Literature DB >> 33520683

Anti-COVID-19 drug candidates: A review on potential biological activities of natural products in the management of new coronavirus infection.

Anchalee Prasansuklab1, Atsadang Theerasri2, Panthakarn Rangsinth3, Chanin Sillapachaiyaporn2, Siriporn Chuchawankul3,4, Tewin Tencomnao3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now become a worldwide pandemic bringing over 71 million confirmed cases, while the specific drugs and vaccines approved for this disease are still limited regarding their effectiveness and adverse events. Since virus incidences are still on rise, infectivity and mortality may also rise in the near future, natural products are highly considered to be valuable sources for the discovery of new antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2. This present review aims to comprehensively summarize the up-to-date scientific literatures on biological activities of plant- and mushroom-derived compounds relevant to mechanistic targets involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection and inflammatory-associated pathogenesis, including viral entry, replication and release, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: Data were retrieved from a literature search available on PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases and collected until the end of May 2020. The findings from in vitro cell and non-cell based studies were considered, while the results of in silico studies were excluded. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Based on the previous findings in SARS-CoV studies, except in silico molecular docking analysis, herein, we provide a total of 150 natural compounds as potential candidates for development of new anti-COVID-19 drugs with higher efficacy and lower toxicity than the existing therapeutic agents. Several natural compounds have showed their promising actions on multiple therapeutic targets, which should be further explored. Among them, quercetin, one of the most abundant of plant flavonoids, is proposed as a lead candidate with its ability on the virus side to inhibit SARS-CoV spike protein-angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) interaction, viral protease and helicase activities, as well as on the host cell side to inhibit ACE activity and increase intracellular zinc level.
© 2021 Center for Food and Biomolecules, National Taiwan University. Production and hosting by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2019-nCoV; Anti-viral; Herbal medicine; Mushroom; Natural compound; Plant; SARS-CoV-2; Therapeutic strategies

Year:  2020        PMID: 33520683      PMCID: PMC7833040          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2020.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med        ISSN: 2225-4110


3-chymotrypsin-like main protease Angiotensin-converting enzyme Angiotensin-receptor blocker Acute respiratory distress syndrome Angiotensin II type 1 receptor Coronavirus Disease 2019 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Non-structural protein Papain-like protease Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system RNA-dependent RNA polymerase Replication-transcription complex Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Transmembrane protease serine 2 Vacuolar-type H+-ATPase

Introduction

On 31 December 2019, several cases of pneumonia were reported in Wuhan, the epicenter of the outbreak in Hubei province of China. The novel coronavirus was identified as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic., From the time of emergence until present, COVID-19 has spread worldwide in which a total of over 71 million confirmed cases with over 1.6 million death tolls has been reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). The COVID-19 positive cases continue rising and is widely distributed throughout the world with the prevalence ranging from highest in America, followed by Europe and South-East Asia, and lowest in Western Pacific region. Asymptomatic patients and patients with mild symptoms can be recovered under home care and isolation while patients with severe complications including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require intensive care unit (ICU) which involves oxygen therapy., Currently, there is scant evidence from clinical trials for WHO to approve any standard drugs or vaccines as several trials have failed due to efficacy and safety concerns., Natural compounds from plant and fungi sources have been recognized in their antiviral properties with numerous mechanisms to prevent infection and strengthen host immunity., Herein, we reviewed potential antiviral compounds with multiple targets of action relating to coronaviruses including inhibiting of viral entry, replication and release, and compounds targeting renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) which exhibit promising effects against the disease. We also proposed future perspectives in adopting natural compounds to combat against the COVID-19.

Promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of COVID-19 infection

Presently, there is no clinically approved therapeutics for treating COVID-19, while the rapid human-to-human transmission of this viral infection has expanded worldwide. As the efficacy and safety of natural products on the treatment of a number of viruses including SARS-CoV and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), have been widely acknowledged for several years, the compounds derived from natural sources, e.g. plants and fungi, could have the potential to be a powerful anti-COVID-19 drug. In this review, we focused on four main categories of therapeutic strategies that aim to target the cellular machinery at each step of virus life cycle, starting from viral entry and replication to the release of viral progenies, as well as the RAAS which is a main target of the treatment of hypertension and has recently been proposed as another promising alternative in the treatment of COVID-19. The multiple potential therapeutic mechanisms, both specific and general, that could be capable of tackling COVID-19 infection are presented in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of potential therapeutic mechanisms in COVID-19 infection. The potential therapeutic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection proposed here fall into four main categories based on the cellular and molecular machinery required for the viral life cycle and its related pathogenic mechanisms: inhibition of virus entry, inhibition of virus replication, blocking the release of viral progenies, and modifying the RAAS. The selective blockade of the S protein-ACE2 binding (❶), TMPRSS2 activity (❷), and endocytic pathway-associated proteins such as clathrin, the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase), and cathepsin L (❸), prevent the internalization of virus within the cell. Virus multiplication can be blocked through direct inhibition of proteolytic activity of two viral proteases, 3CLpro and PLpro (❹), and replicative activity of viral RTC components e.g., RdRp and helicase (❺), or indirect enzyme inhibition by increasing intracellular Zn2+ concentration (❻). Silencing the expression and ion channel activity of viroporin 3a suppresses the release of viral particles from infected cells (❼). Overactivation of Ang II/AT1R axis which contributes to excessive inflammation, can be suppressed by blockade of ACE (❽) and AT1R (❾). 3CLpro, 3-chymotrypsin-like protease; ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; Ang, angiotensin; AT1R, angiotensin II type 1 receptor; E, envelope; MasR, mitochondrial assembly receptor; M, membrane; N, nucleocapsid; PLpro, papain-like protease; pp, polyprotein; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; RTC, replication-transcription complex; S, spike; TMPRSS2, transmembrane protease serine 2.

