| Literature DB >> 32836185 |
Shuang-Jiang Zhou1, Lei-Lei Wang1, Rui Yang2, Xing-Jie Yang1, Li-Gang Zhang1, Zhao-Chang Guo3, Jin-Cheng Chen4, Jing-Qi Wang5, Jing-Xu Chen6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of insomnia symptoms among Chinese adolescents and young adults affected by the outbreak of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; COVID-19; Insomnia; Prevalence; Young adults
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32836185 PMCID: PMC7274988 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sleep Med ISSN: 1389-9457 Impact factor: 3.492
Socio-demographic characteristics, depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms and associations with insomnia symptoms (N = 11,835).
| Variables | Junior high school | Senior high school | College | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | Insomnia | No. (%) | Insomnia | No. (%) | Insomnia | No. (%) | Insomnia | |||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||||||||
| 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.16 | <0.001 | |||||||||
| Male | 1757 (49.1) | 279 (15.9) | 1818 (43.8) | 407 (22.4) | 1434 (35.0) | 350 (24.4) | 5009 (42.3) | 1036 (20.7) | ||||
| Female | 1830 (51.0) | 366 (20.0) | 2331 (56.2) | 641 (27.5) | 2665 (65.0) | 740 (26.4) | 6826 (57.7) | 1711 (25.1) | ||||
| 0.706 | 0.002 | 0.016 | 0.185 | |||||||||
| City | 1611 (44.9) | 294 (18.2) | 1339 (32.3) | 298 (22.3) | 1286 (31.4) | 362 (28.1) | 4236 (35.8) | 954 (22.5) | ||||
| Rural area | 1976 (51.0) | 351 (17.8) | 2810 (67.7) | 750 (26.7) | 2813 (68.6) | 692 (24.6) | 7599 (64.2) | 1793 (23.6) | ||||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
| Yes | 1403 (39.1) | 534 (38.1) | 2069 (49.9) | 940 (45.4) | 1605 (39.2) | 801 (49.9) | 5077 (42.9) | 2275 (44.8) | ||||
| No | 2184 (60.9) | 111 (5.1) | 2080 (50.1) | 108 (5.2) | 2494 (60.8) | 253 (10.1) | 6758 (57.1) | 472 (7.0) | ||||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
| Yes | 1261 (35.2) | 441 (35.0) | 1701 (41.0) | 769 (45.2) | 1112 (27.1) | 600 (54.0) | 4074 (34.4) | 1810 (44.4) | ||||
| No | 2326 (64.8) | 204 (8.8) | 2448 (59.0) | 279 (11.4) | 2987 (72.9) | 454 (15.2) | 7761 (65.6) | 937 (12.1) | ||||
Fig. 1The incidence of insomnia symptoms in students with different levels of COVID-19 knowledge (N = 11,835).
Fig. 2The incidence of insomnia symptoms in students with different levels of adverse impact of COVID-19 (N = 11,835).
Fig. 3The incidence of insomnia symptoms in students with different levels of projections of COVID-19 trend (N = 11,835).
The incidence rate and patterns of insomnia symptoms (N = 11,835).
