| Literature DB >> 28663563 |
Yongjun Huang1,2, Jaime Gonzalo Flor Flores3, Ziqiang Cai3, Mingbin Yu4, Dim-Lee Kwong4, Guangjun Wen5, Layne Churchill6, Chee Wei Wong7.
Abstract
For the sensitive high-resolution force- and field-sensing applications, the large-mass microelectromechanical system (MEMS) and optomechanical cavity have been proposed to realize the sub-aN/Hz1/2 resolution levels. In view of the optomechanical cavity-based force- and field-sensors, the optomechanical coupling is the key parameter for achieving high sensitivity and resolution. Here we demonstrate a chip-scale optomechanical cavity with large mass which operates at ≈77.7 kHz fundamental mode and intrinsically exhibiting large optomechanical coupling of 44 GHz/nm or more, for both optical resonance modes. The mechanical stiffening range of ≈58 kHz and a more than 100th-order harmonics are obtained, with which the free-running frequency instability is lower than 10-6 at 100 ms integration time. Such results can be applied to further improve the sensing performance of the optomechanical inspired chip-scale sensors.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28663563 PMCID: PMC5491504 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04882-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Optomechanical cavity oscillator with large moveable mass. (a) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of nanofabricated large mass silicon optomechanical oscillator. Region I: stationary part, Region II: slot cavity part, and Region III: test-mass part. Scale bar: 20 μm. (b) Zoom-in SEM of the photonic crystal optomechanical device. Scale bar: 2 μm. (c) Zoom-in SEM of the photonic crystal slot cavity with hole perturbation shifts denoted in color. Red: 5 nm, green: 10 nm, blue: 15 nm. Scale bar: 500 nm. (d) Measurement setup. PD: photo detector, PSA: Power Spectrum Analyzer, PC: polarization controller, and DAQ: Data Acquisition. Inset is the image of the vacuum chamber and 5-axis Attocube positioner.
Figure 2Optical transmission spectra of the optomechanical cavity. (a) Optical transmission spectra under different input powers from 16 μW to 4 mW. (b and c) Magnified plots for the two modes with the fitted loaded optical Q.
Figure 3Mechanical frequency stiffening versus different optical detunings at various input powers. (a) and (b) The two-dimensional mapping plots for the mechanical frequency stiffening versus different optical detunings for mode 1 and mode 2, respectively. The drive power here is 316 μW. The insets are the power spectrum density (PSD) at blue detuning side (≈1532.65 nm and ≈1549.19 nm for the two optical modes). (c and d) The peak mechanical frequency shifts for different input powers. The solid lines are the fitted data for determining the optomechanical coupling (g om) with the optomechanical stiffening relation. The g om for both modes are obtained as ≈43.9 GHz/nm and 49.8 GHz/nm, respectively.
Figure 4Mechanical oscillation characteristics of the low-frequency OMO at vacuum state. (a) More than 100th order harmonics of mechanical oscillations are obtained for the low-frequency OMO. The resolution bandwidth (RBW) is 200 Hz and the video bandwidth (VBW) is RBW/3. The inset is the corresponding optical transmission indicating the self-induced regenerative oscillations with the signature spectral fluctuations. One zoom-in plot for the optical wavelength from 1545.1 nm to 1545.15 nm is embedded in the inset figure. (b) Zoom-in plot for the first 13 harmonics. The RBW is 200 Hz and the VBW is RBW/3. (c) The fundamental mode of the low-frequency OMO with fitted curve, which shows the obtained oscillation linewidth of ≈0.45 Hz. Both the RBW and VBW are 1 Hz. (d) The measured Allan deviation performances of the low-frequency OMO for both pre-oscillation and oscillation mode.