| Literature DB >> 32837678 |
Y Pathak1, P K Shukla6, A Tiwari3, S Stalin4, S Singh5, P K Shukla6.
Abstract
The COVID-19 infection is increasing at a rapid rate, with the availability of limited number of testing kits. Therefore, the development of COVID-19 testing kits is still an open area of research. Recently, many studies have shown that chest Computed Tomography (CT) images can be used for COVID-19 testing, as chest CT images show a bilateral change in COVID-19 infected patients. However, the classification of COVID-19 patients from chest CT images is not an easy task as predicting the bilateral change is defined as an ill-posed problem. Therefore, in this paper, a deep transfer learning technique is used to classify COVID-19 infected patients. Additionally, a top-2 smooth loss function with cost-sensitive attributes is also utilized to handle noisy and imbalanced COVID-19 dataset kind of problems. Experimental results reveal that the proposed deep transfer learning-based COVID-19 classification model provides efficient results as compared to the other supervised learning models.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Chest CT images; Classification; Deep learning; Disease
Year: 2020 PMID: 32837678 PMCID: PMC7238986 DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2020.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ing Rech Biomed ISSN: 1876-0988
Fig. 1Chest CT image of COVID-19 infected patient: (a) When the patient come for checkup and (b) to (d) Chest CT images taken on day 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively.
Fig. 2Proposed deep transfer learning (DTL) based COVID-19 classification model.
Algorithm 1Deep transfer learning based COVID-19 classification [24].
Fig. 3Architectural requirements of ResNet-50.
Proposed architecture of convolutional neural network.
Algorithm 2Convolutional neural networks.
Fig. 4Confusion matrix based performance metrics used for comparative analyses.
Fig. 5Training and validation accuracy analyses of deep transfer learning (DTL) and gated bi-directional convolutional neural networks (GCNN) models.
Training analyses of the COVID-19 classification models by considering confusion matrix and various performance metrics.
| Model | TP | FP | TN | FN | Precision | NPV | Sn | Sp | Acc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANN | 234 | 36 | 239 | 21 | 0.866667 | 0.919231 | 0.917647 | 0.869091 | 0.892453 |
| ANFIS | 245 | 25 | 241 | 19 | 0.907407 | 0.926923 | 0.92803 | 0.906015 | 0.916981 |
| CNN | 247 | 23 | 235 | 25 | 0.914815 | 0.903846 | 0.908088 | 0.910853 | 0.909434 |
| DTL | 256 | 14 | 238 | 22 | 0.948148 | 0.915385 | 0.920863 | 0.944444 | 0.932075 |
| Proposed | 264 | 6 | 246 | 14 | 0.977778 | 0.946154 | 0.94964 | 0.97619 | 0.962264 |
Validation analyses of the COVID-19 classification models by considering confusion matrix and various performance metrics.
| Model | TP | FP | TN | FN | Precision | NPV | Sn | Sp | Acc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANN | 223 | 47 | 228 | 32 | 0.825925926 | 0.876923077 | 0.874509804 | 0.829090909 | 0.850943396 |
| ANFIS | 238 | 32 | 229 | 31 | 0.881481481 | 0.880769231 | 0.884758364 | 0.877394636 | 0.881132075 |
| CNN | 236 | 34 | 227 | 33 | 0.874074074 | 0.873076923 | 0.877323420 | 0.869731801 | 0.873584906 |
| DTL | 250 | 20 | 231 | 29 | 0.925925926 | 0.888461538 | 0.896057348 | 0.920318725 | 0.907547170 |
| Proposed | 257 | 13 | 236 | 24 | 0.951851852 | 0.907692308 | 0.914590747 | 0.947791165 | 0.930188679 |