| Literature DB >> 35956775 |
Aisha M H Al-Rajhi1, Husam Qanash2,3, Mohammed S Almuhayawi4, Soad K Al Jaouni5, Marwah M Bakri6, Magdah Ganash7, Hanaa M Salama8, Samy Selim9, Tarek M Abdelghany10.
Abstract
Multiple biological functions of Mentha pulegium extract were evaluated in the current work. Phytochemical components of the M. pulegium extract were detected by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Moreover, M. pulegium extract was estimated for antioxidant potential by 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) free radical scavenging, antimicrobial activity by well diffusion, and anticoagulant activity via prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). GC-MS analysis detected compounds including cholesterol margarate, stigmast-5-en-3-ol, 19-nor-4-androstenediol, androstan-17-one, pulegone-1,2-epoxide, isochiapin B, dotriacontane, hexadecanoic acid and neophytadiene. Chrysoeriol (15.36 µg/mL) was followed by kaempferol (11.14 µg/mL) and 7-OH flavone (10.14 µg/mL), catechin (4.11 µg/mL), hisperdin (3.05 µg/mL), and luteolin (2.36 µg/mL) were detected by HPLC as flavonoids, in addition to ferulic (13.19 µg/mL), cinnamic (12.69 µg/mL), caffeic (11.45 µg/mL), pyrogallol (9.36 µg/mL), p-coumaric (5.06 µg/mL) and salicylic (4.17 µg/mL) as phenolics. Antioxidant activity was detected with IC50 18 µg/mL, hemolysis inhibition was recorded as 79.8% at 1000 μg/mL, and PT and APTT were at 21.5 s and 49.5 s, respectively, at 50 μg/mL of M. pulegium extract. The acute toxicity of M. pulegium extract was recorded against PC3 (IC50 97.99 µg/mL) and MCF7 (IC50 80.21 µg/mL). Antimicrobial activity of M. pulegium extract was documented against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonasaureus, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but not against black fungus Mucor circinelloides. Molecular docking was applied using MOE (Molecular Operating Environment) to explain the biological activity of neophytadiene, luteolin, chrysoeriol and kaempferol. These compounds could be suitable for the development of novel pharmacological agents for treatment of cancer and bacterial infections.Entities:
Keywords: Mentha pulegium; anticancer; anticoagulant; antimicrobial; antioxidant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956775 PMCID: PMC9370026 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27154824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Diagram illustrating M. pulegium plants with the analysis methods and biological activities.
Figure 2GC-MS chromatogram analysis of M. pulegium extract.
Phyto-constituents of M. pulegium extract identified by GC-MS.
| Phyto-Constituent | RT * | Area % | Molecular Formula | Molecular Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulegone-1,2-epoxide (oxygenated terpene) | 14.18 | 0.52 | C10H14O2 | 166 |
| Methyl tridecanoate | 23.80 | 0.69 | C14H28O2 | 228 |
| Neophytadiene (Diterpenoid) | 24.72 | 1.07 | C20H38 | 278 |
| 2-cis-9-Octadecenyloxyethano | 25.56 | 0.36 | C20H40O2 | 312 |
| Methyl hexadecanoate | 26.54 | 4.56 | C17H34O2 | 270 |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 28.30 | 20.88 | C16H32O2 | 256 |
| 2,3-Dihydroxypropyl palmi | 29.34 | 0.32 | C19H38O4 | 330 |
| Linolelaidic acid, methyl ester | 29.62 | 0.87 | C19H34O2 | 294 |
| Elaidic acid, methyl ester | 29.78 | 4.17 | C19H36O2 | 296 |
| cis-11-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 29.90 | 2.80 | C19H36O2 | 296 |
| Isochiapin B | 30.01 | 0.32 | C19H22O6 | 346 |
| Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 30.27 | 3.94 | C19H38O2 | 298 |
| Methyl (7E,10E)-7,10-octadecadienoate | 30.55 | 2.06 | C19H34O2 | 294 |
| Ethyl linoleate | 30.80 | 0.65 | C21H38O2 | 322 |
| Oleic acid | 30.99 | 0.79 | C18H34O2 | 282 |
| 6-Octadecenoic acid | 31.39 | 3.58 | C18H34O2 | 282 |
| cis-13-Octadecenoic acid | 31.57 | 6.84 | C18H34O2 | 282 |
| Stearic acid | 31.81 | 4.87 | C18H36O2 | 284 |
