| Literature DB >> 35956960 |
Mohamed Lamin Abdi Bellau1, Matteo Andrea Chiurato2, Annalisa Maietti3, Giancarlo Fantin3, Paola Tedeschi3, Nicola Marchetti3, Massimo Tacchini2, Gianni Sacchetti2, Alessandra Guerrini2.
Abstract
The ethnobotany of the Sahrawi people considers various species of plants and crude drugs as food, cooking spices and traditional health remedies. From among these, the fruits of Ammodaucus leucotrichus Coss. & Dur. (Apiaceae), known as Saharan cumin, were chosen for our research. The present paper reports a proximate composition and mineral element analysis of various samples of A. leucotrichus fruits, collected during the balsamic period (full fruiting) from plants grown in Bir Lehlu (Western Sahara) and purchased in a local market (Tindouf). These analyses pointed out interesting nutritional values of the crude drug. Decoction and alcoholic extract, analyzed by HPLC-DAD, evidenced ammolactone-A and R-perillaldehyde as the two main isolated constituents, particularly in the ethanolic extracts (ammolactone-A, market sample: 51.71 ± 0.39 mg/g dry extract; wild sample: 111.60 ± 1.80 mg/g dry extract; R-perillaldehyde, market sample: 145.95 ± 0.35 mg/g dry extract; wild sample: 221.40 ± 0.30 mg/g dry extract). The essential oils, obtained through hydrodistillation, were characterized by GC-MS and evidenced R-perillaldehyde (market sample: 53.21 ± 1.52%; wild sample: 74.01 ± 1.75%) and limonene (market sample: 35.15 ± 1.68%; wild sample: 19.90 ± 1.86%) as the most abundant compounds. The R configuration of perillaldehyde was ascertained and a complete description of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of ammolactone-A was performed.Entities:
Keywords: Ammodaucus leucotrichus; R-perillaldehyde; alcoholic extract; ammolactone-A; chemical characterization; decoction; essential oil; mineral element analysis; proximate analysis; secondary metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956960 PMCID: PMC9370740 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27155013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Proximate analysis of A. leucotrichus samples compared to literature data for A. leucotrichus and C. cyminum.
| Proximate Analysis |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humidity (g/100 g) | 12.65 ± 0.07 | 10.59 ± 0.33 | / | 6.44 |
| Proteins (g/100 g) | 10.77 ± 0.07 | 9.14 ± 0.62 | 13.1 ± 0.9 | 19.00 |
| Lipids (g/100 g) | 4.05 ± 0.01 | 11.30 ± 0.14 | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 29.17 |
| Total ash (g/100 g) | 14.43 ± 0.02 | 10.00 ± 0.01 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 7.36 |
| Total fiber (g/100 g) | 74.51 ± 2.04 | 72.00 ± 3.55 | / | 51.3 |
| Insoluble fiber (g/100 g) | 66.68 ± 1.66 | 63.85 ± 4.01 | / | 46.4 |
| Soluble fiber (g/100 g) | 7.83 ± 0.38 | 8.15 ± 0.45 | / | 4.89 |
1 Literature data [3]. 2 Literature data [9,10].
Mineral determination of A. leucotrichus samples compared to literature data for A. leucotrichus and C. cyminum.
| Minerals | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macroelements | ||||
| Na (mg/100 g) | 110 ± 19 | 156 ± 4 | 160 ± 6 | 168 |
| Mg (mg/100 g) | 254 ± 36 | 234 ± 47 | 236.6 ± 0.4 | 337 |
| K (mg/100 g) | 1949 ± 99 | 1636 ± 88 | 2283 ± 0.4 | 1790 |
| Ca (mg/100 g) | 737 ± 10 | 691 ± 48 | 1555 ± 2 | 917 |
| Microelements | ||||
| Fe (mg/100 g) | 132.0 ± 4.4 | 86 ± 1.1 | 22 ± 2 | 14.0 |
| Zn (mg/100 g) | 1.64 ± 0.02 | 2.98 ± 0.29 | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 3.0 |
| Cu (mg/100 g) | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.87 |
| Mn (mg/100 g) | 3.84 ± 0.04 | 2.93 ± 0.01 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 3.46 |
1 Literature data [3]. 2 Literature data [9,10].
Fatty acids (relative percentage) of A. leucotrichus samples compared to literature data for A. leucotrichus and C. cyminum.
