| Literature DB >> 35968483 |
Lan Zhuang1, Minhui Dai2,3, Yi Zhou3, Lingyu Sun2,3.
Abstract
Since electroencephalogram (EEG) is a significant basis to treat and diagnose somnipathy, sleep electroencephalogram automatic staging methods play important role in the treatment and diagnosis of sleep disorders. Due to the characteristics of weak signals, EEG needs accurate and efficient algorithms to extract feature information before applying it in the sleep stages. Conventional feature extraction methods have low efficiency and are difficult to meet the time validity of fast staging. In addition, it can easily lead to the omission of key features owing to insufficient a priori knowledge. Deep learning networks, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have powerful processing capabilities in data analysis and data mining. In this study, a deep learning network is introduced into the study of the sleep stage. In this study, the feature fusion method is presented, and long-term and short-term memory (LSTM) is selected as the classification network to improve the accuracy of sleep stage recognition. First, based on EEG and deep learning network, an automatic sleep phase method based on a multi-channel EGG is proposed. Second, CNN-LSTM is used to monitor EEG and EOG samples during sleep. In addition, without any signal preprocessing or feature extraction, data expansion (DA) can be realized for unbalanced data, and special data and non-general data can be deleted. Finally, the MIT-BIH dataset is used to train and evaluate the proposed model. The experimental results show that the EEG-based sleep phase method proposed in this paper provides an effective method for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders, and hence has a practical application value.Entities:
Keywords: EEG signal; convolutional neural network; feature fusion; long-term and short-term memory; multichannel; sleep stage
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35968483 PMCID: PMC9364961 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1AASM sleep staging criteria.
Figure 2Typical CNN structure.
Figure 3LSTM cell.
Figure 4Single LSTM neuron processing data dependencies.
Figure 5Neural network model of sleep stages.
The subject division of training set and test set.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Subject Reference No. | 7–30 | 1–6 |
Number of 30-s epochs for each sleep stage in training set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 9,563 | 3,177 | 17,246 | 4,854 | 7,393 |
Number of 30-s epochs for each sleep stage in test set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 2,324 | 1,069 | 4,835 | 1,378 | 1,941 |
Figure 6Probability density histogram of instantaneous frequency of EEG signals in each sleep period. (A) W phase. (B) N1 phase. (C) N2 phase. (D) N3 phase. (E) REM phase.
Figure 7Accuracy and loss curve of pre-training process. (A) Training and validation accuracy. (B) Training and validation loss.
Figure 8Accuracy and loss curve of fine tuning process. (A) Training and validation accuracy. (B) Training and validation loss.
Performance comparison.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Fraiwan et al. (2015) ( | Time-frequency analysis of and random forest classifier | 88.32 | 53.26 | 85.28 | 86.31 | 85.15 | 84.72 |
| Tsinalis et al. (2016) ( | Time-frequency analysis and stacked sparse autoencoders | 83.47 | 48.65 | 85.09 | 84.28 | 83.24 | 81.40 |
| Sors et al. (2018) ( | Convolutional neural networks | 96.86 | 35.42 | 89.41 | 85.52 | 82.56 | 89.33 |
| Ours | Multi-channels EEG & EOG CNN-LSTM | 90.73 | 59.78 | 90.55 | 83.22 | 87.38 | 90.60 |