Literature DB >> 35965635

Charge transport properties of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2).

Lijun He1, Zhiyang Xie1, Xing Long1, Chaopeng Zhang1, Chengyun He1, Boyang Zhao1, Fei Qi1, Nan Zhang1.   

Abstract

The B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of concern is causing a new wave of infections in many countries. In order to better understand the changes of the SARS-CoV-2 mutation at the genetic level, we selected six mutations in the S region of the Delta variant compared with the native SARS-CoV-2 and get the conductance information of these six short RNA oligonucleotides groups by construct RNA: DNA hybrids. The electronic characteristics are investigated by the combination of density functional theory and non-equilibrium Green's function formulation with decoherence. We found that conductance is very sensitive to small changes in virus sequence. Among the 6 mutations in the Delta S region, D950N shows the largest change in relative conductance, reaching a surprising 4104.75%. These results provide new insights into the Delta variant from the perspective of its electrical properties. This may be a new method to distinguish virus variation and possess great research prospects.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B.1.617.2 (delta); Conductance; RNA:DNA hybrids; SARS-CoV-2

Year:  2022        PMID: 35965635      PMCID: PMC9364919          DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Process Biochem        ISSN: 1359-5113            Impact factor:   4.885


Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes COVID-19 and B.1.617.2 is one of the variants of SARS-CoV-2 which was first detected in India [1]. B.1.617.2 is also named Delta by WHO (World Health Organization) for easy discussions in the public. The Delta variant acquires multiple mutations which can affect viral properties such as infectivity and immune resistance. For example, it has been reported that L452R (mutation in the 452th amino acid on spike protein from Leucine (L) to Arginine (R)) helps the virus escaping from HLA-A24-mediated cellular immunity and increasing binding affinity to ACE2 [2]. A recent article also pointed out that P681R can make the virus enter cells more effectively [3]. Because of its increase in transmissibility and more severe disease, the Delta variant rapidly spread during the second wave of COVID-19 in India, and it has spread to 78 countries [4]. The continuation of the spread of the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant points out the significance of virus mutation research. Although a large number of researchers have studied the nature and infectivity of the Delta variant. But so far, few articles have studied the Delta variant from the perspective of it’s electronic characteristics. SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus of about 30,000 base length. In recent years, some studies have studied the charge transport in nanomaterials [5], [6] and the electrical properties of cytosine hydroxymethylated (Chm) DNA sequences [7]. A recent article found that single-molecule conductance techniques can be used to extract biologically relevant information from short RNA oligonucleotides by construct RNA:DNA hybrids [8]. So this paper has considered whether virus variation can be analyzed from the perspective of electrical characteristics. In this work, the charge transport properties of the Delta variant sequence with the native SARS-CoV-2 sequence are compared. We demonstrate that the conductance of RNA:DNA hybrids is highly sensitive to single nucleotide differences of Delta variant and native SARS-CoV-2.

Materials and methods

Obtain the sequence information of mutation site before calculation

The SARS-CoV-2 mutates all the time, It has been found that more than 10 mutations have occurred on Delta variant compared with the original SARS-CoV-2 (MN908947.3, one of the initial isolates of SARS-CoV-2 and serves as a reference sequence). But this work focuses on the mutations in its spike (S) protein because the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein is exposed at the surface of the virus and mediates entry into host cells. S is the main target of neutralizing antibodies and the focus of most vaccines [9], [10]. We get the mutation information from the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Resource and collected six of the most critical mutations in the S region [11], [12], [13]. The key information of the six mutations of the Delta variant are shown in Table 1. We took three bases from the base mutation site to the left and right to study the difference of SARS-CoV-2 electrical properties before and after mutation. Double-stranded RNA: DNA hybrids sequences with a total length of seven base pairs are selected, respectively. The Idealized schematic of RNA:DNA hybrids based electrical measurement system is shown in Fig. 1. The RNA:DNA hybrids molecule is bounded between two yellow gold electrodes and electrons are injected and extracted into the DNA sequence through the 3′ end.
Table 1

The key information of the six mutations of Delta variant (compared with MN908947.3).

