| Literature DB >> 35967040 |
Nitin Kumar Sharma1,2, Jyotsna Vishwakarma3, Summi Rai4, Taghrid S Alomar5, Najla AlMasoud5, Ajaya Bhattarai4.
Abstract
The development of the most reliable and green techniques for nanoparticle synthesis is an emerging step in the area of green nanotechnology. Many conventional approaches used for nanoparticle (NP) synthesis are expensive, deadly, and nonenvironmental. In this new era of nanotechnology, to overcome such concerns, natural sources which work as capping and reducing agents, including bacteria, fungi, biopolymers, and plants, are suitable candidates for synthesizing AgNPs. The surface morphology and applications of AgNPs are significantly pretentious to the experimental conditions by which they are synthesized. Available scattered information on the synthesis of AgNPs comprises the influence of altered constraints and characterization methods such as FTIR, UV-vis, DLS, SEM, TEM, XRD, EDX, etc. and their properties and applications. This review focuses on all the above-mentioned natural sources that have been used for AgNP synthesis recently. The green routes to synthesize AgNPs have established effective applications in various areas, including biosensors, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cancer treatment, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), antimicrobial agents, drug delivery, gene therapy, DNA analysis, etc. The existing boundaries and prospects for metal nanoparticle synthesis by the green route are also discussed herein.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35967040 PMCID: PMC9366950 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Different methods of AgNPs synthesis.
Synthesis of AgNPs Using Different Methods: Advantages and Disadvantages
| synthesis methods | synthesis principle | advantages | disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| physical method | Physical method for the AgNPs
synthesized by using physical
energy to harvest AgNPs with a narrow size distribution.[ | Radiation is used as a reducing agent, so no dangerous chemicals involved produce a large number of silver nanoparticles in a single process within a short time. The silver nanoparticles produced are contamination-free and do not need further purification. | Expensive, less yield along with high consumption of energy, contamination of solvent, and random distribution. |
| chemical method | Silver ions reduce to the silver atoms by using chemical reducing agents. | Simple production, economics, and high yield. | Less use of capping agents for AgNP synthesis is toxic and hazardous; the manufactured particles require further purification as their surfaces are contaminated with chemical sediments; lack of regular sizes; require more steps to stop self-aggregation; and the release of hazardous byproducts during synthesis. |
| photochemical method | By using photochemically generated intermediates, production of metal course and reduction of metal ions. | A clean process with good spatial resolution and convenience. | High costs and experimental environment are required.[ |
| biological method | The reduction of silver ions to silver atoms by using biomolecules is derived from living organisms. | Cost-effective and
abundance of raw materials.[ |
Commonly Used Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Components from Plant Extracts
| method | procedure | extraction solvent | volume consumed | extraction time | extraction temperature | extraction efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| maceration | Powdered plant material is dissolved in solvent in a closed vessel for a long time with occasional shaking, filtered to obtain extract, and evaporated. | water, aqueous, and nonaqueous solvents | large | long (hours to days) | room temperature | low |
| Soxhlet extraction | Plant material loaded in a thimble is extracted by continuous hot extraction in a Soxhlet extractor. | organic solvents | moderate | long | under heat | moderate |
| pressurized liquid extraction | Plant material with solvent is heated above boiling point under high pressure. | aqueous or organic solvents | less | less (5–10 min) | under heat and pressure | high |
| supercritical fluid extraction | Supercritical fluid, mainly CO2, is used for plant extraction. | very little amount of organic solvent or no solvent | less | less | heated to supercritical conditions | high |
| microwave-assisted extraction | Plant material with appropriate solvent is packed into a microwave-assisted extractor. | mainly polar solvents | less | less (15–20 min) | under heat generated by conversion of microwave radiation | high |
| ultrasound-assisted extraction | Plant material with appropriate solvent is packed into an ultrasonic water bath. | less | less | under heat generated by the conversion of ultrasonic radiation | high |
Figure 2Generalized method for AgNP synthesis by using plant extracts.
