Aditya Mishra1, Michael A Hope1, Masaud Almalki2, Lukas Pfeifer2, Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin2, Michael Grätzel2, Lyndon Emsley1. 1. Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. Laboratory of Photonics and Interfaces, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
Surface and bulk molecular modulators are the key to improving the efficiency and stability of hybrid perovskite solar cells. However, due to their low concentration, heterogeneous environments, and low sample mass, it remains challenging to characterize their structure and dynamics at the atomic level, as required to establish structure-activity relationships. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has revealed a wealth of information on the atomic-level structure of hybrid perovskites, but the inherent insensitivity of NMR severely limits its utility to characterize thin-film samples. Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) can enhance NMR sensitivity by orders of magnitude, but DNP methods for perovskite materials have so far been limited. Here, we determined the factors that limit the efficiency of DNP NMR for perovskite samples by systematically studying layered hybrid perovskite analogues. We find that the fast-relaxing dynamic cation is the major impediment to higher DNP efficiency, while microwave absorption and particle morphology play a secondary role. We then show that the former can be mitigated by deuteration, enabling 1H DNP enhancement factors of up to 100, which can be harnessed to enhance signals from dopants or additives present in very low concentrations. Specifically, using this new DNP methodology at a high magnetic field and with small sample volumes, we have recorded the NMR spectrum of the 20 nm (6 μg) passivating layer on a single perovskite thin film, revealing a two-dimensional (2D) layered perovskite structure at the surface that resembles the n = 1 homologue but which has greater disorder than in bulk layered perovskites.
Surface and bulk molecular modulators are the key to improving the efficiency and stability of hybrid perovskite solar cells. However, due to their low concentration, heterogeneous environments, and low sample mass, it remains challenging to characterize their structure and dynamics at the atomic level, as required to establish structure-activity relationships. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has revealed a wealth of information on the atomic-level structure of hybrid perovskites, but the inherent insensitivity of NMR severely limits its utility to characterize thin-film samples. Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) can enhance NMR sensitivity by orders of magnitude, but DNP methods for perovskite materials have so far been limited. Here, we determined the factors that limit the efficiency of DNP NMR for perovskite samples by systematically studying layered hybrid perovskite analogues. We find that the fast-relaxing dynamic cation is the major impediment to higher DNP efficiency, while microwave absorption and particle morphology play a secondary role. We then show that the former can be mitigated by deuteration, enabling 1H DNP enhancement factors of up to 100, which can be harnessed to enhance signals from dopants or additives present in very low concentrations. Specifically, using this new DNP methodology at a high magnetic field and with small sample volumes, we have recorded the NMR spectrum of the 20 nm (6 μg) passivating layer on a single perovskite thin film, revealing a two-dimensional (2D) layered perovskite structure at the surface that resembles the n = 1 homologue but which has greater disorder than in bulk layered perovskites.
Hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites
have emerged as a promising
alternative to existing solar cell technologies owing to their bandgap
tunability,[1−3] facile processing methods,[4,5] and
competitive performance.[6−11] The perovskite crystal structure consists of an A-site cation (e.g.,
formamidinium, FA+, CH(NH2)2+; methylammonium, MA+, CH3NH3+) in a three-dimensional (3D) network of lead halide
octahedra as shown in Figure a. As the photoactive phases of hybrid perovskite materials
are not intrinsically stable under ambient conditions,[12] methods to stabilize them are of intense current
interest, with strategies based today either on elemental doping with
inorganic cations (Cs+, K+, Rb+,
Mn2+, Co2+, Sb3+, In3+)[13−15] or on passivation by a surface treatment of organic molecules or
salts.[14−19] When bulky molecular cations are used, two-dimensional (2D) layered
perovskites can form where inorganic perovskite slabs are separated
by layers of organic cations (Figure a).[20−24] Bulk layered perovskites are more stable than their 3D counterparts
but typically have lower photoconversion efficiencies.[24,25] 2D/3D heterostructures, where the layered perovskite forms at the
surface of the bulk perovskite, combine the higher stability provided
by the 2D phase and the superior optoelectronic properties of the
3D perovskite, while further passivating interfacial vacancies to
reduce nonradiative recombination.[26−29] The detailed manner in which
organic moieties interact with the perovskite structure has been thought
to modify the energy landscape of the material and thereby template
the photoactive α-FAPbI3 phase.[6,30,31]
Figure 1
(a) Schematic representation of the layered
Ruddlesden–Popper
perovskite structures. (b–d) DNP-enhanced 1H→13C CP spectra with and without microwave (μw) irradiation
of (b) FAPbI3 (n = ∞) at 133 K,
(c) PEA2PbI4 (n = 1) at 119
K, and (d) PEA2FAPb2I7 (n = 2) at 130 K. All temperatures are given within ±2 K. Asterisks
indicate spinning sidebands. The μw on spectra shown in the
figure were recorded with 8 (n = ∞), 64 (n = 1), and 4 (n = 2) scans each and a
polarization delay of 100 s between scans. The full details are given
in the Experimental Section.
