Literature DB >> 3597461

Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular, and LVC bone cements.

J P Davies, D O O'Connor, J A Greer, W H Harris.   

Abstract

The mechanical properties of the three cement preparations most widely used in the United States were compared by conducting tensile and fatigue tests on Simplex P, LVC, and Zimmer Regular bone cements. Specimens of all three cement preparations were prepared for mechanical testing with and without centrifugation of the cement immediately after mixing. Although the results of the tensile testing revealed a few specific instances of significant differences in the tensile properties of the three cement preparations, there was no consistent evidence that one cement was superior in tension to the others. However, the fatigue properties of Simplex P were consistently and significantly superior to the fatigue properties of both LVC and Zimmer Regular bone cements. Centrifugation of the cement immediately after mixing significantly improved both the tensile and fatigue properties of all three bone cements. However, the fatigue strength of centrifuged Simplex P was substantially and significantly superior to the fatigue strength of the centrifuged LVC and Zimmer Regular bone cements. Since in total joint replacements bone cement is subjected to cyclic loading, these data suggest that centrifuged Simplex P is a preferable bone cement to LVC and to Zimmer Regular cement with or without centrifugation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3597461     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820210604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  10 in total

1.  Fatigue of bone cement with simulated stem interface porosity.

Authors:  S Tepic; U Soltész
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Dynamic creep and mechanical characteristics of SmartSet GHV bone cement.

Authors:  C Z Liu; S M Green; N D Watkins; D Baker; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Static and fatigue mechanical characterizations of variable diameter fibers reinforced bone cement.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Weimin Yue; Chaodi Li; James J Mason
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Why have we left Charnley low friction arthroplasty?

Authors:  D D Goetz; W H Harris
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1993

5.  Comparison of failure mechanisms for cements used in skeletal luting applications.

Authors:  O Clarkin; D Boyd; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of PMMA based bone cements in wet environment.

Authors:  R De Santis; F Mollica; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais; D Ronca
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  On fatigue lifetimes and fatigue crack growth behavior of bone cement.

Authors:  S Ishihara; A J McEvily; T Goshima; K Kanekasu; T Nara
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Jonathon M Struemph; Alexander C M Chong; Paul H Wooley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

9.  Mechanical and cytotoxicity testing of acrylic bone cement embedded with microencapsulated 2-octyl cyanoacrylate.

Authors:  Alice B W Brochu; Gregory A Evans; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Squatting-related tibiofemoral shear reaction forces and a biomechanical rationale for femoral component loosening.

Authors:  Ashvin Thambyah; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.