| Literature DB >> 35966648 |
Zhenhua Xie1,2, Yingnan Liu1,2, Dongdong Di3, Jingyi Liu1,2, Lang Gong4, Zongyan Chen1,2, Yao Li1,2, Wanqi Yu1,2, Lu Lv1,2, Qiuping Zhong1,2, Yingying Song1,2, Xinxin Liao1,2, Qingqing Song3, Heng Wang4, Hongjun Chen1,2.
Abstract
African swine fever virus (ASFV) represents a serious threat to the global swine industry, and there are no safe or commercially available vaccines. Previous studies have demonstrated that inactivated vaccines do not provide sufficient protection against ASFV and that attenuated vaccines are effective, but raise safety concerns. Here, we first constructed a deletion mutant in which EP153R and EP402R gene clusters were knocked out. Based on the deletion mutant, a further deletion from the MGF_360-12L, MGF_360-13L to MGF_360-14L genes was obtained. The five-genes knockout virus was designated as ASFV-ΔECM3. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the ASFV-ΔECM3 virus as a vaccine candidate, the evaluation of the virus was subsequently carried out in pigs. The results showed that the ASFV-ΔECM3 virus could induce homologous protection against the parental isolate, and no significant clinical signs or viremia were observed. These results show that the contiguous deletion mutant, ASFV-ΔECM3 encompassing the EP153R/EP402R and MGF_360-12L/13L/14L genes, could be a potential live-attenuated vaccine candidate for the prevention of ASFV infection.Entities:
Keywords: African swine fever virus; live attenuated vaccine; protective efficacy; recombinant viruses; safety
Year: 2022 PMID: 35966648 PMCID: PMC9374035 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.902932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Primer sequences.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ATGTTTTCTAACAAAAAGTACATCGGTCT |
|
|
| TTATTTACTACAAATATATAATAAACTT ACATGTTTTTGTTTTTTGT | |
|
| CCTAAGCCTTACAGTCGTTATCAG |
|
|
| TGGCGGGATATTGGGTAGTA | |
|
| TGCCCACGAACCAACATTA |
|
|
| GTGGTGGCCGGACTATAAAT | |
|
| GGATCGTGGCCGAATACAAATA |
|
|
| CAAAGGCATTACCACCCAAATC | |
|
| CGGGTAGCTTGTAGCCTTTATT |
|
|
| GATACTCTTCGGCTCGTTTCAG |
Figure 1Schematic of the construction of ASFV-ΔECM3 deletion mutant. (A) The EP153R, EP402R, MGF_360-12L, MGF_360-13L, and MGF_360-14L genes from the GZ201801 genome were replaced by the p72eGFPΔEP153R/ΔEP402R and p72mCherryΔMGF_360-12L/13L/14L recombination transfer vectors by homologous recombination. (B) eGFP and mCherry reporter fluorescence indicate BMDM cells infection with the ASFV-ΔECM3 virus. (C) Confirmation of the ASFV-ΔECM3 deletion mutant by PCR. Lanes 1 and 6 test for the EP153R gene. Lanes 2 and 7 test for the EP402R gene. Lanes 3 and 8 test for the MGF_360-12L gene. Lanes 4 and 9 test for the MGF_360-13L gene. Lanes 5 and 10 test for the MGF_360-14L gene.
Figure 2In vitro growth characteristics of ASFV-ΔECM3 and parental GZ201801 virus. Primary swine macrophage cell cultures were infected (MOI = 0.01) with either virus, and virus yield was titrated at the indicated times post-infection. Data represent means and SD from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Safety investigation of ASFV-ΔECM3 as a vaccine candidate in pigs. (A) Body temperature in piglets challenged with ASFV-ΔECM3 virus and parental GZ201801. (B) Viremia titers were detected in piglets inoculated with ASFV-ΔECM3 virus. Viral titers of oral swabs (C), nasal swabs (D), and anal swabs (E) were evaluated post-infection. The sensitivity of virus detection was ≥ 102.45 TCID50/ml, which meant Cycle threadhold (Ct) more than 35 might be considered below the limit of detection by qPCR analysis. **p < 0.01.
Figure 4Virulence of the ASFV-ΔECM3 virus by serial passages in pigs. The ASFV-ΔECM virus was serially passaged in pigs five times, the organs and tissues with lesions were collected, dissociated, and re-injected into pigs. The qPCR analysis for detection of the viral distribution in pigs. The sensitivity of virus detection was ≥ 102.45 TCID50/ml.
Figure 5The efficacy of ASFV-ΔECM3 virus against ASFV-GZ201801 infection. (A) Body temperature in the ASFV-ΔECM3 virus immunized piglets challenged with parental GZ201801. (B) Percentage of animals surviving after challenge. (C) Viremia titers were detected in piglets that were immunized with ASFV-ΔECM3 virus after being challenged with the parental GZ201801 virus. Viral titers of oral swabs (D), nasal swabs (E), and anal swabs (F) were detected in piglets that were immunized with ASFV-ΔECM3 virus after being challenged with parental GZ201801 virus. (G) The viral shedding in the tissues was measured. The sensitivity of virus detection was ≥102.45 TCID50/ml. **p < 0.01.
Swine survival and fever response following infection with ASFV-ΔECM3 and challenge with parental GZ201801.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| ASFV-GZ201801 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 3.6 | 41.36 |
| ASFV-ΔECM3 | 5 | - | - | - | 39.74 |
p < 0.05.
Figure 6Histological sections of the tissues by HandE staining and TUNEL assay. (A) Histopathological analysis of the spleen, lung, liver, kidney, and mandibular lymph node in the ASFV-ΔECM3 virus and parental GZ201801 (H and E staining). (B) TUNEL assay of lymph nodes.
Figure 7Detection of antibodies against ASFV in sera of pigs. Serum levels of ASFV-specific antibodies were measured using the African Swine Fever Competition ELISA kits. Positive: S/N%≤40%. Doubtful: 40%< S/N% <50%. Negative: S/N% ≥50%.