| Literature DB >> 35956856 |
Aisyah Nur Hanis Azhar1, Nurul Aini Amran1,2, Suzana Yusup1,2, Mohd Hizami Mohd Yusoff1,2.
Abstract
2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2AP) is the compound that gives out the typical aroma and flavour of pandan leaves (Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb.). This research incorporates ultrasonic extraction to extract the aromatic compound in pandan leaves. The parameters varied in this study are the extraction time, sonicator amplitude, concentration of solvent and the mass of pandan leaves. The experiment was conducted using a central composite design (CCD) model generated by the response surface methodology (RSM). From the extraction process, it can be deduced that the effect of leaves' mass is comparably higher than other parameters, while sonicator amplitude gives the most negligible impact on the process. The obtained p-value was 0.0014, which was less than 0.05. The high R-squared 0.9603 and adjusted R-squared 0.8809 indicate the model is well agreed with the actual data. The optimal control variables of ultrasonic extraction of 2AP are at an extraction time of 20 min, 60% of solvent concentration, amplitude of 25% and 12.5 g of pandan leaves, which produced 60.51% of yield of the extract and 1.43 ppm of 2AP. It is found that the mass of pandan leaves and the concentration of solvent have a significant impact on the extraction process of 2AP.Entities:
Keywords: 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline (2AP); RSM; pandan leaves; solvent; ultrasonic extraction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956856 PMCID: PMC9370269 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27154906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Ultrasonic probe system setup.
Specification of ultrasonic processor.
| Item | Specifications |
|---|---|
| Brand | Cole-Parmer |
| Frequency (Hz) | Up to 60 |
| Range of time | 1 s to 10 h |
| Power (W) | 750 |
| Temperature (°C) | 1–100 |
| Sample volume | 250 µL to 19 L/h |
| Dimension | 191 × 216 × 343 mm |
Table of varied parameters and concentration of 2AP obtained.
| Std No | A: Extraction Time | B: Concentration of | C: Amplitude (%) | D: Mass (g) | Yield of Extract (%) | Concentration of 2AP (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | 60 | 35 | 12.5 | 49.68 | 1.578 |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 35 | 7.5 | 60.00 | 2.836 |
| 3 | 20 | 60 | 25 | 12.5 | 60.48 | 1.434 |
| 4 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 7.5 | 77.20 | 1.911 |
| 5 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 7.5 | 61.47 | 1.608 |
| 6 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 7.5 | 58.93 | 3.002 |
| 7 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 12.5 | 50.48 | 1.670 |
| 8 | 40 | 20 | 25 | 12.5 | 63.36 | 4.873 |
| 9 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 12.5 | 45.04 | 1.571 |
| 10 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 61.00 | 2.072 |
| 11 | 20 | 60 | 35 | 12.5 | 38.16 | 1.857 |
| 12 | 20 | 20 | 35 | 12.5 | 46.96 | 0.591 |
| 13 | 20 | 20 | 35 | 12.5 | 65.60 | 1.043 |
| 14 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 12.5 | 52.64 | 4.541 |
| 15 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 7.5 | 61.33 | 3.725 |
| 16 | 40 | 60 | 35 | 7.5 | 62.13 | 2.691 |
| 17 | 40 | 20 | 25 | 7.5 | 55.73 | 1.133 |
| 18 | 30 | 80 | 30 | 10 | 65.90 | 2.490 |
| 19 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 63.50 | 3.833 |
| 20 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 53.50 | 2.497 |
| 21 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 31.00 | 0.955 |
| 22 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 61.20 | 3.086 |
| 23 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 45.10 | 2.043 |
| 24 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 15 | 25.40 | 3.629 |
| 25 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 61.00 | 2.072 |
| 26 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 53.00 | 4.715 |
RSM best for model fitness parameters (F-value and p-value).
| Components | Yield of Extract | Concentration of 2AP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-Value | F-Value | |||
| Model | 6.47 | 0.0042 | 12.10 | 0.0014 |
| Modified | Modified | Quadratic | Quadratic | |
| A | 1.79 | 0.2141 | 31.41 | 0.0008 |
| B | 23.11 | 0.0010 | 15.71 | 0.0054 |
| C | 0.1936 | 0.6703 | 1.60 | 0.2463 |
| D | 55.66 | <0.0001 | 31.97 | 0.0008 |
| AB | - | - | 50.87 | 0.0002 |
| AC | 4.52 | 0.0624 | 0.6563 | 0.4445 |
| AD | 0.2298 | 0.6431 | 113.71 | <0.0001 |
| BC | 11.47 | 0.0080 | 3.67 | 0.0971 |
| BD | 1.60 | 0.2380 | 61.09 | 0.0001 |
| CD | 1.64 | 0.2329 | 1.25 | 0.3000 |
| A2 | 2.41 | 0.1552 | 7.77 | 0.0270 |
| B2 | 2.76 | 0.1309 | 1.58 | 0.2485 |
| C2 | 0.0344 | 0.8570 | 5.13 | 0.0579 |
| D2 | 6.81 | 0.0283 | 27.75 | 0.0012 |
| R-Squared | 0.9034 | 0.9603 | ||
| Adequate Precision | 11.5596 | 11.5921 | ||
Optimum conditions of ultrasonic extraction of yield of extract and 2AP from pandan leaves.