Schematic illustration of potential therapeutic mechanisms in COVID-19 infection. The potential therapeutic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection proposed here fall into four main categories based on the cellular and molecular machinery required for the viral life cycle and its related pathogenic mechanisms: inhibition of virus entry, inhibition of virus replication, blocking the release of viral progenies, and modifying the RAAS. The selective blockade of the S protein-ACE2 binding (❶), TMPRSS2 activity (❷), and endocytic pathway-associated proteins such as clathrin, the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase), and cathepsin L (❸), prevent the internalization of virus within the cell. Virus multiplication can be blocked through direct inhibition of proteolytic activity of two viral proteases, 3CLpro and PLpro (❹), and replicative activity of viral RTC components e.g., RdRp and helicase (❺), or indirect enzyme inhibition by increasing intracellular Zn2+ concentration (❻). Silencing the expression and ion channel activity of viroporin 3a suppresses the release of viral particles from infected cells (❼). Overactivation of Ang II/AT1R axis which contributes to excessive inflammation, can be suppressed by blockade of ACE (❽) and AT1R (❾). 3CLpro, 3-chymotrypsin-like protease; ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; Ang, angiotensin; AT1R, angiotensin II type 1 receptor; E, envelope; MasR, mitochondrial assembly receptor; M, membrane; N, nucleocapsid; PLpro, papain-like protease; pp, polyprotein; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; RTC, replication-transcription complex; S, spike; TMPRSS2, transmembrane protease serine 2. The first therapeutic strategy targets on the mechanisms of virus entry in which the selective blockade of molecules that facilitates the internalization of virus into the host cells could be effective to prevent infection. Upon the binding of a virus surface spike (S) protein to a cellular receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the SARS-CoV-2 generally enters into target host cells via two primary routes; viral membrane fusion and the more common endocytic uptake. The first entry mechanism is assisted by proteolytic activation of S protein by a host cell transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), which allows not only direct fusion of virus at the plasma membrane surface, but also release of viral genomic RNA into the cytoplasm. On the other hand, without the membrane bound protease TMPRSS2, the latter entry mechanism allows the whole viral particle to be uptaken via receptor-mediated endocytosis, before subsequently uncoated following the S protein cleavage by cathepsin L within the endosome, to unveil its RNA genome into the cell. The second and third therapeutic strategies focus on the inhibition of progeny virus production and release from infected cells. As far as the viral replication process is concerned, it begins with the translation of released genome of SARS-CoV-2, a single-stranded (positive-sense) RNA of approximately 30 kb in length, into two precursor polyproteins, pp1a and pp1ab. Both are further cleaved by virus-encoded proteases into several non-structural proteins (nsps) including two key replicative enzymes: the nsp12-RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and the nsp13-helicase, to form the replication-transcription complex (RTC) for synthesizing a full-length genomic RNA (replication) or a nested set of subgenomic mRNA (transcription). These mRNAs are translated into all relevant structural proteins, which together with the viral genome are subsequently assembled into new virions and finally released outside the cell through viroporin-mediated viral budding. The last therapeutic strategy involves modulating the immune system with the RAAS which regulates blood pressure, fibrosis, and inflammation. In this system, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin II which is then converted to lung-protective angiotensin-(1–7) by ACE2. The angiotensin-(1–7) is further recognized by its receptor, the G-protein coupled receptor Mas, to reduce blood pressure, fibrosis, and inflammation. However, as SARS-CoV-2 enters the cells by binding to ACE2, the normal functions of ACE2 are then suppressed. Therefore, instead of converting to angiotensin-(1–7), the angiotensin II is largely bound to type 1 angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) which causing increased inflammation and other deleterious effects, particularly in the renal and cardiovascular systems.

Potential natural products as drug candidates against COVID-19

The data presented in this review were obtained from PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar database up to May 2020. The terms of natural compound, natural product, plant and mushroom were individually searched along with the terms corresponding to each target molecule. Here, we summarize plant- and mushroom-derived compounds that have been reported of antiviral activity with known therapeutic mechanisms specifically against SARS-CoV infection, performed by in vitro cell or non-cell based experiments but not in silico method, as potential candidates to be further researched. We also propose certain promising natural compounds targeting general mechanisms involved in coronavirus infection (see Fig. 1). Additionally, the reports on natural compounds against SARS-CoV with unidentified mechanism of action were included in this review.

Natural bioactive compounds targeting viral entry

The S protein-ACE2 interaction

The S protein plays a pivotal role in the entry of coronaviruses into host cells by recognizing and binding to the ACE2 via multivalent bonds. The attachment of S protein to ACE2 receptor leads to the fusion between the viral envelope and host cell membrane resulting in successful transfer of viral genome into infected cells., S protein is composed of two functional subunits, S1 and S2. The S1 is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor through the receptor binding domain (RDB), while the S2 causes fusion of the viral and cellular membranes., Sequence alignment results showed that the homology of the S protein RBD sequence between the beta coronaviruses SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 is 76%. A number of evidence revealed human ACE2 (hACE2) molecule as an entry receptor for both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S proteins.22, 23, 24, 25 Notably, S protein of SARS-CoV-2 was found to exhibit greater affinity to the ACE2 receptor than that of SARS-CoV. In addition, expression of ACE2 is ubiquitous with diverse functions, however its specific functions are demonstrated in several organs including lung, tongue, heart, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and brain., Accordingly, multiple symptoms could be observed in COVID-19 patients. Several observations have been reported that the use of hydroxychloroquine, an ACE2 FDA-approved antagonist, was able to reduce mortality rate in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Therefore, it is apparent that the S protein-hACE2 interaction complex is the most crucial target for searching appropriate inhibitors to inhibit entry of the virus in the host cell. Several natural compounds have been demonstrated their activity to inhibit SARS-CoV entry to the host cell as shown in Table 1. According to the literature, an anthraquinone compound, emodin, showed the potency to inhibit viral infection by blocking the binding of SARS-CoV S protein to ACE2 in a dose-dependent manner. The plant sources which are likely to contain emodin as their active constituent were also found effective in blocking SARS-CoV S protein and ACE2 interaction, with showing IC50 values for aqueous extracts from the root of Rheum palmatum, the root and stem of Polygonum multiflorum, ranged from 1 to 10 μg/ml. Another previous study using the high-throughput screening technique revealed more promising natural antiviral compounds consisted in the extracts from Chinese herbs. Those small herbal molecules could strongly bind to the SARS-CoV S2 protein and inhibited the pseudovirus entry, possibly by interfering with the function of the S protein.
Table 1

List of bioactive compounds from natural sources as potential anti-COVID-19 drug candidates and their mechanisms of action.