(a) Schematic representation of the layered
Ruddlesden–Popper
perovskite structures. (b–d) DNP-enhanced 1H→13C CP spectra with and without microwave (μw) irradiation
of (b) FAPbI3 (n = ∞) at 133 K,
(c) PEA2PbI4 (n = 1) at 119
K, and (d) PEA2FAPb2I7 (n = 2) at 130 K. All temperatures are given within ±2 K. Asterisks
indicate spinning sidebands. The μw on spectra shown in the
figure were recorded with 8 (n = ∞), 64 (n = 1), and 4 (n = 2) scans each and a
polarization delay of 100 s between scans. The full details are given
in the Experimental Section.Establishing structure–activity relationships
to optimize
perovskite stability requires a detailed knowledge of the atomic-level
local structure for these dopants and surface treatments when applied
to perovskite materials. Although diffraction-based techniques can
be used to study the inorganic lattice, due to the polycrystalline
nature of solution-processed thin films and the lack of long-range
order for surface and/or bulk dopants and additives, it is difficult
to determine structural information for these minor species using
diffraction-based methods.Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
is well suited to establish an
atomic-level understanding of both the organic and inorganic components
of hybrid perovskites, as well as dopants and additives.[32−35] Specifically, magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR has previously been
applied to study cation incorporation,[36−41] phase segregation,[38,42−47] cation dynamics,[48−51] passivating layers,[31,52] degradation,[52,53] and phase transitions.[48−51] NMR has also been successful in probing bulk layered
perovskites,[47,55,56] bulk 2D/3D perovskite heterostructures,[57−60] and the surfaces of perovskite
nanocrystals.[61−63] However, the intrinsic insensitivity of NMR limits
its utility to study thin-film samples as used in perovskite devices,
owing to the very low sample mass. This insensitivity is compounded
for the study of dopants and additives, which comprise only a small
fraction of the sample. Consequently, in the majority of previous
studies, either several thick films or mechanosynthesized powders
were used to enable NMR experiments to be performed. Thus, key challenges
relating to NMR sensitivity in hybrid perovskites remain,[32] with spectra from the surface and interface
species in thin films still largely out of reach.To overcome
the intrinsic sensitivity problem associated with NMR
and solve structural problems in materials science, dynamic nuclear
polarization (DNP) methods have been developed.[64−68] In these experiments, the target material is wetted
with a solution of stable biradicals and cooled to ∼100 K.[66] Continuous microwave irradiation at or near
the electron spin resonance (ESR) frequency transfers the high electron
polarization from the radical to solvent nuclei, which can then be
transferred to surface species on the target material or propagate
into the bulk by spin diffusion, enhancing the corresponding NMR signal
in both cases.[66] This DNP approach has
been successfully applied to study surfaces and interfaces in materials
for batteries,[69,70] catalysis,[71−76] and optoelectronics.[77]Sensitivity-enhancing
protocols for hybrid perovskites have been
investigated by Hanrahan et al.[78] For the
detection of 207Pb spectra, they found the most promising
technique to be proton detection, while MAS DNP was surprisingly inefficient
for both the organic and inorganic components: signal enhancements
were typically <10, especially in the case of the most technologically
relevant iodide perovskite.[78] A clear understanding
of the underlying challenges in applying DNP to organic–inorganic
perovskites, and methodologies to overcome them, are still lacking.Here, we demonstrate efficient DNP for the organic moieties in
layered hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites. Specifically,
we systematically investigate a class of 2D perovskite homologues
to determine that the dynamic A-site cations are the main cause of
poor DNP performance. We then demonstrate how to overcome this with
deuteration strategies, enabling 1H DNP enhancement factors
of up to a factor 100. Finally, using the DNP methodology developed
for the layered perovskite combined with a high magnetic field and
small sample volumes, we have successfully recorded the NMR spectrum
of the surface coating (∼20 nm) deposited on a single FAPbI3 perovskite thin-film sample (2 × 2 cm2 area).
