| Literature DB >> 35955265 |
Kazybek Aimaganbetov1, Nurlan Almas2, Bayan Kurbanova3, Dauren Muratov1, Abay Serikkanov1, Zinetula Insepov3,4, Nurlan Tokmoldin5.
Abstract
Despite the impressive performance and incredible promise for a variety of applications, the wide-scale commercialization of graphene is still behind its full potential. One of the main challenges is related to preserving graphene's unique properties upon transfer onto practically desirable substrates. In this work, few-layer graphene sheets deposited via liquid-phase transfer from copper onto a quartz substrate have been studied using a suite of experimental techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, admittance spectroscopy, and four-point probe electrical measurements. SEM measurements suggest that the transfer of graphene from copper foil to quartz using the aqueous solution of ammonium persulfate was accompanied by unintentional etching of the entire surface of the quartz substrate and, as a result, the formation of microscopic facet structures covering the etched surface of the substrate. As revealed by Raman spectroscopy and the electrical measurements, the transfer process involving the etching of the copper foil in a 0.1 M solution of (NH4)2S2O8 resulted in its p-type doping. This was accompanied by the appearance of an electronic gap of 0.022 eV, as evidenced by the Arrhenius analysis. The observed increase in the conductance of the samples with temperature can be explained by thermally activated carrier transport, dominating the scattering processes.Entities:
Keywords: Hall effect; Raman spectroscopy; admittance; few-layer graphene; scanning electron microscopy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955265 PMCID: PMC9369713 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Low-temperature chamber: General view of the admittance measurement chamber: 1—microcryogenic machine body; 2—cell cover; 3—electrical contacts; 4—viewing window; 5—test sample; 6—mica insulator; 7—substrate.
Figure 2SEM images of (a) CVD graphene grown on a Cu foil; (b) high-resolution SEM image showing graphene irregularities, such as flakes, wrinkles, and holes.
Figure 3Microscopy images of an etched region of FLG on quartz: (a) SEM image; (b) 3D AFM image; (c) 2D AFM image; (d) AFM profiles of the etched quartz regions.
Figure 4Raman spectrum of few−layer graphene on the copper substrate.
Peak positions of the characteristic Raman features of few-layer graphene.
| Raman Peak | Peak Position, cm−1 | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| D | 1350 | [ |
| − | [ | |
| 1350 | Our work | |
| G | 1580–1600 | [ |
| 1593 | [ | |
| 1582 | Our work | |
| 2D | 2660–2700 | [ |
| 2723 | [ | |
| 2675 | Our work |
Figure 5Raman spectra of few−layer graphene on the quartz substrate (a), focusing on the G−band (b) and 2D−band (c) regions, respectively.
Figure 6Optical transmission spectra of a quartz slide and the few-layer graphene sample on top of quartz.
Figure 7Admittance measurement results: Frequency dependence of sample conductivity at different temperatures (a) and the Arrhenius diagram of the logarithm of conductivity versus inverse temperature (b) (inset—current-voltage measurements indicating an ohmic contact to the sample).