CompoundClassSourceBiological action/EfficacyExperimentReference
Inhibiting the SARS-CoV S protein-ACE2 interaction
EmodinAnthraquinoneRheum palmatumaIC50 = 200 μMCell-free assay (Competitive biotinylated ELISA)29
94% inhibition at EC of 50 μMCell-based assay (IFA)
LuteolinFlavonoidRhodiola kirilowiiaIC50 = 4.5 μMCell-free and cell-based assay (FAC/MS and Luciferase assay)30
QuercetinFlavonoidAllium cepaaIC50 = 83.4 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase assay)30
Tetra-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose (TGG)TanninGalla chinensisaIC50 = 10.6 μMCell-free and cell-based assay (FAC/MS and Luciferase assay)30
Inhibiting the endocytic machinery
1-cinnamoyl-3,11-dihydroxy meliacarpinTerpenoidMelia azedarachincreased endolysosomal pH (EC of 7.5 μM)Cell-based assay (AO staining)38
25-O-acetyl-7,8-didehydrocimigenol 3-O-beta-d-xylopyranoside (ADCX)TerpenoidCimicifugae rhizomainhibited degradation activity by decreasing cathepsin expression, but not endolysosomal acidity (EC of 24 μM)Cell-based assay (AO staining, DQ-BSA staining and WB)39
AlantolactoneSesquiterpene lactoneInula heleniumaneutralized endo-lysosomal pH and reducing the expression and activity of cathepsins (EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (LysoTracker Red and AO staining, WB and Cathepsin activity assay)76
Cleistanthin ALignan glycosideCleistanthus collinuainhibited the activity of V-type ATPase and elevated endolysosomal pH (EC of 0.1 μM)Cell-based assay (pH sensitive fluorescent probe/LysoTracker Red staining and V-type ATPase activity assay)77,78
Cleistanthoside A tetraacetateLignan glycosidePhyllanthus taxodiifolius Beille aneutralized endolysosomal acidity and decreased the activity of V-type ATPase (EC of 50 nM)Cell-based assay (LysoTracker Red staining and V-type ATPase activity assay)78
DauricineAlkaloidRhizoma Menispermiaelevated endolysosomal pH, decreased the levels of active cathepsins and inhibited the activity of V-type ATPase (EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (LysoSensor Yellow/Blue staining, WB and V-type ATPase activity assay)42
DaurisolineAlkaloidRhizoma Menispermiaelevated endolysosomal pH, decreased the levels of active cathepsins and inhibited the activity of V-type ATPase (EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (LysoSensor Yellow/Blue staining, WB and V-type ATPase activity assay)42
DiphyllinLignan lactoneCleistanthus collinusainhibited the activity of V-type ATPase (EC of 0.3 μM)Cell-based assay (V-type ATPase activity assay)79
Ginsenoside RoTriterpenoid saponinPanax ginsengraised endolysosomal pH and downregulating the expression and activity of cathepsins (EC of 50 μM)Cell-based assay (AO staining, WB and Cathepsin activity assay)80
Icariside IIFlavonoidEpimedium koreanum Nakaidecreased endolysosomal acidity (EC of 25 μM)Cell-based assay (AO staining)81
LeelamineTerpenePinus sylvestrisadecreased endolysosomal acidity and inhibited cellular endocytosis (EC of 3 μM)Cell-based assay (LysoTracker Red staining and Internalization of fluorescent transferrin-A488)40
MatrineAlkaloidSophora flavescens Aitinhibited endolysosomal acidification and reduced the expression and activity of cathepsins (EC of 2 mM)Cell-based assay (LysoSensor Yellow/Blue, WB and Cathepsin activity assay)43
MyrtenalTerpeneElettaria cardamomumainhibited the activity of V-type ATPase and reduced endolysosomal acidification (EC of 100 μM)Cell-based assay (AO staining and V-type ATPase activity assay)41
Oblongifolin CBenzophenoneGarcinia yunnanensis Huinhibited endolysosomal acidification and downregulated the expression and activity of cathepsins (EC of 15 μM)Cell-based assay (AO staining, WB and Cathepsin activity assay)82
Pulsatilla saponin DTriterpenoid saponinPulsatilla chinensis (Bunge) Regelelevated endolysosomal pH and downregulatedcathepsins (EC of 1.25 μM)Cell-based assay (LysoSensor Yellow/Blue, WB and Cathepsin activity assay)83
TetrandrineAlkaloidStephania tetrandra S. Moore aelevated endolysosomal pH in a concentration-dependent manner (EC of 1–10 μM)Cell-based assay (LysoSensor Yellow/Blue staining)44
Inhibiting the SARS-CoV 3CLproactivity
3’-(3-Methylbut-2-enyl)-3′,4,7-trihydroxyflavaneFlavonoidBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 30.2 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
4-HydroxyderricinChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 81.4 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 50.8 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Betulinic acidTerpenoidBreynia fruticoseaIC50 = 10 μMCell-free assay (FRET)49,50
Broussochalcone AChalconeBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 88.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
Broussochalcone BChalconeBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 57.8 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
Broussoflavan AFlavonoidBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 92.4 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
Dihydrotanshinone ITanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 14.4 μMCell-free assay (FRET)51
HesperetinFlavonoidIsatis indigoticaIC50 = 60 μMCell-free assay (ELISA)48
IC50 = 8.3 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
HirsutenoneDiarylheptanoidAlnus japonicaIC50 = 36.2 μMCell-free assay (FRET)85
IsobavachalconeChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 39.4 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 11.9 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
IsoliquiritigeninChalconeGlycyrrhiza glabraaIC50 = 61.9 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84,86
Kazinol AFlavonoidBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 84.8 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
Kazinol FBiphenyl propanoidsBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 43.3 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
Kazinol JBiphenyl propanoidsBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 64.2 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84
Methyl tanshinonateTanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 21.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET)51
QuercetinFlavonoidAllium cepaaIC50 = 52.7 μMCell-free assay (FRET)84,87
Quercetin-3-b-galactosideFlavonoidMachilus zuihoensisaIC50 = 42.8 μMCell-free assay (FRET)87,88
RosmariquinoneTanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 21.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET)51
SavininLignoidChamaecyparis obtuse var. formosanaIC50 = 25 μMCell-free assay (FRET)49
Tanshinone ITanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 38.7 μMCell-free assay (FRET)51
Tanshinone IIATanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 89.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET)51
Tanshinone IIBTanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 24.8 μMCell-free assay (FRET)51
XanthoangelolChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 38.4 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 5.8 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Xanthoangelol BChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 22.2 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 8.6 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Xanthoangelol DChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 26.6 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 9.3 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Xanthoangelol EChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 11.4 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 7.1 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Xanthoangelol FChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 34.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 32.6 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Xanthokeistal AChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 44.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET)35
IC50 = 9.8 μMCell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)
Inhibiting the SARS-CoV PLproactivity
3′-O-MethyldiplacolFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 9.5 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
3′-O-MethyldiplaconeFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 13.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
4′-O-MethylbavachalconeChalconePsoralea corylifoliaIC50 = 10.1 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)90
4′-O-MethyldiplacolFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 9.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