| 19-nor-4-androstenediol (Phytosterol) | 31.94 | 1.39 | C18H28O2 | 276 |
| Androstan-17-one (Phytosterol) | 32.08 | 1.20 | C21H34O2 | 318 |
| cis-13-Eicosenoic acid | 32.36 | 0.52 | C20H38O2 | 310 |
| Oxiraneoctanoic acid, 3-octyl-methyl ester | 33.00 | 4.72 | C19H36O3 | 312 |
| Methyl 10-ketostearate | 33.50 | 10.84 | C19H36O3 | 312 |
| Arachidic acid methyl ester | 33.71 | 1.00 | C21H42O2 | 326 |
| 7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-Nonafluorodecane-1,2-Diol | 34.24 | 2.10 | C10H13F9O2 | 336 |
| Dasycarpidan-1-methanol, acetate (ester) | 34.56 | 0.75 | C20H26N2O2 | 326 |
| 6,7-Dimethoxy-1,2-Dimethyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-5-isoquinolinol | 35.39 | 0.95 | C13H19NO3 | 237 |
| Hahnfett | 35.48 | 0.34 | ND ** | ND ** |
| 2,3-Dihydroxypropyl elaidate | 35.29 | 0.79 | C21H40O4 | 356 |
| Dotriacontane | 36.29 | 0.84 | C32H66 | 450 |
| Di-2-Benzothiazole Disulfane | 36.80 | 0.36 | C14H8N2S4 | 332 |
| 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid | 37.09 | 3.60 | C24H38O4 | 390 |
| Heptacosane | 37.78 | 0.96 | C27H56 | 380 |
| Docosanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriylester | 38.29 | 0.31 | C69H134O6 | 1058 |
| Docosanoic acid, methylester | 39.71 | 0.49 | C23H46O2 | 354 |
| Cholesterol margarate(Phytosterol) | 41.65 | 0.42 | C44H78O2 | 638 |
| 6,8-DI-C-á-Glucosylluteolin | 41.95 | 0.39 | C27H30O16 | 610 |
| Stigmast-5-EN-3-OL (Phytosterol) | 43.06 | 0.48 | C28H44O4 | 444 |
* RT, retention time; ** ND, not detected.
Flavonoids and phenolic acids contained in M. pulegium extract, identified by HPLC.
| Flavonoids | Phenolic Acids | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT * | Compound | Concentration (µg/mL) | RT * | Compound | Concentration (µg/mL) |
| 7.8 | Kaempferol | 11.14 | 6 | 5.06 | |
| 8.7 | Luteolin | 2.36 | 8 | Caffeic acid | 11.45 |
| 9.8 | Hesperidin | 3.05 | 9 | Pyrogallol | 9.36 |
| 11 | 7-OH flavone | 10.14 | 11 | Ferulic acid | 13.19 |
| 12 | Catechin | 4.11 | 12 | Salicylic acid | 4.17 |
| 15 | Chrysoeriol | 15.36 | 13 | Cinnamic acid | 12.69 |
* RT, retention time.
Figure 3HPLC chromatogram of phenolic acids of M. pulegium extract.
Figure 4HPLC chromatogram of flavonoids of M. pulegium extract.
Antimicrobial activity of M. pulegium extract.
| Tested Microorganisms | Inhibition Zone (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract (100 µL) | Control * | MIC *** µg/mL | ||
| Gram-positive bacteria |
| 23 | 21 | 62.50 |
|
| 27 | 25 | 45.25 | |
| Gram-negative bacteria |
| 26 | 20 | 33.60 |
|
| 19 | 14 | 15.62 | |
| Fungi |
| 25 | 22 | 65.20 |
|
| 0.0 | 11 | ND ** | |
* Ketoconazole, or * Gentamycin as antifungal or antibiotic, respectively. ND **, not detected. *** Minimum inhibitory concentration.
Figure 5Antimicrobial activities of M. pulegium extract against different bacteria and fungi: (E) M. pulegium extract; (D) methanolic loaded disc, (G) Gentamycin, (K) Ketoconazole.
Figure 6TEM micrographs of (A) untreated S. aureus, (B) S. aureus treated at 62.50 µg/mL and (C) at 100 µg/mL, (D) untreated P. aeruginosa, (E) P. aeruginosa treated with M. pulegium extract at 15.62 µg/mL and (F) at 30 µg/mL. Scale Bar = 100 nm, 5000×.
Antioxidant activity of M. pulegium extract.
| Concentration (μg/mL) | O.D * Mean | DPPH Scavenging (%) | SD ** | SE *** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 | 0.172 | 88.1 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| 500 | 0.215 | 85.1 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| 250 | 0.307 | 78.7 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| 125 | 0.419 | 70.9 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| 62.5 | 0.529 | 63.3 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| 31.25 | 0.653 | 54.7 | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| 15.62 | 0.762 | 47.1 | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| 18 μg/mL | ||||
| 15.0 μg/mL | ||||
* OD, optical density; ** SD, standard deviation; *** SE, standard error.