This opens the door to detailed atomic-level structural studies of
surface treatments on technologically relevant samples.
Results and Discussion
First, we determined the DNP
enhancements that can be achieved
for the organic FA+ cation in bulk FAPbI3 using
a conventional DNP formulation, i.e., impregnation of the materials
with 16 mM TEKPol[79] in tetrachloroethane
(TCE) at ∼100 K[65,80] (note that FAPbI3 undergoes
phase transitions at ∼140 and ∼285 K).[49,81] As shown in Figure b, although the enhancement factor upon microwave irradiation for
the 1H of the TCE is 114 (as measured through the 13C signal intensity in a 1H→13C cross-polarization (CP) spectrum), the FA+ cation signal
exhibits an enhancement of only ∼3. While this does correspond
to an experimental time saving by an order of magnitude, for typical
surfaces or even for bulk microcrystalline solids, 1H DNP
enhancement factors >30 can routinely be achieved today.[82−84] Furthermore, the solvent enhancement is also lower than the expected
factor of ∼200 for this formulation. Overall, DNP experiments
do not work as well as expected in this hybrid perovskite.There
are several factors that could explain the poor DNP performance
in α-FAPbI3. It is well established that the organic
cation that occupies the cuboctahedral cavity in organic–inorganic
perovskites is highly dynamic.[48−50] At 100 K, this motion occurs
on a similar timescale to the 1H Larmor frequency (∼1
ns), resulting in fast 1H relaxation (T1 ≈ 1 s). As a result, the cations can act as polarization
sinks, causing the hyperpolarization to relax before it can diffuse
significantly into the particles. Alternatively, the perovskite material
could absorb the microwave radiation itself due to the contribution
of the dynamic cation to the dielectric properties.[85] This can have two main consequences: (i) an overall reduction
in the available microwave energy to drive the ESR transitions and/or
(ii) a significant increase in the sample temperature, resulting in
shorter electron spin relaxation times and less-efficient DNP (note
that while the increased temperature does affect the cation dynamics,
there is little change in the 1H T1 due to the proximity to the T1 minimum; Figure S6). Each of these factors
could play a significant role in determining the overall enhancement
in the perovskite materials, and in the following, we disentangle
their relative contributions.To distinguish between these factors,
we performed experiments
on samples of two-dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper layered perovskites
containing phenylethylammonium (PEA+) spacers,[86,87] which allow the dynamic FA+ cation to be removed and
systematically reintroduced in the different homologues. These low-dimensional
perovskites are characterized by the number of inorganic layers per
organic layer (n), as shown in Figure a. In this convention, α-FAPbI3 can be considered as n = ∞. Notably,
the n = 1 member is unique in that it does not contain
an A-site cation and therefore offers the advantage to selectively
investigate the effects of the mobile FA+ cation.Figure c shows
the DNP enhanced 1H→13C CP spectrum of n = 1 (PEA2PbI4) where we observe
enhancement factors of 215 and 43 for the solvent and PEA+ signals, respectively (see Figure S1 for
the spectral assignment). This is around the maximum solvent enhancement
that can be achieved for this formulation, and the perovskite enhancement
is far higher than for pure α-FAPbI3 (see the summary
in Figure a). The
lower enhancement of PEA+ compared to the solvent is expected
since the high polarization from the wetting phase has to diffuse
into the particle.[64,88,89] For the n = 2 (PEA2FAPb2I7) composition (Figure d), the solvent enhancement is significantly lower (107),
whereas the perovskite enhancements are still appreciable (around
25). Notably, the FA+ and PEA+ moieties show
very similar enhancement factors within error since they are in atomic-scale
proximity and fast 1H–1H spin diffusion
equalizes the nuclear hyperpolarization.[88,89] These large DNP enhancements for both the n = 1
and n = 2 perovskites further allow 1H→15N CP spectra to be measured within minutes (Figure S2).