Genome positionBase changeGeneAmino acids changeBefore mutationAfter
Mutation
21,618C -> GST19RUUACAACUUAGAAC
22,917U -> GSL452RACCUGUAACCGGUA
22,995C -> AST478KGCACACCGCAAACC
23,403A -> GSD614GAGGAUGUAGGGUGU
23,604C -> GSP681RCUCCUCGCUCGUCG
24,410G -> ASD950NCAAGAUGCAAAAUG
Fig. 1

Idealized schematic of electrical property experimental setup. The RNA:DNA hybrids molecule is bounded between two yellow gold electrodes.

The key information of the six mutations of Delta variant (compared with MN908947.3). Idealized schematic of electrical property experimental setup. The RNA:DNA hybrids molecule is bounded between two yellow gold electrodes.

Construct the RNA: DNA hybrid structure

The Nucleic Acid Builder (NAB) software package can be used to construct various nucleic acid structures. Research has found that the RNA: DNA hybrid molecules are all in an A-form-like configuration, so we first constructed A-form-RNA and A-form-DNA according to the above virus sequence, and then combined them into RNA: DNA hybrid structure by NAB. It is worth noting that in this work, we study the charge transport of pure static nucleic acids without considering the influence of counter ions.

DFT and non-equilibrium Green's function

After obtaining the RNA: DNA hybrid molecular structure of virus sequences, the density functional theory (DFT) and non-equilibrium Green’s function approach including decoherence [14], [15], [16], [17] are employed to calculate the electrical information of different molecular structures. First of all, the DFT calculations were performed by Gaussian09 [18] and we chose B3LYP functional and 6–31 G (d, p) basis set. In order to be closer to the real experimental environment, the polarization continuum model (PCM) is used to consider the influence of solvent (water). After DFT calculations we will obtained the Hamiltonian and the overlap matrices of the calculated molecular structure and then use Löwdin transformation [19] method to convert it into orthogonalized Hamiltonian matrix. So far, we have obtained the orthogonalized Hamiltonian matrix of the system by using DFT, next, the Hamiltonian matrix is calculated to obtain the electrical information such as conductance, transmission probability of virus sequence by the non-equilibrium Green's function formulation with decoherence. the retarded Green functional can be calculated by:Where E is the energy, IMM is identity matrix of M*M, H is the Hamiltonian of the molecule, and are the self energy matrices from the left (right) contact. In order to incorporate decoherence into the transmission model. is used to represents the self energy matrices generated by the Buttiker probes. The transmission probability can be obtained by:Where ΓL(R) is the coupling between the Intermediate molecule and the left or right contacts. Here, contact coupling between the molecule and the two electrodes is set to 100 meV. Gr is the retarded Green functional in Eq. (1). Ga is the advanced Green functional. Nb represents the number of Büttiker probes. The Wij-1 is the inverse of Wij. Wij= [(1-Rii)δij-ΓiGrΓjGa(1-δij)], where Rii is the reflection probability at probe i. In this article, the decoherence rate is set to 10 meV. After obtaining the transmission probability, the conductance of the molecule can be get by:Where Ef is the Fermi functional. G0 is The quantum conductance and G0 = 2e2/h≈ 7.75 × 10−5S. Teff is the transmission probability we have calculated above. In our previous publication, we have define a parameter to better understand the relative change in conductance upon mutation [20]. Here, we also useto make It more intuitively to shows the change of conductivity before and after virus mutation. whererepresents the conductance of the naive sars-cov-2 andrepresents the conductance of the Delta variant.