Effect of M. pulegium extract on hemolysis inhibition.
| Concentration (μg/mL) | Hypotonic O.D * | Hemolysis Inhibition % | SD ** | SE *** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.038 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| 1000 | 0.301 | 79.8 | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| 800 | 0.417 | 67.9 | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| 600 | 0.527 | 55.8 | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| 400 | 0.641 | 43.8 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| 200 | 0.766 | 31.2 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| 100 | 0.822 | 25.3 | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Indomethacin at 200 μg/mL | 0.130 | 91.0 | 0.005 | 0.002 |
* OD, optical density; ** SD, standard deviation; *** SE, standard error.
Figure 7Hemolysis inhibition (%) at different concentration of M. pulegium extract 3.5. Anticoagulant Activity of M. pulegium Extract.
Figure 8Anticoagulant activity of M. pulegium at different concentrations, represented by PT and APTT.
Figure 9Anticoagulant activity of heparin at different concentrations, represented by PT and APTT.
Cytotoxicity of M. pulegium L extract against PC3 and MCF7 at different concentrations.
| Concentration | PC3 | MCF7 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean O.D * | SE ** | Viability % | Toxicity % | Mean O.D * | SE ** | Viability % | Toxicity % | |
| Control | 0.554 | 0.010 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.476 | 0.01 | 100 | 0.0 |
| 31.25 | 0.55 | 0.007 | 99.40 | 0.60 | 0.43 | 0.005 | 89.57 | 10.43 |
| 62.5 | 0.39 | 0.008 | 71.12 | 28.88 | 0.25 | 0.016 | 51.547 | 48.46 |
| 125 | 0.18 | 0.007 | 32.31 | 67.69 | 0.11 | 0.010 | 23.53 | 76.47 |
| 250 | 0.11 | 0.005 | 19.19 | 80.81 | 0.05 | 0.007 | 10.85 | 89.15 |
| 500 | 0.06 | 0.001 | 2.83 | 97.17 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 3.29 | 96.71 |
| 1000 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 3.13 | 96.87 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 3.71 | 96.29 |
| IC50 | 97.99 µg/mL | 80.21 µg/mL | ||||||
* OD, optical density; ** SE, standard error.
Figure 10Effects of different concentrations of M. pulegium extract on morphological changes of PC3 and MCF7.
Figure 11Structures of different proteins showing their respective binding sites for active compounds.
Figure 12Amino acid residue interactions of different proteins with active compounds, and the representative key of the types of interaction between active compounds and proteins.
Docking scores and energies of compounds with 7BCZ, 7C7N, 3QUM, and 1JNX proteins.
| Compound | Receptor | mseq | S | rmsd_refne | E_conf | E_place | E_score1 | E_refne | E_score2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neophytadiene | 7BCZ | 1 | −7.1580 | 1.2822 | 24.5600 | −57.8312 | −7.8518 | −31.7035 | −7.1580 |
| Neophytadiene | 7BCZ | 1 | −6.9125 | 2.3982 | 13.1121 | −49.8856 | −8.0566 | −31.8298 | −6.9125 |
| Neophytadiene | 7BCZ | 1 | −6.8013 | 1.3756 | 26.6025 | −54.2040 | −7.6831 | −27.2223 | −6.8013 |
| Neophytadiene | 7BCZ | 1 | −6.7640 | 1.1550 | 86.2092 | −72.2128 | −8.5950 | −31.8384 | −6.7640 |
| Neophytadiene | 7BCZ | 1 | −6.6269 | 1.8035 | 10.0713 | −39.6643 | −7.4382 | −32.7957 | −6.6269 |
| Luteolin | 7C7N | 1 | −5.2683 | 1.2104 | −30.1027 | −53.0515 | −10.7811 | −21.5450 | −5.2683 |
| Luteolin | 7C7N | 1 | −5.2098 | 1.0321 | −33.5362 | −58.5419 | −10.8163 | −25.1026 | −5.2098 |
| Luteolin | 7C7N | 1 | −5.1764 | 2.0993 | −31.8830 | −50.5262 | −9.9086 | −23.7861 | −5.1764 |
| Luteolin | 7C7N | 1 | −5.0736 | 1.1214 | −34.9514 | −74.7281 | −10.4863 | −24.8905 | −5.0736 |
| Luteolin | 7C7N | 1 | −5.0535 | 0.6345 | −30.7855 | −62.0186 | −9.5565 | −20.9379 | −5.0535 |
| Chrysoeriol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.3350 | 1.0946 | −15.0487 | −75.6312 | −11.4227 | −36.8350 | −6.3350 |