Figure 2
Comparison of (a) 1H DNP enhancement factors
and (b) TDNP values measured via 1H→13C CP spectra of n =
∞ (FAPbI3), n = 1 (PEA2PbI4),
and n = 2 (PEA2FAPb2I7) at the specified temperatures. Temperatures are given within ±2
K.
Comparison of (a) 1H DNP enhancement factors
and (b) TDNP values measured via 1H→13C CP spectra of n =
∞ (FAPbI3), n = 1 (PEA2PbI4),
and n = 2 (PEA2FAPb2I7) at the specified temperatures. Temperatures are given within ±2
K.The observation that the solvent enhancements for
the n = 2 and n = ∞ samples
are similar, while
that for n = 1 is higher, is consistent with the
presence of dynamic FA+ cations in the former; we now examine
the mechanism for this. First, we consider microwave heating: for n = 2 and n = ∞, the microwaves
induce heating by 30 ± 2 and 33 ± 2 K, respectively, resulting
in a minimum achievable temperature of 133 ± 2 K, whereas for n = 1 the heating is only 19 ± 2 K, resulting in a
minimum achievable temperature of 119 ± 2 K. Clearly, the presence
of the dynamic FA+ cation does induce greater sample heating.
However, when the sample temperature is deliberately increased to
130 ± 2 K for the n = 1 sample by heating the
incident gas flows, the solvent enhancement decreases only to 177,
still far higher than for the n = 2 and n = ∞ perovskites. Therefore, while sample heating does play
a role, it is not the major cause of the differing DNP performance.Further details on the DNP behavior can be inferred from the buildup
of nuclear polarization under microwave irradiation, as characterized
by the time constant TDNP (Figure b). The long TDNP for the n = 1 sample is consistent
with the high enhancement, since there is more time to accumulate
polarization, which relaxes more slowly. TDNP is significantly shorter for the n = 2 and n = ∞ perovskites, consistent with the presence of
fast-relaxing FA+ cations. However, despite the similar
build-up behavior, the enhancement is far higher for n = 2 than for n = ∞. This difference can
be explained by considering another crucial factor for DNP of impregnated
solids, the particle size and morphology;[88,89] therefore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained
as shown in Figure .
Figure 3
SEM images of mechanosynthesized (a) n = ∞
(FAPbI3), (b) n = 1 (PEA2PbI4), and (c) n = 2 (PEA2FAPb2I7) perovskites.
SEM images of mechanosynthesized (a) n = ∞
(FAPbI3), (b) n = 1 (PEA2PbI4), and (c) n = 2 (PEA2FAPb2I7) perovskites.The n = ∞ and n = 1 compositions
show loosely agglomerated secondary particles composed of approximately
spherical primary particles with an average particle size of 0.7 ±
0.2 μm (Figure a,b). In contrast, the n = 2 sample (Figure c) exhibits platelet-like primary
particles, as commonly observed for layered materials,[60] with a thickness of 0.13 ± 0.05 μm.
