| Literature DB >> 35956271 |
Zhi Huang1,2, Ping Guo1, Ying Wang1, Ziming Li3, Xiaochen Yin3, Ming Chen3, Yong Liu1, Yuming Hu3, Bo Chen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to measure docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in both the plasma and erythrocyte of a child population and compares them with respect to their associations with dietary and metabolic risk patterns.Entities:
Keywords: dietary patterns; docosahexaenoic acid; erythrocyte; metabolic risk patterns; plasma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956271 PMCID: PMC9370652 DOI: 10.3390/nu14153095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Schematic diagram to precisely identify bidirectional biomarker of blood DHA.
The demographic characteristics and metabolic risk variables of children (N = 414).
| Indices | |
|---|---|
| Demographic Variables | |
| Age | |
| 4–5 years | 202 (48.79) |
| 6–7 years | 212 (51.21) |
| Gender | |
| Boy | 217 (52.42) |
| Girl | 197 (47.58) |
| Caregiver | |
| Parents | 238 (57.49) |
| Grandparents and others | 176 (42.51) |
| Caregiver’s occupation | |
| Public institution staff | 35 (8.45) |
| Non-public institution staff | 150 (36.23) |
| Unemployment | 229 (55.31) |
| Caregiver’s education | |
| College and above | 36 (8.70) |
| Senior | 115 (27.78) |
| Junior and below | 263 (63.53) |
| Family economic level | |
| CNY 50,000 and above | 128 (30.92) |
| CNY 20,000–50,000 | 183 (44.20) |
| Below CNY 20,000 | 103 (24.88) |
| Metabolic risk variables | |
| Physical indicators | |
| Weight (kg) | 19 (17, 21) |
| Height (cm) * | 114 (6) |
| BMI | 14.75 (13.96, 15.69) |
| Sitting height (cm) * | 63 (3) |
| Chest circumference (cm) | 54 (52, 56) |
| Upper arm circumference (cm) | 16 (16, 17) |
| Shoulder width (cm) | 31 (29, 32) |
| Pelvis breadth (cm) | 57 (54, 59) |
| Blood pressure | |
| SBP (mm/Hg) | 91 (85, 97) |
| DBP (mm/Hg) | 58 (54, 62) |
| Glycolipid metabolic indicators | |
| GLU (mmol/mL) | 4.85 (4.53, 5.30) |
| TG (mmol/mL) | 0.94 (0.67, 1.39) |
| CHOL (mmol/mL) | 4.13 (3.71, 4.53) |
| HDL-C (mmol/mL) | 1.54 (1.35, 1.73) |
| LDL-C (mmol/mL) | 2.14 (1.81, 2.49) |
| DHA (μg/mL) | |
| Plasma DHA | 7.91 (6.22, 10.45) |
| Erythrocyte DHA | 13.89 (7.49, 18.99) |
* Mean (SD).
Figure 2The correlation of plasma DHA with erythrocyte DHA among children.
The correlation of food items with plasma and erythrocyte DHA status among children.
| Food Items | Plasma DHA | Erythrocyte DHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r |
| r |
| |
| Rice | −0.078 | 0.114 | −0.063 | 0.201 |
| Wheat flour | 0.052 | 0.293 | 0.033 | 0.497 |
| Coarse cereals | 0.100 | 0.042 | 0.072 | 0.144 |
| Tubers | 0.050 | 0.308 | −0.001 | 0.977 |
| Soybean and its products | 0.056 | 0.260 | −0.004 | 0.929 |
| Meat | 0.166 | 0.001 | −0.072 | 0.143 |
| Poultry | 0.152 | 0.002 | −0.034 | 0.493 |
| Eggs | 0.225 | <0.001 | 0.091 | 0.064 |
| Fish | 0.141 | 0.004 | 0.066 | 0.181 |
| Shrimp, crab, and shellfish | 0.074 | 0.134 | 0.029 | 0.555 |
| Milk and its products | −0.005 | 0.927 | 0.084 | 0.088 |
| Leafy vegetable | 0.074 | 0.134 | 0.039 | 0.429 |
| Leafless vegetable | 0.022 | 0.651 | 0.040 | 0.417 |
| Fresh beans | 0.048 | 0.334 | −0.020 | 0.683 |
| Fungi and algae | 0.109 | 0.027 | 0.030 | 0.545 |
| Fruits | 0.101 | 0.040 | 0.013 | 0.796 |
| Beverage | −0.062 | 0.211 | −0.138 | 0.005 |
| Nuts | 0.088 | 0.075 | 0.023 | 0.635 |
| Snacks | −0.038 | 0.438 | −0.035 | 0.472 |
Figure 3The plasma and erythrocyte DHA status in different dietary patterns among children: (a) plasma and (b) erythrocyte. Q1~Q4 represented four quartiles of factor scores for dietary patterns: Q1, black; Q2, red; Q3, blue; Q4, magenta.
