| Literature DB >> 35956708 |
Gamal Abdel Nasser Atia1, Hany K Shalaby2, Mehrukh Zehravi3, Mohamed Mohamady Ghobashy4, Hager Abdel Nasser Attia5, Zubair Ahmad6,7, Farhat S Khan7, Abhijit Dey8, Nobendu Mukerjee9,10, Athanasios Alexiou10, Md Habibur Rahman11, Joanna Klepacka12, Agnieszka Najda13.
Abstract
Chitosan is a natural anionic polysaccharide with a changeable architecture and an abundance of functional groups; in addition, it can be converted into various shapes and sizes, making it appropriate for a variety of applications. This article examined and summarized current developments in chitosan-based materials, with a focus on the modification of chitosan, and presented an abundance of information about the fabrication and use of chitosan-derived products in periodontal regeneration. Numerous preparation and modification techniques for enhancing chitosan performance, as well as the uses of chitosan and its metabolites, were reviewed critically and discussed in depth in this study. Chitosan-based products may be formed into different shapes and sizes, considering fibers, nanostructures, gels, membranes, and hydrogels. Various drug-loaded chitosan devices were discussed regarding periodontal regeneration.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; periodontitis; regeneration; scaffold; tissue engineering
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956708 PMCID: PMC9371089 DOI: 10.3390/polym14153192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Chitin existence in nature.
| Phylum | Class |
|---|---|
| Arthropoda | Crustaceans (e.g., Shripms), Arachnida (e.g., spiders) |
| Mollusca | Cephalopoda (squid, octopus) |
| Annelida | Polychaeta (Bristle worms) |
| Fungi | Ascomycota, Basidiomycota |
| Protozoa | Rhizopoda (amoeba) |
Figure 1Sources and extraction of chitosan (Created with BioRender.com access on 1 February 2021).
Chitosan’s benefits and drawbacks as a local medicine delivery vehicle.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Minimal Toxicity | Low mechanical resistance |
| Improved Biocompatibility | Uncontrolled pore size |
| Have a mucoadhesive features | Possibility of contraction |
| Stable | Pure chitosan is difficult to electrospin. |
| Site-specific drug delivery | Crosslinking can alter the intrinsic characteristics of chitosan. |
| Increased therapeutic index | Poor solubility except in acidic media. |
| Repeated, costly, and undesirable dosing is avoided. | The method of manufacturing process must be altered depending on the medicine to be administered. |
Figure 2Molecular structure of chitosan (A) and some of its derivatives: N-carboxymethyl chitosan (B), N-trimethyl chitosan (C), and thiolated chitosan (D).
Figure 3Shows multiple properties of chitosan (Created with BioRender.com).
Fabrication methods of chitosan products, application, advantages and disadvantages [41].
| Fabrication Method | Carrier | Loaded Drug | Form | Application | Advantages | Disadvantages | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Chitosan/carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles | Doxycycline | Nanoparticles | Periodontal implant | -Less toxic | -Low Solubility | [ |
|
| Chitosan | metronidazole | microparticles | Periodontal implant | -Simple | -Difficulty of controlling the evaporation rate. | [ |
|
| Sulfobutylether β- cyclodextrin/chitosan nanoparticles (SBEβCD/CS NPs) | Asiaticoside (AS) | Gel | Periodontal implant | Ability to produce a small particle size with a narrow size of the distribution | Laborious and time-consuming process and the presence of organic solvent and surfactant | [ |
|
| chitosan/alginate polyelectrolyte complex | clindamycin phosphate | Film | Periodontal Implant | -Soft and flexible networks. | -Uncontrolled dissolution. | [ |
|
| polyelectrolytes carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) and polylysine (PLL) | Metformin | Scaffold | -Surface coating | -Save energy. | -Sophisticated procedure | [ |
|
| Chitosan | Triclosan | Nanoparticles |
|
| -Presence of hazardous residues | [ |
|
| Chitosan dispersed in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | Doxycycline | Gel | -Scaffold | -Simple | -High cost | [ |
|
| β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), chitosan (CTS) and the mesoporous silica (SBA-15) | Metformin | Composite | Scaffold | -prolonged shelf-life. | -Inability to preserve bioactivity. | [ |
Advantages and disadvantages of different formulations of chitosan as local drug delivery system.
| Formulation | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|
| Gel | Ease of application, sustained drug release, and good patient compliance. | Needs large volume. |
| Hydrogel | Controlled drug release, and can take the shape of the deformity | lack of mechanical strength. |
| Micro particles | Ease of application, controlled drug release. | Difficulty in retaining in the application site. |
| Fibers | Can be used in distant area, such as last tooth in the jaw. | Needs to be removed and shows some inflammation. |
| Nanoparticles | Precise application. | Lack of stability and sophisticated manufacturing techniques. |
| Strips and films | Thin, flexible, and minimal discomfort. | Burst drug release. |
| Scaffolds | Enhanced mechanical properties, and | Difficult processing, and high cost |
Figure 4Different formulations of chitosan (Created with BioRender.com).
Examples of Drug-Loaded chitosan Scaffolds for periodontal tissue regeneration.
| Form of Chitosan | Drug | Technique Used | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microspheres | Tetracycline HCL | Enhancing bioadhesion, controlling medication distribution, and boosting antibacterial properties | [ | |
| microspheres | Ofloxacin | Controlled release rate is high, and the pharmacokinetic pattern is advancing. | [ | |
| Microspheres | Doxycycline | Water-in-oil emulsion | Improves cell survival significantly when compared to pure medication, and performs better in vitro | [ |
| Micro particles | Natamycin | Emulsion-polymerization | Antibacterial activity with prolonged drug release. | [ |
| Films | Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride | Casting/solvent evaporation | Deliver antimicrobial agents into the periodontal pocket. | [ |
| Film | Metronidazole benzoate | evaporation | Sustained drug release, the effective local dose was 15-fold less than the systemic dose. | [ |
| Inserts | Metronidazole | Casting method | Initial rapid release shown for reducing pathogenic load in periodontitis | [ |
| Films | Ornidazole | Casting methods | Drug bioavailability extended up to six days. | [ |
| Gels | Metronidazole | Dissolution rate in gingival crevicular fluid was massively increased multiple folds when evaluated in vivo. | [ | |
| Gels | Ornidazole | Improved bio adhesivity, prolonged pharmacological activity, and good patient compliance | [ | |
| Nanoparticles | e-aminocaproic acid | Ionic gelation | Increased cementogenesis and osteogenesis | [ |