Literature DB >> 35971002

Sex-specific morphs: the genetics and evolution of intra-sexual variation.

Judith E Mank1.   

Abstract

Sex-specific morphs exhibit discrete phenotypes, often including many disparate traits, that are observed in only one sex. These morphs have evolved independently in many different animals and are often associated with alternative mating strategies. The remarkable diversity of sex-specific morphs offers unique opportunities to understand the genetic basis of complex phenotypes, as the distinct nature of many morphs makes it easier to both categorize and compare genomes than for continuous traits. Sex-specific morphs also expand the study of sexual dimorphism beyond traditional bimodal comparisons of male and female averages, as they allow for a more expansive range of sexualization. Although ecological and endocrinological studies of sex-specific morphs have been advancing for some time, genomic and transcriptomic studies of morphs are far more recent. These studies reveal not only many different paths to the evolution of sex-specific morphs but also many commonalities, such as the role of sex-determining genes and hormone signalling in morph development, and the mixing of male and female traits within some morphs.
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35971002     DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00524-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   59.581


  44 in total

1.  Comparative phylogenetic analysis of male alternative reproductive tactics in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; John C Avise
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes.

Authors:  M R Gross
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  ECOLOGICAL CAUSES OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The evolution of genetic and conditional alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Leif Engqvist; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys.

Authors:  Alan H Krakauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  An analysis of neuroscience and psychiatry papers published from 2009 and 2019 outlines opportunities for increasing discovery of sex differences.

Authors:  Rebecca K Rechlin; Tallinn F L Splinter; Travis E Hodges; Arianne Y Albert; Liisa A M Galea
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff.

Authors:  Clemens Küpper; Michael Stocks; Judith E Risse; Natalie Dos Remedios; Lindsay L Farrell; Susan B McRae; Tawna C Morgan; Natalia Karlionova; Pavel Pinchuk; Yvonne I Verkuil; Alexander S Kitaysky; John C Wingfield; Theunis Piersma; Kai Zeng; Jon Slate; Mark Blaxter; David B Lank; Terry Burke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences.

Authors:  Nicole C Woitowich; Annaliese Beery; Teresa Woodruff
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies.

Authors:  Emer Brady; Mathias Wullum Nielsen; Jens Peter Andersen; Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.