Literature DB >> 33611991

Some people just want to watch the world burn: the prevalence, psychology and politics of the 'Need for Chaos'.

Kevin Arceneaux1, Timothy B Gravelle2, Matthias Osmundsen3, Michael Bang Petersen3, Jason Reifler4, Thomas J Scotto5.   

Abstract

People form political attitudes to serve psychological needs. Recent research shows that some individuals have a strong desire to incite chaos when they perceive themselves to be marginalized by society. These individuals tend to see chaos as a way to invert the power structure and gain social status in the process. Analysing data drawn from large-scale representative surveys conducted in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, we identify the prevalence of Need for Chaos across Anglo-Saxon societies. Using Latent Profile Analysis, we explore whether different subtypes underlie the uni-dimensional construct and find evidence that some people may be motivated to seek out chaos because they want to rebuild society, while others enjoy destruction for its own sake. We demonstrate that chaos-seekers are not a unified political group but a divergent set of malcontents. Multiple pathways can lead individuals to 'want to watch the world burn'. This article is part of the theme issue 'The political brain: neurocognitive and computational mechanisms'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Need for Chaos; marginalization; personality; politics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33611991      PMCID: PMC7934998          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  4 in total

1.  Dominance-Driven Autocratic Political Orientations Predict Political Violence in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) and Non-WEIRD Samples.

Authors:  Henrikas Bartusevičius; Florian van Leeuwen; Michael Bang Petersen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-07-24

2.  The spread of true and false news online.

Authors:  Soroush Vosoughi; Deb Roy; Sinan Aral
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations.

Authors:  Douglas T Kenrick; Vladas Griskevicius; Steven L Neuberg; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-05

Review 4.  A new Big Five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.

Authors:  Dan P McAdams; Jennifer L Pals
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-04
  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks.

Authors:  Toby D Pilditch; Jon Roozenbeek; Jens Koed Madsen; Sander van der Linden
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Who Will Help to Strive Against the "Infodemic"? Reciprocity Norms Enforce the Information Sharing Accuracy of the Individuals.

Authors:  Kehan Li; Weiwei Xiao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Bringing political psychology into the study of populism.

Authors:  Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Political uncertainty moderates neural evaluation of incongruent policy positions.

Authors:  Ingrid J Haas; Melissa N Baker; Frank J Gonzalez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Nudging Social Media toward Accuracy.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2022-05-05

6.  Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Brandon K N Sze; Matthew Andreotta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience.

Authors:  Leor Zmigrod; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Political games of attack and defence.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; Ruthie Pliskin; Michael Rojek-Giffin; Zsombor Méder; Jörg Gross
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.