| Literature DB >> 35954995 |
Baozhi Li1, Ni Zhuo1, Chen Ji2,3, Qibiao Zhu1.
Abstract
The literature about how Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) influence farmers' adoption of sustainable agricultural technology is emerging, studies regarding the effects of particular smartphone-based digital extension services on farmers' sustainable agricultural technology practices are limited. This study investigates the relationship between a digital extension service ("Zhe' yang' shi" WeChat application) and the adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization, a precision fertilization technology. A household choice model is constructed to explain the impact of the application. Based on a household-level data set from a survey of 400 farmers in Zhejiang in 2022, empirical results show that the use of the "Zhe' yang' shi" WeChat application significantly increases the adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization. We also discuss the heterogeneous effect by different production scales. The findings enrich the literature regarding ICTs' influence on farmers' behavior in adopting sustainable agricultural technology. It provides a valuable example for developing countries to promote sustainable agriculture through digital technology.Entities:
Keywords: smartphone-based digital extension service; soil testing formula fertilizer technology; sustainable agricultural technology adoption
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954995 PMCID: PMC9367796 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Screenshots of “Zhe’yang’shi” WeChat application. Notes: Subfigure (a) shows the screenshot of policy information, farmers can find the related policies on land and fertilizer. In subfigure (b), farmers can search their farm by entering names or phone numbers. Subfigure (c) shows the detailed soil quality information of every site. Subfigure (d) shows the fertilization consultation information, which provides farmers with the formula fertilization plans.
Definition of the variables and descriptive statistics.
| Variables | Definition | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Acreage | Acreage of land that applied soil testing and formula fertilization technology | 415.911 | 1211.894 | 0 | 10,150 |
| Amount | Amount of fertilizer that applied soil testing and formula fertilization technology (unit: ton) | 16.893 | 29.973 | 0 | 180 |
|
| |||||
| App | Household usage of Zhe’yang’shi | 0.37 | 0.4834 | 0 | 1 |
| Gender | Gender of household head: 1 = male, 0 = female | 0.71 | 0.454 | 0 | 1 |
| Age | Age of household head | 42.75 | 11.628 | 20 | 72 |
| Edu | The schooling years of household head (unit: years) | 11.35 | 4.051 | 1 | 24 |
| Training | Whether received training about agricultural green technology | 0.66 | 0.474 | 0 | 1 |
| Pop | Number of people residing in a household | 4.85 | 1.886 | 1 | 15 |
| Land | Total area of agricultural land operated by household (unit: mu) | 547.73 | 1407.359 | 1 | 12,000 |
| Distance | Distance to the nearest fertilizer store (unit: km) | 10.15 | 12.834 | 0 | 70 |
| Cooperatives | Whether household has an agricultural cooperative member | 0.52 | 0.500 | 0 | 1 |
| Brand | Whether to have an agricultural public brand 1 = yes, 0 = no | 0.56 | 0.497 | 0 | 1 |
| Service | Whether accepted the socialized service of soil testing and formula fertilization 1 = yes, 0 = no | 0.53 | 0.499 | 0 | 1 |
Note: Mu is a traditional land area unit in China. 1 mu = 1/15 hectare.
Effects of “Zhe’ yang’ shi” on soil testing and formula fertilization.
| Ln (Acreage) | Ln (Amount) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| App | 1.2850 *** | 0.7527 *** | 0.8679 *** | 0.7349 *** |
| Gender | 1.2353 *** | 0.6497 *** | ||
| Age | −0.0046 | −0.0085 | ||
| Edu | −0.0236 | 0.01246 | ||
| Training | 0.4253 | −0.1916 | ||
| Pop | 0.0109 | −0.0354 | ||
| Land | 0.0001 | 0.0002 *** | ||
| Distance | 0.0317 *** | 0.0226 *** | ||
| Cooperatives | 0.5367 * | −0.1060 | ||
| Brand | −0.0955 | 0.2922 * | ||
| Service | 0.6201 * | 0.4075 *** | ||
| _cons | 2.8267 *** | 1.3334 | 1.4657 *** | 0.9348 * |
| Obs | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
| R2 | 0.0567 | 0.2253 | 0.0759 | 0.2089 |
Note: Standard errors in parentheses. * p < 0.1, *** p < 0.01.
Effects of “Zhe’ yang’ shi” on different scales.
| Log (Acreage) | Log (Amount) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Large-Scale | (2) Small-Scale | (3) Large-Scale | (4) Small-Scale | |
| App | 0.4379 | 1.2662 *** | 0.8478 *** | 0.1109 |
| (0.39) | (0.29) | (0.21) | (0.25) | |
| Gender | 1.0620 | 1.6480 *** | 0.7986 * | 0.3934 ** |
| (0.79) | (0.23) | (0.44) | (0.19) | |
| Age | −0.0091 | 0.0170 | −0.0007 | −0.0232 * |
| (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Edu | −0.0547 | 0.0355 | 0.0172 | −0.0170 |
| (0.07) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.03) | |
| Training | 0.6006 | 0.7402 ** | −0.0088 | −0.0774 |
| (0.59) | (0.28) | (0.33) | (0.24) | |
| Pop | −0.2116 * | 0.0601 | −0.1402 ** | 0.1000 ** |
| (0.12) | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.04) | |
| Land | 0.0002 * | −0.0019 | 0.0002 *** | 0.0135 |
| (0.00) | (0.01) | (0.00) | (0.01) | |
| Distance | 0.0404 *** | −0.0158 | 0.0238 *** | −0.0019 |
| (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Cooperatives | 0.4070 | 0.8882 *** | −0.4081 | 0.4911 ** |
| (0.48) | (0.26) | (0.27) | (0.22) | |
| Brand | −0.0611 | 0.2628 | 0.1746 | 0.7300 *** |
| (0.40) | (0.27) | (0.22) | (0.23) | |
| Service | 0.8907 ** | −0.1719 | 0.3664 | 0.0975 |
| (0.42) | (0.27) | (0.23) | (0.23) | |
| _cons | 2.7079 * | −0.1582 | 0.8542 | 1.2600 * |
| (1.62) | (0.87) | (0.89) | (0.74) | |
| Obs | 248 | 152 | 248 | 152 |
| R2 | 0.1470 | 0.6240 | 0.2388 | 0.2997 |
Note: Standard errors in parentheses. * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.