A simple and efficient protocol has been developed to access symmetrical and unsymmetrical 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from arylacetic acids and hydrazides via copper-catalyzed dual oxidation under an oxygen atmosphere. Oxidative decarboxylation of arylacetic acids and oxidative functionalization of the imine C-H bond are the key steps. This is the first example of the synthesis of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles through dual oxidation in one-pot. Avoidance of the expensive ligand and high yield of the products are advantageous features of the developed method.
A simple and efficient protocol has been developed to access symmetrical and unsymmetrical 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from arylacetic acids and hydrazides via copper-catalyzed dual oxidation under an oxygen atmosphere. Oxidative decarboxylation of arylacetic acids and oxidative functionalization of the imine C-H bond are the key steps. This is the first example of the synthesis of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles through dual oxidation in one-pot. Avoidance of the expensive ligand and high yield of the products are advantageous features of the developed method.
1,3,4-Oxadiazole scaffolds exist ubiquitously
in natural products,
pharmaceuticals, polymers, and materials.[1] In particular, the compounds that are containing 2,5-disubstituted
1,3,4-oxadiazole motifs exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities
including antimicrobial, anticonvulsant, antidiabetic, antiproliferative,
anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, anticancer, antimalarial, antiobesity,
antiviral, antidepressant, antihypertensive, antileishmanial, insecticidal,
herbicidal, analgesic, antioxidant, immunosuppressant, monoamine oxidase
inhibitory, and urease inhibitory activities (Figure ).[2] On the other
hand, these scaffolds are being employed in the development of organic
light-emitting diodes (OLEDS), which are utilized in full-color, flat-panel
displays.[3] Moreover, some of the conjugated
oxadiazoles act as multiphoton absorbing systems.[4]
Figure 1
Active compounds containing 1,3,4-oxadiazole scaffolds.
Active compounds containing 1,3,4-oxadiazole scaffolds.Owing to their importance in various fields, the
exploration of
methodologies for the synthesis of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles is being continued
by organic chemists.[5] Traditional methods
used for the construction of 1,3,4-oxadiazole framework involve the
N-acylation of acyl hydrazides or their precursors with either carboxylic
acids or their activated derivatives such as acid chlorides,[6] esters,[7] and anhydrides[8] followed by intramolecular cyclodehydration.
Alternatively, these compounds can also be constructed by oxidative
cyclization of N-acyl hydrazones in the presence of various oxidizing
agents such as hypervalent iodines,[9a−9e] chloramine T,[9f] ceric
ammonium nitrate,[9g] FeCl3,[9h] tetravalent lead reagents,[9i,9j] Br2,[9k] KMnO4 under
microwave condition,[9l] Fe(III)/TEMPO,[10] Cu(OTf)2,[11] I2/K2CO3,[12] and isobutyl aldehyde/O2/PhI[13] (Scheme a). These
methods are, however, often limited in the requirement of harsh reaction
conditions such as the involvement of strong acids in combination
with high temperature and utilization of toxic oxidants. Some of these
drawbacks have been overcome by the recent developments in metal-catalyzed
cross-coupling reactions via C–H activation
that allow the construction of target heterocyclic compounds under
relatively milder conditions. For example, 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles
have been synthesized by copper-catalyzed coupling between 1,3,4-oxadiazole
with aryl or alkenyl halides (Scheme b).[14] Subsequently, He et
al. disclosed a metal- and base-free reaction to obtain 2,5-diaryl
1,3,4-oxadiazoles from aryl tetrazoles by N-acylation with aldehydes
followed by thermal rearrangement (Scheme c).[15] Recently,
Li Liu et al. developed a novel approach to assemble 2,5-disubstituted
1,3,4-oxadiazoles from α-oxocarboxylic acids via a decarboxylative cyclization by photoredox catalysis using hypervalent
(III) iodine as a catalyst (Scheme d).[16] Although these methods
are impressive, still there are some drawbacks such as the presynthesis
of starting materials, long reaction times, expensive ligands, reagents,
and low yields. Therefore, facile and simple approaches for accessing
an array of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from easily available
starting materials are highly desirable.
Scheme 1
Recent Progress in
the Synthesis of 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles
Recently, transition-metal-catalyzed decarboxylative
coupling of
carboxylic acids, in particular, C(sp3) arylacetic acids,
has been employed as an effective tool in organic synthesis to forge
various heterocyclic compounds[17] because
arylacetic acids are highly stable compared to aldehydes and release
a nontoxic byproduct (CO2). Moreover, arylacetic acids
are cheap, commercially available, nontoxic, and easy to handle, thus
making it advantageous to be used as an ideal starting material. Recently,
our group reported the synthesis of 2,4,6 triphenyl pyridines using
oxime acetates and arylacetic acids via oxidative decarboxylative
cyclization.[18] As a continuous study on
this field, we visualized that 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles
could be synthesized from aryl hydrazides and arylacetic acids via dual oxidation using oxygen as the sole terminal oxidant.
