| Literature DB >> 35967611 |
Abstract
COVID-19 has altered our lifestyle, communication, employment, and also our emotions. The pandemic and its devastating implications have had a significant impact on higher education, as well as other sectors. Numerous researchers have utilized typical statistical methods to determine the effect of COVID-19 on the psychological wellbeing of young people. Moreover, the primary aspects that have changed in the psychological condition of children and young adults during COVID lockdown is analyzed. These changes are analyzed using machine learning and AI techniques which should be established for the alterations. This research work mainly concentrates on children's and young people's mental health in the first lockdown. There are six processes involved in this work. Initially, it collects the data using questionnaires, and then, the collected data are pre-processed by data cleaning, categorical encoding, and data normalization method. Next, the clustering process is used for grouping the data based on their mood state, and then, the feature selection process is done by chi-square, L1-Norm, and ReliefF. Then, the machine learning classifiers are used for predicting the mood state, and automatic calibration is used for selecting the best model. Finally, it predicts the mood state of the children and young adults. The findings revealed that for a better understanding of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's and youths' mental states, a combination of heterogeneous data from practically all feature groups is required.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; artificial intelligence; clustering; feature selection; machine learning; mental health; mood state
Year: 2022 PMID: 35967611 PMCID: PMC9374006 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
A summary of research on the first COVID-19 pandemic, which included teens and young people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ren Z. et al. ( | China | After the reopening of the institution, 478 college students | COVID-19's psychological influence was investigated. | Multivariate logistic regression |
| Cost et al. ( | Canada | One thousand thirteen infants and young people between the ages of 6 and 18, even without prior illnesses | To assess the impact of COVID-19 on mental wellbeing. | Multinomial logistic regression |
| Garcia de Avila et al. ( | Brazil | 6–12 years old: 157 females and 132 boys | To see how common anxiousness was there during COVID-19. | Logistic regression |
| Yeasmin et al. ( | Bangladesh | Three hundred eighty-four families with at minimum one child under the age of eight | Detecting psychological problems during COVID-19 | Binary logistic regression |
| Wathelet et al. ( | France | 69,054 college students in France | COVID-19-related mental health disorders will be investigated. | Multivariate logistic regression |
| Sciberras et al. ( | Australia | Families of 213 ADHD-diagnosed children and adolescents ages 5 to 17 years old | To determine the COVID-19 limitations' effect | Adjusted logistic regression analyses |
Figure 1Architecture of proposed method.
Figure 2Clustering methods used.
Figure 3Feature selection method used.
Clustering technique's parameter settings.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Spectral clustering | Three classes, arpack eigen solver, and affinities for nearest neighbors |
| Average linkage | Average linkage, cityblock affinity, and symmetric connection are three kinds. |
| Mini Batch K-means | Three classes |
| Ward's hierarchical agglomerative clustering | Symmetric connection, three classes, ward linkage |
| Birch | Three classes |
| Jenks | There are three classes, including the lowest value. |
Figure 4For the first 40 features in which the greatest result was attained, a spider plot showing the amount of characteristics that correspond to every characteristic group was created.
Figure 5Maximum accuracy for classification methods.
Maximum accuracy for classification methods.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Random forest | 68.6 | 44 |
| MLP | 59.38 | 58 |
| XG Boost | 72.43 | 40 |
| Logistic regression | 56.74 | 50 |
| SVM | 66.95 | 49 |
| KNN | 53.28 | 3 |
| Decision trees | 52.23 | 5 |
Results of using SIRD, isotonic regression to calibrate the XG Boost classifier.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| XG Boost | 1.196 | 68.98 |
| XG Boost+Isotonic | 0.513 | 73.12 |
| XG Boost+SIRD | 0.352 | 78.98 |
Figure 6Following calibration using isotonic and SIRD model, change in expected probability on test samples.
Figure 7XG Boost classifier calibration graph for class 0.
Figure 9XG Boost classifier calibration graph for class 3.