| Literature DB >> 35975451 |
Wenxuan Lv1, Zhaoying Hu1, Wei Qiu1, Dongdong Yan1, Meicheng Li2, Anyi Mei3, Ligang Xu1, Runfeng Chen1.
Abstract
High-performance perovskite solar cells (PSCs) depend heavily on the quality of perovskite films, which is closely related to the lattice distortion, perovskite crystallization, and interfacial defects when being spin-coated and annealed on the substrate surface. Here, a dynamic strategy to modulate the perovskite film formation by using a soft perovskite-substrate interface constructed by employing amphiphilic soft molecules (ASMs) with long alkyl chains and Lewis base groups is proposed. The hydrophobic alkyl chains of ASMs interacted with poly(triarylamine) (PTAA) greatly improve the wettability of PTAA to facilitate the nucleation and growth of perovskite crystals, while the Lewis base groups bound to perovskite lattices significantly passivate the defects in situ. More importantly, this soft perovskite-substrate interface with ASMs between PTAA and perovskite film can dynamically match the lattice distortion with reduced interfacial residual strain upon perovskite crystallization and thermal annealing owing to the soft self-adaptive long-chains, leading to high-quality perovskite films. Thus, the inverted PSCs show a power conversion efficiency approaching 20% with good reproducibility and negligible hysteresis. More impressively, the unencapsulated device exhibits state-of-the-art photostability, retaining 84% of its initial efficiency under continuous simulated 1-sun illumination for more than 6200 h at elevated temperature (≈65 °C).Entities:
Keywords: device stability; dynamic modulation; passivation; perovskite solar cells; residual strain
Year: 2022 PMID: 35975451 PMCID: PMC9534936 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202202028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 17.521
Figure 1a) Device structure and chemical structures of CTAB, DTAB, and DTAC. b) Schematic illustration of I) ideal volume contraction of the annealing perovskite films after cooling down, II) residual strain due to substrate adhesion for PTAA‐based perovskite film, III) residual strain release for ASMs‐based perovskite film, IV) schematic illustration of passivated perovskite‐substrate defects and improved wettability of perovskite precursor on PTAA by a multifunctional ASMs.
Figure 2a) XRD patterns of perovskite films deposited on PTAA and DTAC. Williamson–Hall plot of full width at half maximum (FWHM) corresponding to the XRD peaks. The lattice strains of perovskite films deposited on b) PTAA and c) DTAC were calculated as the slope of the linear fitting. XPS spectra of d) Pb 4f for pure perovskite (PVK) and DTAC on perovskite film, e) N 1s for pure DTAC and DTAC on perovskite film, and f) Cl 2p for pure DTAC and DTAC doping with PbI2 (1:1 m/m).
Figure 3a) Digital photographs of perovskite films deposited on pure PTAA (left) and DTAC (right). b) Cross‐sectional SEM image of the inverted device based on ASMs. Contact angles of c) water and d) perovskite precursor on PTAA and ASMs surfaces. SEM images of thick and thin perovskite films based on PTAA and ASMs cast from e) 1.4 and f) 0.3 mol L−1.
Figure 4a) Current density–voltage (J–V) curves of optimized devices based on the control and ASMs. b) EQE and integrated J SC of PSCs based on PTAA and DTAC. c) Photostabilities of devices with and without DTAC. d,e) XPS spectra of Pb element distribution as a function of etching time of argon ion (2 keV) obtained from the top surface of PTAA without and with DTAC to perovskite.
Figure 5a) Steady‐state PL and b) PL decay profiles of perovskite film deposited on different surfaces. c) The change in photocurrent (J ph) as a function of applied voltage (V eff) for the corresponding PSCs to calculate the exciton dissociation probability (P diss). d) The dependence of V OC on the light intensity curves. e) J–V curves of the hole‐only devices used to estimate the defect concentrations of perovskite films. f) Nyquist plots of corresponding PSCs under dark at 1.1 V.