Harm-Anton Klok1, Andreas Herrmann2,3, Robert Göstl2. 1. Institut des Matériaux and Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Laboratoire des Polymères, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Station 12, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. DWI - Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstr. 50, 52056 Aachen, Germany. 3. Institute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
The use of mechanochemical reactions
in polymer science is a relatively new concept. Initially, the widespread
introduction of polymers as commodity materials required the investigation
of their behavior under mechanical action. One of the early experiments
in this regard was performed by Staudinger and Heuer in 1934 who observed
that the degradation of polystyrene and natural rubber led to a decreasing
viscosity and hence attributed this to a decreasing molar mass. They
speculated that this was caused by the mechanochemically induced depolymerization
of the polymer backbone.[1] Kauzmann and
Eyring confirmed Staudinger’s hypothesis in 1940 and offered
the first kinetic description of the mechanochemical bond scission
process in polymers.[2] Besides degradation,
it was found that mechanically produced macroradicals could be used
for secondary polymerizations thus rendering mechanochemistry a versatile
tool in polymer chemistry.[3,4]Continuing this
early work on polymer fragmentation and formation,[5] the past decade experienced rapid growth of polymer
mechanochemistry employing designer polymers that bear force sensitive
functional molecular motifs (mechanophores).[6,7] These
mechanophores were placed in different polymer architectures and their
mechanochemical actuation resulted in specific molecular transformations
realizing a desired function. Exciting examples are the incorporation
of chromogenic molecules as mechanophores that undergo a molecular
transformation accompanied by alteration of absorption and/or emission,
rendering them optical force probes (OFPs).[8] Thereby, the mechanical failure mechanisms in different architectures
ranging from soft matter to high-performance polymers were studied
with the aim to use the gained knowledge to design materials with
better properties. Moreover, the incorporation of multiple, nonconjugated,
fused four-membered carbon rings, reminiscent of the unusual ladderane
membrane lipids of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in polymers,
led to the formation of polyacetylene with extended π-conjugation
along the polymer backbone after mechanical activation.[9] Besides changing the optical or electronic properties
of polymer systems under force, transition metals were incorporated
into the central region of linear polymers resulting in catalysts
that were activated by applying elongational flow as mechanical stimulus.[10] More generally, polymer mechanochemistry was
used to dynamically alter potential energy surfaces by force allowing
access to products unavailable by traditional reaction pathways.[11]Arguably, these seminal contributions
had transformative character
for the field and have sparked new developments and unprecedented
applications in the field. In this Editorial, we present selected
emerging trends, opportunities, and obstacles for the application
of mechanochemical methods in polymer science. We highlight the trend
toward bond scission quantification using OFPs and its associated
difficulties. Moreover, we summarize which solutions polymer mechanochemistry
contributes to a more sustainable usage of polymers. Lastly, we put
focus on the emerging field of sonopharmacology where the principles
of polymer mechanochemistry are employed for drug delivery and activation.
From Mechanochromism to Optical Force Probes
The force-induced
activation of a latent mechanophore can cause
a change in its optical properties, rendering the mechanophore an
OFP (Figure ).[12] Such OFPs allow real-time in situ or postmortem
monitoring of force-induced events from the molecular to the macroscopic
scale, qualifying them ideal tools to investigate material mechanics.
However, OFPs are not a one-size-fits-all solution for every polymer.
The OFP type and its localization within a material determine the
mechanical information that is accessible regarding spectral properties,
force range, and spatiotemporal resolution in solution, the bulk,
and at interfaces. Polymer materials differ, e.g., in their time-dependent
mechanical properties (creep, stress-relaxation) or in their optical
properties (intrinsic absorption or fluorescence). Tailoring OFPs
to a specific demand of the material they are incorporated within
is thus a necessary step to obtain meaningful and representative data.
Figure 1
Optical
force probe concept and exemplary tunable characteristics,
such as scission force threshold, spectral properties, and temporal
response for reversibility.
Optical
force probe concept and exemplary tunable characteristics,
such as scission force threshold, spectral properties, and temporal
response for reversibility.While historically the first examples of OFPs (e.g.,
spiropyran)
were designed by synthetic chemists and were employed qualitatively
to visualize force-induced reactions in polymers,[8,13] recently
a strong trend to quantitative measurements has been promoted by researchers
applying OFPs as tools to investigate mechanical phenomena in soft
matter.[14−16] Specifically the application of high-resolution microscopy
methods, such as confocal laser scanning microscopy,[17,18] enabled the quantification of bond scission processes on the locally
resolved sub-micrometer scale.[14,19] This information aided
in developing and benchmarking computational models and polymer theory.Prospectively, the popularity of OFPs in engineering and physics
applications will continue to spur new developments, such as previously
inaccessible spectral ranges,[20] broader
force ranges,[21] instantaneous reversibility,[22] continuum and ratiometric OFPs,[23,24] or higher spatial resolution beyond the diffraction limit (Figure ). It will be necessary
at every instance to critically evaluate the quality of the obtained
data and how they relate to the formulated scientific hypothesis.