| Fatty Acid | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 (myristic) | 0.06 | <0.05 | 0.87 | 0.10 |
| C16:0 (palmitic) | 3.83 | 3.33 | 21.2 | 6.13 |
| C16:1 (palmitoleic) | 0.40 | 0.33 | 1.06 | 1.13 |
| C18:0 (stearic) | 1.10 | <0.05 | 0.10 | 1.83 |
| C18:1n9c (oleic) | 86.07 | 86.7 | 53.8 | 73.17 |
| C18:2n6c (linoleic) | 8.33 | 9.27 | 1.99 | 16.68 |
| C18:3n3 (α-linolenic) | 0.22 | 0.38 | 10.6 | 0.97 |
1 Literature data [3]. 2 Literature data [10].
Essential oil composition of A. leucotrichus samples.
| No. | Component 1 | AI Exp 3 | AI Lit 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-pinene | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 1.28 ± 0.02 | 928 | 932 |
| 2 | camphene | 3.33 ± 0.12 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 943 | 946 |
| 3 | β-pinene | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.90 ± 0.04 | 972 | 974 |
| 4 | myrcene | - | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 986 | 988 |
| 5 | p-mentha-1(7),8-diene | 0.16 ± 0.01 | - | 1001 | 1003 |
| 6 | 3-carene | 2.1 ± 0.03 | 1.15 ± 0.01 | 1005 | 1008 |
| 7 |
|
|
| 1024 | 1024 |
| 8 |
|
|
| 1272 | 1269 |
| 9 | perillyl alcohol | 2.41 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.11 | 1296 | 1294 |
| 10 | methylperillate | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 0.91 ± 0.02 | 1395 | 1392 |
| 11 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | - | 1400 | 1408 | |
| 12 | germacrene D | 0.35 ± 0.01 | - | 1483 | 1485 |
| 13 | δ-amorphene | - | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 1514 | 1511 |
| Total identified | 98.74 | 99.56 |
1 Components are listed in order of elution and their nomenclature is in accordance with the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) library. 2 Relative peak areas, calculated by GC-FID. 3 AI exp: linear retention indices calculated on Varian VF-5 ms column. 4 AI lit: linear retention indices [16]. The main compounds are in bold.
Main components of A. leucotrichus essential oils in literature and their extraction yields.
| Compound | (Area%) A | (Area%) B | (Area%) C | (Area%) D | (Area%) E | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| limonene | 35.15 | 19.90 | 28.8 | 1.7 | 26.8 | 8.2 | 6.9–29.2 |
| perillaldehyde | 53.21 | 74.01 | 56.4 | 84.4 | 63.6 | 87.9 | 60.1–37.5 |
| Yield | 2.00% | 3.80% | 0.7% | 2.58% | 2.76% | 1.6% | 2.0–2.1% |
A = [17]; B = [18]; C = [19]; D = [20]; E = [21].
Figure 1R-perillaldehyde.
Figure 2Proton connectivity network by COSY (bold lines) and key HMBC cross-peaks of ammolactone-A. Further HMBC cross-peaks are omitted for clarity.
HPLC-DAD quantitative analysis of fruits extracts of A. leucotrichus.
| Component | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ammolactone-A | 5.68 ± 0.12 | 51.71 ± 0.39 | 3.32 ± 0.22 | 111.6 ± 1.8 |
| R-perillaldehyde | 24.32 ± 0.93 | 145.95 ± 0.35 | 35.88 ± 0.60 | 221.4 ± 0.3 |
1 mg/g dry extract ± (sd).