| Literature DB >> 35955195 |
Jingjing Liao1,2, Shuangqi Deng1, Hisham Essawy3, Xiaoyan Bao1, Hongyan Wang4, Guanben Du1, Xiaojian Zhou1.
Abstract
The possibility of using commercial bayberry tannin (BT) from a Chinese source as a cross-linker and functional additive to develop soybean protein isolate (SPI)-based films was explored in this study by using the solvent casting method. In particular, the impacts of BT loading on the tensile strength, microstructure, thermal stability, water resistance and antioxidant capacity were fully investigated. The results reveal that SPI incorporated with BT yielded a phenolic-protein hybrid whose relevant films exhibited an improvement in tensile strength of around two times greater compared with native SPI as a result of the formed interactions and covalent cross-links, which could be proven using FTIR spectroscopy. The introduction of BT also led to the compact microstructure of SPI-BT films and enhanced the thermal stability, while the water vapor permeability was reduced compared with the control SPI film, especially at high loading content of tannin. Additionally, the use of BT significantly promoted the antioxidant capacity of the SPI-based films according to DPPH radical scavenging assay results. On this basis, Chinese bayberry tannin is considered a promising natural cross-linker and multifunctional additive that can be dedicated to developing protein-derived films with antioxidant activity for food packaging applications.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese bayberry tannin; antioxidant; cross-linking; soybean protein isolate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955195 PMCID: PMC9369632 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Structure of prodelphinidin.
Scheme 1Possible chemical bonding between SPI and BT in resulting films: (a) non-covalent bonds; (b) covalent bonds.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of (a) BT and (b,c) SPI–BT films.
Mechanical properties, optical appearance and opacity of SPI–BT films.
| TS (MPa) | EB (%) | Optical Appearance | Opacity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST0 | 0.94 ± 0.06 | 247.69 ± 45.24 |
| 2.35 ± 0.15 |
| ST5 | 2.09 ± 0.13 | 76.35 ± 12.74 |
| 4.46 ± 0.02 |
| ST10 | 2.20 ± 0.47 | 240.51 ± 71.88 |
| 4.19 ± 0.05 |
| ST15 | 2.01 ± 0.07 | 56.65 ± 7.65 |
| 5.10 ± 0.10 |
| ST20 | 2.04 ± 0.22 | 229.95 ± 41.52 |
| 5.37 ± 0.14 |
Notes: mean values ± standard deviation.
Figure 3The SEM fractured cross-section micrographs of SPI and SPI–BT films.
Figure 4TGA and corresponding DTG traces of SPI and SPI–BT films.
Figure 5The WVP of SPI and SPI–BT films.
Figure 6DPPH radical scavenging performance of SPI as well as SPI–BT films.