| Literature DB >> 35954780 |
Sietske A Berghuis1, Arend F Bos1, Henk Groen2, Wilhelmina H A de Jong3, Anneke C Muller Kobold3, Lucie Wagenmakers-Huizinga3, Pieter J J Sauer1, Gianni Bocca4.
Abstract
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs), such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), may interfere with hormonal processes. Knowledge about the effects of prenatal exposure to PCBs and their hydroxylated metabolites (OH-PCBs) on pubertal development is limited. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to determine whether prenatal environmental PCB and OH-PCB exposure are associated with reproductive hormone levels and pubertal characteristics in 13- to 15-year-old children. In this Dutch observational cohort study, 194 mother-infant pairs were included (1998-2002). Maternal pregnancy serum levels of PCBs, OH-PCBs, and other POPs were measured. At follow-up (2014-2016), we measured serum or plasma levels of reproductive hormones in their children. We assessed Tanner stages and testicular volume (by clinician or standardized self-assessment), and participants completed questionnaires on pubertal onset. In total, 101 adolescents (14.4 ± 0.8 years; 53.7% of invited) participated, and 55 were boys. In boys, higher prenatal PCB levels were associated with higher testosterone levels, higher pubic hair stage, larger testicular volume, and younger age at onset of growth spurt and voice break. In girls, higher prenatal PCB levels were associated with higher stages for breast development. In conclusion, higher prenatal PCB exposure could be associated with more advanced pubertal development in 13- to 15-year-old children.Entities:
Keywords: adolescence; adolescent; chemical exposure; endocrine disruptor; persistent organic pollutant; polychlorinated biphenyl; prenatal exposure; pubertal development; reproductive hormone; testosterone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954780 PMCID: PMC9367960 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Characteristics of the study group (N = 101).
| Characteristic | Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, boy/girl | 55/46 (54.5/45.5%) | ||||
| Gestational age at birth (weeks) | 40 (37–42) | ||||
| Age at examination (years) -Total cohort | 14.4 ± 0.8 | ||||
| -RENCO cohort ( | 15.1 ± 0.4 | ||||
| -GIC cohort ( | 13.6 ± 0.3 | ||||
| Body mass index at examination | 20.0 ± 3.6 | ||||
| Assessment Tanner stage by clinician [yes/no] ( | 33/64 (34/66%) | ||||
| Maternal education level | |||||
| Below average (≤11 years education) | 9 | ||||
| Average (12–13 years education) | 41 | ||||
| Above average (≥14 years education) | 51 | ||||
| Maternal smoking during pregnancy [yes/no] | 13/88 (13/87%) | ||||
| Maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy [yes/no] | 21/80 (21/79%) | ||||
| Maternal age at menarche ( | 12.8 ± 1.5 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Boys: -Testicular volume ( | 10.0 ± 3.8 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -Tanner genital stage ( | 2 | 14 | 22 | 14 | 1 |
| -Tanner pubic hair stage ( | 4 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 3 |
| Girls: -Tanner breast stage ( | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 | 10 |
| -Tanner pubic hair stage ( | 0 | 0 | 17 | 21 | 3 |
|
| |||||
| Boys: | 49 (89%) | 12.4 ± 0.92 | |||
| -‘Did you notice that you have grown a lot in short time?(growth spurt)’ [yes] | 44 (80%) | 12.4 ± 1.10 | |||
| -‘Have you had ejaculations?’ [yes] | 29 (53%) | 13.0 ± 0.69 | |||
| -‘Did you notice voice break (lower voice)’ [yes] | 35 (64%) | 13.2 ± 0.76 | |||
| Girls: | 46 (100%) | 11.7 ± 1.20 | |||
| -‘Did you notice that you have grown a lot in short time?(growth spurt)’ [yes] | 37 (80%) | 11.7 ± 1.37 | |||
| -‘Did you observe growth of pubic hair?’ [yes] | 46 (100%) | 12.0 ± 1.06 | |||
| -‘Have you had a period?’ [yes] | 39 (85%) | 12.4 ± 1.16 | |||
Data are given as frequencies (n/n), median (min-max), or mean ± SD; RENCO cohort: Risk of Endocrine Contaminants on Human Health cohort; GIC cohort: Groningen-Infant-COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure-Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) cohort.
T-tests comparing means of prenatal levels of PCB-153 and OH-PCBs between the RENCO and COMPARE cohorts for children included in the DACE study.
| Boys | Girls | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | Cohort |
| Mean | SD | SEM | t |
| Mean | SD | SEM | t | ||
| PCB-153 a | RENCO | 26 | 93.19 | 41.00 | 8.04 | 2.77 | 0.008 | 28 | 110.53 | 40.11 | 7.58 | 4.67 | <0.001 |
| COMPARE | 29 | 63.90 | 37.35 | 6.94 | 18 | 65.77 | 24.84 | 5.85 | |||||
| OH-PCB-107 b | RENCO | 26 | 74.73 | 34.72 | 6.81 | 6.31 | <0.001 | 26 | 83.08 | 60.04 | 11.78 | 3.98 | <0.001 |
| COMPARE | 28 | 27.59 | 16.29 | 3.08 | 17 | 31.94 | 21.29 | 5.16 | |||||
| OH-PCB-146 b | RENCO | 26 | 82.42 | 34.71 | 6.81 | −1.22 | 0.227 | 26 | 84.85 | 42.75 | 8.38 | −2.57 | 0.016 |
| COMPARE | 29 | 95.23 | 42.03 | 7.81 | 18 | 130.69 | 66.81 | 15.75 | |||||
| OH-PCB-187 b | RENCO | 26 | 137.38 | 44.58 | 8.74 | 6.54 | <0.001 | 26 | 149.85 | 58.36 | 11.44 | 3.37 | 0.002 |
| COMPARE | 29 | 73.94 | 22.64 | 4.20 | 18 | 96.95 | 38.17 | 9.00 | |||||
RENCO cohort included 1998–2000; GIC cohort included 2001–2002; DACE study: Development at Adolescence and Chemical Exposure study; a in ng/g lipid; b in pg/g fresh weight.