This reaction involves copper-catalyzed oxidative decarboxylation
coupling followed by the oxidative functionalization of the imine
C–H bond (Scheme e). To the best of our knowledge, this protocol has not been reported
to date.
Results and Discussion
Initially, we began our investigation
by employing the reaction
of hydrazide 1a (0.7 mmol) and arylacetic acid 2a (0.7 mmol) with the catalytic system of CuI (20 mol %)
and K2CO3 (0.3 mmol, 0.5 equiv) in dimethylformamide
(DMF) (2.0 mL) at 120 °C for 4 h under an oxygen atmosphere.
To our delight, the target product 3a was obtained with
a 74% yield (Table , entry 1). To improve the yield of 3a, we examined
different copper catalysts such as CuCl2, CuBr, Cu(OAc)2, and CuCl (Table , entries 2–4) and found that CuCl was the best choice
and provided a 92% yield (Table , entry 5). It was also observed that no desired product
could be obtained in the absence of copper catalysts (Table , entry 6). Subsequently, various
oxidants such as DTBP, PIDA, and TBHP were tested; these results illustrated
that oxygen displayed the best ability in the transformation (Table , entries 7–9).
We also performed the reaction in air without any additional oxidant,
but only 22% of 3a was observed (Table , entry 10). Further, other bases including
NaHCO3, Cs2CO3, and Na2CO3 were tested, and K2CO3 was proven
to be the most effective base (Table , entries 11–13). This investigation also revealed
that the base was very crucial for this reaction and no desired product
was observed in the absence of base (Table , entry 14). The screening of different solvents
such as DMSO, dioxane, and toluene indicated that DMF was a suitable
solvent (Table , entries
15–17). The yield of 3a was decreased when either
the increase of the catalyst was from 20 to 30 mol % or the decrease
of the catalyst was to 10 mol % (Table , entries 17–19). In addition, the parallel
reaction conducted at 80 °C gave a lower yield of 3a, and increasing the reaction temperature could not enhance the yield
either (Table , entries
20 and 21).
Table 1
Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
s. no
catalyst
(mol %)
oxidant
base
solvent
T (°C)
yieldb (%)
1
CuI (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
74
2
CuCl2(20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
82
3
CuBr (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
80
4
Cu(OAc)2 (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
84
5
CuCl (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
92
6
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
NR
7
CuCl (20)
DTBP
K2CO3
DMF
120
23
8
CuCl (20)
PIDA
K2CO3
DMF
120
45
9
CuCl (20)
TBHP
K2CO3
DMF
120
34
10
CuCl (20)
Air
K2CO3
DMF
120
22
11
CuCl (20)
O2
NaHCO3
DMF
120
82
12
CuCl (20)
O2
Cs2CO3
DMF
120
36
13
CuCl (20)
O2
Na2CO3
DMF
120
43
14
CuCl (20)
O2
DMF
120
NR
15
CuCl (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMSO
120
85
16
CuCl (20)
O2
K2CO3
Dioxane
120
76
17
CuCl (20)
O2
K2CO3
Toluene
120
62
18
CuCl (30)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
80
19
CuCl (10)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
120
65
20
CuCl (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
80
22
21
CuCl (20)
O2
K2CO3
DMF
150
44
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), catalyst (20 mol%), base
(0.5 equiv), and solvent (2.0 mL), 120 °C, under an oxygen atmosphere,
4 h.
Isolated yields.
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), catalyst (20 mol%), base
(0.5 equiv), and solvent (2.0 mL), 120 °C, under an oxygen atmosphere,
4 h.Isolated yields.With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we then
explored
the scope of various substituted hydrazides and arylacetic acids to
generate the desired products. In general, substituted aryl hydrazides
reacted with arylacetic acid 2a and delivered the respective
products in moderate to good yields (Scheme ). Simple hydrazide 1a reacted
with arylacetic acid 2a and gave the desired product 3a in a 92% yield. Hydrazides with electron-donating groups
such as 3-CH3, 4-CH3, 3-OCH3, and
4-OCH3 groups on the aromatic ring could convert efficiently
and give good yields (Scheme ). Hydrazides having electron-withdrawing groups such as 2-Cl,
4-Cl, 2-Br, and 4-F on the aromatic ring also took part in the reaction
with arylacetic acid and afforded good yields. It is noteworthy that
nitro-substituted hydrazide also survived and gave the respective
1,3,4-oxadiazole (3j) in a 52% yield.
