Literature DB >> 29967387

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring.

Sandro C Esteves1,2,3, Matheus Roque4, Giuliano Bedoschi5, Thor Haahr6,7, Peter Humaidan6,7.   

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become the most commonly used method of fertilization in assisted reproductive technology. The primary reasons for its popularity stem from its effectiveness, the standardization of the procedure, which means that it can easily be incorporated into the routine practice of fertility centres worldwide, and the fact that it can be used to treat virtually all forms of infertility. ICSI is the clear method of choice for overcoming untreatable severe male factor infertility, but its (over)use in other male and non-male factor infertility scenarios is not evidence-based. Despite all efforts to increase ICSI efficacy and safety through the application of advanced sperm retrieval and cryopreservation techniques, as well as methods for selecting sperm with better chromatin integrity, the overall pregnancy rates from infertile men remain suboptimal. Treating the underlying male infertility factor before ICSI seems to be a promising way to improve ICSI outcomes, but data remain limited. Information regarding the health of ICSI offspring has accumulated over the past 25 years, and there are reasons for concern as risks of congenital malformations, epigenetic disorders, chromosomal abnormalities, subfertility, cancer, delayed psychological and neurological development, and impaired cardiometabolic profile have been observed to be greater in infants born as a result of ICSI than in naturally conceived children. However, as subfertility probably influences the risk estimates, it remains to be determined to what extent the observed adverse outcomes are related to parental factors or associated with ICSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29967387     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-018-0051-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  39 in total

1.  Density gradient centrifugation and swim-up for ICSI: useful, unsafe, or just unsuitable?

Authors:  Hamilton De Martin; Eduardo P Miranda; Marcello S Cocuzza; Pedro A A Monteleone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Erica T Y Leung; Cheuk-Lun Lee; Xinyi Tian; Kevin K W Lam; Raymond H W Li; Ernest H Y Ng; William S B Yeung; Philip C N Chiu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature.

Authors:  Arnold P P Achermann; Thairo A Pereira; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Evolution of the World Health Organization semen analysis manual: where are we?

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 16.430

5.  Assessment of operant learning and memory in mice born through ICSI.

Authors:  Matthew Lewon; Yue Wang; Christina Peters; Matthew Peterson; Huili Zheng; Zhuqing Wang; Linda Hayes; Wei Yan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Authors:  Katherine L Palmerola; Sally F Vitez; Selma Amrane; Catha P Fischer; Eric J Forman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Machine learning for sperm selection.

Authors:  Jae Bem You; Christopher McCallum; Yihe Wang; Jason Riordon; Reza Nosrati; David Sinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing reveals 30 testis-enriched genes dispensable for male fertility in mice†.

Authors:  Yonggang Lu; Seiya Oura; Takafumi Matsumura; Asami Oji; Nobuyuki Sakurai; Yoshitaka Fujihara; Keisuke Shimada; Haruhiko Miyata; Tomohiro Tobita; Taichi Noda; Julio M Castaneda; Daiji Kiyozumi; Qian Zhang; Tamara Larasati; Samantha A M Young; Mayo Kodani; Caitlin A Huddleston; Matthew J Robertson; Cristian Coarfa; Ayako Isotani; R John Aitken; Masaru Okabe; Martin M Matzuk; Thomas X Garcia; Masahito Ikawa
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  A Novel Predictive Model to Estimate the Number of Mature Oocytes Required for Obtaining at Least One Euploid Blastocyst for Transfer in Couples Undergoing in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: The ART Calculator.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; José F Carvalho; Fabiola C Bento; Jonathan Santos
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Time has come to provide infertile men with an optimal fertility pathway.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.