Levels of reproductive hormones in plasma and serum of 13–15-year-old children.
| Boys | Girls a | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hormone |
| Mean | SEM | Median | Min | Max |
| Mean | SEM | Median | Min | Max |
| E2 (nmol/L plasma) | 48 b | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 32 | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 1.67 |
| LH (U/L plasma) | 48 c | 3.19 | 0.21 | 3.31 | 0.05 | 7.45 | 32 | 6.98 | 0.63 | 7.01 | 0.14 | 14.96 |
| FSH (U/L plasma) | 48 | 2.69 | 0.19 | 2.51 | 0.21 | 5.86 | 32 | 4.48 | 0.39 | 4.59 | 1.14 | 9.57 |
| AMH (ng/mL serum) | 54 | 21.9 | 3.78 | 10.86 | 2.45 | 111.32 | 34 | 3.47 | 0.34 | 3.13 | 0.51 | 8.51 |
| Inhibin B (pg/mL serum) | 54 | 183.1 | 7.95 | 190.52 | 66.78 | 328.63 | 34 d | 58.28 | 6.87 | 58.86 | 1.46 | 190.43 |
| Testosterone (nmol/L plasma) | 48 | 11.37 | 0.91 | 12.20 | 0.27 | 26.93 | ||||||
| Free Testosterone (nmol/L plasma) | 48 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.58 | ||||||
| SHBG (nmol/L plasma) | 48 | 42.80 | 3.04 | 37.60 | 10.90 | 106.50 | ||||||
| Albumin (g/L serum) | 54 | 47.49 | 0.28 | 47.50 | 42.70 | 52.20 | ||||||
E2: estradiol; LH: luteinizing hormone; FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; AMH: anti-müllerian hormone; SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin; samples < LOD taken as LOD/2; a levels of nine girls who uses contraceptives were excluded; b 9 samples < LOD; c 1 sample < LOD; d 2 samples < LOD.
(a) Spearman’s correlation coefficients between pubertal characteristics in boys. (b) Spearman’s correlation coefficients between pubertal characteristics in girls.
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 0.76 | <0.001 | 0.52 | <0.001 | 0.66 | <0.001 | ||||
|
| x | x | 0.51 | <0.001 | 0.49 | <0.001 | ||||
|
| 0.51 | <0.001 | x | x | 0.42 | 0.004 | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.46 | 0.003 | −0.25 | 0.154 | −0.19 | 0.241 | −0.10 | 0.537 | −0.21 | 0.232 |
|
| x | x | −0.46 | 0.006 | −0.49 | 0.001 | −0.45 | 0.003 | −0.30 | 0.090 |
Univariate linear regression between body mass index (BMI) and reproductive hormones and pubertal characteristics in boys.
| Free Testosterone | E2 | LH | SHBG | Testicular Volume | Self-Reported Age at Onset Growth Spurt | Tanner Pubic Hair Stage 5 (Compared to 4) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| beta |
| beta |
| beta |
| beta |
| beta |
| beta |
| beta |
| |
| BMI | 0.30 | 0.037 | 0.43 | 0.003 | 0.36 | 0.013 | −0.51 | <0.001 | 0.24 | 0.087 | −0.32 | 0.033 | 0.38 | 0.006 |
Only associations with p < 0.10 are shown; E2: estradiol; LH: luteinizing hormone; SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin.
Figure 1Heat map of adjusted beta coefficients obtained from linear regression analyses performed between log10 transformed prenatal levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and hydroxylated PCBs (OH-PCBs) and reproductive hormone levels and pubertal characteristics in boys. AMH: anti-müllerian hormone; associations with a p-value < 0.10 are shown in bold; a adjusted for age at examination; b adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI); c volume of the largest testicle and measured with an orchidometer; d adjusted for BMI and onset paternal growth spurt; only boys who reported ‘yes’ on the question whether they mentioned onset of growth spurt were included; RENCO cohort: Risk of Endocrine Contaminants on Human Health cohort; GIC cohort: Groningen-Infant-COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure-Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) cohort; e RENCO cohort.
Figure 2Heat map of adjusted beta coefficients obtained from linear regression analyses performed between log10 transformed prenatal PCB and OH-PCB levels and reproductive hormone levels in girls. LH: luteinizing hormone; FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; associations with a p-value < 0.10 are shown in bold; a adjusted for age at examination in months; b 1 sample < LOD, taken as LOD/2 in analyses; c RENCO cohort.