Literature DB >> 35966159

Delayed urticaria after BNT162b2 booster vaccination at previous intradermal test site with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 spike protein.

Jidapa Triwatcharikorn1, Jettanong Klaewsongkram2, Pawinee Rerknimitr1.   

Abstract

Urticaria is a common cutaneous adverse event from coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination. Previous studies hypothesized that excipients as polyethylene glycol in BNT162b2 vaccine and polysorbate in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine are allergens. A 28-year-old woman had urticaria after a booster vaccination with BNT162b2 at the site of previous intradermal injection with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein. This reaction emphasized that delayed urticaria may not be an allergic reaction to excipient but rather to the immunogen as such as SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Copyright © 2022. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BNT162 vaccine; COVID-19 vaccination; Delayed urticaria; Pfizer

Year:  2022        PMID: 35966159      PMCID: PMC9353207          DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy        ISSN: 2233-8276


INTRODUCTION

Urticaria is a common cutaneous adverse event from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. The onset is delay (>4 hours) in most reaction [1]. The exact immunological mechanism is yet to be identified. We herein report a case of localized urticaria after a booster vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer Inc.; Philadelphia, PA, USA) at the site of previous intradermal injection with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein. This case might shed some light on the pathomechanism of urticaria induced by COVID-19 vaccination. This case report was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (IRB number: 668/64).

CASE REPORT

A 28-year-old woman was a healthcare volunteer to identify nonirritating concentration of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for skin intradermal testing (IDT). The IDT was undertaken with 1/100 and 1/1,000 synthetic SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides (Mimotopes Pty Ltd., Mulgrave, VIC, Australia) dilution at volar side of left forearm. After a 30-minute observational period, the skin test showed negative result. However, 12 hours later, a 1-cm infiltrated erythematous papule appeared at the 1/100 spike protein injection site (Fig. 1) and disappeared spontaneously 3 days later. The volunteer had completed CoronaVac (Sinovac, Beijing, China) vaccination 3 weeks earlier and had no prior COVID-19 infection. Four weeks after the skin testing, BNT162b2 was given as a booster vaccine. Thirty-six hours after the injection, an itchy indurated wheal occurred on the previous IDT-positive test site (Fig. 2). The 0.1% betamethasone valerate cream was applied and the lesion faded in 2 hours. She had fever, myalgia, and headache. Systemic symptoms resolved after 3 days. Physical examination showed an indurated erythematous papule, 1 cm in diameter on volar side of left forearm.
Fig. 1

An indurated erythematous papule after 12 hours of intradermal test with 1/100 and 1/1000 severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 spike protein dilution at volar side of left forearm.

Fig. 2

An urticarial reaction occurred 36 hours after an injection of booster dose BNT162b2 COVID vaccine.

