| Literature DB >> 35955488 |
Fabrizio Schipani1, Marcella Manerba1, Roberto Marotta2, Laura Poppi3, Arianna Gennari4, Francesco Rinaldi1, Andrea Armirotti5, Fulvia Farabegoli3, Marinella Roberti3, Giuseppina Di Stefano6, Walter Rocchia7, Stefania Girotto1, Nicola Tirelli4,8, Andrea Cavalli1,3.
Abstract
The cytotoxic action of anticancer drugs can be potentiated by inhibiting DNA repair mechanisms. RAD51 is a crucial protein for genomic stability due to its critical role in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. BRCA2 assists RAD51 fibrillation and defibrillation in the cytoplasm and nucleus and assists its nuclear transport. BRC4 is a peptide derived from the fourth BRC repeat of BRCA2, and it lacks the nuclear localization sequence. Here, we used BRC4 to (i) reverse RAD51 fibrillation; (ii) avoid the nuclear transport of RAD51; and (iii) inhibit HR and enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic treatments. Specifically, using static and dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and microscale thermophoresis, we show that BRC4 eroded RAD51 fibrils from their termini through a "domino" mechanism and yielded monomeric RAD51 with a cumulative nanomolar affinity. Using cellular assays (BxPC-3, pancreatic cancer), we show that a myristoylated BRC4 (designed for a more efficient cell entry) abolished the formation of nuclear RAD51 foci. The present study provides a molecular description of RAD51 defibrillation, an essential step in BRCA2-mediated homologous recombination and DNA repair.Entities:
Keywords: BRCA2; DNA repair; PARP; anticancer drug discovery; chemo/radiosensitizer; homologous recombination; synthetic lethality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955488 PMCID: PMC9368738 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1(A) Negative staining TEM of 0.1 mg/mL RAD51 fibrils, alone (top) or in the presence of BRC4 (middle, RAD51/BRC4 1:0.6 molar ratio), clearly indicates the latter as an antagonist of RAD51 fibrillation. The fibril length is reported in a box plot as a function of BRC4 concentration (bottom) after fitting TEM data with Gaussian models (see Supporting Information, Figure S3). In the absence of BRC4, most of the fibrils appeared to be 80–200 nm-long, but they may have been fragmented during sample preparation; indeed, static light scattering predicted a higher fibril length (Table S1). (B) Evolution of Rg, Rh, and the Rg/Rh ratio (i.e., the aspect ratio) of RAD51 fibrils (6.25 µM = 0.25 mg/mL) upon addition of BRC4 or scBRC4. (C) Apparent weight average mass ( from SLS measurements: it is the average mass of all colloids in the sample) for RAD51/BRC4 suspensions ((RAD51) = 6.25 µM = 0.25 mg/mL) as a function of the peptide/protein ratio. The dashed line was calculated assuming that a compound of the same mass of BRC4 was added and had no interaction with RAD51. The empty squares refer to SLS measurements performed with a double-mutated form of BRC4. (D) MST measurements provide an indication of the size (diffusion coefficient) of RAD51 fibrils, which was reduced with increasing RAD51/BRC4 ratios ((RAD51) = 100 nM = 4 µg/mL). (E) SLS (Rg and apparent mass data), DLS (Rh data), and MST measurements ( data) all suggest a stoichiometric (1:1) mode of action for the BRC4-induced RAD51 defibrillation.
Figure 2(A) Localization of biotinylated BRC4 peptide by avidin–gold labelling. The histogram below shows the different densities of gold nanoparticles when nonlabelled BRC4 or biotinylated BRC4 was used. The asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference (two-tailed Student’s t-test * p < 0.01). The labelled peptide was predominantly localized at only one of the fibril termini (23%, n = 67). In the remaining cases, it appeared to be bound to isolated RAD51 monomers (73%, n = 67). In the pictorial representation of RAD51 (below), its protomer was assumed to adopt a helical morphology, as evidenced by TEM images, and the fibrils were assumed to comprise aligned helices. (B) recorded as a function of time on RAD51/BRC4 suspensions ([RAD51] = 6.25 µM = 0.25 mg/mL) with various peptide/protein ratios. The data were fitted with an exponential function. The initial decrease rate, recorded as a function of the BRC4/RAD51 molar ratio (inset), was obtained as the derivative of the function at time zero. (C) Simulated weight distribution of RAD51 fibrils with different lengths was produced upon addition of variable amounts of BRC4. The model used is described in Appendix A and was fed with data. Mechanistically, the whole process was based on a succession of losses of a RAD51 unit. Each individual step appeared to be characterized by a rather unfavourable constant. However, their coupling and above all the presence of a final “sink” drove the process to completion. Indeed, the complexation of RAD51 with BRC4 appeared to be thermodynamically favoured, with a dissociation constant kd1 calculated by our model estimated to be mostly in the range 0.1–1 µM.
Figure 3(A) homologous recombination (HR) assay: evaluation of the percentage of HR inhibition at 5, 10, and 30 μM BRC4myr peptide (red) or scrambled myristoylated peptide scBRC4myr (black). (B) Immunofluorescence detection of RAD51 foci in cell nuclei. BxPC-3 cells were exposed to 50 μM cisplatin (CPL) or 200 nM doxorubicin (DOXO) alone or in combination with 5 μM BRC4myr or scBRC4myr peptides. Representative pictures showing DAPI-stained cell nuclei and the corresponding immune labelling of RAD51 localization. RAD51 labelling appeared mainly in CPL- and DOXO-exposed cells. A higher magnification detail of the 200 nM DOXO-treated sample is included. The bar graph shows the percentage of RAD51-lableled nuclei estimated by analyzing approximately 300 cells for each treatment. Data were statistically evaluated by applying the two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. A statistically significant difference was found between cells treated with BRC4myr in combination with CPL or DOXO compared to cells treated with CPL or DOXO alone. (C) Cell viability assessed in BxPC-3 cultures exposed to CPL (50 or 100 µM, 1.5 h) or doxorubicin (DOXO, 200 nM or 1 µM, 1.5 h) and treated for 48 h with 5 µM BRC4myr. During the experiment, cultures were maintained in a medium without serum supplementation to avoid interference of serum with peptide effects (degradation by proteases). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. BRC4myr significantly increased the effects of both CPL and DOXO with p < 0.01 (**).