The morphology in the n = 2 sample favors the propagation
of polarization to the bulk owing to the increased surface-to-volume
ratio and the shorter diffusion lengths required.[88,89] Therefore, although the FA+ cation reduces the T1 and therefore the spin-diffusion length for
the n = 2 homologue, the favorable thin particle
size nevertheless allows appreciable hyperpolarization to be relayed
to the perovskite.To determine, and mitigate, the effect of
fast 1H relaxation
by the dynamic FA+ cation, we synthesized the n = 2 perovskite having deuterated the FA+ cation to different
degrees. Note that since the −NH3 hydrogens in PEA+ could exchange with FA+ during synthesis, these
were also deuterated. Deuteration of the DNP matrix to decrease the 1H heat capacity is well established,[89−91] while deuteration
of fast-relaxing methyl groups in proteins[92] or on the surfaces of heterogeneous catalysts[93] has also previously been shown to improve DNP performance. Figure a shows how with
increasing deuteration of FA+, the enhancement of the solvent
increases progressively, to reach levels similar to the factors of
177–215 achieved for n = 1. This indicates
that dissipation of hyperpolarization in the fast-relaxing perovskite
phase is the primary factor limiting the solvent enhancement in the n = 2 formulations. The concomitant increase in the TDNP constants for the perovskite corroborates
this observation (Figure b), since the ratio of fast-relaxing FA+ protons
to slower relaxing PEA+ protons decreases. For the sample
with medium deuteration, the enhancement of the perovskite signals
increases by a factor of 4 to over 100 for the PEA+, as
compared to the nondeuterated sample. This arises from the lower proportion
of the fast-relaxing cations, which slows the average T1 relaxation, increasing the spin-diffusion length and
the amount of hyperpolarization that can accumulate both in the solvent
and the perovskites. Interestingly, the highly deuterated sample exhibits
even higher solvent enhancements, but lower enhancements for the perovskite,
comparable to the nondeuterated n = 2 sample. This
can be explained by a reduction in 1H spin-diffusion efficiency
at the highest deuteration level due to the low 1H concentration,
which hampers the propagation of polarization into the perovskite.
In particular, when the FA+ cation is highly deuterated,
the perovskite layer acts as a barrier to 1H spin diffusion.
Furthermore, since the layers are likely to be aligned with the platelet
morphology, we speculate that polarization from the majority of the
hyperpolarized solvent must pass through FA+ layers. Therefore,
although the high deuteration of FA+ moieties increases
the perovskite TDNP and reduces polarization
loss by relaxation, the overall effect with diminished spin diffusion
gives similar enhancements to those of the nondeuterated n = 2 composition.
Figure 4
1H DNP enhancement factors and polarization
build-up
constants (TDNP) as a function of deuteration
level for (a, b) n = 2 PEA2FAPb2I7 and (c, d) n = ∞ FAPbI3. Medium deuteration for n = 2 is achieved
using 60% d3-PEAI and 50% d4-FAI. High deuteration for n = 2 is
achieved using 80% d3-PEAI and 85% d5-FAI. High deuteration for FAPbI3 is achieved using 85% d5-FAI.
1H DNP enhancement factors and polarization
build-up
constants (TDNP) as a function of deuteration
level for (a, b) n = 2 PEA2FAPb2I7 and (c, d) n = ∞ FAPbI3. Medium deuteration for n = 2 is achieved
using 60% d3-PEAI and 50% d4-FAI. High deuteration for n = 2 is
achieved using 80% d3-PEAI and 85% d5-FAI. High deuteration for FAPbI3 is achieved using 85% d5-FAI.Applying a similar deuteration strategy to pure
FAPbI3 is less successful. The solvent enhancement is increased
to some
extent but not as much as for n = 2 (Figure c); this is ascribed to the
fact that the T1 relaxation of the perovskite
remains fast (TDNP = 4 s, Figure d), and therefore, although
the concentration of the relaxation sinks is reduced, the perovskite
does still act as a sink for the solvent hyperpolarization. Greater
microwave absorption by n = ∞ than by n = 2 reducing the efficiency of saturating the ESR transitions
could also play a role, although the sample heating remains similar.
