| Literature DB >> 35965776 |
Vidyadevi G Biradar1, Mejdal A Alqahtani2, H C Nagaraj3, Emad A Ahmed4, Vikas Tripathi5, Miguel Botto-Tobar6,7, Henry Kwame Atiglah8.
Abstract
The COVID-19 infection is the greatest danger to humankind right now because of the devastation it causes to the lives of its victims. It is important that infected people be tested in a timely manner in order to halt the spread of the disease. Physical approaches are time-consuming, expensive, and tedious. As a result, there is a pressing need for a cost-effective and efficient automated tool. A convolutional neural network is presented in this paper for analysing X-ray pictures of patients' chests. For the analysis of COVID-19 infections, this study investigates the most suitable pretrained deep learning models, which can be integrated with mobile or online apps and support the mobility of diagnostic instruments in the form of a portable tool. Patients can use the smartphone app to find the nearest healthcare testing facility, book an appointment, and get instantaneous results, while healthcare professionals can keep track of the details thanks to the web and mobile applications built for this study. Medical practitioners can apply the COVID-19 detection model for chest frontal X-ray pictures with ease. A user-friendly interface is created to make our end-to-end solution paradigm work. Based on the data, it appears that the model could be useful in the real world.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35965776 PMCID: PMC9372529 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7126259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1DenseNet architecture.
Figure 2ResNet-18 architecture.
Figure 3SqueezeNet architecture.
Figure 4Positive images.
Figure 5Negative images.
Number of images.
| Datasets | Corona +ve | Corona −ve | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training | 100 | 150 | 250 |
| Validation | 50 | 100 | 150 |
| Testing | 50 | 100 | 150 |
Model parameters.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Epoch count | 100 |
| Optimizer | Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) |
| Loss function | Cross-entropy loss |
| Learning rate | 0.001 |
| Model momentum | 0.9 |
| Batch size | 10 |
Figure 6Architecture design.
Figure 7(a) Test history. (b) Test centers on map. (c) Booking a test center.
Figure 8Web portal patient history screen.
Figure 9X-ray upload screen.
Figure 10Validation accuracy plot.
Figure 11Training loss plot.
Figure 12Validation loss plot.
Performance metrics.
| Model | COVID + correct classification (TP) | COVID + wrong classification (FP) | COVID correct classification (FN) | COVID wrong classification (TN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DenseNet121 | 47 | 3 | 99 | 1 |
| ResNet18 | 47 | 3 | 97 | 3 |
| SqueezeNet | 44 | 6 | 98 | 2 |
Figure 13SqueezeNet confusion matrix.
Figure 14ResNet confusion matrix.
Figure 15DenseNet confusion matrix.
Model training comparison.
| Model | Time to predict 200 images (s) | Time to predict a single image (s) |
|---|---|---|
| DenseNet121 | 18.85 | 0.09 |
| ResNet18 | 10.13 | 0.05 |
| SqueezeNet | 9.90 | 0.04 |
Prediction scores using different metrics.
| Model | Accuracy | Sensitivity |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| DenseNet121 | 97.33 | 94.00 | 95.92 |
| ResNet18 | 96.00 | 94.00 | 94.00 |
| SqueezeNet | 94.67 | 88.00 | 91.67 |