| Literature DB >> 35958030 |
Abstract
Background: Dietary diversity is very critical for fetal growth and development, as well as for the health and wellbeing of the mother. In Ethiopia, 41% of pregnant mothers consume diversified diets. There has been no study assessing whether pregnant women in southwest Ethiopia consume a varied diet. Objective: To estimate the proportion of adequate diversified dietary intake and to determine whether there is an association between diversified dietary intake and mothers' social capital. Design: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 367 pregnant women in South West Ethiopia. A 24-hour multiple-pass dietary recall method was used to measure dietary intake and the 10 food groups of FANTA/FAO 2016 were used to analyze dietary diversity. Social capital was assessed based on the number of social networks in which a mother participated. Result: The proportion of diversified dietary intake was 14.7% (95% CI: 11.1, 18.3). Pregnant mothers who had social capital, had their own income, had emotional support from their husbands, were from a rich family, and had a frequent dietary intake were statistically associated with a diversified dietary intake, with an AOR of 7.8 (95% CI 1.02, 2.3 (95% CI 1.12, 4.44), 4.0, (95% CI 1.16, 13.7), 59.19), 2.3 (95% CI 1.04, 5.26), and 1.5 (95% CI 1.04, 2.07), respectively.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958030 PMCID: PMC9363205 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4613165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Figure 1Schematic presentation of the enrollment of participants in the study in Arba Minch Zuria district in February 2021.
Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of pregnant mothers in South West Ethiopia in February 2020 (n = 367).
| Characteristics | Categories | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational status | Illiterate | 66 | 18 |
| Attended some grads | 266 | 72.5 | |
| Higher education | 35 | 9.5 | |
|
| |||
| Living | With husband | 344 | 93.7 |
| Alone | 2 | 0.5 | |
| Her family | 9 | 2.5 | |
| Husband family | 12 | 3.3 | |
|
| |||
| Religion | Protestant | 297 | 80.7 |
| Orthodox tewahedo | 68 | 18.5 | |
| Muslim | 2 | 0.5 | |
|
| |||
| Mothers have income | Yes | 90 | 24.5 |
| No | 272 | 75.5 | |
|
| |||
| Husband's education status | Illiterate | 54 | 14.7 |
| Attend some grades | 269 | 73.3 | |
| Higher education | 44 | 12 | |
|
| |||
| Husband's job | Government office | 37 | 10.1 |
| Farmer | 145 | 39.5 | |
| Retailor | 85 | 23.2 | |
| Daily wage | 100 | 27.2 | |
|
| |||
| Husband's support | Yes | 301 | 82 |
| No | 66 | 18 | |
|
| |||
| Participating in social network | Yes | 312 | 85 |
| No | 55 | 15 | |
|
| |||
| Wealth status | Poor | 122 | 33.2 |
| Medium | 125 | 34.1 | |
| Rich | 120 | 32.7 | |
|
| |||
| HFI (A) | Food secured | 230 | 62.7 |
| Mild food insecure | 34 | 9.30 | |
| Moderately food insecure | 67 | 18.3 | |
| Severely food insecure | 36 | 9.8 | |
HFI (A): household food insecurity access.
Nutritional practice of pregnant mothers in South West-Ethiopia, in February 2020 (n = 367).
| Characteristics | Categories | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of nutrition during pregnancy knowledge | Knowledgeable | 308 | 83.9 |
| Not knowledgeable | 59 | 16.1 | |
|
| |||
| Avoid any food or fluid | Yes | 102 | 27.8 |
| No | 265 | 72.2 | |
|
| |||
| Nutrition information | Yes | 201 | 45.2 |
| No | 166 | 54.8 | |
|
| |||
| Iron tablet intake status | Taking | 249 | 67.8 |
| Stop taking | 46 | 12.5 | |
| New | 72 | 19.6 | |
Figure 2Food groups consumed by pregnant mothers in Arba Minch Zuria district in February 2020.
