| Literature DB >> 35967713 |
Lei Shi1,2.
Abstract
The study's overarching purpose was to investigate the impact of strategic HR outsourcing on organizational sustainability. This study also attempted to evaluate the function of organizational capabilities and HR proficiency as a mediator in the relationship between strategic HR outsourcing and organizational sustainability. Data was collected from 400 HR professionals in China using a questionnaire technique. The Smart-PLS software and a structural equation modeling (SEM) technique were used to evaluate the data. Organizational sustainability was found to be insignificantly related to strategic HR outsourcing. Furthermore, organizational capabilities and HR proficiency were discovered to mediate the association between strategic HR outsourcing and organizational sustainability. By analyzing the impact of strategic HR outsourcing on organizational sustainability, this paper provided an important theoretical contribution. In terms of practical applications, this article would surely help HR professionals to maintain and develop policies to encourage employees to be engaged and perform well. Furthermore, this study might be effective in resolving difficulties linked to organizational sustainability. The small sample size of this study, which included solely HR professionals working in Chinese firms, was one of its limitations. In addition, future studies can incorporate other constructs to acquire a deeper knowledge of the factors that influence employee health.Entities:
Keywords: economic sustainability; human resource outsourcing; organizational capabilities; organizational sustainability; sustainable innovation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35967713 PMCID: PMC9366096 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical framework.
Demographic analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 221 | 400 |
| Female | 169 | ||
| Education | Graduate | 260 | |
| Masters | 140 | 400 |
Common method biasness.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 14.659 | 32.576 | 32.576 | 14.659 | 32.576 | 32.576 |
| 2 | 4.503 | 10.007 | 42.583 | |||
| 3 | 2.854 | 6.342 | 48.925 | |||
| 4 | 2.4 | 5.334 | 54.259 | |||
| 5 | 1.931 | 4.29 | 58.549 | |||
| 6 | 1.739 | 3.864 | 62.413 | |||
| 7 | 1.482 | 3.294 | 65.707 | |||
| 8 | 1.372 | 3.05 | 68.757 | |||
| 9 | 1.271 | 2.824 | 71.581 | |||
| 10 | 1.173 | 2.608 | 74.189 | |||
| 11 | 1.029 | 2.287 | 76.475 | |||
| 12 | 0.914 | 2.032 | 78.507 | |||
| 13 | 0.886 | 1.97 | 80.477 | |||
| 14 | 0.841 | 1.87 | 82.347 | |||
| 15 | 0.773 | 1.718 | 84.065 | |||
| 16 | 0.711 | 1.58 | 85.645 | |||
| 17 | 0.656 | 1.459 | 87.104 | |||
| 18 | 0.548 | 1.217 | 88.321 | |||
| 19 | 0.546 | 1.213 | 89.533 | |||
| 20 | 0.488 | 1.083 | 90.617 | |||
| 21 | 0.464 | 1.032 | 91.648 | |||
| 22 | 0.43 | 0.955 | 92.603 | |||
| 23 | 0.404 | 0.899 | 93.502 | |||
| 24 | 0.354 | 0.786 | 94.288 | |||
| 25 | 0.289 | 0.642 | 94.93 | |||
| 26 | 0.277 | 0.616 | 95.546 | |||
| 27 | 0.269 | 0.597 | 96.143 | |||
| 28 | 0.218 | 0.485 | 96.628 | |||
| 29 | 0.207 | 0.459 | 97.088 | |||
| 30 | 0.205 | 0.455 | 97.543 | |||
| 31 | 0.171 | 0.381 | 97.924 | |||
| 32 | 0.15 | 0.334 | 98.258 | |||
| 33 | 0.145 | 0.323 | 98.58 | |||
| 34 | 0.117 | 0.26 | 98.84 | |||
| 35 | 0.098 | 0.218 | 99.059 | |||
| 36 | 0.084 | 0.186 | 99.245 | |||
| 37 | 0.07 | 0.157 | 99.402 | |||
| 38 | 0.058 | 0.128 | 99.53 | |||
| 39 | 0.049 | 0.109 | 99.639 | |||
| 40 | 0.041 | 0.09 | 99.729 | |||
| 41 | 0.037 | 0.083 | 99.812 | |||
| 42 | 0.032 | 0.07 | 99.883 | |||
| 43 | 0.024 | 0.054 | 99.937 | |||
| 44 | 0.021 | 0.046 | 99.982 | |||
| 45 | 0.008 | 0.018 | 100 | |||
Figure 2Output of measurement model algorithm.