The low enhancement for the perovskite itself is expected because
only the fast-relaxing cations with residual protonation can be observed.Although these DNP experiments significantly improve the NMR sensitivity,
they were performed with conventional DNP hardware using 3.2 mm outer
diameter sample containers (rotors) that require a high sample mass
of at least 50 mg, whereas a typical thin-film device contains only
∼1 mg of perovskite. Very recently, state-of-the-art DNP hardware
has been developed using 0.7 mm outer diameter rotors that require
only 1–2 mg of sample, while enabling faster magic-angle spinning
that improves resolution;[94] sensitivity
and resolution are further improved by the use of a high magnetic
field of 21 T, compared to 9.4 T used above. We first tested the DNP
using this system on a mechanosynthesized n = 1 perovskite
sample, as studied above, wetted with a 32 mM solution of the HyTEK-2
biradical[95] in TCE, which has been shown
to perform significantly better than TEKPol at a high field with fast
spinning.[94] As shown in Figure a, the TCE and PEA+ signals exhibit enhancement factors of 125 and 35, respectively.
Although solvent enhancements up to 200 have been demonstrated with
this formulation in pure frozen solutions,[94] the sample enhancement is nevertheless similar to that obtained
in the more conventional DNP experiments at 9.4 T above, validating
the effectiveness of the experimental setup. We note that a slightly
lower sample temperature of 111 K was observed (cf. 119 K at 9.4 T),
possibly due to different microwave absorption at higher frequency
and/or more efficient cooling of the smaller rotor.
Figure 5
DNP-enhanced 1H→13C spectra at ∼110
K and 21 T of (a) mechanosynthesized n = 1 PEA2PbI4 recorded for 2 min (20 min for microwave off)
at 50 kHz MAS and (b) a PEAI-treated single thin film of deuterated
FAPbI3 recorded for one day at 40 kHz MAS.
DNP-enhanced 1H→13C spectra at ∼110
K and 21 T of (a) mechanosynthesized n = 1 PEA2PbI4 recorded for 2 min (20 min for microwave off)
at 50 kHz MAS and (b) a PEAI-treated single thin film of deuterated
FAPbI3 recorded for one day at 40 kHz MAS.We then turned to the challenge of studying a technologically
relevant
surface coating on a thin film. Phenylethylammonium iodide (PEAI)
is one of the most widely used passivating agents[24,96−98] for perovskite thin films owing to its bulky nature
that facilitates the formation of 2D perovskites while providing high
stability to the material.[98,99] Here, an ∼500
nm layer of deuterated FAPbI3 was spin-coated onto a glass
slide (2 × 2 cm2) and passivated with a thin (∼20
nm) surface layer of PEAI, followed by annealing at 100 °C. The
film was then scraped off (to yield about 0.8 mg) and packed into
a 0.7 mm rotor to which the radical-containing solution was then added
by centrifugation. The sample is estimated to contain a total of about
6 μg (50 nmol) of PEA+. Figure b shows that the PEA+ signals
can clearly be seen in the resulting DNP-enhanced 1H→13C spectrum obtained in 27 h, whereas even the most intense
peak can barely be seen without DNP, giving an estimated enhancement
for the PEA+ layer by a factor of ∼10. (We therefore
estimate that it would have taken ∼100 days to acquire this
spectrum with the same signal-to-noise ratio without DNP.) The FA+ enhancement is minimal, consistent with expectations from
the experiments on deuterated mechanosynthesized FAPbI3. The high PEA+ enhancement and low FA+ enhancement
are also evident in the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure S5); however, the resolution is insufficient to interpret
the structure, even at 40 kHz MAS.Comparing the observed PEA+ carbon-13 shifts (Figures and S3), we note that there
is a significant change
between the PEAI salt and the n = 1 perovskite, reflecting
the substantial structural transformation.[47] The PEA+ signals observed in the spectra of the surface-coated
thin film, as shown in Figure b, align most closely with those of the layered perovskites,
indicating that after the surface treatment, the PEA+ adopts
the layered perovskite structure, in line with previous reports.[96,98−100] However, the peaks are significantly broader,
indicating a broader distribution of local environments and disorder
in the thin-film coating. This is consistent with a mixture of n = 1 and higher-order homologues,[55] as well as the nanoscale thickness of the passivating layer, meaning
that most of the material is within ∼10 nm of the surface or
the bulk perovskite, which can slightly modify the local structure.