For example, Storm and co-workers investigated the conditions at which
OFPs (which are intrinsically designed to contain bonds that cleave
at an increased rate compared to other bonds) over- or underreport
overall bond scission events in bulk materials.[25]
Sustainable Polymer Chemistry
Plastic waste constitutes
one of the central and most visible arguments
to develop sustainable approaches to materials. Since this topic is
at the heart of chemistry, polymer chemists perform sustainability
research in three general directions: (i) to prolong the life cycle
of a given material, (ii) to achieve sustainable syntheses of polymers,
and (iii) to efficiently degrade and/or recycle polymers (Figure ). These directions
are generally addressed by gating certain functions in polymers by
external physicochemical stimuli. Using mechanical force in this context
is complex but also potentially rewarding, since stress and strain
are ubiquitous and continuously act on most polymers, particularly
on structural materials.
Figure 2
Mechanochemical approaches to sustainable polymer
chemistry exemplarily
shown for life cycle prolongation by secondary bond formation reactions
using monomers (M) and for a circular economy by depolymerization
to monomers.
Mechanochemical approaches to sustainable polymer
chemistry exemplarily
shown for life cycle prolongation by secondary bond formation reactions
using monomers (M) and for a circular economy by depolymerization
to monomers.One approach to prolong the lifecycle of polymers
that is being
fundamentally explored is self-healing.[26] Although the seminal report by Wudl and co-workers in 2002[27] and those that followed did not explicitly investigate
mechanochemical reactions, it is plausible to assume that material
fracture has led to the scission of chemical bonds—also at
the functional group that provides the healing capability.[28] While the use of polymer mechanochemistry (e.g.,
by ultrasound) to initiate secondary bond formation reactions has
been known since the 1980s,[3] it was not
before 2013 when Craig and co-workers showed that gem-dibromocyclopropane (gDBC) mechanophores upon bond
scission could be used to cross-link the resulting activated chains,
thus strengthening the mechanically challenged material.[29] Other approaches followed that used the mechanochemical
generation of transient[30] and persistent
radicals[31−33] or nucleophiles.[34,35] Boulatov,
Couty, and co-workers recently demonstrated for poly(styrene-co-butadiene) that such principles may even be implemented
without distinct mechanophores.[36] This
line of research in polymer mechanochemistry must overcome the same
obstacles as other self-healing concepts to eventually make the leap
into application. However, polymer mechanochemistry has the decisive
advantage that it makes use of the stimulus that causes material failure
in the first place to initiate a repair or reinforcement reaction
on the molecular level. In contrast to other physicochemical stimuli,
this may mitigate material failure at a microscopic stage where the
necessity to initiate the healing process would not even be visible
on the macroscale.Exploiting mechanical force to initiate a
bond formation reaction
can reach far beyond repair and healing functions, as Kim, Borchardt,
and co-workers succinctly summarized.[4] Specifically,
researchers within the mechanochemical trituration community investigated
ball milling processes for sustainable polymer syntheses,[4] postsynthetic modification,[37] or tuning of molar mass distributions.[38] Notably, this line of research might lead to a convergence
of the methods of trituration and polymer mechanochemistry.In addition, the degradation and recycling of polymers are important
topics in sustainability research.[39] Modern
concepts of degradation for a circular economy are generally concerned
with the recovery of polymerizable monomers or chain fragments (i.e.,
depolymerization reactions). This also holds true for mechanochemical
approaches and might contribute to the convergence of trituration
and polymer mechanochemistry mentioned above[40] since the controlled mechanochemical degradation of polymers is
being investigated using ball milling.[41] Other forms of force application have been investigated as well.
Moore and co-workers showed that a polymer with a low ceiling temperature
could be mechanochemically unzipped into its monomers by ultrasound.[42] Craig and co-workers even proved that such a
degradation reaction could be activated inside of an extruder.[43] In addition, Yang and Xia synthesized a hydrolytically
stable polymer that contained a cyclic ether and a cyclobutane mechanophore
moiety based on their experience with ladderanes.[9] Mechanochemical ring-opening of the cyclobutanes produced
poly(enol ether) derivatives that were found to be acid-degradable,
thus gating the degradability with two stimuli, force and protons.[44] These examples showcase the dichotomy of the
mechanochemically induced degradability of polymers. On the one hand,
force application is easily scalable using ball mills or extruders
and therefore promising on an industrial scale. On the other hand,
such polymers cannot be safely used as structural materials that are
required to withstand base and peak loads of stress and strain in
their life cycles. The latter might be circumvented by serially connecting
different stimuli that logically gate the programmed degradability.