| Parameters | Extraction Time (Min) | Concentration of Solvent (%) | Amplitude (%) | Mass of Leaves (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 20 | 60 | 25 | 12.5 |
Replicate runs at the optimum condition of yield of pandan extract from ultrasonic extraction process.
| Replicate Runs | Run 1 | Run 2 | Run 3 | Average Value (%) | Predicted Value (%) | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield (%) | 60.48 | 60.53 | 60.51 | 60.51 | 56.38 | 7.32 |
| Concentration of 2AP (ppm) | 1.43 | 1.47 | 1.39 | 1.43 | 1.77 | 19.10 |
Previous extraction methods used to extract 2AP.
| Extraction Method | Solvent Used | Extraction Time | Concentration of 2AP Obtained | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction | Liquid carbon dioxide | 2 h | 0.16 to 0.19 ppm | [ |
| Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction | Liquid carbon dioxide | 2 h | 0.72 ppm | [ |
| Hexane extraction | Hexane | 12 h | 0.52 ppm | [ |
Figure 23D response surface plots representing the effect of response variables towards the yield of pandan extract; (a) Effect of concentration of solvent and mass of leaves towards yield of extract; (b) Effect of sonication amplitude and extraction time towards yield of extract; (c) Effect of mass of leaves and extraction time towards yield of extract; (d) Effect of sonication amplitude and concentraction of solvent towards yield of extract; (e) Effect of mass of leaves and sonication amplitude towards yield of extract.
Figure 33D response surface plots representing the effect of response variables on the concentration of 2AP obtained from pandan extract; (a) Effect of mass of leaves and extraction time towards concentration of 2AP; (b) Effect of concentration of solvent and extraction time towards the concentration of 2AP; (c) Effect of sonication amplitude and extraction time towards concentration of 2AP; (d) Effect of mass of leaves and sonication amplitude towards concentration of 2AP; (e) Effect of sonication amplitude towards concentration of 2AP; (f) Effect of mass of leaves and concentration of solvent towards concentration of 2AP.
Compounds identified in the extract.
| Peak | Compounds |
|---|---|
| 2.739 | Acetic acid |
| 2.874 | O-Methylisourea |
| 2-propanone | |
| 3.263 | Methyl glyoxal |
| 1,4-Butanediamine | |
| Propanoic acid | |
| 4.480 | 2(5 |
| 3-methyl- | |
| 4-Methyl-2-hexene,c&t | |
| 5.618 | 4 |
| 5.88 | Catechol |
| 6.012 | Benzofuran |
| 2,3-dihydro-Benzeneacetaldehyde | |
| Benzene | |
| 6.647 | 2,5-Methano-2 |
| 2,4,6-Trihydroxytoluene | |
| 4(1 | |
| -amino-6-(methylamino)- | |
| 8.367 | 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline |
| 8.419 | 1,3,5-tri-tert-butyl-Propanamide |
| 8.758 | 4-((1 |
| 1,2,4-Cyclopentanetrione | |
| 8.966 | 6-Hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl-5,6,7,7a-tetrahydrobenzofuran-2(4 |
| [5-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-(2 | |
| 1-(2-Hydroxycyclohexyloxy)-1 | |
| 9.033 | 3-Methylamino-1-.beta.-d-ribofuran |
| osylpyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one | |
| Benzyl alcohol | |
| ethanone | |
| 9.198 | Bicyclo [2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene, 1,2,3,6-tetramethyl |
| 5-Hydroxy-3-methyl-1-indanone | |
| 9.384 | Pyrrolidine |
| 2-hexyl-1-methyl-Pyrrolidine, | |
| 9.622 | |
| 10.07 | 4′-Hydroxyphenazopyridine |
| Benzoic acid | |
| 4-(4-propylcyclohexyl)-, 4-cyano-3-fluorophenyl ester | |
| Benzimidazole-5-amine | |
| 10.235 | Phytol |
| 10.336 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid |
| 10.788 | 1,4-Dioxaspiro [4.5]decan-8-ol |
| 2(3 | |
| dihydro-4-methyl-5-pentyl-2-Piperidinone | |
| 11.98 | 1 |
| butane | |
| 13.401 | (5 |
| (5 | |
| Isoquinolin-6-ol | |
| 1-[4-hydroxybenzyl]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-7-methoxy |