Results and discussion

For the convenience of discussion, we will use amino acid changes to refer to specific virus sequences in the following analysis, such as pre-D614G (pre-mutation) represent the sequence of AGGAUGU and D614G represent the sequence of AGGGUGU (refer to Table 1). Fig. 2 shows the conductance variation with energy in the vicinity of respective HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) energy for the six mutation sites of the Delta variant. It is easy to see that compared with the native SARS-CoV-2 sequence,the conductance of the Delta variant has changed significantly in all six mutation cases. The conductance variation of pre-T19R and T19R is shown in Fig. 2a. In this mutation, a C base is changed to G base. After mutation, the conductance increased from 2.0010−5 G0 to 1.5210−4 G0, that is, = 660%. Fig. 2b shows the conductance of pre-L452R and L452R. Same as T19R, after mutation, the conductance of L452R increased from 6.8410−6 G0 to 7.4310−6 G0. thehere is only 8.63%, which is the minimum conductance change among all the six mutations studied. Fig. 2c presents the conductance variation of virus sequence when a C base is changed to A base. the conductance decreased from 1.0510−5 G0 to 3.4210−6 G0, that is,= −67.43%. We can see that there are three successive AT base pairs in the Delta sequence after mutation and there have been research findings that AT base pair acts as a barrier and GC base pair as a well for hole transport in DNA (dsDNA) duplexes [21]. So we believe that AT base pair has the same barrier properties in RNA:DNA hybrids as dsDNA. Fig. 2d shows the conductance variation of pre-D614G and D614G. The conductance at HOMO before the mutation is 3.3410−5 G0 and 7.2710−6 G0 after the mutation, that is,= −78.23%. the reason why the conductance becomes smaller after mutation is the pre-D614G possess higher HOMO decreasing the activation energy for a charge to move between the electrodes and the bridge [8]. Fig. 2e shows the conductance of P681R decreased from 1.5210−5 G0 to 6.7910−6 G0 (=−55.33%) compared with pre-P681R and Fig. 2f shows the conductance of D950N increased from 5.4710−6 G0 to 2.3010−4 G0 (=4104.75%) compared with pre-D950N. The transmission in the vicinity of respective HOMO energy for the six mutation sites of the Delta variant is also recorded in Table 2 and which shows the same trend as the conductance.
Fig. 2

The conductance in the vicinity of HOMO for virus sequences of the six mutations of Delta variant: (a) T19R, (b) L452R, (c) T478K, (d) D614G, (e) P681R, (f) D950N. Dash line is the position of HOMO energy level and black represents the non-mutated SARS-CoV-2, red represents the Delta variant.

Table 2

The transmission, conductance, under the six mutations of the Delta variant.

Virus
SequenceHOMO (eV)Cond (G0)Teff (HOMO)ΔG
Sequence
pre-T19RUUACAAC-5.072.00E-051.77E-05660%
T19RUUAGAAC-5.121.52E-047.01E-05
pre-L452RACCUGUA-4.896.84E-066.77E-068.63%
L452RACCGGUA-4.867.43E-069.29E-06
pre-T478KGCACACC-4.781.05E-052.68E-05-67.43%
T478KGCAAACC-4.713.42E-064.31E-06
pre-D614GAGGAUGU-4.773.34E-057.47E-05-78.23%
D614GAGGGUGU-4.887.27E-061.61E-05
pre-P681RCUCCUCG-4.921.52E-051.47E-05-55.33%
P681RCUCGUCG-4.826.79E-066.56E-06
pre-D950NCAAGAUG-4.775.47E-064.90E-064104.75%
D950NCAAAAUG-4.722.30E-047.60E-04
The conductance in the vicinity of HOMO for virus sequences of the six mutations of Delta variant: (a) T19R, (b) L452R, (c) T478K, (d) D614G, (e) P681R, (f) D950N. Dash line is the position of HOMO energy level and black represents the non-mutated SARS-CoV-2, red represents the Delta variant. The transmission, conductance, under the six mutations of the Delta variant. In Fig. 2f, we can obviously see that the conductance of the virus changes much more before and after mutation compared with the other five cases. thevalue reached a surprising 4104.75%. This shows that it is more possible to detect this mutation by measuring sequence conductivity. To provide additional verification that why D950N possesses higher conductance than pre-D950N. here we also performed ab initio electronic structure calculations of the 7 bp RNA:DNA duplex using the Gaussian 09 W software package and the Multiwfn [22] to examine the delocalization of the HOMO level along with the base stack. Fig. 3 plots the HOMO isosurface (isovalue = 310−3), Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b represent the HOMO isosurface of pre-D950N and D950N, respectively. and in Fig. 3 it is evident that a higher delocalization of the HOMO orbital in the D950N case. These results suggest that for a given number of bp’s, the charge should transport more efficiently in the D950N case than in the pre-D950N case [23]. This fact is consistent with the conductance we calculate before.
Fig. 3

3D iso-surface plot of the HOMO orbital: (a) pre-D950N and (b) D950N, (blue and red colors represent positive and negative isosurfaces, respectively; isovalue = 310−3).

