Literature DB >> 15744300

Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys.

Alan H Krakauer1.   

Abstract

In the few species of birds in which males form display partnerships to attract females, one male secures most or all of the copulations. This leads to the question of why subordinate males help in the absence of observable reproductive benefits. Hamilton's concept of kin selection, whereby individuals can benefit indirectly by helping a relative, was a crucial breakthrough for understanding apparently altruistic systems. However in the only direct test of kin selection in coordinated display partnerships, partners were unrelated, discounting kin selection as an explanation for the evolution of cooperation. Here I show, using genetic measures of relatedness and reproductive success, that kin selection can explain the evolution of cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Subordinate (helper) males do not themselves reproduce, but their indirect fitness as calculated by Hamilton's rule more than offsets the cost of helping. This result confirms a textbook example of kin selection that until now has been controversial and also extends recent findings of male relatedness on avian leks by quantifying the kin-selected benefits gained by non-reproducing males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744300     DOI: 10.1038/nature03325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  29 in total

Review 1.  Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability.

Authors:  Amanda L File; Guillermo P Murphy; Susan A Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  There is no fitness but fitness, and the lineage is its bearer.

Authors:  Erol Akçay; Jeremy Van Cleve
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution.

Authors:  Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism.

Authors:  Barry Sinervo; Alexis Chaine; Jean Clobert; Ryan Calsbeek; Lisa Hazard; Lesley Lancaster; Andrew G McAdam; Suzanne Alonzo; Gwynne Corrigan; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Kin-dependent dispersal influences relatedness and genetic structuring in a lek system.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Laurent Boualit; Martin Laporte; Jérôme G Prunier; Françoise Preiss; Alain Laurent; Francesco Foletti; Jean Clobert; Gwenaël Jacob
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The general form of Hamilton's rule makes no predictions and cannot be tested empirically.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Alex McAvoy; Benjamin Allen; Edward O Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Can Hamilton's rule be violated?

Authors:  Matthijs van Veelen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Cooperation and Hamilton's rule in a simple synthetic microbial system.

Authors:  John S Chuang; Olivier Rivoire; Stanislas Leibler
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Thomas G Platt; James D Bever
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Female's courtship threshold allows intruding males to mate with reduced effort.

Authors:  J A Stoltz; M C B Andrade
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.