Max R Schroeder1,2, Vladimir Loparev1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Scientific Resources, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Heat stabilization treatment preserves the in vivo state of biological samples by rapidly inactivating enzymes that cause degradation of proteins and nucleic acids. Historically, proteomics studies used this technique as an alternative to chemical fixation. More recently, microbiologists discovered that heat stabilization treatment rapidly inactivates pathogens present in tissue samples and preserves deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in the tissue. However, these recent studies did not investigate the inactivation of high-density bacterial suspensions and the quality of bacterial DNA. Methods and Results: High-density suspensions of Escherichia coli (>109 cfu/mL) were completely inactivated by heat stabilization treatment using the Denator Stabilizor T1 instrument at 72°C and 95°C for 45 seconds. Using the heat stabilization instrument, a panel of 30 species, 20 Gram-negative and 10 non-endospore-forming Gram-positive species, were fully inactivated by treatment (95°C for 45 seconds). DNA was isolated from bacterial suspensions of Gram-negative bacteria, including E. albertii, E. coli, Shigella dysenteriae, and S. flexneri, following inactivation via heat stabilization treatment and without treatment. DNA isolated following heat stabilization treatment was fully compatible with all downstream molecular applications tested, including next-generation sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and real-time PCR. Conclusions and Discussion: Heat stabilization treatment of Gram-negative and non-endospore-forming Gram-positive pathogens completely inactivates high-density bacterial suspensions. This treatment is compatible with downstream DNA molecular assays, including next-generation sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and PCR. Inactivation by heat stabilization is a rapid process that may increase safety by decreasing risks for laboratory-associated infections and risks associated with transportation of infectious materials.
Introduction: Heat stabilization treatment preserves the in vivo state of biological samples by rapidly inactivating enzymes that cause degradation of proteins and nucleic acids. Historically, proteomics studies used this technique as an alternative to chemical fixation. More recently, microbiologists discovered that heat stabilization treatment rapidly inactivates pathogens present in tissue samples and preserves deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in the tissue. However, these recent studies did not investigate the inactivation of high-density bacterial suspensions and the quality of bacterial DNA. Methods and Results: High-density suspensions of Escherichia coli (>109 cfu/mL) were completely inactivated by heat stabilization treatment using the Denator Stabilizor T1 instrument at 72°C and 95°C for 45 seconds. Using the heat stabilization instrument, a panel of 30 species, 20 Gram-negative and 10 non-endospore-forming Gram-positive species, were fully inactivated by treatment (95°C for 45 seconds). DNA was isolated from bacterial suspensions of Gram-negative bacteria, including E. albertii, E. coli, Shigella dysenteriae, and S. flexneri, following inactivation via heat stabilization treatment and without treatment. DNA isolated following heat stabilization treatment was fully compatible with all downstream molecular applications tested, including next-generation sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and real-time PCR. Conclusions and Discussion: Heat stabilization treatment of Gram-negative and non-endospore-forming Gram-positive pathogens completely inactivates high-density bacterial suspensions. This treatment is compatible with downstream DNA molecular assays, including next-generation sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and PCR. Inactivation by heat stabilization is a rapid process that may increase safety by decreasing risks for laboratory-associated infections and risks associated with transportation of infectious materials.
Authors: Marcus Svensson; Mats Boren; Karl Sköld; Maria Fälth; Benita Sjögren; Malin Andersson; Per Svenningsson; Per E Andren Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Christopher J Doona; Florence E Feeherry; Barbara Setlow; Shiwei Wang; William Li; Frank C Nichols; Prabhat K Talukdar; Mahfuzur R Sarker; Yong-Qing Li; Aimee Shen; Peter Setlow Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: C Bart Rountree; Colleen A Van Kirk; Hanning You; Wei Ding; Hien Dang; Heather D VanGuilder; Willard M Freeman Journal: Proteome Sci Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Max R Schroeder; Phalasy Juieng; Dhwani Batra; Kristen Knipe; Lori A Rowe; Mili Sheth; Peyton Smith; Lisley Garcia-Toledo; Vladimir N Loparev; Rebecca L Lindsey Journal: Genome Announc Date: 2018-01-04
Authors: Ellen A Spotts Whitney; Mark E Beatty; Thomas H Taylor; Robbin Weyant; Jeremy Sobel; Matthew J Arduino; David A Ashford Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 6.883