Factors associated with dietary diversity practice of pregnant mothers in Arba Minch Zuria district, South West-Ethiopia, February 2020 (n = 367).
| Variable | Category | Dietary practice | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inadequate | Adequate | ||||
| Age | 313 | 54 | 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) | ||
|
| |||||
| Mother's education | Illiterate | 55 (83.3%) | 11 (16.7%) | 1 | |
| Some grade attended | 234 (88%) | 32 (12%) | 0.7 (0.3, 1.4) | ||
| Higher education | 24 (68.6%) | 11 (31.4%) | 2.3 (0.9, 6.0) | ||
| Years in marriage | 313 | 54 | 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) | ||
|
| |||||
| Mother having income | No | 243 (89.5%) | 29 (10.5%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 65 (72.2%) | 23 (27.8%) | 3.3 (1.8, 6.0) | 2.3 (1.1, 4.4) | |
|
| |||||
| Husband's education | Illiterate | 46 (85.2%) | 8 (14.8%) | 1 | |
| Some grade attended | 235 (87.4%) | 34 (12.6%) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.9) | ||
| Higher education | 32 (72.7%) | 12 (27.3%) | 2.2 (0.8, 5.9) | ||
|
| |||||
| Husband's job | Government employee | 28 (75.7%) | 9 (24.3%) | 7.7 (2.2, 26.9) | |
| Farmer | 118 (81.4%) | 27 (18.6%) | 5.5 (1.9, 16.2) | ||
| Retailer | 71 (83.5%) | 14 (16.5%) | 4.7 (1.5, 15.0) | ||
| Daily labor | 96 (96%) | 4 (4%) | 1 | ||
| ANC visit | 313 | 54 | 1.3 (0.96, 1.6) | ||
|
| |||||
| Gravida | One | 87 (91.6%) | 8 (8.4%) | 1 | |
| Two up to five | 178 (86%) | 29 (14%) | 1.8 (0.8, 4.0) | ||
| More than five | 48 (73.8%) | 17 (26.2%) | 3.9 (1.5, 9.6) | ||
|
| |||||
| Gestational age | First trimester | 14 (77.8%) | 4 (22.2%) | 1 | |
| Second trimester | 148 (87.1%) | 22 (12.9%) | 0.5 (0.2, 1.7) | ||
| Third trimester | 151 (84.4%) | 28 (15.6%) | 0.6 (0.2, 2.1) | ||
| Family size | 313 (4; IQR : 3) | 54 (5; IQR : 2) | 1.1 (1.0, 1.3) | ||
|
| |||||
| SC | No | 53 (98.1%) | 2 (1.9%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 260 (83.1%) | 52 (16.9%) | 10.8 (1.5, 79.9) | 7.8 (1.0, 59.2) | |
|
| |||||
| Wealth | First tertile | 112 (91.8%) | 10 (8.2%) | 1 | 1 |
| Second tertile | 114 (91.2%) | 11 (8.8%) | 1.1 (0.4, 2.6) | 0.8 (0.3, 1.9) | |
| Third tertile | 87 (72.5%) | 23 (27.5%) | 4.2 (2.0, 9.1) | 2.3 (1.1, 5.3) | |
|
| |||||
| Knowledge of nutrition during pregnancy knowledge | Not knowledgeable | 266 (86.4%) | 42 (13.6%) | 1 | |
| Knowledgeable | 47 (79.7%) | 12 (20.3%) | 1.6 (0.8, 3.3) | ||
| Frequency of eating | 313 | 54 | 1.6 (1.2, 2.2) | 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) | |
|
| |||||
| Husband's support | No | 61 (95.3%) | 5 (4.7%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 252 (83.2%) | 49 (16.8%) | 4.1 (1.2, 13.6) | 4.0 (1.2, 13.7) | |
|
| |||||
| HFIA¥ | Secured | 188 (81.7%) | 42 (18.3%) | 2.5 (0.7, 8.4) | |
| Mild insecure | 29 (85.3%) | 5 (14.7%) | 1.9 (0.4, 8.6) | ||
| Moderately insecure | 63 (94%) | 4 (6%) | 0.7 (0.1, 3.3) | ||
| Severely insecure | 33 (91.7%) | 3 (8.3%) | 1 | ||