4′-O-MethyldiplaconeFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 12.7 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
6-Geranyl-4′,5,7-trihydroxy-3′,5′-dimethoxyflavanoneFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 13.9 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
Broussochalcone AChalconeBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 9.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84
Broussochalcone BChalconeBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 11.6 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84
CryptotanshinoneTanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 0.8 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)51
CurcuminPolyphenolCurcuma longaaIC50 = 5.7 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)85,91
Dihydrotanshinone ITanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 4.9 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)51
DiplaconeFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 10.4 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
HirsutanonolDiarylheptanoidAlnus japonicaIC50 = 7.8 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)85
HirsutenoneDiarylheptanoidAlnus japonicaIC50 = 4.1 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)85
IsobavachalconeChalconePsoralea corylifoliaIC50 = 7.3 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)90
Angelica keiskeiIC50 = 13.0 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)35
IsoliquiritigeninChalconeGlycyrrhiza glabraaIC50 = 24.6 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84,86
KaempferolFlavonoidZingiber officinaleaIC50 = 16.3 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84,92
Kazinol JBiphenyl propanoidsBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 15.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84
Methyl tanshinonateTanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 9.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)51
MimuloneFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 14.4 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
NeobavaisoflavoneFlavonoidPsoralea corylifoliaIC50 = 18.3 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)90
Papyriflavonol AFavonoidBroussonetia papyriferaIC50 = 3.7 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84
PsoralidinFlavonoidPsoralea corylifoliaIC50 = 4.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)90
QuercetinFlavonoidAllium cepaaIC50 = 8.6 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)84,87
RubranolDiarylheptanoidAlnus japonicaIC50 = 12.3 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)85
Rubranoside ADiarylheptanoidAlnus japonicaIC50 = 9.1 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)85
Rubranoside BDiarylheptanoidAlnus japonicaIC50 = 8.0 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)85
Tanshinone ITanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 8.8 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)51
Tanshinone IIATanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 1.6 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)51
Tanshinone IIBTanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhizaIC50 = 10.7 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)51
TerrestrimineCinnamic amideTribulus terrestrisIC50 = 15.8 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)93
Tomentin AFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 6.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
Tomentin BFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 6.1 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
Tomentin CFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 11.6 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
Tomentin DFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 12.5 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
Tomentin EFlavonoidPaulownia tomentosaIC50 = 5.0 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)89
XanthoangelolChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 11.7 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)35
Xanthoangelol BChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 11.7 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)35
Xanthoangelol DChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 19.3 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)35
Xanthoangelol EChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 1.2 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)35
Xanthoangelol FChalconeAngelica keiskeiIC50 = 5.6 μMCell-free assay (Fluorescence-based deubiquitination)35
Inhibiting the SARS-CoV helicase activity
MyricetinFlavonoidCamellia sinensisainhibited ATPase activity of SARS-CoV helicase with IC50 of 2.71 μMCell-free assay (Colorimetry-based ATP hydrolysis assay)94
QuercetinFlavonoidAllium cepaainhibited duplex DNA-unwinding activity of SARS-CoV NTPase/helicase with IC50 of 8.1 μMCell-free assay (FRET-based dsDNA unwinding assay)95
ScutellareinFlavonoid glycosideScutellaria baicalensisinhibited ATPase activity of SARS-CoV helicase with IC50 of 0.86 μMCell-free assay (Colorimetry-based ATP hydrolysis assay)94
Increasing intracellular Zn2+
Caffeic acidPhenolic acidOcimum basilicumaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (3-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
CatechinFlavonoidCamellia sinensisaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (2-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
CatecholPhenolAllium cepaaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (2-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)FlavonoidCamellia sinensisaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (36-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
increased the uptake of Zn2+ in both cell (4-fold increase at EC of 100 μM) and liposome model (16-fold increase at EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (Fluorescent Zn2+ indicator) and cell-free assay (using liposome model)62
Gallic acidPhenolic acidSyzygium aromaticumaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (8-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
GenisteinFlavonoidGlycine maxaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (2-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
LuteolinFlavonoidRhodiola kirilowiiaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (12-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
PyrithioneOrganic sulfur compoundAllium stipitatumaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (3-fold increase at EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (Radioactive Zn2+ uptake)96
QuercetinFlavonoidAllium cepaaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (18-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
increased the uptake of Zn2+ in both cell (2-fold increase at EC of 100 μM) and liposome model (8-fold increase at EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (Fluorescent Zn2+ indicator) and cell-free assay (using liposome model)[62]
ResveratrolPolyphenolVitis viniferaaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (7.5-fold increase at EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (AAS)61
RutinFlavonoid glycosideMorus albaaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (4-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
Tannic acidPhenolic acidCamellia sinensisaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (12-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
TaxifolinFlavonoidSilybum marianumaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (4-fold increase at EC of 50 μM)Cell-free assay (using liposome model)60
β-thujaplicin (Hinokitiol)TerpeneChamaecyparis obtuseaincreased intracellular Zn2+ level (3-fold increase at EC of 125 μM)Cell-based assay (Radioactive Zn2+ uptake)96
Inhibiting the viroporin 3a activity
AfzelinFlavonoid glycosideHouttuynia cordataainhibited the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV 3a protein (17% inhibition at EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (Voltage-clamp method in Xenopus oocyte model)65
EmodinAnthraquinoneRheum tanguticuminhibited the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV 3a protein with IC50 of 20 μMCell-based assay (Voltage-clamp method in Xenopus oocyte model)66,97
JuglanineFlavonoid glycosidePolygonum aviculareainhibited the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV 3a protein with IC50 of 2.3 μMCell-based assay (Voltage-clamp method in Xenopus oocyte model)65
KaempferolFlavonoidZingiber officinaleainhibited the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV 3a protein (18% inhibition at EC of 20 μM)Cell-based assay (Voltage-clamp method in Xenopus oocyte model)65,66