In addition, a slight shift of ∼1 ppm is observed for the carbon
closest to the perovskite layer (Figure S3). This may correspond to a slightly different binding of the organic
spacers to the inorganic layers, or a slight difference in the electronic
structure of the inorganic layers, in the nanoscale-coating layer
as compared to the bulk layered perovskite.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have identified the factors
that previously limited
DNP efficiency in hybrid perovskites. In particular, we find that
the primary impediment to hyperpolarization is the fast 1H relaxation of the dynamic cation, while microwave absorption by
the sample is also detrimental due to both sample heating and reduced
saturation efficiency. We have shown that this can be mitigated by
deuterating the cation, which then enables large DNP enhancements
to develop on both the DNP matrix and target organic species present
at low concentrations in the sample. We have further demonstrated
that DNP can be favorably applied to two-dimensional layered perovskites,
with the high surface-to-volume ratio that can arise from platelet
morphologies being particularly beneficial.There is plenty
of further scope to improve the enhancement by
optimizing the impregnation protocols, which could be further combined
with isotopic labeling to achieve ultimate sensitivity.[74,101,102] This will then enable, for example,
multidimensional correlation experiments to provide information about
connectivity and spatial proximities.Here, efficient DNP with
deuterated samples enabled the observation
of the 13C PEA+ signals from the approximately
6 μg of surface coating on a single FAPbI3 perovskite
thin film, by combining with cutting-edge DNP hardware for small-diameter
rotors at a high field. The spectra of the thin film immediately reveal
that a 2D PEA+ layered perovskite structure forms on the
bulk perovskite surface that most strongly resembles that in the n = 1 layered perovskite homologue, rather than remaining
as PEAI, but with a greater distribution of local environments. This
work extends DNP-enhanced solid-state methods to a new class of semiconducting
photovoltaic materials and, therefore, paves the way to characterize
the local structure of additives and surface treatments for technologically
relevant perovskite thin-film compositions.
Experimental Section
Materials
The following materials were used: formamidinium
iodide (Sigma, >99%), PbI2 (Sigma, 99%), phenylethylammonium
iodide (Greatcell Solar Materials), anhydrous dimethylformamide (99.8%,
Acros), dimethylsulfoxide (99.7%, Acros), acetone (99.6%, Acros),
chlorobenzene (99.8%, Acros), isopropanol (99.5%, Acros), and d5-FAI (Cortecnet, 85% CD deuterated, 90% ND2 deuterated). d4-FAI and d3-PEAI were prepared by dissolving in heavy
water (1:40 mol/mol ratio), followed by evaporation. This yielded
∼50 and ∼70% deuterium on the FAI and PEAI, respectively.
Bulk Sample Preparation
The perovskite materials were
prepared using mechanosynthesis following a previously published protocol.[48] The precursors (PbI2, PEAI, and FAI,
∼200 mg total) were mixed in the appropriate molar ratio and
ground in an electric ball mill (Retsch MM 400) using an agate grinding
jar (10 mL) and agate ball (⌀10 mm) for 60 min at 25 Hz. The
resulting materials were then annealed at 150 °C for 20 min.
Surface-Coated Thin-Film Fabrication
A 1.4 M solution
of d4-FAPbI3 in 4:1 (v:v) DMF/DMSO
ratio was spin-coated onto a glass slide (2 × 2 cm2) with a two-step program at 1000 and 4000 r.p.m. for 10 and 30 s,
respectively. During the second step, 200 μL of chlorobenzene
(99.8%, Acros) was dropped onto the spinning substrate 10 s prior
to the end of the program and the film was annealed at 150 °C
for 20 min. After cooling down the substrate to room temperature,
a thin surface layer of d3-PEAI (5 mg
in 1 mL of acetone) was spin-coated on the perovskite layer at 5000
rpm for 30 s, followed by annealing at 100 °C for 5 min.