| Variables | Junior high school | Senior high school | College | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | ||
| 645 | 18.0bc | 1048 | 25.3a | 1054 | 25.7a | <0.001 | 2747 | 23.2 | |
| <0.001 | |||||||||
| Excellent | 1793 | 49.9bc | 1694 | 40.8ac | 1585 | 38.7ab | 5072 | 42.8 | |
| Good | 1493 | 41.6bc | 1945 | 46.9a | 1925 | 47.0a | 5363 | 45.3 | |
| Bad | 254 | 7.1ab | 436 | 10.5ac | 515 | 12.6bc | 1205 | 10.2 | |
| Poor | 53 | 1.5 | 75 | 1.8 | 74 | 1.8 | 202 | 1.7 | |
| <0.001 | |||||||||
| ≤15 min | 2069 | 57.7c | 2390 | 57.6c | 2076 | 50.6ab | 6535 | 55.2 | |
| 16–30 min | 1167 | 32.5c | 1399 | 33.7c | 1538 | 37.5ab | 4104 | 34.7 | |
| 31–60 min | 251 | 7.0c | 280 | 6.7c | 349 | 8.5ab | 880 | 7.4 | |
| ≥60 min | 100 | 2.8b | 80 | 1.9ac | 135 | 3.3b | 316 | 2.7 | |
| <0.001 | |||||||||
| No more than 7 | 816 | 22.7bc | 2080 | 50.1ac | 1134 | 27.7ab | 4030 | 34.0 | |
| Greater than 7 and not greater than 9 | 2385 | 66.4bc | 1949 | 47.0ac | 2592 | 63.2ab | 6926 | 58.5 | |
| More than 9 | 392 | 10.9bc | 373 | 2.9ac | 373 | 9.1ab | 886 | 7.5 | |
| 837 | 23.3bc | 691 | 16.7ac | 164 | 27.4ab | 2651 | 22.4 | ||
| <0.001 | |||||||||
| Before 22 o'clock | 1208 | 33.8bc | 286 | 6.9ac | 164 | 4.0ab | 1658 | 14.0 | |
| Greater than or equal to 22 o'clock and less than 24 | 2087 | 58.3bc | 3325 | 80.4ac | 2138 | 52.2ab | 7550 | 63.9 | |
| No less than 24 o'clock | 282 | 7.9bc | 527 | 4.5ac | 1797 | 43.8ab | 2606 | 22.1 | |
| 1880 | 52.3bc | 2403 | 57.9ac | 2731 | 66.6ab | <0.001 | 7015 | 59.2 | |
| 23 | 0.6bc | 61 | 1.5ac | 99 | 2.4ab | <0.001 | 183 | 1.5 | |
| 1602 | 44.6bc | 2463 | 59.3ac | 2277 | 55.6ab | <0.001 | 6342 | 53.6 | |
a Compared with junior high school, P < 0.05.
b Compared with senior high school, P < 0.05.
c Compared with college, P < 0.05.
Binary regression analyses of the factors associated with insomnia (N = 11,835).
| Variables | B | SE | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 1 | ||||
| Female | 0.263 | 0.052 | 1.301 | 1.175–1.1.441 | <0.001 |
| Junior high school | 1 | ||||
| Senior high school | 0.320 | 0.066 | 1.378 | 1.210–1.568 | <0.001 |
| College | 0.710 | 0.071 | 2.033 | 1.768–2.338 | <0.001 |
| Rural area | 1 | ||||
| City | 0.168 | 0.054 | 1.183 | 1.065–1.315 | 0.002 |
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 1.850 | 0.065 | 6.361 | 5.599–7.227 | <0.001 |
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.722 | 0.059 | 2.059 | 1.835–2.310 | <0.001 |
| COVID-19 knowledge | −0.013 | 0.02 | 0.987 | 0.964–1.010 | 0.255 |
| Adverse impact of COVID-19 | 0.153 | 0.024 | 1.165 | 1.112–1.222 | <0.001 |
| Projections of COVID-19 trend | −0.085 | 0.025 | 0.919 | 0.875–0.965 | 0.001 |
| Subjective support | −0.033 | 0.005 | 0.967 | 0.957–0.978 | <0.001 |
| Objective support | −0.009 | 0.002 | 0.991 | 0.988–0.995 | <0.001 |
Fig. 4A shoes model 1 path diagram of the mediation model (X = subjective support; Y= PSQI total score). Path C represent the variance in subjective support associated with PSQI total score. Path C′ represent the association between subjective support and PSQI total score after taking into account PHQ-9 total scores. B shows model 2 path diagram of the mediation model (X = subjective support; Y= PSQI total score). Path C represent the variance in subjective support associated with PSQI total score. Path C′ represent the association between subjective support and PSQI total score after taking into account GAD-7 total scores. Path AB is the mediation effect and is significant at P<0.05 based on 95% CI from bias-corrected bootstrapping of 5000 samples.
Fig. 5A shows model 3 path diagram of the mediation model (X = subjective support; Y= PSQI total score). Path C represent the variance in subjective support associated with PSQI total score. Path C′ represent the association between subjective support and PSQI total score after taking into account PHQ-9 total scores. B shows model 4 path diagram of the mediation model (X = subjective support; Y= PSQI total score). Path C represent the variance in objective support associated with PSQI total score. Path C′ represent the association between objective support and PSQI total score after taking into account GAD-7 total scores. Path AB is the mediation effect and is significant at P<0.05 based on 95% CI from bias-corrected bootstrapping of 5000 samples.