Kaempferol-3-O-α-rhamnopyranosyl (1 → 2) [α-rhamno pyranosyl(1 → 6)]-β-glucopyranosideFlavonoid glycosideClitoria ternateaainhibited the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV 3a protein (32% inhibition at EC of 20 μM)Cell-based assay (Voltage-clamp method in Xenopus oocyte model)65
TilirosideFlavonoid glycosideAlthaea officinalisainhibited the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV 3a protein (52% inhibition at EC of 20 μM)Cell-based assay (Voltage-clamp method in Xenopus oocyte model)65,66
Inhibiting the ACE activity
25-O-methylalisol FTriterpenoidAlisma orientaleReduced ACE and AT1R protein expression (∼30% and ∼10% inhibition at EC of 10 μM)Cell-based assay (WB analysis)98
3,5-dihydroxy-4- methoxybenzoic acidPhenolic acidTamarix hohenackeri46.2% inhibition at EC of 20 mg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)99
4′-hydroxy Pd-C-IIICoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 9.4 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
4′-methoxy Pd–C–ICoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 16 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
Ampleopsin CStilbenoidVitis thunbergii var. TaiwanianIC50 = 18.2 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)101
ApigeninFlavonoidAdinandra nitidaa30.3% inhibition at EC of 500 μg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)102
AsparaptineOrganic sulfur compoundAsparagus officinalisIC50 = 113 μMCell-free assay (3HB-GGG hydrolysis assay)103
Caffeic acidPhenolic acidEchinacea purpureaaIC50 = 0.1 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)71
Camellianin AFlavonoidAdinandra nitida30.2% inhibition at EC of 500 μg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)102
Camellianin BFlavonoidAdinandra nitida40.7% inhibition at EC of 500 μg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)102
CarlinosideFlavonoid glycosideDesmodium styracifoliumIC50 = 33.6 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)104
CatechinFlavonoidMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 109 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Chlorogenic acidPhenolic acidEchinacea purpurea(a)IC50 = 0.1 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)71
ChrysinFlavonoidMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 146 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
ChrysoeriolFlavonoidTamarix hohenackeri57.6% inhibition at EC of 20 mg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)99
CoretinconePhenolic glycosideCoreopsis tinctoriaIC50 = 228 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)106
CurcuminPolyphenolCurcuma longa(a)76.9% inhibition at EC of 10 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)107
Cyanidin-3-O-glucosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 174 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Cyanidin-3-O-galactosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 206 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Cyanidin-3-O-rhamnosdieFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 114 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Cyanidin-3-O-sambubiosideFlavonoid glycosideHibiscus sabdariffaIC50 = 117.7 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)108
Cyanidin-3-O-β-glucosideFlavonoid glycosideRosa damascenaIC50 = 138.8 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)109
DecursidinCoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 20 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
(+)-trans-DecursidinolCoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 4.7 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
DecursinolCoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 18.3 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
Delphinidin-3-O-sambubiosideFlavonoid glycosideHibiscus sabdariffaIC50 = 141.6 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)108
EpicatechinFlavonoidMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 73 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Gallic acidPhenolic acidTamarix hohenackeri43.1% inhibition at EC of 20 mg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)99
Gluco-aurantioobtusinAnthraquinone glycosideCassia toraIC50 = 30.2 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)110
(+)-HopeaphenolStilbenoidAmpelopsis brevipedunculata var. hanceiIC50 = 1.6 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)72
Isoferulic acidPhenolic acidTamarix hohenackeri30.6% inhibition at EC of 20 mg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)99
IsoquercetrinFlavonoidTropaeolum majus(a)Reduced plasmatic ACE activity in SHR rats (43% inhibition at EC of 10 mg/kg)Cell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)111
IsorutarineCoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 68.4 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
Junipediol A-8-O-β-d-glucosidePhenylpropa-noid glycosideApium graveolensIC50 = 210 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)112
(S)-Malic acid 1′-O-β-gentiobiosideOrganic acid glycosideLactuca sativaIC50 = 27.8 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)113
MangiferinXanthone glycosideSwertia chirayita(a)31.5% inhibition at EC of 500 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)114
MiquelianinFlavonoid glycosideCuphea glutinosa32.1% inhibition at EC of 100 ng/mLCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)115
N1,N4,N8-tris (dihydrocaffeoyl)spermidinePolyamineSolanum quitoenseIC50 = 9.6 ppmCell-free assay (3HB-GGG hydrolysis assay)116
Methyl gallatePhenolic acidTamarix hohenackeri35.7% inhibition at EC of 20 mg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)99
NaringeninFlavonoidMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 78 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
OnopordiaPolyphenolOnopordum acanthium L.IC50 = 300 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)117,118
Orotic acidOrganic acidDaucus carota(a)40.3% inhibition at EC of 5 μg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)119
Pd–C–ICoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 6.8 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
Pd-C-IICoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 12.4 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
Pd-C-IIICoumarinAngelica decursivaIC50 = 15.3 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)100
QuercetinFlavonoidMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 151 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Tamarix hohenackeri48.6% inhibition at EC of 20 mg/mLCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)99
Quercetin-3-O-galactosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 180 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Quercetin-3-O-glucosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 71 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Quercetin-3-O-glucuronic acidFlavonoid conjugateMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 27 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Quercetin-3-O-rhamnosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 100 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Quercetin-3-O-rutinosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 90 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Quercetin-3-O-sulfateFlavonoid conjugateMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 131 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
Quercetin-4′-O-glucosideFlavonoid glycosideMalus domestica(a)IC50 = 211 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)105
SchaftosideFlavonoid glycosideDesmodium styracifoliumIC50 = 58.4 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)104
Tannic acidPhenolic acidCamellia sinensis(a)IC50 = 230 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)120
TaxifolinFlavonoidCoreopsis tinctoriaIC50 = 145.7 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)106
Vicenin 1Flavonoid glycosideDesmodium styracifoliumIC50a52.5 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)104
Vicenin 2Flavonoid glycosideDesmodium styracifoliumIC50 = 43.8 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)104
Vicenin 3Flavonoid glycosideDesmodium styracifoliumIC50 = 46.9 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)104
(+)-ε-ViniferinStilbenoidVitis thunbergii var. taiwanianIC50 = 35.5 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)101
(+)-Vitisin AStilbenoidVitis thunbergii var. taiwanianIC50 = 3.3 μMCell-free assay (FAPGG degradation assay)101
Ampelopsis brevipedunculata var. hanceiIC50 = 1.5 μMCell-free assay (HHL degradation assay)72