These stimuli must be orthogonal to the environmental stimuli the
polymer is subjected to in its application; i.e., using light as the
gating stimulus will not be promising in strongly light-exposed applications,
such as in automotive parts.
Sonopharmacology
Medical professionals use ultrasound
as a tool for diagnostic and
therapeutic purposes. Thereby, ultrasound overcomes several systematic
limitations of pharmacotherapy, such as drug resistance, environmental
toxicity, degradation, and most importantly off-target activity.[45] Since ultrasound is used as convenient tool
to deliver shear forces in solution to polymer chains as well,[46] the development of polymers for biomedicine
that are activated using the principles of polymer mechanochemistry
is only consequential. Specifically, the mechanochemical release of
bioactive molecules, being an imperative feature for drug delivery
systems, has paved the way toward the emerging field of sonopharmacology.[47,48]First steps in this direction were taken by the incorporation
of
strong covalent or supramolecular dedicated mechanophores as drug
releasing and drug activating moieties (Figure ).[49−54] However, it became clear very soon that the applied ultrasound doses
were biomedically incompatible with regard to frequency, power intensity,
and necessary sonication times. Recently, these issues were addressed
twofold. On the one hand, the force-reactive molecular moieties were
tailored such that they require less mechanical energy to break. On
the other hand, mechanophores were incorporated into polymer structures
for which the topology drastically increased the mechanochemical reactivity[55] and thereby decreased the necessary ultrasound
doses. For example, this was achieved by designing mechanochemically
responsive ultrahigh molar mass polyaptamers as supramolecular groups
to inhibit the activity of bioactives,[50,56] gold nanoparticle
assemblies,[50,57] genetically engineered proteins,[58] microgels,[59] and
polymer brushes.[60] Consequently, sonication
times using a classical immersion probe sonicator at 20 kHz could
be reduced by 1–2 orders of magnitude, i.e., from hours to
seconds.
Figure 3
Principle of sonopharmacology for drug (D) activation (upper panel)
and associated standing challenges for its successful future biomedical
application, such as reduction in ultrasound doses by reducing sonication
time, compatibilization with therapeutic and diagnostic ultrasound
frequencies, or increase of loaded drug content (lower panel).
Principle of sonopharmacology for drug (D) activation (upper panel)
and associated standing challenges for its successful future biomedical
application, such as reduction in ultrasound doses by reducing sonication
time, compatibilization with therapeutic and diagnostic ultrasound
frequencies, or increase of loaded drug content (lower panel).However, ultrasound in biomedicine is rarely employed
at the frequencies
of polymer mechanochemistry due to cytotoxicity,[61] and hence, compatibilization with clinically employed therapeutic
and diagnostic ultrasound has become one of the currently standing
challenges. First examples of polymer mechanochemical reactions using
either clinically employed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)[62] or low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU)[56] have been performed, but diagnostic or imaging
ultrasound frequencies remain out of reach. Should research in sonopharmacology
overcome limitations associated with ultrasound type and dosage, loaded
drug content, as well as mechanochemical reactivity of the carrier
polymer architecture (Figure ), prospects for success in clinical settings can be expected
in the future. Although the spatiotemporal resolution of ultrasound
as an external trigger is lower than that of, e.g., light,[63] the drastically increased routinely achievable
penetration depth of ultrasound (multiple cm) renders it a unique
method for spatiotemporal control of drug action.[64]Over the course of the past almost 90 years, polymer
mechanochemistry
has undergone dramatic developments. While the initial focus—of
what could hardly be called a field at the time—was on studying
and understanding polymer degradation, researchers soon developed
methods to productively use generated mechanoradicals for functionalization
and polymerization reactions. However, a true blooming of the field
was initiated by the development of dedicated mechanophores that continue
to give access to novel intricate functionalities that can be activated
by force. In this Editorial, we have highlighted three selected areas,
out of a wide variety of others, that present exciting and important
challenges and opportunities of research for the polymer science community.
Authors: Gun Kim; Vivian M Lau; Abigail J Halmes; Michael L Oelze; Jeffrey S Moore; King C Li Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yunyan Sun; William J Neary; Zachary P Burke; Hai Qian; Lingyang Zhu; Jeffrey S Moore Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Ashley L Black Ramirez; Zachary S Kean; Joshua A Orlicki; Mangesh Champhekar; Sarah M Elsakr; Wendy E Krause; Stephen L Craig Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Ina Vollmer; Michael J F Jenks; Mark C P Roelands; Robin J White; Toon van Harmelen; Paul de Wild; Gerard P van der Laan; Florian Meirer; Jos T F Keurentjes; Bert M Weckhuysen Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 15.336