| Literature DB >> 33850732 |
Deepika Singh1, Deepak Chaudhary2, Vikas Kumar1, Amita Verma1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Inflammation and oxidative stress are the main factors ascribed with interruption in the process of renal tissue impairment. The toxicity of different types of nitrosamine is well recognized in animals and humans. Administration of the smallest quantities of diethylnitrosamine or dimethylnitrosamine either orally or parenterally results into renal damage. Therapeutic effects of phytofabricated silver nanoparticles of Carissa carandas aqueous extract has been scrutinised in current study for the assessment of renal cancer activity in animal model.Entities:
Keywords: ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; AgNO3, silver nitrate; AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CC, carissa carandas; CCAgNPs, silver nanoparticles of carissa carandas aqueous extract; CDNB, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene; Carissa carandas embedded silver nanoparticles; DEN, diethylnitrosamine; DLS, dynamic light scattering; DMN, dimethylnitrosamine; DMSO, dimethyl sulphoxide; FE-SEM, field emission scanning electron microscopy; GGT, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase activity; GSH, glutathione; GST, glutathione –S- Transferase; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; IAEC, institutional animal ethical committee; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MDA, malondialdehyde; NF-κB pathway; NPs, nanoparticles; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Renal carcinoma; SOD, superoxide dismutase; XO, xanthine oxidase
Year: 2021 PMID: 33850732 PMCID: PMC8039534 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.03.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Experimental protocol for Carissa carandas embedded silver nanoparticles.
Fig. 2FESEM images of Carissa carandas embedded silver nanoparticles.
Fig. 6Effect of CCAgNPs on tumour marker enzymes.
Results were represented as mean ± SEM of six animals in each group. It was analysed statistically significantly (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001) groups compared to normal control; (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) groups compared to DEN control; ns -not significant.
Fig. 3FESEM images of Carissa carandas embedded silver nanoparticles.
Fig. 4in vitro antioxidant study by ABTS scavenging activity of CCAgNPs.
Fig. 5Effect of CCAgNPs on theserum marker enzymes of rats.
Results were represented as mean ± SEM of six animals in each group. It was analysed statistically significantly (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001) groups compared to normal control; (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) groups compared to DEN control; ns -not significant.
Fig. 7Effect of CCAgNPs on the levels of endogenous antioxidant enzymes.
Results were represented as mean ± SEM of six animals in each group. It was analysed statistically significantly (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001) groups compared to normal control; (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) groups compared to DEN control; ns -not significant.
Fig. 8Effect of CCAgNPs on the proinflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators.
Results were represented as mean ± SEM of six animals in each group. It was analysed statistically significantly (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001) groups compared to normal control; (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) groups compared to DEN control; ns -not significant.
Fig. 9Effect of CCAgNPs on Tumour promotion enzymes.
Fig. 10Photograph of eosin-haematoxylin stained histological renal section area for (a) Normal Control group, (b) DEN induced renal cancer group (c) DEN + CCAgNPs (20 mg/kg bw), (d) DEN + CCAgNPs (30 mg/kg bw).