3HB-GGG = 3-hydryoxybutyryl-Gly-Gly-Gly; AAS = Atomic absorption spectrophotometry; AO = Acridine orange; ATP = Adenosine triphosphate; DQ-BSA = Dye quenched-bovine serum albumin; EC = The effective test concentration; ELISA = Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay; FAC/MS = Frontal affinity chromatography-Mass spectrometry; FAPGG = furylacryloyl-phenylalanyl-glycyl-glycine; FRET = Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; HHL = hippuryl-L-histidyl-l-leucine; IC50 = The half maximal inhibitory concentration; IFA = Immunofluorescence assay; SHR = spontaneously hypertensive rat; WB = WesternBlot.

The study used commercial products. Here provides a natural source of compound as an example.

List of bioactive compounds from natural sources as potential anti-COVID-19 drug candidates and their mechanisms of action. 3HB-GGG = 3-hydryoxybutyryl-Gly-Gly-Gly; AAS = Atomic absorption spectrophotometry; AO = Acridine orange; ATP = Adenosine triphosphate; DQ-BSA = Dye quenched-bovine serum albumin; EC = The effective test concentration; ELISA = Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay; FAC/MS = Frontal affinity chromatography-Mass spectrometry; FAPGG = furylacryloyl-phenylalanyl-glycyl-glycine; FRET = Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; HHL = hippuryl-L-histidyl-l-leucine; IC50 = The half maximal inhibitory concentration; IFA = Immunofluorescence assay; SHR = spontaneously hypertensive rat; WB = WesternBlot. The study used commercial products. Here provides a natural source of compound as an example.

The plasma membrane protease TMPRSS2

Recognized as a host trypsin-like serine protease, TMPRSS2 highly expressed in alveolar cells has been demonstrated to facilitate viral entry by priming of viral S protein. Inhibition of TMPRSS2 activity could prevent infection of coronaviruses including MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Now, several synthetic drugs like camostat mesylate, nafamostat mesylate and bromhexine which are serine protease inhibitors showed potential to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection.32, 33, 34 However, on the side of natural products, only few compounds were reported. Xanthoangelol G isolated from Angelica keiskei was reported to inhibit a trypsin-like serine protease with its IC50 value of 51.6 μM. Notably, in vitro cell-based and in vivo experiments are needed to be done for the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs.

The endocytic machinery

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis has been recognized as the primary cell entry route for multiple coronaviruses, including new emerging SARS-CoV-2, by utilizing the binding of viral S protein to host receptor ACE2 molecule. After endocytosis into the target cell, the viral particle undergoes the cleavage of S protein mediated by a pH-dependent cysteine protease cathepsin L at an acidic endolysosomal pH (∼3.0–6.5), which finally triggers membrane fusion between virus and endosome, followed by release of viral genetic material into the cytoplasm. Hence, targeting endocytic pathway-associated proteins are considered to be one of promising strategies for inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 entry. Following this idea, Table 1 summarizes natural compounds that have been reported with inhibitory effects on the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) activity, the expression and activity of cathepsins, or an increasing effect on lysosomal pH, which lead to impaired acidification and protein degradation of intracellular vesicles like endolysosome. Our search revealed that terpenes/terpenoids38, 39, 40, 41 and alkaloids42, 43, 44 are two major classes of compounds acting through this strategy. In addition to individual compounds, some crude plant extracts have shown their potential for being developed as an anti-COVID-19 drug. The traditional Japanese herbal formulation named Maoto, prepared from a mixture of four plants (Ephedrae herba, Armeniacae semen, Cinnamomi cortex and Glycyrrhizae radix), was recently shown to inhibit endolysosomal acidification. Zhuang et al. also demonstrated that butanol crude fraction from C. cortex was able to inhibit the clathrin-dependent endocytosis pathway as well as the infection of SARS-CoV using cell-based assays.

Natural bioactive compounds targeting viral replication

The 3-chymotrypsin-like main protease (3CLpro)

The 3CLpro is an enzyme that plays important role in replication of coronaviruses. It is responsible for the cleavage of polyproteins to functional proteins. Base on the protein structures, 3CLpro of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 show similarity of amino acid sequence at 96%, and both enzymes exhibit high conservation of active residues. Therefore, small molecules with SAR-CoV 3CLpro inhibitory activity may also inhibit 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2. Numerous studies have revealed for plant and mushroom derived natural compounds that could suppress SARS-CoV replication by blocking 3CLpro activity with IC50 range from 8.3 to 92.4 μM in either cell-free or cell-based assays. Among them, hesperetin, a phenolic compound isolated from Isatis indigotica root exhibited the greatest inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV 3CLpro (IC50 = 8.3 μM) in an African green monkey kidney (Vero) cell line and this effective dose did not toxic to the cells (CC50 = 2.7 mM). Other phytochemical classes that have shown promise in the inhibition of this enzyme are lignoid, terpenoid, tanshinone and chalcone with IC50 less than 25 μM.,49, 50, 51 Interestingly, the lignoid savinin was able to reduce both viral replication (Selective index > 667) and cytopathic effect on SARS-CoV-infected Vero E6 cells. The summary of bioactive compounds against SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitory activity is tabulated in Table 1. Regarding to the similarity between 3CLpro of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, these natural compounds are interesting substances to screen as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro activity furthermore.

The papain-like protease (PLpro)

Similar to 3CLpro, the function of PLpro is essential for coronavirus replication by generating RTC through proteolytic processing of viral polyprotein. Hence, PLpro could be served as another attractive target of drug discovery for treatment of coronavirus infection, especially SARS-CoV-2. At present, there is no FDA approved PLpro inhibitor available, therefore identification of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants that specifically inhibit PLpro has been focused to develop a new class of anti-coronavirus drug. According to high similarity of protein sequences and active residues between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 PLpro (83%), the compounds that have been reported as inhibitors of SARS-CoV PLpro may also be effective against SARS-CoV-2. Table 1 lists many interesting compounds from natural sources that exhibited SARS-CoV PLpro inhibitory activity. The IC50 values of the compounds ranged from 0.8 to 19.3 μM, demonstrating their strong inhibitory potential. Among them, the cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA were regarded as two most excellent inhibitors.

