Literature DB >> 35958086

Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks.

Toby D Pilditch1,2, Jon Roozenbeek3, Jens Koed Madsen4, Sander van der Linden3.   

Abstract

The unchecked spread of misinformation is recognized as an increasing threat to public, scientific and democratic health. Online networks are a contributing cause of this spread, with echo chambers and polarization indicative of the interplay between the search behaviours of users and reinforcement processes within the system they inhabit. Recent empirical work has focused on interventions aimed at inoculating people against misinformation, yielding success on the individual level. However, given the evolving, dynamic information context of online networks, important questions remain regarding how such inoculation interventions interact with network systems. Here we use an agent-based model of a social network populated with belief-updating users. We find that although equally rational agents may be assisted by inoculation interventions to reject misinformation, even among such agents, intervention efficacy is temporally sensitive. We find that as beliefs disseminate, users form self-reinforcing echo chambers, leading to belief consolidation-irrespective of their veracity. Interrupting this process requires 'front-loading' of inoculation interventions by targeting critical thresholds of network users before consolidation occurs. We further demonstrate the value of harnessing tipping point dynamics for herd immunity effects, and note that inoculation processes do not necessarily lead to increased rates of 'false-positive' rejections of truthful communications.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  belief updating; complex systems; inoculation theory; misinformation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35958086      PMCID: PMC9363981          DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  R Soc Open Sci        ISSN: 2054-5703            Impact factor:   3.653


  21 in total

1.  Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems.

Authors:  Eric Bonabeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Sahil Loomba; Alexandre de Figueiredo; Simon J Piatek; Kristen de Graaf; Heidi J Larson
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-05

3.  Post-truth: Study epidemiology of fake news.

Authors:  Adam Kucharski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Toby D Pilditch; Jens K Madsen; Naomi Oreskes; James S Risbey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-01-24

5.  Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.

Authors:  Rakoen Maertens; Jon Roozenbeek; Melisa Basol; Sander van der Linden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2020-10-05

Review 6.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence.

Authors:  John Cook; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Some people just want to watch the world burn: the prevalence, psychology and politics of the 'Need for Chaos'.

Authors:  Kevin Arceneaux; Timothy B Gravelle; Matthias Osmundsen; Michael Bang Petersen; Jason Reifler; Thomas J Scotto
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Misinformation making a disease outbreak worse: outcomes compared for influenza, monkeypox, and norovirus.

Authors:  Julii Brainard; Paul R Hunter
Journal:  Simulation       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.377

10.  A method for evaluating cognitively informed micro-targeted campaign strategies: An agent-based model proof of principle.

Authors:  Jens Koed Madsen; Toby D Pilditch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.