Aznida Firzah Abdul Aziz1, Tuti Ningseh Mohd-Dom2, Norlaila Mustafa3, Abdul Hadi Said4, Rasidah Ayob5, Salbiah Mohamed Isa6, Ernieda Hatah7, Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh8, Mohd Farez Fitri Mohd Alwi1,9. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia. 2. Department of Family Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia. tutinin@ukm.edu.my. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia. 4. Department of Family Medicine, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University of Malaysia, Kuantan, Pahang, 25150, Malaysia. 5. Oral Health Programme, Ministry of Health, Malaysia, Level 5, Presint 1, Putrajaya, 62590, Malaysia. 6. Klinik Kesihatan Bandar Botanic, Ministry of Health, Malaysia, Klang, Selangor, 42000, Malaysia. 7. Faculty of Pharmacy, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia. 8. Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia. 9. Hospital Ampang, Ministry of Health of Health, Malaysia, Jalan Mewah Utara, Ampang, Selangor, 68000, Malaysia.
The research team discussed and identified all the disciplines involved in healthcare provision for periodontitis patients with diabetes in an ideal seamless healthcare set-up. The team agreed that the expert panel members should include Periodontists, Family Medicine Specialists, Endocrinologists and Clinical Pharmacists. All members of the expert panel are clinicians from the public and private sectors including those at university health care facilities, and were actively involved in providing care for patients with diabetes. Members of the expert panel were recruited using snowball technique (Fig. 1) through which multidisciplinary experts who were directly involved in the management of patients with diabetes or periodontitis or both were identified.
Fig. 1
Study flow chart
Study flow chart
Panel recruitment
Panel members were invited to participate in the discussion via personalised email invitation; additionally, reminders to respond in relation to their willingness to participate were also sent out via email. If no response was received after two email reminders, they were considered as non-responders.
Conduct of data collection
All respondents who agreed to participate received an online link to the questionnaire (Google form). The questionnaire contained a brief introduction and summary of the diabetes-periodontitis link and related references from published credible sources. The latter was provided as full-length publications which the respondents were able to download and read at their convenience as they answered the questionnaire. The first section of the questionnaire gathered the sociodemographic background and work experience of the respondents. The second part of the questionnaire was on the respondents’ clinical experience in the screening, confirmation, and management of diabetes patients with periodontitis. The questionnaire addressed issues related to confirmation protocol of diabetes mellitus based on the clinical practice guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health Malaysia. A Modified Delphi technique was employed to achieve consensus on responses which were not unanimous. A face-to-face meeting was conducted on 17th October 2019 to finalise the care pathway and to endorse the final document. The finalised document was then shared with the expert panel members for checking and endorsement.
Data analysis
Data entry and analysis to calculate the descriptive statistics was performed using Microsoft Excel.
Results
Background of expert panel members
A total of 17 experts agreed to participate. The background of the experts is presented in Table 1. The experts had a minimum of 10.3 (SD4.9) years of experience in their clinical field and majority were from the public sector.
Table 1
Background of expert panel members
Clinical expertise
N
Gender
Sector
Age(Mean SD)
Years of service(Mean, SD)
Family Medicine Specialists and Endocrinologists
7
Female 5 Male 2
Public 5
Private 2
46.6, 6.8
13.6, 10.5
Periodontists
6
Female 4 Male 2
Public 5
Private 1
48.8, 7.6
11.2, 7.5
Clinical Pharmacists
4
Female 2 Male 2
Public 4
35.8, 4.9
10.3, 4.9
Background of expert panel membersPublic 5Private 2Public 5Private 1
This care pathway was designed to screen patients who presented with symptoms and signs of periodontitis to any dental care practitioner (Fig. 2). History taking should include screening for possible diabetes or prediabetes by identifying other risk factors such as obese or overweight with central obesity, history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), inactivity (exercises < 150 min per week), family history of diabetes (among first degree relatives), hypertension, dyslipidaemia, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), acanthosis nigricans or small for gestational age.
The CODAPT-My algorithm for the primary healthcare practitioner
Upon receiving the referral from the Dentists or Periodontists, the primary healthcare practitioner should proceed to confirm the glycaemic status of a symptomatic (i.e., periodontitis) prediabetic or diabetic patient (Fig. 3). Apart from re-confirming the risk profile of the patient, confirmatory testing should be performed using fasting plasma glucose levels. This procedure would also provide an opportunity for risk profiling of the patients in terms of risk for cardiovascular disease (i.e., coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular events or subclinical heart disease).