DNP-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Measurements
DNP formulations,
except for the 0.7 mm DNP samples, were prepared according to the
standard protocols for impregnation DNP[64−66] by wetting ∼50
mg of the perovskite materials with ∼50 μL of 16 mM TEKPol[79] in tetrachloroethane (TCE). 1% d6-EtOH ethanol was included to improve glass formation.[103] For the thin-film formulation, powder was scraped
off from the thin film, packed into the 0.7 mm rotor, and then a 32
mM solution of HyTEK-2[95] in TCE was added
to the sample by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for a minute.The
majority of the DNP-enhanced spectra were acquired on a commercial
Bruker Avance III 400 MHz (9.4 T) NMR spectrometer equipped with a
263 GHz gyrotron microwave source using a 3.2 mm triple resonance
low-temperature magic angle spinning (LTMAS) probe with sapphire rotors
spinning at 8 kHz. A few grains of KBr were mixed into the material
before the impregnation step and the temperature was measured from
the 79Br T1 constant.[104] Before measuring the DNP-enhanced NMR spectra,
samples were degassed by performing three insert–eject cycles,
waiting for ∼1 min at each step. The DNP enhancement factors
were measured from the intensity ratio of the 1H→13C cross-polarization (CP)[105] spectra
acquired under microwave-on and -off conditions with 100 kHz of SPINAL-64[106] decoupling. A microwave power of ∼12
W was used for all DNP experiments, as measured by a calorimeter halfway
along the waveguide. 13C chemical shifts were referenced
to the TCE peak at 74 ppm at ∼100 K.[64,107] The TCE enhancement is reported for a recycle delay of 5 s and the
PEA+/FA+ enhancements for a recycle delay of
100 s. The 1H build-up time constants (TDNP) were measured using a saturation-recovery 1H→13C experiment. Errors in the time constants
were calculated using Monte-Carlo analysis based on the experimental
noise level.High-field fast-spinning DNP solid-state NMR experiments
were performed
on a 900 MHz (21.1 T) Avance Neo Bruker NMR spectrometer. The spectrometer
was equipped with a LTMAS 0.7 mm triple resonance probe coupled with
a Bruker gyrotron producing 593 GHz continuous microwaves. The frequency
of the gyrotron was tuned to give the previously observed maximum
enhancement for cross-effect DNP with HyTEK-2[95] by modifying the gyrotron cavity temperature to 28°C. The DNP
enhancement factors were measured from the intensity ratio of the 1H→13C cross-polarization (CP) spectra acquired
under microwave-on and -off conditions with 110 kHz of SPINAL-64 decoupling.
Details specific to particular spectra are given in Table S2 and the figure captions.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Measurements
Powder XRD patterns
of mechanosynthesized layered and 3D perovskites were recorded with
a Bruker D8 Discover Vario diffractometer with a Cu Kα1 monochromator (1.5406 Å) from 2θ = 2–50°.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Measurements
For
the SEM images, mechanosynthesized powders were deposited on a standard
SEM sample stub with conductive carbon adhesive tabs. A Zeiss Merlin
scanning electron microscope was used, and images were acquired at
0.8 kV beam energy using low currents (20–40 pA) detecting
secondary electrons with an in-lens detector. SEM images were analyzed
using ImageJ software.
Authors: Michal Leskes; Gunwoo Kim; Tao Liu; Alison L Michan; Fabien Aussenac; Patrick Dorffer; Subhradip Paul; Clare P Grey Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Dominik J Kubicki; Daniel Prochowicz; Albert Hofstetter; Marcin Saski; Pankaj Yadav; Dongqin Bi; Norman Pellet; Janusz Lewiński; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Michael Grätzel; Lyndon Emsley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dominik J Kubicki; Daniel Prochowicz; Albert Hofstetter; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Michael Grätzel; Lyndon Emsley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yunhua Chen; Sara R Smock; Anne H Flintgruber; Frédéric A Perras; Richard L Brutchey; Aaron J Rossini Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 15.419