Scheme 2
Scope of Hydrazides
and Arylacetic Acids,
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), CuCl (20 mol%),
K2CO3 (0.5 equiv), and DMF (2.0 mL), 120 °C,
under
an oxygen atmosphere, 4 h.
Isolated yields.
Scope of Hydrazides
and Arylacetic Acids,
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), CuCl (20 mol%),
K2CO3 (0.5 equiv), and DMF (2.0 mL), 120 °C,
under
an oxygen atmosphere, 4 h.Isolated yields.Moreover,
hydrazide with a heterocyclic substituent
was compatible with this conversion and gave a 63% yield (3r). To our delight, hydrazides with alkyl substituents were also well
tolerated and afforded good yields (3s and 3t). To prove the practicability of this protocol, the reaction was
scaled up to the gram scale. The coupling of 1a (1.0
g, 7.3 mmol) with 2a (1.0 g, 7.3 mmol) on the gram scale
proceeded smoothly under the optimized conditions to obtain the desired
product 3a in an 82% yield.Next, various arylacetic
acids under the optimized reaction conditions
were examined and the results are shown in Scheme . Arylacetic acids bearing either electron-donating
3-CH3, 4-CH3, 3-OCH3, and 4-OCH3 (2b, 2c, 2d, 2e) or electron-withdrawing groups 2-Cl and 4-F (2f and 2i) on the aromatic ring were able to undergo this
transformation smoothly to get the intended 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles
in moderate to good yields (Scheme ). To our delight, 4-nitroarylacetic acid was also
tolerated for this reaction and gave a 48% yield of the corresponding
1,3,4-oxadiazole (3j′). Notably, heteroarylacetic
acids were also compatible in this reaction and gave the desired products
in good yields (3v, 3w).
Scheme 3
Scope of Arylacetic
Acids,
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), CuCl (20 mol %),
K2CO3 (0.5 equiv), and DMF (2.0 mL), 120 °C,
under
an oxygen atmosphere, 4 h.
Isolated yields.
Scope of Arylacetic
Acids,
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), CuCl (20 mol %),
K2CO3 (0.5 equiv), and DMF (2.0 mL), 120 °C,
under
an oxygen atmosphere, 4 h.Isolated yields.To gain insight into the
mechanism of this protocol, several control
experiments have been performed (Scheme ). Since the reaction involves oxygen, radical
trapping experiments were conducted with arylacetic acid under optimized
conditions. During these experiments, we observed that the reaction
was obviously inhibited in the presence of butylated hydroxytoluene
(BHT) or 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO). The results
showed that the reaction presumably underwent a radical pathway (Scheme , eq 1). In our previous
work, we identified that arylacetic acids can be converted into aldehydes
via oxidative decarboxylation in the presence of a copper catalyst
under an oxygen atmosphere (Scheme , eq 2).[18] As shown in eq
3, when we performed the reaction of benzaldehyde with aryl hydrazide
under standard conditions, the desirable product 3 was
obtained in a 92% yield. It strongly revealed that benzaldehyde is
formed as an intermediate in the reaction.
Scheme 4
Control Experiments
Based on the above results and previous
studies,[18−20] the plausible mechanism of the present reaction is
illustrated in Scheme . In the first step, arylacetic acid gives araldehyde (A) via oxidative decarboxylation in the presence
of a copper catalyst under an oxygen atmosphere. The araldehyde (A) further converts into acyl radical (B) followed
by acyl cation (C) in the presence of copper and oxygen.
Then, a nucleophilic reaction of hydrazide (1) to C forms D. Coordination of D with
Cu(I) ion provides E in the presence of a base. Finally,
product 3 affords by the intramolecular nucleophilic
attack of an oxygen atom to the double bond followed by oxidation.
Scheme 5
Plausible Mechanism
In conclusion, we have developed a simple and
efficient protocol
for the synthesis of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from hydrazides
and arylacetic acids via copper-catalyzed dual oxidation
in DMF at 120 °C for 4 h under an oxygen atmosphere. This protocol
involves the oxidative decarboxylation of arylacetic acids followed
by oxidative functionalization of the imine C–H bond. In this
reaction, various hydrazides and arylacetic acids are well tolerated
and provided the 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles in good yields.
Usage of the easily available starting substrates, operational simplicity,
and avoiding the use of expensive ligands are the advantages of this
methodology.