| Literature DB >> 35975274 |
Yulianna Zaytseva1, Anastasia Petruk1, Tatyana Novikova1.
Abstract
Rhododendron mucronulatum Turcz., distributed throughout the northern region of East Asia has been considered to be an alternative natural source of taxifolin (dihydroquercetin) and rutin. The present study was conducted based on a biotechnological approach to develop an environment friendly and efficient system to produce taxifolin and rutin in R. mucronulatum microshoots, using different thidiazuron (TDZ) treatments (0.1; 0.5; 2.5 µM) in combination with various types of lighting including fluorescent (FL) and light-emitting diode (LED) (R/B- 80% red + 20% blue; 5LED-20% red + 20% blue + 20% green + 20% yellow + 20% white). The highest number of shoots per explant was obtained under 0.5 µM TDZ combined with 5LED in comparison with FL lighting. Among shoot clusters obtained under different lighting types and TDZ concentrations, a considerable increase in fresh and dry weight was observed in ones cultivated on medium, supplemented with 2.5 µM TDZ under FL and 0.5 µM TDZ at R/B or 5LED. The content of total chlorophylls in R. mucronulatum microshoots increased on TDZ-free medium under FL lighting, whereas, the TDZ treatment decreased chlorophylls concentration at FL and 5LED. The use of 0.1 µM TDZ at 5LED decreased the ratio of chlorophylls a + b to carotenoids and led to the highest accumulation of taxifolin and rutin, quercetin, hyperoside, and avicularin. Thus, it has been demonstrated that the application of combined action of LED and TDZ has great potential in terms of propagation efficiency, biomass accumulation, and taxifolin and rutin production in R. mucronulatum microshoots.Entities:
Keywords: Biomass accumulation; HPLC analysis; In vitro culture; Phenolic compounds; Photosynthetic pigments
Year: 2022 PMID: 35975274 PMCID: PMC9374291 DOI: 10.1007/s00344-022-10757-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Plant Growth Regul ISSN: 0721-7595 Impact factor: 4.640
Effect of lighting type and TDZ on axillary shoot proliferation of R. mucronulatum
| Lighting type | TDZ, µM | Shoot number per explant | Shoot length, mm | Leaves number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 0 | 1.36 ± 0.23 d | 16.63 ± 1.55 a | 9.63 ± 0.49 a |
| 0.1 | 9.30 ± 2.16 c | 9.09 ± 1.797 b | 8.25 ± 0.74 ab | |
| 0.5 | 5.80 ± 2.41 cd | 6.66 ± 1.67 bcd | 7.30 ± 1.11 bc | |
| 2.5 | 19.10 ± 2.03 b | 5.54 ± 0.87 bcd | 5.69 ± 0.14 cde | |
| R/B | 0 | 1.84 ± 0.25 d | 8.00 ± 0.47 bc | 8.32 ± 0.35 ab |
| 0.1 | 3.45 ± 0.37 d | 5.19 ± 0.49 cd | 5.94 ± 0.45 cde | |
| 0.5 | 3.73 ± 0.32 d | 6.87 ± 0.581 bcd | 6.10 ± 0.38 b cd | |
| 2.5 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| 5LED | 0 | 1.60 ± 0.21 d | 6.52 ± 0.46 bcd | 8.40 ± 0.32 ab |
| 0.1 | 18.65 ± 3.95 b | 4.15 ± 0.55 d | 4.30 ± 0.39 e | |