The replication/transcription complex (RTC)

The replication of full-length genomic RNA and the discontinuous transcription of subgenomic RNA transcripts are crucial for the production of new coronavirus particles inside the host cell. Both processes are mediated by the coronavirus RTC composed of multiple viral nsps including two key replicative enzymes like the RdRp (nsp12) and helicase (nsp13), which are now considered as potential targets for COVID-19 therapy. Considering a strikingly high homology of nucleotide sequence, amino acid sequence and protein structure between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 RdRp, the natural compounds with previous reports of inhibitory activities towards RdRp of SARS-CoV could also have the potential to suppress the activities of those enzymes of the SARS-CoV-2. It was shown that the water extract from Houttuynia cordata exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition on SARS-CoV RdRp activity with the highest decrease by 74% in the treatment of 800 μg/mL. That activity of H. cordata was confirmed in another study by Fung et al., along with Sinomenium acutum, Coriolus versicolor, Ganoderma lucidum and a traditional Chinese herbal formula Kwan Du Bu Fei Dang. Their IC50 values were 251.1, 198.6, 108.4, 41.9 and 471.3 μg/mL, respectively. The inhibitors of SARS-CoV helicase also serve as a potential drug candidate since this enzyme has a highly conserved sequence among coronaviruses and shares the similar structure to that of SARS-CoV-2. Herein, three plant-derived bioactive compounds that could be natural inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 helicase are listed in Table 1.

The zinc ion

Zinc is an essential micronutrient that is required for various cellular metabolic processes, not only in human immunity but also in the replication of many viruses. Although Zinc ion (Zn2+) acts as a cofactor for several important viral enzymes such as RdRp, 3CLpro and PLpro, it is interesting that its high intracellular concentration was found to inhibit those enzyme activities of a variety of RNA viruses including SARS-CoV,56, 57, 58 thus leading to subsequent decrease in the production of new virions. Therefore, Zn2+ possesses antiviral properties through generating host immune responses and inhibiting viral replication. As of now, several researchers have suggested the use of Zn2+ ionophore, a compound that stimulates cellular import of Zn2+ (e.g., chloroquine and its derivatives), as a possible option for the treatment of COVID-19. In Table 1, we summarized some natural compounds with Zn2+ ionophore activity. The most promising compound is epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), followed by quercetin, luteolin, tannic acid and resveratrol.60, 61, 62

Natural bioactive compounds targeting viral release

The viroporin 3a

The viroporins are small, pore-forming, viral-encoded accessory proteins with ion channel activity that have been known to play an essential role in mediating several processes in the life cycle of many viruses, including coronaviruses. Viroporin 3a functions are strongly involved in the regulation of viral budding and release from infected cells. Interestingly, this protein was found unique to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 and not present in other known coronaviruses, thus the viroporin 3a protein can be an important potential therapeutic target for COVID-19. Summary of natural compounds with inhibitory effect on viroporin 3a activity is presented in Table 1. Schwarz et al. revealed that flavonoid compounds like kaempferol and its derivatives were capable of blocking the ion channel activity of SARS-CoV viroporin 3a protein. Among them, the most potent one is the glycoside juglanine, kaempferol 3-O-α-l-arabinopyranoside, exhibiting IC50 of 2.3 μM. Another kaempferol glycoside tiliroside and the anthraquinone emodin also showed good inhibitory activity with and IC50 of 20 μM.

Natural bioactive compounds targeting inflammation-related pathogenesis

Upon binding to SARS-CoV-2 S protein, the ACE2 function is downregulated which leads to increased angiotensin II level and overactivation of the AT1R signaling, causing the deleterious effects associated with excessive inflammation on several tissues. Therefore, suppressing angiotensin II production by ACE inhibitors and blocking of AT1R by angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) may be of benefit to ameliorate Ang II/AT1R-mediated inflammation in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, it was shown that an ARB could not only reduce AT1R activation, but also activate the AT2R, thus resulting in a production of vasodilation benefit. Currently, ACE inhibitors and ARBs are commonly prescribed in COVID-19 patients with severe symptoms. Even though risks of the use of hypertensive drugs were concerned, accumulating evidence has not suggested the association between the drugs and worse clinical outcomes., Interestingly, a great number of natural compounds have been identified as potent ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Given that there are minimal side effects of using drugs from natural sources, those compounds with potential activity should be considered and investigated. Bioactive compounds derived from natural sources which possess ACE inhibitory activity are summarized in Table 1. Among them, the excellent inhibitory properties against ACE were exerted by the phenolic caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid, and the stilbenoid hopeaphenol and vitisin A, with IC50 less than 2 μM., These two stilbenoids were also found to be resveratrol tetramers exhibiting multifaceted properties including anti-inflammation and antiviral infection as a potent inhibitor of hepatitis C virus helicase. However, only few compounds have shown the ability to block AT1R which one of them is [6]-gingerol, the major bioactive compounds present in Zingiber officinale. According to the report by Liu and colleagues, it could inhibit AT1R activity with IC50 of 8.2 μM as detected by cell-based calcium mobilization assay.

Anti-SARS-CoV natural compounds with unidentified mechanism of action

Some natural occurring compounds have been reported their beneficial effect to inhibit SARS-CoV, even though their mechanisms of action have not yet been identified (Table 2). Accordingly, the compounds from those previous studies might also have a potency to inhibit COVID-19 infection. Using HIV/SARS-CoV S pseudovirus and wild-type SARS-CoV, three anthocyanins derived from Cinnamomi cortex, cinnamtannin B1, procyanidin A2 and procyanidin B1, were reported their inhibitory activities against the infection of both viruses, but at least not through the inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. This study also investigated the effects of some crude plant extracts and found that aqueous extract of Caryophylli Flos exhibited moderate inhibition to pseudovirus (IC50 = 58.8 μM) and wild-type virus (IC50 = 50.1 μM). In addition, the natural alkaloid lycorine, isolated from Lycoris radiate, has been suggested as an anti-SARS-CoV compound with an IC50 value of 15.7 nM.
Table 2

List of anti-SARS-CoV compounds from natural sources with unidentified mechanism of action.

