the composition of fatty acids in SHRs. Our results also showed that the expression of Ehhadh and Aldh3a2, which are associated with TMAO treatments in SHRs, function in both fatty acid metabolism and valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation pathways. EHHADH encoded a bifunctional beta-oxidation enzyme involved in peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation [56]. ALDH3A2 is a classic target gene of PPARα, being involved in peroxisomal and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation [57]. In addition, phagosome and lysosome pathways, which are closely associated with fatty acid metabolism, were also enriched in the WGCNA. Additionally, Lamp1 and Ctss were found in the same co-expression module, which was strongly associated with TMAO therapy. They play roles in both phagosome and lysosome pathways [58]. The potential mechanism of TMAO regulating phagosome and lysosome pathways might be associated with its effect of reducing the endoplasmic reticulum-stress response [36,59]. Lipolysis and autophagy share similar regulatory mechanisms. When nutrients are scarce for the generation of energy, cellular lipids in lipid droplets are degraded into fatty acids. Autophagy induction is a cellular response to the famine that occurs for the second time, and it transports intracellular proteins and organelles sequestered in autophagosomes to lysosomes for degradation and energy production [60]. In addition, SFAs prevent autophagosome-lysosome fusion. As a result, intracellular protein aggregates develop, while enhancing the breakdown of autophagic vacuoles, and unsaturated fatty acids counteract the effects of SFAs [61]. These results indicated that TMAO could shift metabolic pathways, which was associated with IL-6 secretion, especially those related to fatty acid metabolism, and the metabolic alterations of vWAT may be implicated in phagosome and lysosome pathways. Several limitations of our study should be acknowledged. First, this study focused on both long-chain and medium-chain fatty acids. However, an abundance of research demonstrated that short-chain fatty acids are also critical for health maintenance and disease progression [62], but further investigations are required. Second, although the WGCNA of transcriptome sequencing indicated the potential mechanisms of fatty acid metabolic regulation via TMAO treatment in vWAT, experimental experiments remain required to determine such mechanisms. Third, further research is required to explore the effects of insulin induced by TMAO on vWAT in SHRs. Last, TMAO treated WYKs and high-fat diet-fed SHRs also need to be investigated because these experiments could reveal important information about the effects of TMAO on vWAT.

Conclusion

The study results shed new light on the metabolic roles of TMAO on vWAT in SHRs. TMAO could regulate the metabolic status of the vWAT of SHRs, including lipogenesis reduction and improvement of specific fatty acid composition. The mechanism underlying this effect likely involves the phagosome and lysosome pathways in vWAT. Click here for additional data file.
  62 in total

1.  TMAO and Heart Disease: The New Red Meat Risk?

Authors:  Jennifer Abbasi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Investigation of Modulatory Effect of Pinolenic Acid (PNA) on Inflammatory Responses in Human THP-1 Macrophage-Like Cell and Mouse Models.

Authors:  Szu-Jung Chen; Wen-Cheng Huang; Hung-Jing Shen; Ruei-Yu Chen; Hsiang Chang; Yun-Shan Ho; Po-Jung Tsai; Lu-Te Chuang
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 3.  Free Fatty Acid Receptors in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Ikuo Kimura; Atsuhiko Ichimura; Ryuji Ohue-Kitano; Miki Igarashi
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  n - 3 Docosapentaenoic acid: the iceberg n - 3 fatty acid.

Authors:  Samaneh Ghasemi Fard; David Cameron-Smith; Andrew J Sinclair
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Phospholipid Incorporation of Non-Methylene-Interrupted Fatty Acids (NMIFA) in Murine Microglial BV-2 Cells Reduces Pro-Inflammatory Mediator Production.

Authors:  Szu-Jung Chen; Lu-Te Chuang; Jia-Siang Liao; Wen-Cheng Huang; Hong-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.092

6.  Individual omega-9 monounsaturated fatty acids and mortality-The Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Graciela E Delgado; Bernhard K Krämer; Stefan Lorkowski; Winfried März; Clemens von Schacky; Marcus E Kleber
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.766

7.  STAT3-mediated anti-inflammatory signalling.

Authors:  P J Murray
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.407

8.  Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Zeneng Wang; Elizabeth Klipfell; Brian J Bennett; Robert Koeth; Bruce S Levison; Brandon Dugar; Ariel E Feldstein; Earl B Britt; Xiaoming Fu; Yoon-Mi Chung; Yuping Wu; Phil Schauer; Jonathan D Smith; Hooman Allayee; W H Wilson Tang; Joseph A DiDonato; Aldons J Lusis; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Molecular phenomics and metagenomics of hepatic steatosis in non-diabetic obese women.

Authors:  Lesley Hoyles; José-Manuel Fernández-Real; Massimo Federici; Matteo Serino; James Abbott; Julie Charpentier; Christophe Heymes; Jèssica Latorre Luque; Elodie Anthony; Richard H Barton; Julien Chilloux; Antonis Myridakis; Laura Martinez-Gili; José Maria Moreno-Navarrete; Fadila Benhamed; Vincent Azalbert; Vincent Blasco-Baque; Josep Puig; Gemma Xifra; Wifredo Ricart; Christopher Tomlinson; Mark Woodbridge; Marina Cardellini; Francesca Davato; Iris Cardolini; Ottavia Porzio; Paolo Gentileschi; Frédéric Lopez; Fabienne Foufelle; Sarah A Butcher; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy K Nicholson; Catherine Postic; Rémy Burcelin; Marc-Emmanuel Dumas
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes.

Authors:  Adam Frankish; Mark Diekhans; Anne-Maud Ferreira; Rory Johnson; Irwin Jungreis; Jane Loveland; Jonathan M Mudge; Cristina Sisu; James Wright; Joel Armstrong; If Barnes; Andrew Berry; Alexandra Bignell; Silvia Carbonell Sala; Jacqueline Chrast; Fiona Cunningham; Tomás Di Domenico; Sarah Donaldson; Ian T Fiddes; Carlos García Girón; Jose Manuel Gonzalez; Tiago Grego; Matthew Hardy; Thibaut Hourlier; Toby Hunt; Osagie G Izuogu; Julien Lagarde; Fergal J Martin; Laura Martínez; Shamika Mohanan; Paul Muir; Fabio C P Navarro; Anne Parker; Baikang Pei; Fernando Pozo; Magali Ruffier; Bianca M Schmitt; Eloise Stapleton; Marie-Marthe Suner; Irina Sycheva; Barbara Uszczynska-Ratajczak; Jinuri Xu; Andrew Yates; Daniel Zerbino; Yan Zhang; Bronwen Aken; Jyoti S Choudhary; Mark Gerstein; Roderic Guigó; Tim J P Hubbard; Manolis Kellis; Benedict Paten; Alexandre Reymond; Michael L Tress; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.