The association of dietary patterns with plasma and erythtocyte DHA status by multivariate linear regression analysis.
| Dietary Patterns | Plasma | Erythrocyte | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| Diversified pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.165 (0.070, 0.261) | 0.001 | −0.002 (−0.099, 0.095) | 0.967 |
| Model 2 | 0.145 (0.045, 0.244) | 0.004 | −0.008 (−0.110, 0.094) | 0.875 |
| Plant pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | −0.068 (−0.165, 0.029) | 0.167 | 0.024 (−0.073, 0.121) | 0.622 |
| Model 2 | −0.075 (−0.171, 0.021) | 0.125 | 0.018 (−0.080, 0.116) | 0.725 |
| Beverage and snack pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | −0.110 (−0.207, −0.014) | 0.025 | −0.032 (−0.128, 0.065) | 0.520 |
| Model 2 | −0.092 (−0.187, 0.003) | 0.057 | −0.031 (−0.128, 0.066) | 0.531 |
Model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for age, sex, caregiver, caregiver’s eduction and occupation, and family economic level.
The correlation of metabolic risk variables with plasma and erythtocyte DHA status among children.
| Metabolic Risk Variables | Plasma DHA | Erythrocyte DHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r |
| r |
| |
| Weight | −0.163 | 0.001 | −0.076 | 0.122 |
| Height | −0.153 | 0.002 | −0.046 | 0.355 |
| BMI | −0.097 | 0.049 | −0.071 | 0.147 |
| Sitting height | −0.146 | 0.003 | −0.004 | 0.939 |
| Chest circumference | −0.118 | 0.017 | −0.093 | 0.057 |
| Upper arm circumference | −0.078 | 0.112 | −0.139 | 0.005 |
| Shoulder width | −0.170 | 0.001 | −0.017 | 0.736 |
| Pelvis breadth | −0.142 | 0.004 | −0.066 | 0.182 |
| SBP | 0.011 | 0.817 | −0.061 | 0.217 |
| DBP | −0.042 | 0.392 | −0.049 | 0.321 |
| GLU | 0.003 | 0.958 | −0.094 | 0.056 |
| TG | 0.057 | 0.251 | −0.001 | 0.990 |
| CHOL | 0.269 | <0.001 | 0.120 | 0.014 |
| HDL-C | 0.011 | 0.822 | 0.075 | 0.129 |
| LDL-C | 0.269 | <0.001 | 0.069 | 0.162 |
Factor loadings for metabolic risk patterns.
| Metabolic Risk Variables | Obesity | Blood Lipid | Blood Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 0.980 | −0.029 | −0.073 |
| Height | 0.740 | −0.083 | −0.149 |
| BMI | 0.829 | 0.028 | 0.015 |
| Sitting height | 0.770 | −0.054 | −0.081 |
| Chest circumference | 0.818 | −0.054 | −0.065 |
| Upper arm circumference | 0.823 | 0.022 | −0.030 |
| Shoulder width | 0.671 | −0.083 | −0.139 |
| Pelvis breadth | 0.899 | −0.014 | −0.077 |
| SBP | 0.408 | 0.251 | 0.787 |
| DBP | 0.234 | 0.285 | 0.862 |
| GLU | 0.170 | −0.020 | 0.016 |
| TG | 0.315 | −0.057 | −0.117 |
| CHOL | 0.057 | 0.950 | −0.273 |
| HDL-C | −0.010 | 0.338 | −0.028 |
| LDL-C | 0.005 | 0.906 | −0.237 |
Figure 4The plasma and erythrocyte DHA status in different metabolic risk patterns among children: (a) plasma and (b) erythrocyte. Q1~Q4 represented four quartiles of factor scores for dietary patterns: Q1, black; Q2, red; Q3, blue; Q4, magenta.
The association of metabolic risk patterns with plasma and erythtocyte DHA status by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
| Metabolic Risk Patterns | Plasma | Erythrocyte | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Obesity risk pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.870 (0.793, 0.953) | 0.003 | 0.967 (0.931, 1.004) | 0.079 |
| Model 2 | 0.910 (0.825, 1.004) | 0.060 | 0.968 (0.929, 1.008) | 0.116 |
| Model 3 | 0.873 (0.786, 0.969) | 0.011 | 0.962 (0.923, 1.004) | 0.075 |
| Blood lipid risk pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.276 (1.157, 1.406) | <0.001 | 1.047 (1.008, 1.088) | 0.017 |
| Model 2 | 1.288 (1.162, 1.428) | <0.001 | 1.046 (1.006, 1.088) | 0.025 |
| Model 3 | 1.271 (1.142, 1.415) | <0.001 | 1.043 (1.002, 1.086) | 0.040 |
| Blood pressure risk pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.961 (0.878, 1.052) | 0.391 | 0.978 (0.942, 1.016) | 0.252 |
| Model 2 | 0.946 (0.861, 1.040) | 0.249 | 0.977 (0.940, 1.015) | 0.238 |
| Model 3 | 0.973 (0.880, 1.075) | 0.585 | 0.983 (0.945, 1.023) | 0.397 |
The results show OR (95% CI) of Q4 vs. Q1 by multivariate logistic regression analysis, with Q1 as the reference. Model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for age, sex, caregiver, caregiver’s education and occupation, and family economic level; model 3: adjusted for model 2 and intake of meat, poultry, eggs, and fish.