Factor loadings cronbach alpha, composite reliability, and AVE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic sustainability | 0.931 | 0.931 | 0.948 | 0.784 | ||
| ECP1 | 0.895 | |||||
| ECP2 | 0.91 | |||||
| ECP3 | 0.868 | |||||
| ECP4 | 0.882 | |||||
| ECP5 | 0.871 | |||||
| Environmental sustainability | 0.906 | 0.909 | 0.93 | 0.728 | ||
| ENP1 | 0.873 | |||||
| ENP2 | 0.875 | |||||
| ENP3 | 0.834 | |||||
| ENP4 | 0.871 | |||||
| ENP5 | 0.811 | |||||
| Social sustainability | 0.876 | 0.885 | 0.91 | 0.671 | ||
| SCP1 | 0.85 | |||||
| SCP2 | 0.874 | |||||
| SCP3 | 0.87 | |||||
| SCP4 | 0.87 | |||||
| SCP5 | 0.858 | |||||
| Strategic HR outsourcing | 0.936 | 0.939 | 0.944 | 0.563 | ||
| HOS1 | 0.756 | |||||
| HOS2 | 0.739 | |||||
| HOS3 | 0.726 | |||||
| HOS4 | 0.751 | |||||
| HOS5 | 0.742 | |||||
| HOS6 | 0.719 | |||||
| HOS7 | 0.721 | |||||
| HOS8 | 0.761 | |||||
| HOS10 | 0.758 | |||||
| HOS11 | 0.79 | |||||
| HOS12 | 0.795 | |||||
| HOS13 | 0.774 | |||||
| HOS14 | 0.721 | |||||
| HR proficiency | 0.876 | 0.885 | 0.91 | 0.671 | ||
| HP1 | 0.862 | |||||
| HP2 | 0.88 | |||||
| HP3 | 0.841 | |||||
| HP4 | 0.803 | |||||
| HP5 | 0.698 | |||||
| Organizational capabilities | 0.941 | 0.943 | 0.948 | 0.587 | ||
| OC1 | 0.747 | |||||
| OC2 | 0.658 | |||||
| OC3 | 0.748 | |||||
| OC4 | 0.768 | |||||
| OC5 | 0.698 | |||||
| OC6 | 0.772 | |||||
| OC7 | 0.799 | |||||
| OC9 | 0.761 | |||||
| OC10 | 0.808 | |||||
| OC11 | 0.764 | |||||
| OC12 | 0.802 | |||||
| OC13 | 0.833 | |||||
| OC14 | 0.782 |
Discriminant validity (HTMT ratio).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Sustainability | ||||||
| Environmental sustainability | 0.963 | |||||
| HR Proficiency | 0.859 | 0.866 | ||||
| Organizational Capabilities | 0.797 | 0.824 | 0.846 | |||
| Social Sustainability | 0.748 | 0.792 | 0.790 | 0.856 | ||
| Strategic HR outsourcing | 0.717 | 0.76 | 0.731 | 0.767 | 0.747 |
Discriminant validity (fronell and larcker criteria).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic sustainability |
| |||||
| Environmental sustainability | 0.81 |
| ||||
| HR proficiency | 0.778 | 0.775 |
| |||
| Organizational capabilities | 0.843 | 0.812 | 0.773 |
| ||
| Social sustainability | 0.786 | 0.814 | 0.771 | 0.802 |
| |
| Strategic HR outsourcing | 0.722 | 0.712 | 0.678 | 0.776 | 0.708 |
|
Bold value shows the significance between variable.
R-Square values and Q-Square values for the variables.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| HR Proficiency | 0.459 | 0.21 |
| Organizational Capabilities | 0.682 | 0.105 |
| Organizational sustainability | 0.818 | 0.145 |
Figure 3Output of structural model algorithm.
Direct effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| H1 | Strategic HR outsourcing -> Organizational sustainability | 0.076 | 0.047 | 1.622 | 0.105 | −0.015 | 0.164 | Unsupported |
| H2a | Strategic HR outsourcing -> Organizational capabilities | 0.826 | 0.018 | 44.777 | 0.000 | 0.790 | 0.862 | Supported |
| H2b | Organizational capabilities -> Organizational sustainability | 0.530 | 0.045 | 11.763 | 0.000 | 0.444 | 0.616 | Supported |
| H3a | Strategic HR outsourcing -> HR proficiency | 0.678 | 0.031 | 22.018 | 0.000 | 0.622 | 0.743 | Supported |
| H3b | HR proficiency -> Organizational sustainability | 0.363 | 0.041 | 8.887 | 0.000 | 0.292 | 0.443 | Supported |
Mediation effect.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H4 | SHO->OC->OS | 0.76 | 0.000 | 0.076 | 0.105 | 0.438 | 0.000 |
| H5 | SHO->HP->OS | 0.246 | 0.000 | ||||