| Literature DB >> 35954847 |
Menghua Deng1,2, Zhiqi Li1, Feifei Tao3.
Abstract
Rainstorm disasters have had a serious impact on the sustainable development of society and the economy. However, due to the complexity of rainstorm disasters, it is difficult to measure the importance of each indicator. In this paper, the rainstorm disaster risk assessment framework was systematically proposed based on the disaster system theory and a system of corresponding indicators was established. Furthermore, the genetic algorithm optimized projection pursuit and XGBoost were coupled to assess the rainstorm disaster risk and to measure the relative importance of each indicator. Finally, the Yangtze River Delta was taken as the case study area. The results show that: the rainstorm disaster risk in the eastern and southeast is higher than those in the central and northwest of the Yangtze River Delta; the total precipitation from June to September and the top ten indicators contribute 9.34% and 74.20% to the rainstorm disaster risk assessment results, respectively. The results can provide references for decision makers and are helpful for the formulation of rainstorm adaptation strategies.Entities:
Keywords: XGBoost; Yangtze River Delta; projection pursuit; rainstorm disaster; risk assessment
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954847 PMCID: PMC9368372 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The administrative division and geographical location of the Yangtze River Basin, China.
Figure 2The framework of rainstorm disaster risk assessment based on disaster system theory.
The indicator system of rainstorm disaster risk assessment.
| Abbreviation | Name | |
|---|---|---|
| Dangerousness | 24-H-P | maximum daily precipitation |
| M-D-P | the maximum monthly precipitation | |
| JS-T-P | the total precipitation from June to September | |
| UR | urbanization rate | |
| Sensitivity | Elev | elevation |
| VCR | vegetation coverage ratio | |
| PGS | per capita public green space | |
| WAR | water area ratio | |
| UIAR | the urban impervious area ratio | |
| Vulnerability | PD | population density |
| UA-GDP | unit area GDP | |
| UA-FAI | unit area fixed-asset investment | |
| RD-BUD | the road density in the built-up district | |
| DPD-BUD | the drainage pipeline density in the built-up district | |
| Capability | UA-DFI | unit area drainage facilities investment |
| ARFCL | anti-rainstorm facility construction level | |
| GERC | government emergency and rescue capacity | |
| PDERC | the public disaster emergency response capacity |
Figure 3Rainstorm disaster risk assessment and influencing factors analysis based on GAPP-XGBoost.
Figure 4The projection values of 27 cities from 2011 to 2019.
Figure 5The spatio-temporal distribution of rainstorm disaster risk level of 27 cities from 2011 to 2019 (a) the rainstorm disaster risk of 2011; (b) the rainstorm disaster risk of 2015; (c) the rainstorm disaster risk of 2017; (d) the rainstorm disaster risk of 2019.
Each risk level percentage during 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019.
| Risk Level | Lowest | Low | Moderate | High | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0% | 25.93% | 51.85% | 22.22% | 0% |
| 2013 | 3.70% | 40.74% | 40.74% | 11.11% | 3.70% |
| 2015 | 3.70% | 22.22% | 37.04% | 33.33% | 3.70% |
| 2017 | 7.41% | 33.33% | 51.85% | 7.41% | 0% |
| 2019 | 14.81% | 44.44% | 22.22% | 18.52% | 0% |
Figure 6The number of estimates trees under different learning rates.
Figure 7The importance of each indicator to rainstorm disaster risk.