| Literature DB >> 35971146 |
Dongxu Huang1, Haiyan Zhu2, Yandi Zhu1, Qinyu Dang1, Qian Yang1, Yadi Zhang1, Xiaxia Cai1, Xiaoyan Zhao1, Ning Liang1, Hongliang Wang1, Huanling Yu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal lipid levels during pregnancy are critical for fetal development. Recent studies revealed that high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) levels during pregnancy were negatively correlated with birthweight. High-density lipoprotein 2 cholesterol (HDL2-c) is one of the major subclasses of HDL-c, and its relationship with birthweight is unclear. Association of HDL2-c concentration in the first trimester and risk of large for gestational age (LGA) was explored.Entities:
Keywords: Birthweight; HDL; HDL subfractions; LGA; Maternal lipids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35971146 PMCID: PMC9380360 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-022-01688-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 4.315
Maternal and neonatal characteristics
| Total ( | AGA ( | LGA ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal characteristics | ||||
| Age (years) | 31.4 ± 3.7 | 31.5 ± 3.7 | 31.3 ± 3.2 | 0.687 |
| Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 21.84 ± 2.95 | 21.77 ± 2.96 | 22.27 ± 2.78 | 0.169 |
| GWG (kg) | 13.25 ± 4.97 | 13.09 ± 4.93 | 14.25 ± 5.20 | 0.066 |
| Parity | 0.861 | |||
| 1 | 375(68.3) | 310(67.7) | 50(66.7) | |
| > 1 | 174(31.7) | 148(32.3) | 25(33.3) | |
| Neonatal characteristics | ||||
| Gender | 0.279 | |||
| Male | 295(53.7) | 244(53.3) | 45(60.0) | |
| Female | 254(46.3) | 214(46.7) | 30(40.0) | |
| Birth length (cm) | 49.57 ± 1.82 | 49.41 ± 1.72 | 51.03 ± 1.57 | 0.000 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3348.67 ± 411.95 | 3277.79 ± 327.26 | 3936.67 ± 307.06 | 0.000 |
| Birth head circumference (cm) | 34.66 ± 1.20 | 34.55 ± 1.11 | 35.69 ± 1.05 | 0.000 |
| Delivery mode | 0.337 | |||
| Vaginal delivery | 381(70.6) | 318(70.8) | 49(65.3) | |
| Cesarean section | 159(29.4) | 131(29.2) | 26(34.7) | |
AGA Appropriate for gestational age, LGA Large for gestational age, GWG Gestational weight gain, BMI Body mass index
a Statistically significant difference between AGA and LGA groups
Fig. 1Maternal serum HDL-c, HDL2-c, and HDL3-c concentrations and HDL2-c/HDL3-c ratios in the first trimester in the AGA and LGA groups. a Maternal serum HDL-c, HDL2-c, and HDL3-c concentrations in the first trimester in the AGA and LGA groups. b The ratio of HDL2-c/HDL3-c in the AGA and LGA groups. AGA, appropriate for gestational age. LGA, large for gestational age. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Fig. 2The incidence of LGA based on different maternal HDL-c, HDL2-c, and HDL3-c concentrations and HDL2-c/HDL3-c ratios in the first trimester. a The incidence of LGA based on different maternal HDL-c concentrations in the first trimester. b The incidence of LGA based on different maternal HDL2-c concentrations in the first trimester. c The incidence of LGA based on different maternal HDL3-c concentrations in the first trimester. d The incidence of LGA based on different maternal ratios of HDL2-c/HDL3-c in the first trimester. LGA, large for gestational age. AGA, appropriate for gestational age. *P value < 0.05, **P value < 0.01
Kendall's tau_b correlations between the incidence of LGA and HDL-c, HDL2-c, and HDL3-c concentrations as well as the ratio of HDL2-c/HDL3-c
| Kendall's tau_b | HDL-c | HDL2-c | HDL3-c | HDL2-c/HDL3-c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient | -0.124** | -0.129** | -0.011 | -0.089* |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.773 | 0.020 |
LGA Large for gestational age. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
The association between maternal HDL2-c concentration at first trimester and risk of LGA
| Variables | OR | 95% CI for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.996 | 0.918–1.080 | 0.919 |
| GWG (kg) | 1.059 | 1.004–1.116 | 0.034 |
| Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| 18.5–23.9 | Reference | ||
| < 18.5 | 0.544 | 0.157–1.883 | 0.336 |
| ≥ 24 | 1.097 | 0.559–2.151 | 0.788 |
| Parity | |||
| 1 | Reference | ||
| > 1 | 1.134 | 0.606–2.122 | 0.695 |
| HDL2-c (mmol/L) | 0.237 | 0.099–0.567 | 0.001 |
The model was adjusted for maternal age, GWG, prepregnancy BMI and parity. GWG Gestational weight gain, BMI Body mass index
Fig. 3Nomogram for the risk of LGA. To estimate the probability of LGA, the values of a pregnant woman value were marked at each axis. A straight line was drawn perpendicular to the point axis, and the points for all variables were summed. Next, the sum was noted on the total point axis, and a straight line was drawn perpendicular to the probability axis. LGA, large for gestational age. GWG, gestational weight gain. BMI, body mass index
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.663 (95% CI 0.593–0.732)