| 0.5 | 24.05 ± 4.14 a | 6.85 ± 0.99 bcd | 5.35 ± 0.66 de | |
| 2.5 | 6.72 ± 1.03 cd | 3.17 ± 0.34 d | 4.22 ± 0.45 e | |
| Significance of two-way ANOVA | ||||
| ‘lighting type’ | + + x | + + | + + | |
| ‘TDZ’ | + + | + + | + + | |
| ‘TDZ’ ´ ‘lighting type’ | + + | + + | ns y | |
xSignificant at p < 0.05
yNot significant
Effect of lighting type and TDZ on biomass accumulation in R. mucronulatum shoot culture
| Lighting type | TDZ, µM | FW, mg | DW, mg | FW/DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 0 | 0.062 ± 0.008 bcd | 0.015 ± 0.004 abc | 4.33 ± 0.19 cd |
| 0.1 | 0.026 ± 0.009 d | 0.004 ± 0.001 cd | 6.5 ± 0.27 bc | |
| 0.5 | 0.091 ± 0.027 bcd | 0.013 ± 0.004 abc | 7.0 ± 0.32 bc | |
| 2.5 | 0.344 ± 0.106 a | 0.026 ± 0.008 a | 13.2 ± 0.47 a | |
| R/B | 0 | 0.010 ± 0.002 d | 0.003 ± 0.001 d | 3.3 ± 0.16 d |
| 0.1 | 0.098 ± 0.014 bcd | 0.023 ± 0.005 ab | 4.3 ± 0.22 cd | |
| 0.5 | 0.149 ± 0.025 b | 0.026 ± 0.003 a | 5.7 ± 0.26 bcd | |
| 2.5 | 0.033 ± 0.012 d | 0.004 ± 0.001 cd | 8.25 ± 0.43 b | |
| 5LED | 0 | 0.006 ± 0.001 d | 0.002 ± 0.000 d | 3.0 ± 0.14 d |
| 0.1 | 0.054 ± 0.016 cd | 0.008 ± 0.002 cd | 6.75 ± 0.35 bc | |
| 0.5 | 0.125 ± 0.034 bc | 0.024 ± 0.007 ab | 5.2 ± 0.24 bcd | |
| 2.5 | 0.015 ± 0.004 d | 0.002 ± 0.001 d | 7.5 ± 0.39 b | |
| Significance of two-way ANOVA | ||||
| ‘lighting type’ | + + x | ns y | Ns | |
| ‘TDZ’ | + + | + + | + + | |
| ‘TDZ’ ´ ‘ lighting type’ | + + | + + | + + | |
xSignificant at p < 0.05
yNot significant
Effect of lighting type and TDZ on photosynthetic pigment content in FW of R. mucronulatum in vitro shoot culture
| Lighting type | TDZ, µM | Chlorophyll, mg g−1 | Carotenoids, mg g−1 | (a + b)/carotation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | a + b | ||||
| Fl | 0 | 0.71 ± 0.03 a | 1.07 ± 0.05 a | 1.78 ± 0.08 a | 0.19 ± 0.01 b | 9.36 |
| 0.1 | 0.20 ± 0.01 d | 0.31 ± 0.02 e | 0.51 ± 0.03 de | 0.11 ± 0.01 d | 4.63 | |
| 0.5 | 0.32 ± 0.02 bc | 0.44 ± 0.01 d | 0.75 ± 0.03 c | 0.10 ± 0.01 d | 7.50 | |
| 2.5 | 0.09 ± 0.01 e | 0.14 ± 0.00 g | 0.23 ± 0.01 g | 0.02 ± 0.00 f | 11.50 | |
| R/B | 0 | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 0.30 ± 0.01 e | 0.59 ± 0.03 d | 0.06 ± 0.00 e | 9.83 |
| 0.1 | 0.41 ± 0.02 b | 0.59 ± 0.03 bc | 1.01 ± 0.05 b | 0.26 ± 0.01 a | 3.88 | |
| 0.5 | 0.27 ± 0.01 c | 0.31 ± 0.02 e | 0.58 ± 0.03 d | 0.10 ± 0.01 d | 5.50 | |
| 2.5 | 0.38 ± 0.02 b | 0.52 ± 0.03 c | 0.90 ± 0.05 b | 0.15 ± 0.01 b | 6.00 | |
| 5LED | 0 | 0.45 ± 0.02 b | 0.65 ± 0.03 b | 1.10 ± 0.05 b | 0.17 ± 0.01 b | 6.47 |
| 0.1 | 0.14 ± 0.01 e | 0.17 ± 0.01 g | 0.31 ± 0.02 f | 0.08 ± 0.00 d | 3.88 | |
| 0.5 | 0.28 ± 0.01 bc | 0.47 ± 0.02 cd | 0.75 ± 0.03 c | 0.09 ± 0.00 d | 8.33 | |
| 2.5 | 0.16 ± 0.01 e | 0.26 ± 0.01 f | 0.43 ± 0.02 e | 0.10 ± 0.00 d | 4.30 | |
| Significance of two-way ANOVA | ||||||