| Chrysoeriol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.2655 | 1.7381 | −20.6640 | −84.1280 | −11.5780 | −37.1195 | −6.2655 |
| Chrysoeriol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.2171 | 0.7234 | −14.4679 | −76.0750 | −11.4356 | −33.1380 | −6.2171 |
| Chrysoeriol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.1692 | 2.1441 | −15.4071 | −78.4542 | −11.5705 | −36.1058 | −6.1692 |
| Chrysoeriol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.1571 | 1.1044 | −15.2604 | −84.8887 | −11.8802 | −35.8331 | −6.1571 |
| Chrysoeriol | 1JNX | 1 | −5.0644 | 1.7265 | −17.5303 | −62.1961 | −9.9634 | −25.0239 | −5.0644 |
| Chrysoeriol | 1JNX | 1 | −5.0101 | 0.9227 | −15.7642 | −42.2704 | −9.1471 | −24.0765 | −5.0101 |
| Chrysoeriol | 1JNX | 1 | −4.9971 | 1.6559 | −14.5476 | −43.9988 | −9.2024 | −23.3186 | −4.9971 |
| Chrysoeriol | 1JNX | 1 | −4.9616 | 1.4387 | −16.8284 | −44.6490 | −9.6921 | −23.2991 | −4.9616 |
| Chrysoeriol | 1JNX | 1 | −4.8836 | 2.0835 | −17.2031 | −52.3723 | −9.3292 | −24.7783 | −4.8836 |
| Kaempferol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.3593 | 1.7518 | −54.3337 | −63.8852 | −12.2329 | −35.5105 | −6.3593 |
| Kaempferol | 3QUM | 1 | −6.2456 | 1.7957 | −53.7207 | −84.7006 | −11.2066 | −33.4084 | −6.2456 |
| Kaempferol | 3QUM | 1 | −5.9016 | 1.4734 | −50.9818 | −65.7556 | −11.2285 | −27.7261 | −5.9016 |
| Kaempferol | 3QUM | 1 | −5.8823 | 1.1136 | −48.9402 | −68.5376 | −11.2814 | −31.7357 | −5.8823 |
| Kaempferol | 3QUM | 1 | −5.8293 | 1.7911 | −50.1359 | −67.1079 | −11.2273 | −31.8993 | −5.8293 |
| Kaempferol | 1JNX | 1 | −5.2916 | 3.4082 | −57.8566 | −54.0164 | −7.9325 | −25.2956 | −5.2916 |
| Kaempferol | 1JNX | 1 | −5.2264 | 1.3456 | −58.4060 | −23.5095 | −7.0560 | −24.2946 | −5.2264 |
| Kaempferol | 1JNX | 1 | −4.9339 | 2.1388 | −58.0519 | −35.5016 | −6.9689 | −23.3973 | −4.9339 |
| Kaempferol | 1JNX | 1 | −4.9124 | 2.8442 | −58.3635 | −31.1941 | −7.3013 | −22.9019 | −4.9124 |
| Kaempferol | 1JNX | 1 | −4.8548 | 1.5679 | −59.0462 | −43.3097 | −8.0880 | −23.1065 | −4.8548 |
Where S = final score, which is the score of the last stage that was not set to none. rmsd = root mean square deviation of the pose, in Å, from the original ligand. This field was exist if the site definition was identical to the definition of ligand. rmsd_refine = root mean square deviation between the pose before refinement and the pose after refinement. E_conf = energy of the conformer. If there was a refinement stage, this is the energy calculated at the end of the refinement. Note that for force field refinement, by default, this energy was calculated with the solvation option set to Born. E_place = score from the placement stage. E_score 1, E_score 2 = scores from rescoring stages 1 and 2. E_refine = score from the refinement stage, calculated to be the sum of the van der Waals electrostatic and solvation energies, under the generalized Born solvation model (GB/VI).
Interaction of active compounds with proteins.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C 1 | 6-ring PHE 191 (A) | Pi-H | 4.73 | −0.5 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| O 28 | OD2 ASP 45 (A) | H-donor | 3.26 | −1.7 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| O 23 | SG CYS 220 (P) | H-donor | 4.29 | −1.0 |
| O 26 | OE2 GLU 21 (P) | H-donor | 2.85 | −2.0 |
| 6-ring | N GLY 19 (P) | Pi-H | 4.40 | −0.6 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6-ring | CB HIS 1673 (X) | Pi-H | 3.65 | −0.5 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| O 28 | OE2 GLU 21 (P) | H-donor | 3.26 | −0.9 |
| O 27 | N LYS 154 (P) | H-acceptor | 3.01 | −3.1 |
| O 27 | CE LYS 154 (P) | H-acceptor | 3.18 | −2.6 |
| 6-ring | N GLY 19 (P) | Pi-H | 4.38 | −1.5 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6-ring | CA THR 1675 (X) | Pi-H | 4.09 | −1.1 |