3D iso-surface plot of the HOMO orbital: (a) pre-D950N and (b) D950N, (blue and red colors represent positive and negative isosurfaces, respectively; isovalue = 310−3).

Conclusion

In this work, we have investigated the electronic characteristics of Delta variant and native SARS-CoV-2 sequence by a combination of DFT and non-equilibrium Green's function including decoherence. These results provide new insights into the ongoing second wave of COVID-19. We demonstrate that the conductance is extremely responsive to small changes in the virus sequence, down to single-base modification. The underlying reason for this specificity originates may attribute to their conformational differences due to viral mutations. we have plots the HOMO isosurface which show that the HOMO level is more distributed along with the molecules in RNA:DNA duplexes of D950N, which suggests a higher conductance than pre-D950N. Given the obvious difference of conductance caused by mutation, this electrical measurement of SARS-CoV-2 may open the new door to single-molecule sensors with applications in fundamental biomedical research and COVID-19 diagnosis.

Data accessibility

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  15 in total

1.  Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer.

Authors:  Tian Lu; Feiwu Chen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Effect of cytosine hydroxymethylation on DNA charge transport.

Authors:  Lijun He; Jinsha Zhang; Chengyun He; Boyang Zhao; Weizhong Chen; Sunil R Patil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  The 2019 novel coronavirus resource.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Zhao; Shu-Hui Song; Mei-Li Chen; Dong Zou; Li-Na Ma; Ying-Ke Ma; Ru-Jiao Li; Li-Li Hao; Cui-Ping Li; Dong-Mei Tian; Bi-Xia Tang; Yan-Qing Wang; Jun-Wei Zhu; Huan-Xin Chen; Zhang Zhang; Yong-Biao Xue; Yi-Ming Bao
Journal:  Yi Chuan       Date:  2020-02-20

4.  Layer-by-Layer Growth of AA-Stacking MoS2 for Tunable Broadband Phototransistors.

Authors:  Xiai Luo; Zhenghan Peng; Zegao Wang; Mingdong Dong
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Comparing Charge Transport in Oligonucleotides: RNA:DNA Hybrids and DNA Duplexes.

Authors:  Yuanhui Li; Juan M Artés; Jianqing Qi; Ian A Morelan; Paul Feldstein; M P Anantram; Joshua Hihath
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation.

Authors:  Daniel Wrapp; Nianshuang Wang; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Jory A Goldsmith; Ching-Lin Hsieh; Olubukola Abiona; Barney S Graham; Jason S McLellan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The Global Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes, Variants, and Haplotypes in 2019nCoVR.

Authors:  Shuhui Song; Lina Ma; Dong Zou; Dongmei Tian; Cuiping Li; Junwei Zhu; Meili Chen; Anke Wang; Yingke Ma; Mengwei Li; Xufei Teng; Ying Cui; Guangya Duan; Mochen Zhang; Tong Jin; Chengmin Shi; Zhenglin Du; Yadong Zhang; Chuandong Liu; Rujiao Li; Jingyao Zeng; Lili Hao; Shuai Jiang; Hua Chen; Dali Han; Jingfa Xiao; Zhang Zhang; Wenming Zhao; Yongbiao Xue; Yiming Bao
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 7.691

8.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein.

Authors:  Alexandra C Walls; Young-Jun Park; M Alejandra Tortorici; Abigail Wall; Andrew T McGuire; David Veesler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  An online coronavirus analysis platform from the National Genomics Data Center.

Authors:  Zheng Gong; Jun-Wei Zhu; Cui-Ping Li; Shuai Jiang; Li-Na Ma; Bi-Xia Tang; Dong Zou; Mei-Li Chen; Yu-Bin Sun; Shu-Hui Song; Zhang Zhang; Jing-Fa Xiao; Yong-Biao Xue; Yi-Ming Bao; Zheng-Lin Du; Wen-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-11-18

10.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant (B.1.617.2) in surging second wave of COVID-19 and efficacy of vaccines in tackling the ongoing pandemic.

Authors:  Abu Montakim Tareq; Talha Bin Emran; Kuldeep Dhama; Manish Dhawan; Trina Ekawati Tallei
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.