DISCUSSION

Though IDT is mainly used for type 1 IgE-mediated drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR), delayed reading can serve as a tool for non-immediate DHR testing [2]. The volunteer showed a reaction from spike protein at 12-hour period, therefore this reaction may not be IgE-mediated in nature. The similar pattern of reaction has been reported to occur from IDT with COVID-19 vaccines in individuals who have already been vaccinated. It is thought to be a sign of desired cellular immune protection as the second exposure to a specific allergen, sensitized T cells mount immune responses resulting in inflammation [3]. Interestingly, delayed urticaria developed at the site of IDT with spike protein after BNT162b2 was given. A recent study has demonstrated the presence of SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in endothelial cells in urticarial rash from a COVID-19 patient by Immunohistochemistry study [4]. Moreover, we have seen cases of COVID-19 vaccine-associated urticaria who were tested positive with spike protein IDT. The fact that urticaria appeared at the site of spike protein injection is intriguing. Patients who recovered from COVID-19 infection can continue to have SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in their upper respiratory tract specimens for up to 12 weeks after symptom onset [56]. Though there are no studies to investigate how long SARS-CoV-2 RNA/spike protein remain in skin after the infection, we consider that the spike protein that was introduced through the skin may remain at the test site until the time of the booster vaccine is given (4 weeks later). Once the booster vaccine is administered, it is capable of eliciting innate and adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 [7]. Plethora of immune cells are activated and may lead to a reaction with the residual spike protein inducing urticarial lesion. Unfortunately, skin biopsy was not obtained from the subject due to the ethical consideration. The delayed localized urticaria occurred solitary at the previous skin tested site. According to the fact that CoronaVac and BNT162b2 do not shared any same excipients, and the synthetic SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides were diluted with normal saline (without added excipients), this delayed localized urticaria should be the reaction between embedded SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides and host immune responses. Urticaria is frequently IgE-mediated, however, mast cell degranulation can be induced via activation of complement systems, IgG, cytokines, chemokines, and other inflammatory mediators [89]. Delayed urticaria (onset > 24 hours) can be associated with COVID-19 as well as other vaccines [1011]. The pathophysiology of this reaction is not well understood. With findings from the previous reports together with this present case, we hypothesize that delayed urticaria from COVID-19 vaccines is non-IgE-mediated immune reaction, not to the vaccine excipients but rather to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This is evident by the fact that those with delayed urticaria from the first dose can be safely vaccinated in the second dose without fatal recurrence [1]. In conclusion, a 28-year-old woman who had completed CoronaVac vaccination 3 weeks earlier underwent intradermal test with 1/100 and 1/1,000 synthetic SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides. A delayed localized urticaria occurred at the test site after she received BNT162b2 booster vaccination. Delayed urticaria from COVID-19 vaccination may not be an allergic reaction to the excipients but rather to the immunogen such as SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Non-IgE mediated mast cell activation.

Authors:  Yingxin Yu; Bart R Blokhuis; Johan Garssen; Frank A Redegeld
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 2.  Vaccine allergy.

Authors:  Jean-Christoph Caubet; Claude Ponvert
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 3.  Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Michael M McNeil; Frank DeStefano
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 4.  Vaccines and allergic reactions: The past, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vanitha Sampath; Grace Rabinowitz; Mihir Shah; Surabhi Jain; Zuzana Diamant; Milos Jesenak; Ronald Rabin; Stefan Vieths; Ioana Agache; Mübeccel Akdis; Domingo Barber; Heimo Breiteneder; Sharon Chinthrajah; Tomas Chivato; William Collins; Thomas Eiwegger; Katharine Fast; Wytske Fokkens; Robyn E O'Hehir; Markus Ollert; Liam O'Mahony; Oscar Palomares; Oliver Pfaar; Carmen Riggioni; Mohamed H Shamji; Milena Sokolowska; Maria Jose Torres; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann; Menno van Zelm; De Yun Wang; Luo Zhang; Cezmi A Akdis; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 5.  An Updated Review of the Diagnostic Methods in Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Ana Copaescu; Andrew Gibson; Yueran Li; Jason A Trubiano; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: A registry-based study of 414 cases.

Authors:  Devon E McMahon; Erin Amerson; Misha Rosenbach; Jules B Lipoff; Danna Moustafa; Anisha Tyagi; Seemal R Desai; Lars E French; Henry W Lim; Bruce H Thiers; George J Hruza; Kimberly G Blumenthal; Lindy P Fox; Esther E Freeman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  SARS-CoV-2 spike protein positivity in pityriasis rosea-like and urticaria-like rashes of COVID-19.

Authors:  E Welsh; J A Cardenas-de la Garza; A Cuellar-Barboza; R Franco-Marquez; R I Arvizu-Rivera
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 11.113

8.  False negative of RT-PCR and prolonged nucleic acid conversion in COVID-19: Rather than recurrence.

Authors:  Ai Tang Xiao; Yi Xin Tong; Sheng Zhang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Baricitinib therapy in COVID-19: A pilot study on safety and clinical impact.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cantini; Laura Niccoli; Daniela Matarrese; Emanuele Nicastri; Paolo Stobbione; Delia Goletti
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 10.  COVID-19 vaccines: modes of immune activation and future challenges.

Authors:  John R Teijaro; Donna L Farber
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 53.106

View more
  1 in total

1.  APAAACI's activities and this issue.

Authors:  Yoon-Seok Chang
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2022-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.