| ‘lighting type’ | + + x | + + | + + | + + | ||
| ‘TDZ’ | + + | + + | + + | + + | ||
| ‘TDZ’´ ‘lighting type’ | + + | + + | + + | ns y | ||
xSignificant at p < 0.05
yNot significant
Effect of lighting types and TDZ on content of phenolic compounds in extracts of R. mucronulatum in vitro shoot culture
| Lighting type | TDZ, µM | Chlor acid, mg g−1 of DW | Ta, mg g−1 of DW | Q, mg g−1 of DW | Hy, mg g−1 of DW | Rutin, mg g−1 of DW | Avi, mg g−1 of DW | Qtr, mg g−1 of DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 0 | 4.91 ± 0.01 a | 6.41 ± 0.02 j | 0.83 ± 0.02 l | 4.51 ± 0.02 j | 4.87 ± 0.01 j | 11.90 ± 0.01 h | 5.26 ± 0.04 g |
| 0.1 | 1.91 ± 0.02 g | 8.46 ± 0.02 f | 1.15 ± 0.02 k | 4.72 ± 0.02 i | 4.97 ± 0.03 i | 11.64 ± 0.03 i | 7.54 ± 0.06 f | |
| 0.5 | 4.87 ± 0.02 a | 19.16 ± 0.03 b | 3.38 ± 0.02 f | 11.77 ± 0.05 g | 11.21 ± 0.02 e | 11.85 ± 0.04 hi | 6.96 ± 0.03 f | |
| 2.5 | 1.47 ± 0.02 h | 9.16 ± 0.02 d | 2.70 ± 0.01 g | 4.34 ± 0.03 k | 3.93 ± 0.03 k | 11.73 ± 0.03 ij | 4.51 ± 0.07 h | |
| R/B | 0 | 4.49 ± 0.01 b | 8.84 ± 0.03 e | 5.87 ± 0.09 c | 14.95 ± 0.05d | 14.01 ± 0.05 d | 31.11 ± 0.05 b | 23.76 ± 0.07 c |
| 0.1 | 2.46 ± 0.01 e | 7.63 ± 0.05 g | 3.92 ± 0.01 e | 12.29 ± 0.03f | 8.02 ± 0.04 g | 26.15 ± 0.04 e | 10.61 ± 0.03 e | |
| 0.5 | 2.42 ± 0.01 e | 6.89 ± 0.02 i | 2.24 ± 0.03 h | 8.43 ± 0.02 h | 6.17 ± 0.03 h | 14.59 ± 0.09 g | 5.33 ± 0.04 g | |
| 2.5 | 2.75 ± 0.02 d | 3.49 ± 0.03 l | 2.06 ± 0.03 i | 14.68 ± 0.03 e | 14.26 ± 0.04 c | 17.28 ± 0.04 f | 3.69 ± 0.05 i | |
| 5LED | 0 | 2.24 ± 0.01 f | 5.81 ± 0.02 k | 7.64 ± 0.04 b | 15.19 ± 0.02 c | 16.61 ± 0.01 b | 28.88 ± 0.03 c | 37.31 ± 0.70 a |
| 0.1 | 3.02 ± 0.03 c | 23.40 ± 0.02 a | 8.11 ± 0.01 a | 28.66 ± 0.05 a | 23.58 ± 0.04 a | 49.45 ± 0.07 a | 24.47 ± 0.03 b | |
| 0.5 | 2.26 ± 0.02 f | 11.51 ± 0.02 c | 5.25 ± 0.02 d | 16.44 ± 0.03 b | 10.9 ± 0.03 f | 27.24 ± 0.04 d | 22.74 ± 0.03 d | |
| 2.5 | 1.07 ± 0.03 i | 1.04 ± 0.02 m | 1.33 ± 0.01 j | 4.64 ± 0.03 i | 2.76 ± 0.04 l | 3.71 ± 0.06 k | 1.08 ± 0.4 j | |
| Significance of two-way ANOVA | ||||||||
| ‘lighting type’ | + + x | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | |
| ‘TDZ concentration’ | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | |
| ‘TDZ concentration * ‘lighting type’ | ns y | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | |
Chlor acid chlorogenic acid, Ta taxifolin, Q quercetin, Hy hyperoside, Avi avicularin, Qtr quercitrin
xSignificant at p < 0.05
yNot significant
Fig. 1Chromatogram of a water–ethanol extract of R. mucronulatum microshoots cultivated on TDZ-free AM and FL lighting (a) and 0.1 µM TDZ and 5LED (b). X-axis—retention time, min; on Y-axis—detector signal, in units of optical density. The peak number: (1) Chlorogenic acid; (2) Taxifolin; (3) Hyperoside; (4) Rutin; (5) Avicularin; (6) Quercitrin; (7) Quercetin. Bar—10 mm