Figure 3Mechanism of AgNP formation by using plant extracts.
Figure 4Chemical structures of common sugars, polysaccharides, and amino acids found in plant extracts.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of FTIR.
Figure 6Analyses of the FTIR spectrum of leaf extracts of Eichhornia crassipes (reprinted with permission from ref (84)).
Figure 7Infrared spectra of ginger extract (A) and silver nanoparticles produced using ginger extract (B) (reprinted with permission from ref (86)).
Figure 8Schematic diagram of the UV–visible spectrophotometer.
Figure 9Using Cyprus rotundas, the UV–visible spectrum of AgNPs (reprinted with permission from ref (95)).
Figure 10UV–visible absorption spectra of green synthesized AgNPs made with an aqueous Peganum harmala leaf extract (reprinted with permission from ref (96)).
Figure 11Absorption spectra of produced AgNPs in the ultraviolet–visible range utilizing ginger extract (reprinted with permission from ref (86)).
Figure 12XRD spectra of AgNPs produced with G. resinifera at various precursor concentrations (reprinted with permission from ref (98)).
Figure 13Schematic diagram of SEM.
Figure 14(a) R. glutinis AgNP SEM image and (c) size histogram. (b) R. mucilaginosa AgNP SEM image and (d) size histogram (reprinted with permission from ref (122)).
Figure 15Schematic diagram of TEM.
Figure 16Interaction of AgNPs with biomolecules.
Overview of Plant Extracts Used to Synthesize AgNPs and Their Potential Biological Applications
| plant species | parts used | extraction technique | bioactive components | agnps specification | potential application | reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stem bark | Soxhlet extraction with water. | amino acids, carbohydrates, alkaloids, tannins, glycosides, flavonoids, and steroids | polydispersed, sphere-shaped, 17–29 nm | antibacterial activity | ( | |
| leaves, flower, and stem | Boiled with water at 60 °C for 15–20 min with constant shaking. | polydispersed, sphere-shaped, 88.11 nm | antibacterial activity | ( | ||
| tuber | Macerated with methanol for 4 days. | phenolic compounds | sphere-shaped, 5–8 nm | antibacterial activity | ( | |
| aerial part | Boiling with 50% ethanol at 60 °C for 10 min. | flavonoid and phenolic acids | sphere-shaped, 5–25 nm | antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activity | ( | |
| leaf | Boiling with water at 85 °C for 60 min with continuous stirring at 200 rpm. | sphere-shaped | anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activity | ( | ||
| leaf | Maceration with 70% methanol. | phenolics and flavonoids | sphere-shaped, 3–6 nm | antibacterial activity and anticancer activity | ( | |
| flower | Simple boiling with water for 5 min. | flavonoids, terpenoids, and glycosides | polydispersed, sphere-shaped, 37.71–71.99 nm | antibacterial activity, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, and no cytotoxic activity | ( | |
| leaf | Simple extraction with cold water followed by centrifugation. | alkaloids and flavonoids | polydispersed, cuboidal, and rectangular-shaped, 15–65 nm | antibacterial activity. | ( | |
| leaf | Simple boiling with water for 30 min followed by centrifugation. | iridoids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and etheric oils | quasi-sphere-shaped, 40.37 ± 1.8 nm | anticancer activity, antibacterial activity, and antibiofilm activity | ( | |
| stem bark | Boiled with ethanol. | scavenging, antiurolithiatic, and antidiabetic activity | ( | |||
| leaf | Macerated with ethanol (98%) for 24 h with shaking at room temperature. | essential oils, phenolics, terpenoids, and flavonoids | sphere-shaped, 23.4–53.2 nm | scavenging, antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory activity | ( | |
| root | Ultrasound-assisted extraction with 70% ethanol. | spherical and irregularly shaped, 12–15 nm | antibacterial activity | ( |