CompoundClassSourceBiological action/EfficacyExperimentReference
Cinnamtannin B1FlavonoidCinnamomi cortexIC50 = 32.9 μM (HIV/SARS-CoV S pseudovirus)Cell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)46
IC50 = 32.9 μM (Wild-type SARS-CoV)Cell-based assay (Plaque reduction assay)
LycorineCrystalline alkaloidLycoris radiataIC50 = 15.7 nMCell-based assay (CPE/MTS assay)121
Procyanidin A2FlavonoidCinnamomi cortexIC50 = 120.7 μM (HIV/SARS-CoV S pseudovirus)Cell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)46
IC50 = 29.9 μM (Wild-type SARS-CoV)Cell-based assay (Plaque reduction assay)
Procyanidin B1FlavonoidCinnamomi cortexIC50 = 161.1 μM (HIV/SARS-CoV S pseudovirus)Cell-based assay (Luciferase reporter assay)46
IC50 = 41.3 μM (Wild-type SARS-CoV)Cell-based assay (Plaque reduction assay)

CPE/MTS = cytopathic effect-based MTS reduction; IC50 = the half maximal inhibitory concentration.

(a) The study used commercial products. Here provides a natural source of compound as an example.

List of anti-SARS-CoV compounds from natural sources with unidentified mechanism of action. CPE/MTS = cytopathic effect-based MTS reduction; IC50 = the half maximal inhibitory concentration. (a) The study used commercial products. Here provides a natural source of compound as an example.

Conclusion and further prospects

Emerged as the most devastating viral infection in this era for the human race, the COVID-19 pandemic has introduced “new normal” for changing life as we recognize it. As numbers of new COVID-19 infected cases are rising globally, disruption of the transmission chain to minimize this spread is seriously unavoidable. This rise in COVID-19 infection is hardly disrupted unless its infective mechanisms including entry, replication and release, and modification of RAAS can be properly eliminated by humans. Certainly, we are waiting for effective strategies including drugs and vaccines to fight against COVID-19. Due to the unavailability of drugs to treat this infection, natural compounds are a main area of anti-COVID-19 research discovery. Our review suggests that 24 natural compounds have showed their potential actions on multiple therapeutic targets, which should be further explored for anti-COVID-19 plant/mushroom-based medicines (Fig. 2). The classes of these phytochemical compounds include chalcones (n = 7), flavonoids (n = 5), tanshinones (n = 5), phenolic acids (n = 3), polyphenol (n = 1), anthraquinone (n = 1), diarylheptanoid (n = 1) and biphenylpropanoid (n = 1). Among them, a natural flavonoid quercetin is found as a lead candidate with its ability on the virus side to inhibit SARS-CoV S protein-ACE2 interaction, viral protease and helicase activities, as well as on the host cell side to inhibit ACE activity and increase intracellular zinc level, thus making it very promising to reduce the disease burden. Although it is previously speculated that certain ACE inhibitors with an increased activity of ACE2 receptor may indeed enhance viral infectivity, recent studies revealed no substantial association between increased risks of infection and ACE inhibitor medications., Therefore, it is worth noting that many potential mechanisms of anti-COVID-19 natural agents are required to carefully and substantially investigated. Together with proper proactive investments, it is our great hope that qualified natural compound-based medicines from promising leads described here will be developed as anti-COVID-19 soon to benefit the human race in this “new normal” era.
Fig. 2

Chemical structures of natural compounds with potential antiviral properties against multiple therapeutic targets for COVID-19.

Chemical structures of natural compounds with potential antiviral properties against multiple therapeutic targets for COVID-19.

Taxonomy (classification by EVISE)

Emerging Infectious Disease, Viral Infection of Respiratory System, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, Cell culture, Molecular Biology, Traditional herbal medicine, Natural Product Analysis.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  10 in total

1.  Polygoni multiflori radix extracts inhibit SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus entry in HEK293T cells and zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Wang; Shengying Lin; Roy Wai-Lun Tang; Hung Chun Lee; Ho-Hin Chan; Sheyne S A Choi; Ka Wing Leung; Sarah E Webb; Andrew L Miller; Karl Wah-Keung Tsim
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.656

2.  Calendulaglycoside A showing potential activity against SARS-CoV-2 main protease: Molecular docking, molecular dynamics, and SAR studies.

Authors:  Ahmed A Zaki; Ahmed Ashour; Sameh S Elhady; Khaled M Darwish; Ahmed A Al-Karmalawy
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 3.  Molecular Mechanisms of Possible Action of Phenolic Compounds in COVID-19 Protection and Prevention.

Authors:  Nikola Gligorijevic; Mirjana Radomirovic; Olgica Nedic; Marija Stojadinovic; Urmila Khulal; Dragana Stanic-Vucinic; Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Role of ethno-phytomedicine knowledge in healthcare of COVID-19: advances in traditional phytomedicine perspective.

Authors:  Md Nasir Ahmed; Kerry Hughes
Journal:  Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  Thidiazuron and LED Lighting Enhance Taxifolin and Rutin Production in Rhododendron mucronulatum Turcz. Microshoot Culture.

Authors:  Yulianna Zaytseva; Anastasia Petruk; Tatyana Novikova
Journal:  J Plant Growth Regul       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.640

Review 6.  Promising use of immune cell-derived exosomes in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Authors:  Murad Alahdal; Eyad Elkord
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

Review 7.  In silico investigation and potential therapeutic approaches of natural products for COVID-19: Computer-aided drug design perspective.

Authors:  Md Mominur Rahman; Md Rezaul Islam; Shopnil Akash; Sadia Afsana Mim; Md Saidur Rahaman; Talha Bin Emran; Esra Küpeli Akkol; Rohit Sharma; Fahad A Alhumaydhi; Sherouk Hussein Sweilam; Md Emon Hossain; Tanmay Kumar Ray; Sharifa Sultana; Muniruddin Ahmed; Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez; Polrat Wilairatana
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.073

8.  In-silico evaluation of bioactive compounds from tea as potential SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural protein 16 inhibitors.

Authors:  Rahul Singh; Vijay Kumar Bhardwaj; Jatin Sharma; Rituraj Purohit; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 9.  Antiviral Strategies Using Natural Source-Derived Sulfated Polysaccharides in the Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Major Human Pathogenic Viruses.

Authors:  Bimalendu Ray; Imran Ali; Subrata Jana; Shuvam Mukherjee; Saikat Pal; Sayani Ray; Martin Schütz; Manfred Marschall
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Structure-based screening of natural product libraries in search of potential antiviral drug-leads as first-line treatment to COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  S J Aditya Rao; Nandini P Shetty
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.848

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.