| Literature DB >> 35965625 |
Jiqun Xu1, Yi Yu1, Mingyue Xue1, Xiangyang Lv1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on the normal fertilization rate of oocytes and the clinical pregnancy rate of cycles in male infertility. Eighty cases of male infertility patients attending our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected and divided into observation group and control group using the random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF), and the observation group was treated with ICSI. The normal fertilization rate of oocytes and the clinical pregnancy rate of the cycle were compared between the two groups, and the adverse pregnancy outcome and obstetric and perinatal complications were compared between the two groups The rate of normal fertilization and clinical pregnancy in the cycle was higher in the observation group (P < 0.05). The differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) when comparing adverse pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. The difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) when comparing obstetrics (5.41%, 10.34%) and perinatal complications (8.33%, 14.81%) between the two groups. ICSI in male infertility is significantly effective in improving the rate of normal oocyte fertilization and the clinical pregnancy rate of the cycle. It also has a low impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes and obstetric and perinatal complications and has a high safety profile.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35965625 PMCID: PMC9357718 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1522636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Comparison of normal oocyte fertilization rate and cycle clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (n = 40, (%)).
| Group | Normal fertilization rate | Interval clinical pregnancy rate |
|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 88.02 (742/843) | 88.10 (37/42) |
| Control group | 83.72 (679/811) | 69.05 (29/42) |
| Χ2 | 6.301 | 4.525 |
|
| 0.012 | 0.033 |
Comparison of adverse pregnancy outcomes between the two groups (n, (%)).
| Group | Number of subjects | Abortion | Premature | Perinatal mortality | Neonatal mortality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 37 | 1 (2.70) | 2 (5.41) | 3 (8.11) | 2 (5.41) |
| Control group | 29 | 2 (6.90) | 3 (10.34) | 2 (6.90) | 1 (3.45) |
| Χ2 | — | 0.659 | 0.567 | 0.034 | 0.144 |
|
| — | 0.417 | 0.452 | 0.854 | 0.705 |
Comparison of obstetrical and perinatal complications between the two groups (n, (%)).
| Group | Gestational diabetes | Gestational hypertension | Obstetric complications | Congenital anomaly | Macrosomia | Perinatal complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 2.70 (1/37) | 2.70 (1/37) | 5.41 (2/37) | 2.78 (1/36) | 5.56 (2/36) | 8.33 (3/36) |
| Control group | 3.45 (1/29) | 6.90 (2/29) | 10.34 (3/29) | 7.41 (2/27) | 7.41 (2/27) | 14.81 (4/27) |
| Χ2 | — | — | 0567 | — | — | 0.656 |
|
| — | — | 0.452 | — | — | 0.418 |